Flat earth debunked.

Freudian slip?!?!

and darkness was upon the face of the deep.

for this to happen there had to be what we call gravity in the very beginning of creation

There is no need for cognitive dissonance where there is understanding of basic physics.

No, just selected the wrong word. I meant concave, of course.

Not sure what was worse, the song, or the video.

I admit, I lean towards universal compression, rather than gravity. Not sure why, if people say, they don't believe in gravity, they don't believe, that things go down.

It's really hard to prove gravity, but to say things are forced down to earth is common sense.

What I'm trying to say is, don't post that video again. It was horrible! lol

What a stupid argument. What is the mass of a bird? How does it stay aloft? And what happens if the bird quits flying? Even the lightest will fall to the ground. Do you know the density of liquid water? Are you aware that water vapour and other gases quite happily stay in the atmosphere? It's just as well, or we would die of oxygen starvation. Do you know why the atmosphere does not bleed of into space? Obviously you are clueless. And you insult those who dare to disagree with the FE follies. Without gravity, we all die. That is fact.

uh-huh!

lol

************************************************************************************************************************************************************************

O.k. this next message is for your subconscious mind, learn about the Tamarack Mine Shaft Experiment, Rectilineator, and survey a lake with telescope.
***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************

Not every video can be as good as Conjunction Junction or I'm Just a Bill.

I hope Bill made it to Capital Hill.

I already proved to you how radar disproved ball-Earth on a different thread. Radar supports a flat Earth, not a ball-Earth.

I doubt you've ever seen an ant's legs either, from any sort of distance, but I assure you they do exist, and they're not hidden by any imaginary curvature of the Earth.

Heliocentrist: Nope, nope! Those photographs prove that the table must be curved.

Why doesn't the sun appear to get bigger as it moves closer to my position on the earth?

I think you should better describe your observation, because the sun's apparent size can depend on several factors. But I understand that on a clear day, the sun will appear smallest when it is overhead (around noon), and largest at sunrise and sunset.

My thinking for this is that our clearest view of the sun is at midday, when it is mostly overhead. As it moves further away, there is diffraction of sunlight due to the additional atmosphere it has to penetrate to reach you (atmosphere is thicker closer to the ground, so is easier to penetrate top-down, than horizontally), which can actually make the sun appear larger despite it being further away. Note also it is usually easier to look at the sun at sunset rather than midday, for the same reasons.