Did man land on the moon?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Did man land on the moon?


  • Total voters
    66

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,348
1,045
113
If you can't question them then it is no longer science but a cult.
You can question science all you want but that doesn't invalidate it.
But you seem to be Doom and gloom about everything.
If I said I'm having tolls for breakfast you would probably say toasters are a satanic conspiracy to destroy America
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
32,496
5,704
113
You can question science all you want but that doesn't invalidate it.
But you seem to be Doom and gloom about everything.
If I said I'm having tolls for breakfast you would probably say toasters are a satanic conspiracy to destroy America
You have me confused with other posters. I did a search for this expression that I have highlighted in red, there are only two posters on this forum who have used that expression: Dude653 and Nehemiah6. Both of you have used this expression twice.

Therefore out of 12,000 posts I have not used it once, so your conclusion that I would use it to refer to a toaster is really not scientific. More like wild speculation from an unstable mind.
 

HealthAndHappiness

Well-known member
Jul 7, 2022
8,443
3,493
113
Almost Heaven West Virginia
That's the claim. However, the evidence (lasers bouncing back), could be done before man allegedly landed on the moon. So using lasers as a proof that man landed on the moon is the same as claiming the US flag still waving up there is proof - it is only proof to those who believe the story already.
As important as that is, here's something of much more significance IMHO, my friend. Check it out...V
NASA Document Unclassified
 

Dude653

Senior Member
Mar 19, 2011
12,348
1,045
113
I think I might be more leary of someone having 'tolls' for breakfast... :unsure:
Oops toast
But the individual in question always Doom and gloom about everything
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
32,496
5,704
113
As important as that is, here's something of much more significance IMHO, my friend. Check it out...V
NASA Document Unclassified
"Humans have negative value' -- Seems like someone has done the math. She says we are being controlled by corporations, I guess they are focused on the bottom line.

I think this document would be very helpful in the gospel. The world has concluded you are worth more dead than alive and that you have a "negative value" but Jesus died for you. He loves you. God the Father gave His Son that you might have life and have it more abundantly.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
32,496
5,704
113
Oops toast
But the individual in question always Doom and gloom about everything
"The individual in question" -- I would hope that this is a reference to each individuals salvation and standing before God. It will certainly be doom and gloom if they have not repented of their sins and pleaded the blood of Jesus to wash their sins away.

That is certainly "the question" -- Where will you spend eternity? Will it be doom and gloom or will it be in the arms of Jesus with praise and thanksgiving?

This is a question that each individual must answer. You are not saved because your parents were, or because you were born in America or because you are "good". The only payment God respects for your sins is the blood of Jesus.
 

ZNP

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2020
32,496
5,704
113
If that doesn't cheer up your day, not sure what will! :)
I look at this as a great big barbecue in God's backyard followed by a bonfire at night where we can all sit around the fire and tell stories and burn marshmallows. God is good.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,163
3,997
113
mywebsite.us
Well that settles it. Science is bad. We should stop doing it immediately
What everyone should stop doing immediately is believing-without-questioning anything-and-everything that anyone who claims to be an 'authority' says - and start thinking about - and paying attention to - what is really going on in the world...
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,836
6,376
113
What everyone should stop doing immediately is believing-without-questioning anything-and-everything that anyone who claims to be an 'authority' says - and start thinking about - and paying attention to - what is really going on in the world...
yes, 100% correct.
 
Jul 28, 2015
2,262
331
83
What do people, especially Christians accomplish by disproving that we went to the moon? IMO, the most compelling case for the moon landings isn't any one piece of actual evidence, but rather the fact that the Soviets didn't dispute it. We were ready to nuke each other back into the Stone Age, and even they admitted we got there first.

Number two piece of evidence is why bother faking it? It may sound trite but the main cost and obstacle to a moon landing - namely the massive rocket - still needed to be built and launched. If you say you went to the moon, the first thing people would ask is "how did you get there?", and the only credible answer is "in that massive rocket you watched being launched a few weeks back."

This means that if anything it would be more expensive challenging to fake it than actually go there. Hiring a soundstage, building the sets, swearing the whole crew to secrecy, faking the soil samples and moon rocks they brought back to a degree that subsequent generations of scientists would be fooled by them, developing Teflon and the other myriad spin off inventions of the Apollo program, all in addition to building and launching the massive rocket, would quickly add up.
 

Moses_Young

Well-known member
Sep 15, 2019
9,328
5,020
113
What do people, especially Christians accomplish by disproving that we went to the moon?
Because truth is important, if for no other reason. But NASA's moon landing is the lie propping up the theory of heliocentricity, which is propping up the theory of big bangism, which is propping up evolutionism, which is the excuse for the Godless religion of atheism. Also, the government has spent billions of dollars on a fraud, which should be a concern to everyone who has taxes extorted for such purposes. Also, that the funds were used not for legitimate purposes, but spent on nefarious and Satanic plans aimed at the destruction of those who funded them. A concern for everyone, wouldn't you agree?

IMO, the most compelling case for the moon landings isn't any one piece of actual evidence, but rather the fact that the Soviets didn't dispute it. We were ready to nuke each other back into the Stone Age, and even they admitted we got there first.
The Soviets and the US hierarchy were working together. This "most compelling case" is easily explained with what should now be an obvious fact.

Number two piece of evidence is why bother faking it? It may sound trite but the main cost and obstacle to a moon landing - namely the massive rocket - still needed to be built and launched. If you say you went to the moon, the first thing people would ask is "how did you get there?", and the only credible answer is "in that massive rocket you watched being launched a few weeks back."
Lol. How many rockets have been used in wars only this year and last? It's a lot cheaper building a rocket than it is getting to the moon, especially considering the latter is impossible. Think of the money, if no other reason. But go back to the garden of Eden - why did Satan lie to Eve? To sabotage God's creation. I believe Satan is behind NASA, and his aim has not changed.

This means that if anything it would be more expensive challenging to fake it than actually go there. Hiring a soundstage, building the sets, swearing the whole crew to secrecy, faking the soil samples and moon rocks they brought back to a degree that subsequent generations of scientists would be fooled by them, developing Teflon and the other myriad spin off inventions of the Apollo program, all in addition to building and launching the massive rocket, would quickly add up.
Lol. You're not counting that it's cheaper to kill people than to keep paying them off. And people also have families, even if they don't care for their own safety. Stanley Kubrick, Buzz Aldrin, Neil Armstrong are just three who tried to tell us in their own ways.

If you want to keep believing that NASA lost the technology to go back to the moon, amongst a plethora of other excuses, keep doing so. Just don't insult the intelligence of others who can see the obvious lie by trying to make out its cheaper to do the impossible than it is to fake it.