Re: A refutation of Sola Scriptura (scripture alone)
the main thread is way too long you lose most of us, after the first two paragraphs. suffer not the little children to come unto Me. it's not about all the education which can also be called puffed up knowledge, it was the scholars in the Bible days that Jesus had a problem with, the little widow whom we don't even know if she could read or not , was said of Jesus, that she knew more about worship and pleasing God, than all the scholars. what Sola Scriptura has always meant to me was if, we have a misunderstanding amongst us pretaining to the scriptures, then we turn to the scriptures for the truth, not a pope or a pastor or even a famous evanglist.
2pe 1:20Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation.2pe 1:21For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.
Not all us believers have written a book on our faith or our doctrines, and some of us don't run out and by the next Christian book published, but we are not hanging on to the next words that come out of a pastor's or pope's mouth either. we know what is right and wrong we know it is wrong to take a life. to lump christians all in one group simply because you know one or two that do this. is just as wrong for us Christians to lump all Catholics as child abusers because alot of pope's have been busted doing this.
if the Word Of God is not good enough For us to find Out who God is and what He wants His pepole to do then we are all in trouble. My vote is scriptures only.
B basic
I instructions
B before
L leaving
E earth
yep the Bible that's the Book for me.
|