Originally Posted by livingbygrace

AOK

Although I obviously do not see this subject quite as you do, you put your points well.

You say it is heretical to believe in an ontological subordination of one member of the Trinity to another. I take it you do believe that there is an economic subordination of Son to Father within the Trinity. I also assume you believe therefore that the Son is now and always has been subject to the Father in the economic sense of the Trinity. May I ask you? If the son now at this time is subject to the Father in the economic Trinity in what way is Paul meaning that the Son will become subject to the Father in the future when all dominion, authority and power has been defeated. Paul cannot be speaking of the economic Trinity as in this way Christ is and has always been in your belief subject to the Father.

And when all things shall be subdued unto him then shall the Son also himself be subject unto him that put all things under him, that God may be all in all