Scriptures Cannot be alone... Scripture is clear

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
May 9, 2012
1,514
25
0
#21
Jesus needs no Viceroy...He IS the Key to the Kingdom...not a man sitting in the Vatican...
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#22
Jesus needs no Viceroy...He IS the Key to the Kingdom...not a man sitting in the Vatican...
Then you disagree with Christ when He said that He was giving Peter the "keys to the kingdom." Or when Christ said "You are Cephus and on this Cephus I will build my Church." (italics added)

It is not Peter's Church, and it is not Francis' Church, it is Christ's Church. It has always been Christ's Church, it will always be Christ's Church. You see, we don't trust the Pope or the College of Cardinals. We trust the Holy Spirit.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#23
Then you disagree with Christ when He said that He was giving Peter the "keys to the kingdom." Or when Christ said "You are Cephus and on this Cephus I will build my Church." (italics added)

It is not Peter's Church, and it is not Francis' Church, it is Christ's Church. It has always been Christ's Church, it will always be Christ's Church. You see, we don't trust the Pope or the College of Cardinals. We trust the Holy Spirit.
Popes exist because Jesus gave Peter some figurative keys?

Leap in reasoning.

Epic leap.
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#24
Popes exist because Jesus gave Peter some figurative keys?

Leap in reasoning.

Epic leap.
Its not a leap when you look at the OT when the "Keys of the Kingdom" are mentioned. They were the keys to the dungeon and to the treasury. They were only given to the Viceroy who served as herald of the King and "first among equals" among the King's ministers. AND that position passed down from one Viceroy to the next.

So, that sounds like a Pope to me.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#26
Its not a leap when you look at the OT when the "Keys of the Kingdom" are mentioned. They were the keys to the dungeon and to the treasury. They were only given to the Viceroy who served as herald of the King and "first among equals" among the King's ministers. AND that position passed down from one Viceroy to the next.

So, that sounds like a Pope to me.
Oh please, that wasn't an authority given just to Peter.
It belongs to all believers.

“All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 [e]Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you [f]always, even to the end of the age.”
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#27
Oh please, that wasn't an authority given just to Peter.
It belongs to all believers.
Jesus does not give the "Keys of the Kingdom" to anyone else. The phrase is used once in reference to one disciple in the NT.
 
May 9, 2012
1,514
25
0
#28
He gave EVERYONE the keys to the Kingdom: that being the Gospel, Jesus being the worker of the Gospel. I don't see why it's so hard to understand..
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#29
Jesus does not give the "Keys of the Kingdom" to anyone else. The phrase is used once in reference to one disciple in the NT.
No it's not.
The keys are tied to binding things on Earth and in Heaven.
Matthew 16
18 I also say to you that you are [a]Peter, and upon this [b]rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; and whatever you bind on earth [c]shall have been bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth [d]shall have been loosed in heaven.20 Then He [e]warned the disciples that they should tell no one that He was [f]the Christ.
This power to bind things in Earth and heaven was given to more than Peter.

Mathew 18

15 “If your brother sins[k], go and [l]show him his fault [m]in private; if he listens to you, you have won your brother.16 But if he does not listen to you, take one or two more with you, so that by the mouth of two or three witnesses every [n]fact may be confirmed. 17 If he refuses to listen to them, tell it to the church; and if he refuses to listen even to the church, let him be to you as [o]a Gentile and [p]a tax collector. 18 Truly I say to you, whatever you [q]bind on earth [r]shall have been bound in heaven; and whatever you [s]loose on earth [t]shall have been loosed in heaven.19 “Again I say to you, that if two of you agree on earth about anything that they may ask, it shall be done for them [u]by My Father who is in heaven. 20 For where two or three have gathered together in My name, I am there in their midst.”
Peters was told that specifically, just like others were told specifically that Jesus loved them.
Being told you have something specifically doesn't mean you're the only one who has it.
 

Jackson123

Senior Member
Feb 6, 2014
11,769
1,370
113
#30
Catholic use tradition as the bible, because to find a reason to lie to it member.

For example, they said Peter is the first Pope in Rome from ad 32 to ad 67. It is not in the bible and if you read Act 28 at the arrival of Paul in ad 60, seem no Peter there, and Jew still don't quite understand about Christianity, Luke describe the Jew was listen to Paul from morning till evening. If Peter already there for 28 years I don't you think Peter evangelized them?

The letter from Paul to Rome mention about 38 elder and not mention Peter at all.

a. Why Paul write a pastoral letter to Rome if Peter, his boss is a bishop there. I never heard local priest wrote a pastoral Letter to Vatican.

b. If it does, why not greet Peter while he greet 38 elder.

My conclusion Peter is not bishop in Rome.

You can't use the bible to say Peter bishop Rome, that why need another resource to accommodate his lie, to make it look like the truth.
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#31
Catholic use tradition as the bible, because to find a reason to lie to it member.

For example, they said Peter is the first Pope in Rome from ad 32 to ad 67. It is not in the bible and if you read Act 28 at the arrival of Paul in ad 60, seem no Peter there, and Jew still don't quite understand about Christianity, Luke describe the Jew was listen to Paul from morning till evening. If Peter already there for 28 years I don't you think Peter evangelized them?

The letter from Paul to Rome mention about 38 elder and not mention Peter at all.

a. Why Paul write a pastoral letter to Rome if Peter, his boss is a bishop there. I never heard local priest wrote a pastoral Letter to Vatican.

b. If it does, why not greet Peter while he greet 38 elder.

My conclusion Peter is not bishop in Rome.

You can't use the bible to say Peter bishop Rome, that why need another resource to accommodate his lie, to make it look like the truth.
Actually, no we don't say Peter was in Rome in 32 AD. Most Catholic scholars believe Peter arrived in Rome probably around 62-65 AD.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#32
Most Christians haven't suffered for the faith since the 400s. So...whats your point here? That a Jesuit priest who lived among the poor, a German priest whose youth was under the Nazis, a Polish priest who suffered under communism (and the Nazis), an Italian priest who smuggled messages in and out of Rome to protect Jews, and an Italian priest who helped Jews escape through Turkey don't understand the dangers of the faith or what suffering is like? That is the last five Popes by the way.
Gulp. More Christians suffered persecution in the 20th century than all 1900 years before.
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#33
Gulp. More Christians suffered persecution in the 20th century than all 1900 years before.
I don't doubt that. And you are right, my comment was hyperbole verging on an ignorant statement. My only point was that things have changed heavily since the 400s for many of us. And the way I said it makes me wrong.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#34
Acts 17:11
Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true.

Clearly the
Bereans did NOT believe in the scriptures ALONE!!!
They listened to Paul >>
AND<< they checked their "Old Testament scriptures"!
Paul was TEACHING "Christ Resurrected"! Christ Resurrected is NOT found in the "Old Testament"!

**The Bereans NEEDED Paul and his TEACHING to find truth, they NEEDED Church to arrive at truth!

The LESS...
The Less Noble people of
Thessalonica; Believed in the Scriptures ALONE!!! They refused to listen to Church, the teaching of Paul!! BUT.....

But they have an excuse when they stand in front of Jesus at judgement... They can say: "We did not know we were to listen to Church; We do not have written in our Old Testament "'Listen to the Church'"!

The person living today has NO excuse for not listening to the Church they are "NOT NOBLE!!!"
We today have the "New Testament" our scriptures say; "Listen to the Church or be treated as pagan"!

Pagan: A person outside of God' body!
All who believe in "Scriptures ALONE" must reject the scriptures to believe this man made TRADITION!
If Scripture is not the final standard and arbiter in matters of faith, then what or who is?

The Church? What does she base her authority on if not the Scriptures?
Jesus Christ? Who is to say their 'Jesus' is the true Jesus if he is not the One revealed in Scripture?
Holy Spirit? There are many spirits running around the landscape, on what basis do you test the spirits if not by the Scriptures?
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#35
If Scripture is not the final standard and arbiter in matters of faith, then what or who is?

The Church? What does she base her authority on if not the Scriptures?
Jesus Christ? Who is to say their 'Jesus' is the true Jesus if he is not the One revealed in Scripture?
Holy Spirit? There are many spirits running around the landscape, on what basis do you test the spirits if not by the Scriptures?
And yet it is Scripture that say the Church is the pillar of truth. That the Holy Spirit would lead the Church in all truth.

While I deny Sola Scriptura, that does not mean I deny the Scriptures. They are a standard of divine revelation that is tested against, but that is not Sola Scriptura. That's Prima Scriptura.
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,612
274
83
#36
Scripture alone does not mean each man sitting alone with the Bible, privately interpreting it as he wills. It means having Scripture as the final authority in all matters of faith and practice. Of course we need good fellowship where sound teaching is taught and where we can submit to such teachers. The protestant reformation cleaned up where the Church had went wrong.
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#37
Scripture alone does not mean each man sitting alone with the Bible, privately interpreting it as he wills. It means having Scripture as the final authority in all matters of faith and practice. Of course we need good fellowship where sound teaching is taught and where we can submit to such teachers. The protestant reformation cleaned up where the Church had went wrong.
Obviously, I thoroughly disagree with your final statement. However, Scripture First is a correct use, but Scripture alone without divine authority guiding all Christians (which by the way is the Church/Body of Christ) leads into heresy. It also leads to 33,000+ denominations and growing. Most of which would claim the founders of the Protest as heretics.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#38
And yet it is Scripture that say the Church is the pillar of truth. That the Holy Spirit would lead the Church in all truth.

While I deny Sola Scriptura, that does not mean I deny the Scriptures. They are a standard of divine revelation that is tested against, but that is not Sola Scriptura. That's Prima Scriptura.
The statement " the Church is the pillar of truth" is dependent on Scripture. Scripture is the final Word...not the Church, that is, the Church must derive it's 'truths' from Scripture not the other way around. The Holy Spirit will not contradict Scripture as it reveals truth through the Scripture.
 
Last edited:
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#39
The statement " the Church is the pillar of truth" is dependent on Scripture. Scripture is the final Word...not the Church, that is, the Church must derive it's 'truths' from Scripture not the other way around.
Yet again, that argues Scripture as a testing standard, not as the only thing. Sola Scriptura is "the only thing." However, what many within the Protest do is not in Scripture. Look at the worship service.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#40
Yet again, that argues Scripture as a testing standard, not as the only thing. Sola Scriptura is "the only thing." However, what many within the Protest do is not in Scripture. Look at the worship service.
That was a little confusing..."not as the only thing." / "the only thing."
Explain please.