Is science against God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

callthe5o

Guest
#21
god bless you to pickles
 
C

callthe5o

Guest
#23
lol your siggnature is, ok. (only because i hate pickles lol its awesome though)
 
M

mcubed

Guest
#24
Absolutely not!!! Science is not against G-d! Anyone familiar with the creation/evolution debate should know that anti-creationists love to lob the accusation that creationists are “anti-science” or that they “reject science.” Evolutionists frequently label creationists “flat-earthers” and even go as far as suggesting that consistent creationists should deny the law of gravity! What’s more, these assertions are sometimes made with the implication (or outright allegation) that creationists are openly anti-science. Creationist groups affirm and support the teaching and use of scientific methodology, and we believe this supports the biblical account of origins. Causing confusion is the simple distinction some try to make between “faith” and “science.” this dichotomy is in error, because some form of faith (in a religion) is required to believe in creation or evolution. Both creation and evolution make claims about an unrepeatable past that was not observed by humans. Thus both creation and evolution fall under the category of historical science. This is distinctly different from operational (observational) science, which is a methodological system governing directly observed, repeatable results (such as laboratory experiments). Historical or “origins” science, which requires extrapolation beyond the presently available data, for both evolutionist and creationist require faith in a story about the unobserved past. Science is not against G-d, He is the One who gave man the ability to become scientist, even marine biologist, and it’s just a question of which world-view will one hold to Biblical or non- Biblical.
 
F

forgivenandloved

Guest
#25
When I grow up I want to be a marine biologist, but is it a sin? It sounds silly, but i'm curious. Marine biologists study marine life and plants and how they both react with eachother. Marine biologists may also feed "evidence" to theories about evolution and life. this is what i'm scared of. is this a sin? I'm so curious because i have a burning passion about the ocean. please help.
True science proves the existence of God :)
 
C

callthe5o

Guest
#26
yeah. but i was so worried because marine biologists, oceanogrophers, zoologists, etc, feed more things to the theory of evolution which i dont want that theory to gain more evidence of the lie there trying to make reality to knock god out of the picture. i didnt want to feed that theory more info so they can go against my heavenly father.
 
F

forgivenandloved

Guest
#27
yeah. but i was so worried because marine biologists, oceanogrophers, zoologists, etc, feed more things to the theory of evolution which i dont want that theory to gain more evidence of the lie there trying to make reality to knock god out of the picture. i didnt want to feed that theory more info so they can go against my heavenly father.
Well, evolution has so many holes which kind of proves their has to be a God.
 
C

callthe5o

Guest
#28
thats true.
 
C

callthe5o

Guest
#30
i dont even see how they can even hypothasize evolution might actualy be true.
 
M

mcubed

Guest
#31
Doctrinaire evolutionist claim evolution is science, and creation is religion. Even though scientists never cite any real scientific evidence for evolution, evolutionists insist there is such evidence, because any alternative is outlawed by the rules. In other words, it’s natural selection or a Creator. There is no middle ground. This is why prominent Darwinists like G.G. Simpson and Stephen Jay Gould, who are not secretive about their hostility to religion, cling so vehemently to natural selection, to do otherwise would be to admit the probability that there is design in nature—and hence a Designer.
Unfortunately, many Christians accept some form of evolution and try to add it to the Bible. They say that God could have used evolutionary processes over millions of years to bring about plants, animals, and finally man. Many accept molecule-to-man evolution because they believe that science has “proven” that the earth is millions of years old, so they simply attach God to the process. But this view, called “theistic evolution,” is actually destructive to the gospel message. Of course, this does notmean that people who believe in theistic evolution aren’t Christians, since the Bible teaches that believing in and confessing Christ’s death and resurrection is the key to salvation. However, they are being very inconsistent in their faith. The Bible clearly teaches that when God created Adam and Eve, the world was perfect ( “very good”). There was no death and bloodshed. But because of the sin of Adam, God brought death as a judgment into the world. Of course, He also provided a means by which man could be reconciled to his Creator. But a Christian who believes in evolution over eons as told by evolutionists must also believe that God used death and bloodshed over millions of years as a way to bring man into existence. For them, the fossil record is not a sign of God’s judgment in the Flood, but of the cruel nature of the world they believe God created. However, if death is not a result of the Fall, then why would God need to send His Son to save us from death? In this view, cancer, pain, and death would simply be part of the original plan. But thank God this is not the true history of the world. Death came into the world because of sin, but Christ came to the earth and died to save us from sin and death. There is no room for death before sin, and no room for the evolutionary myth in the Bible.
 
C

callthe5o

Guest
#32
as i said, if we evolved from monkeys, why isnt there half monkey half humans walking around? lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.