Politics has little to do with it.
Correct.
Wanting to keep God out of the picture, that's the main reason for Evolution and for it being perpetuated to the masses like it is.
Wrong-ish.
Evolution is based off of physical, empirical, evidence. Using God as evidence isn't science since God can't be proven physically and empirically.
The Enemy hates God and uses anything he can get his hands on to kill, steal and destroy.
Wrong again. Evolution isn't based on some sort of hatred for God. In fact, the theory of evolution has literally nothing to do with God. It's not pro-God nor is it anti-God.
Evolution is a lie and has always been a lie
Yet you have never been able to prove evolution is a lie. Nearly every argument you have made has been addressed and you have always failed to rebut those arguments. I understand a person can't always respond to everything someone says about their arguments, but you never address one's counter arguments. If you do, they counter again, and you move on to ignore their counter-argument and post yet another creationist point that's eventually utterly destroyed. And the process rolls on.
No one has ever witnessed evolution
Yes, we have. You refer to it as micro-evolution. Micro-evolution is the exact same thing as macro-evolution except on a much smaller and observable scale. Without micro-evolution, the theory of evolution would be too incomplete to state as being fact.
Furthermore, you don't have to witness macro-evolution to verify it to be true. You can examine nature and draw your conclusions from scientific studies. Obviously, you're going to pretend scientists look at nature and come up with some sort of story about how it worked - but that's not how evolution is verified and you would know this if you stopped assuming evolution to be wrong and look into it without a preconceived bias.
it is a stinking theory that has been taught as fact which goes against science it self.
No Kerry. You have been told time and time again that scientific theory does NOT refer to a hunch or a guess. It refers to a series of statements about the causal elements for observed phenomena. How many times must we correct you?
Seriously, even Creation.com suggests creationists stop using this argument. They argue that you should instead say "Evolution is not a proven fact, therefore it should not be taught dogmatically." Of course, science doesn't consider anything to be 100% fact, so that would also be a non-argument. But at least you would stop using the whole "If evolution is true, why do scientists call it a theory?" bunk.
In Science true science it must be repeatable in a controlled environment. Yet Sciences has never been able to that and use the excuse that it takes billions of years.
In science, you don't always have to duplicate a particular phenomena verbatim because we simply lack the means to do so in many cases. This is why we rely on numerous smaller studies that we can duplicate to determine the things we can't.
For example, we can't duplicate the sun nor can we examine it up close. So how did we figure out what the sun is made of? We use spectroscopy to measure electromagnetic radiation. By using data used to measure elements on earth, we're able to figure out what the sun is made of. This video explains it in fairly simple terms - I think you might be able to understand it if you actually listen:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLIrM4QXGis
Different elements absorb different types of light - something we can reproduce on Earth. Knowing which wavelengths are absorbed allows us to determine what the sun is made of by examining the light.
This is how evolution works. We perform tests or make observations that can be witnessed today. We figure out how we came to those conclusions, then observe nature and see if we can find similar patterns. How did we figure out how small marine fossils reached to top of certain mountain peaks? Through our current observation of plate tectonics. We have witnessed tectonic plates on earth colliding and forming peaks - which is how we figured out mountains were formed. We've also been able to find marine life in other parts of the world that were above sea level. And before you yell "GREAT FLOOD", we know a great flood didn't happen for numerous reasons. There's a wonderful video detailing these reasons but I doubt you'll even watch the first video I linked. But if you're serious about having a civil conversation, just ask me for the link and I'll dig up the video for you.
It's funny. You don't have to witness the creation of the Earth because the Bible says it was created. But when we see various different patterns in nature that are rigorously tested that results in the confirmation of evolution, you argue "were alive long enough to see it happen?" Talk about double standards!
