Here is what Adam Clarke says about that scripture.
Verse 22. "Whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause" - Æo orgizomenov-eikh, who is vainly incensed. "This translation is literal; and the very objectionable phrase, without a cause, is left out, eikh being more properly translated by that above." What our Lord seems here to prohibit, is not merely that miserable facility which some have of being angry at every
trifle, continually taking offense against their best friends; but that anger which leads a man to commit outrages against another, thereby subjecting himself to that punishment which was to be inflicted on those who break the peace. eikh, vainly, or, as in the common translation, without a cause, is wanting in the famous Vatican MS. and two others, the Ethiopic, latter Arabic, Saxon, Vulgate, two copies of the old Itala, J.
Martyr, Ptolomeus, Origen, Tertullian, and by all the ancient copies quoted by St. Jerome. It was probably a marginal gloss originally, which in process of
time crept into the text.
"Shall be in danger of the judgment" - enocov estai, shall be liable to the judgment. That is, to have the matter brought before a senate, composed of twenty-three
magistrates, whose
business it was to judge in
cases of murder and other capital crimes. It
punished criminals by strangling or beheading; but Dr. Lightfoot supposes the judgment of
God to be intended. See at the end of this chapter.
"Raca" - hqyr from the Hebrew qr rak, to be empty. It signifies a vain, empty, worthless fellow, shallow brains, a term of great contempt. Such expressions were
punished among the Gentoos by a
heavy fine. See all the
cases,
Code of Gentoo Laws, chap. xv sec. 2.
"The council" - sunedrion, the famous council, known among the Jews by the name of
Sanhedrin. It was composed of seventy-two elders, six chosen out of each tribe. This grand
Sanhedrin not only received appeals from the inferior Sanhedrins, or
court of twenty-three mentioned above; but could alone take cognizance, in the first instance, of the highest crimes, and alone inflict the punishment of stoning.
"Thou fool" - Moreh, probably from hrm marah, to rebel, a rebel against
God, apostate from all good. This term implied, among the Jews, the highest enormity, and most aggravated guilt. Among the Gentoos, such an expression was
punished by
cutting out the
tongue, and thrusting a
hot iron, of ten fingers breadth, into the mouth of the person who used it.
Code of Gentoo Laws, chap. xv sec. 2. p. 212.
"Shall be in danger of hell fire." - enocov estai eiv thn geennan tou purov, shall be liable to the hell of
fire. Our Lord here alludes to the valley of the son of Hinnom, µnh yg Ghi hinom. This
place was near Jerusalem, and had been formerly used for those abominable sacrifices, in which the idolatrous Jews had caused their children to pass through the
fire to Molech. A particular
place in this valley was called Tophet, from tpt tophet, the
fire stove, in which some supposed they burnt their children alive to the above idol. See
2 Kings xxiii. 10;
2 Chron. xxviii. 3; Jeremiah vii. 31, 32. From the circumstances of this valley having been the scene of those infernal sacrifices, the Jews, in our saviour's
time, used the word for hell, the
place of the
damned. See the word applied in this sense by the Targum, on
Ruth ii. 12;
Psa. cxl. 12;
Gen. iii. 24; xv. 17. It is very probable that our Lord means no more here than this: if a man charge another with apostasy from the
Jewish religion, or rebellion against
God, and cannot prove his charge, then he is exposed to that punishment (burning alive) which the other must have suffered, if the charge had been substantiated. There are
three kinds of offenses here, which exceed each other in their degrees of guilt. 1st. Anger against a man, accompanied with some injurious act. 2dly. Contempt, expressed by the opprobrious epithet raka, or shallow brains. 3dly. Hatred and mortal enmity, expressed by the term moreh, or apostate, where such apostasy could not be proved. Now, proportioned to these
three offenses were
three different degrees of punishment, each exceeding the other in its severity, as the offenses exceeded each other in their different degrees of guilt. 1st. The judgment, the council of twenty-three, which could inflict the punishment of strangling. 2dly. The
Sanhedrin, or great council, which could inflict the punishment of stoning. And 3dly. The being burnt alive in the valley of the son of Hinnom. This appears to be the meaning of our Lord. Now, if the above offenses were to be so severely
punished, which did not immediately affect the
life of another, how much sorer must the punishment of murder be! ver. 21. And as there could not be a greater punishment inflicted than death, in the above terrific forms, and this was to be inflicted for minor crimes; then the punishment of murder must not only have death here, but a hell of
fire in the eternal world, attached to it. It seems that these different degrees of guilt, and the punishment attached to each, had not been properly distinguished among the Jews. Our Lord here calls their attention back to them, and gives then to understand, that in the coming world there are different degrees of punishment prepared for different degrees of vice; and that not only the outward act of iniquity should be judged and
punished by the Lord, but that injurious
words, and evil passions, should all meet their just recompense and reward. Murder is the most punishable of all crimes, according to the written
law, in respect both of our neighbours and
civil society. But he who sees the
heart, and judges it by the eternal
law, punishes as much a word or a desire, if the hatred whence they proceed be
complete and perfected. Dr. Lightfoot has some curious observations on this passage in the preface to his Harmony of the Evangelists. See his works, vol. ii., and the conclusion of this chapter
Adam Clarke's Bible Commentary - Matthew 5