Christ's Commandments

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #100

-
C: 114-115

114) 1Cor 11:33-34 . . My brethren, when you come together to eat, wait
for each other. If anyone is hungry, he should eat at home, so that when
you meet together it may not result in judgment.

The command doesn't frown upon things like church banquets, men's'
breakfasts, ladies' luncheons, and/or potlucks per se. What it's criticizing is a
lack of congregational unity. Here's comments leading up to that verse.

†. 1Cor 11:17-22 . . Now in giving these instructions I do not praise you,
since you come together not for the better but for the worse. For first of all,
when you come together as a church, I hear that there are divisions among
you, and in part I believe it. For there must also be factions among you, that
those who are approved may be recognized among you.

. . .Therefore when you come together in one place, it is not to eat the
Lord's Supper. For in eating, each one takes his own supper ahead of others;
and one is hungry and another is drunk. What! Do you not have houses to
eat and drink in? Or do you despise the church of God and shame those who
have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I praise you in this? I do not
praise you.

Their lack of love and unity during church functions was nothing short of
hypocrisy seeing as how the Lord's supper speaks of sacrifice rather than
selfishness, elitism, and hoarding. In other words; seeing as how Christians
all share in Christ's blood equally, then everyone should be given equal
treatment at church regardless of age, gender, skin color, intelligence,
income level, nationality, what side of the tracks they live on, or social
status. None of Christ's body parts are untouchable; nor are any of them
expendable. God forbid that there should be some sort of caste system in a
gathering of people for whom Christ suffered and died equally for each one.
That just| wouldn't right: it would be an insult to the principles underlying
the Lord's supper.

†. Matt 26:27 . . Then he took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them,
saying: Drink from it, all of you.

If Christians are all drinking from the same cup, then they should all be, at
the very least, eating the same food and not be overly concerned about
where they sit and/or who they sit next to and/or who they're seen with.
And they should also make double sure that everyone gets enough to eat
and that no one gets left out and nobody gets more than his fair share. And
they should all sit down together at the same time. I just hate it when
people don't wait for each other. Some get back to the table and start in
gulping, slurping, clattering, and clanking while others from their table are
still in line.

And they should also take into consideration the possibility that a number of
their congregation are in assistance programs like TANF and SNAP. In other
words; don't just bring enough food from home for yourself; but, if you're
able, bring enough for those among you who can't bring anything at all. And
for God's sake, don't bring a side dish of gourmet food along just for
yourself. Leave your special gourmet stuff at home. There's just no excuse
for flaunting your "sophistication" around church thus giving everyone the
impression that everyone else's tastes are below yours.

You know; why am I even saying these things? In point of fact, why even
did Paul? I mean: shouldn't Christians be eo ipso sources of the milk of
human kindness without somebody shaming them and lecturing them into
being humane with their fellow believers and taking thought for their
feelings? Why must so many Christians be practically strong-armed into
being humble and civil with one another?

115) 1Cor 12:24-27 . . God has combined the members of the body and has
given greater honor to the parts that lacked it, so that there should be no
schism in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each
other. If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored,
every part rejoices with it. Now you are the body of Christ, and each one of
you is a part of it.

It's sad that congregations have been reduced to the level of an invasive
species in some churches by over-achieving, ambitious types passing
themselves off as pastors, deacons, and elders. Churches like that might just
as well start selling tickets to their sermons and Sunday schools; and set up
red carpets outside so the rank and file might crowd up like the Oscars;
where they can ooh and ahh over the Cadillac Escalades and Lexus LX10's
driven by their church's managers; admire their fashions, cheer, kiss
derrieres, lick shoes, pose for selfies, and ask for autographs.

The rank and file are not expendable commodities; nor do they constitute a
fan base. And God forbid that church managers should begin to think of their
congregation as just numbers. I once attended a mega Baptist church in San
Diego that hired a hot shot business man that we all had to address as
"reverend" to help them increase their membership. Why would they do that
when there was already 4,000+ members on the books already? Well; I'll
tell you why. They had an ambitious building program in mind that couldn't
proceed without more money in the church's coffers. Well; Mister HotShot
got the church's numbers up, and the managers got their building program.
My wife and I bailed. We wanted no part of it.

BTW: after the church's managers got the congregation deeply in debt to
finance the building program, they all took new positions elsewhere,
including the pastor, leaving their "flock" holding the bag. That was the most
disappointing church I ever attended. It treated the congregation like so
many head of livestock: just dollars per pound on the hoof.

==============================
 

ISeeYou

Senior Member
Jan 8, 2015
794
11
0
Re: Continued From Post #100

I never let any church put my name in their filing cabinet, I just didnt see it as necessary, now I see in hindsight that this wasnt such a bad idea, those deceived onto those books become responsible for their pastors debts right?

Or no?
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
C: 116

-
116) 1Cor 14:1a . . Pursue charity

The koine Greek word for "charity" in that command is agape (ag-ah'-pay)
which basically means love, e.g. affection, benevolence, kindness,
compassion, tenderness, understanding, devotion, caring, thoughtfulness,
and a host of other things like that. Love will cause you to look out for
someone's best interests without them even having to ask you to.

The word for "pursue" is dioko (dee-o'-ko) which in many places in the New
Testament means persecute. Well; it hardly seems a good idea to persecute
love. I think what the command is wanting to get across to Christians is that
they're supposed to go after and obtain love with a determined attitude like
a hunter, or a stalker, or someone who just won't take "no" for an answer;
like the woman who hounded the Lord at Mark 7:25-28.

Love is the heart and soul of all of Christ's commandments. Christians
without love haven't even got to first base yet.

†. John 14:15 . . If you love me, you will comply with what I command.

†. John 14:21 . .Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one
who loves me.

†. John 14:23-24 . . If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching . . He who
does not love me will not obey my teaching.

The Lord wasn't talking about loyalty in those verses. He was talking about
feelings for him. You know, when you love somebody, you will do all in your
power to make them happy. Nobody has to crack the whip on people who
truly love Christ because their affections compel them to please him-- not to
get on his good side, but just to cheer him up, do him little favors, and make
him happy. People with a tin woodman's soul don't understand what I'm
talking about because there's a cold piece of steel inside them where a heart
is supposed to be. Well; thank God there's a remedy for that; at least for
Yhvh's people anyway.

†. Ezek 36:24-27 . . For I will take you from among the nations and gather
you from all the countries, and I will bring you to your land. And I will
sprinkle clean water upon you, and you will be clean; from all your
impurities and from all your abominations will I cleanse you. And I will give
you a new heart, and a new spirit will I put within you, and I will take away
the heart of stone out of your flesh, and I will give you a heart of flesh. And
I will put My spirit within you and bring it about that you will walk in My
statutes and you will keep My ordinances and do them.

I think it safe to say that what we're looking at there in Ezekiel is a result of
the curious birth about which Jesus spoke at John 3:3-8.

I believe that there are large numbers of rank and file pew warmers trying
to follow Christ and keep his commandments without love. They're actually
love-starved and love-challenged. It's a handicap; and for them, following
Christ and keeping his commandments is a chore rather than a pleasure. I
feel for those love-challenged pew warmers because without affection for
Christ, it is impossible to please him. It just can't be done. In point of fact;
I've no doubt they even resent having to make the effort. To them; Jesus is
a nuisance-- he's imposing on their privacy, he's meddling, he's asking too
much of them, and he's sticking his nose in things that are none of his
business.

There's a worst-case scenario depicted in the third chapter of Revelation.
The Laodicean church had become so love-challenged that Christ is depicted
standing outside the building banging on the door trying to get someone's
attention to let him in. Nobody in that church had any feelings for Christ, he
was unwelcome there, none of them were his friends-- not the pastor, not
the deacons, not the choir, not the Sunday school teachers, not the
deaconesses, not the ushers, not the elders, and certainly not the rank and
file pew warmers. Can you imagine an entire, fully-functioning Christian
church off-reservation and estranged from Christ? Well; if there was one,
then you just know there's gotta be more.

==============================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #103

-
117) 1Cor 14:1b . . but rather that ye may prophesy.

The New Testament Greek word for "prophesy" is propheteuo (prof-ate-yoo'
o) which essentially means to speak under inspiration. That definition is very
similar to the Old Testament Hebrew word for "prophet" which is nabiy'
(naw-bee'). That word describes an inspired person of either gender; e.g.
Abel was a prophet (Luke 11:50-51) Abraham was a prophet (Gen 20:7)
Moses was a prophet (Deut 18:18) Miriam was a prophet (Ex 15:20)
Deborah was a prophet (Judg 4:4) and Huldah was a prophet (2Kgs 22:14).

Inspired people need not be especially educated because the situation of a
prophet isn't a career path. For example Amos was just a simple farm boy
whom God drafted into service right out of the blue. (Amos 7:14-15)

Inspired people are actually quite abundant, and all around us all the time
only we're not aware of them because we've been conditioned to expect
them to be notable, e.g. Popes and outstanding missionaries like Mother
Teresa, and/or celebrities like Billy Graham. Ann Graham Lotz, and Luis
Palau; and super-duper church managers, and radio and television
evangelists.

But inspired people are not always that conspicuous because according to
1Cor 12:4-11, inspiration is a gift, and being a gift, it is distributed by God's
Spirit to recipients of His own choosing; not their choosing.

†. 1Cor 12:11 . . But one and the same Spirit works all these things,
distributing to each one individually just as He wills.

Inspired people were at one time valuable sources of guidance and
information in the fledgling days of Christianity when the apostles couldn't
be everywhere at once and very few churches had in their possession mass
produced copies of the apostles' writings.

118) 1Cor 14:13 . . Let him that speaketh in an unknown tongue pray that
he may interpret.

In other words; it's possible that someone praying in Chinese may not even
know what they're saying. They might be thinking they're reciting a Hail
Mary or an Our Father but actually reciting the Gettysburg Address!

A charismatic once informed me that he prayed in a tongue because he
couldn't express his feelings any other way. Mind you this was an American
adult of almost fifty years old; educated in America and spoke, wrote, and
read English his entire life. So I asked him how it is that his command of the
English language was so poor that he could only express his thoughts in a
language that not even himself could either identify or understand. Wouldn't
scream therapy be just as effective?

†. 1Cor 14:14-15 . . For if I pray in an unknown tongue, my spirit prayeth,
but my understanding is unfruitful. What is it then? I will pray with the spirit,
and I will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I
will sing with the understanding also.

(chuckle) It's no wonder that so many people think that Christians behave
like men gone mad from an overdose of crystal meth; what with so many of
them dancing with rattlesnakes, flailing their arms, yelling, bellowing, and
screaming, passing out, hurling themselves in the aisle, predicting the end of
the world, and gurgling like lunatics.

†. 1Cor 14:23 . . So if the whole church comes together and everyone
speaks in tongues, and some who do not understand, or some unbelievers
come in, will they not say that you are out of your mind?

==============================
 

vic1980

Senior Member
Apr 25, 2013
1,653
199
63
44
Christ's Commandments

Jesus Heals at the pool at Besetheda

John 5:14 Afterward Jesus findeth him in the temple, and said unto him, Behold, thou art made whole: sin no more, lest a worse thing come unto thee.

Jesus was teaching the man something important that was written in the OT
 

john832

Senior Member
May 31, 2013
11,365
186
63
It is that great falling away that the Lord spoke about in the last days, that many will fall away to deceptions of false teaching. It is sad to see churches teaching their members that Jesus 3 1/2 years of His earthly ministry where He taught how we are to walk and the commandments to follow under the new covenant, were done away with at the cross. Pretty much saying His earthly ministry means nothing to us. Then some of these like the new age church go as far and teach other ways to heaven besides the Lord Jesus. Crazy deceptions going on, and at a bigger and higher rate then in the past, and people are falling for it.
Something that must be considered here is that one cannot fall away from something they have never been part of or had possession of.
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #104

-
119) 1Cor 14:22a . .Tongues are for a sign

The sign isn't intended for the benefit of believers, but rather, for non
believers.

†. 1Cor 14:22b . . not to them that believe, but to them that believe not:
but prophesying serveth not for them that believe not, but for them which
believe.

The purpose of any tongue is communication.

†. 1Cor 14:6-9 . . Even things without life giving sound, whether pipe or
harp, except they give a distinction in the sounds, how shall it be known
what is piped or harped? For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who
shall prepare himself to the battle? So likewise ye, except ye utter by the
tongue words easy to be understood, how shall it be known what is spoken?
for ye shall speak into the air.

So if a tonguer is speaking a language nobody understands, they've actually
created a barrier to communication; viz: a regression to the tower of Babel;
and you can see for yourself how destructive that was to unity (Gen 11:1-9).
Webster's defines "regression" as: movement backward to a previous, and
especially worse or more primitive state or condition; viz: backwards
thinking.

NOTE: Some people object to the use of a Webster's dictionary in Bible
study; but this is the very reason why I highly recommend it's use to anyone
who utilizes the English language when communicating with English
speaking peoples and/or reading Bibles translated from the ancient
languages into English.

Since tongues are for the benefit of unbelievers, then it's de facto that a
tongue should be a valid language that the unbeliever himself speaks and
understands (cf. Acts 2:4-11). Somebody who exercises a tongue for any
other reason has missed the point; and they're behaving like a little kid with
a toy.

120) 1Cor 14:20 . . Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in
malice be ye children, but in understanding be men.

121) 1Cor 14:27-28 . . If any man speak in an unknown tongue, let it be by
two, or at the most by three, and that by course; and let one interpret. But
if there be no interpreter, let him keep silence in the church; and let him
speak to himself, and to God.

Tonguers are not permitted to speak all at the same time like a mob of
howling political protesters. One of the reasons why I get so annoyed by talk
shows like Today's Talk with Kathy Lee Gifford and Hoda Kodb, and ABC's
The View is because everyone talks all at once like a bunch of undisciplined
dogs barking and yapping in a kennel. And the way they interrupt each other
back and forth before the other can even finish a sentence is one of the very
things we teach children not to do. You'd think those supposedly mature
adults grew up without supervision the way they conduct themselves in a
conversation.

NO; tonguers are to take turns; speaking one at a time, rather than an
entire congregation of tonguers barking and yapping like dogs in a kennel
whenever they "feel the Spirit" moving them. And if there's no one to
interpret, tonguers are not permitted to speak at all. If Christians the world
over followed those rules, it would put the charismatics out of business in
less than two weeks.

FYI: These directives regulating the exercise of tongues in a church meeting
were written by the apostle Paul-- a duly authorized agent speaking on
behalf of Christianity's Christ.

†. 1Cor 14:37 . . If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let
him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the
commandments of The Lord.

Therefore, when Christians proceed to defy the rules regulating the exercise
of tongues, they are in shameful rebellion against the very lord and master
of Christianity; and yet, ironically, many tongue violators still have the
chutzpah to pass themselves off as the Lord's Spirit-filled followers.
However; a follower can be defined as someone who gets in step and/or falls
in line rather than going off-reservation to do their own thing.

†. 1Sam 15:23 . . Rebellion is as the sin of divination; and insubordination is
as iniquity and idolatry.

†. 1John 1:6 . . If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in
darkness, we lie, and do not the truth

==============================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #107

-
122) 1Cor 14:29-31 . .Two, or three, prophets should speak, and everyone
else should weigh carefully what is said. If a revelation comes to someone
who is sitting down, the first speaker should stop. For you can all prophesy
in turn so that everyone may be instructed and encouraged.

True prophets channel God's thoughts; viz: they speak as the voice of God.
People with opinions don't speak as the voice of God at all; they speak as
themselves. True prophets are revelators; people with opinions are little
more than activists; and if not kept in check they will quickly derail a Sunday
school class and drag it off onto a tangent.

Though God endows certain Spirit-selected people in church with the gift of
prophecy (1Cor 12:4-11) it is not He who endows them with the impulse to
talk out of turn. Self control is their responsibility; not His.

†. 1Cor 14:32 . . The spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets.

123) 1Cor 14:33-34 . . As in all the congregations of the saints, women
should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but
must be in submission, as the Law says.

The "law" to which Paul refers is Gen 3:16-- "To the woman He said: he
shall rule over you."

1Cor 14:33-34 seems to contradict 1Cor 11:3-10 where the author
permitted women to pray and/or prophecy just so long as they cover their
hair. However; there are limits to that privilege.

†. 1Tim 2:11-13 . . Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I
suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be
in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

In other words, the pulpit is a God-given male domain. It's important to note
that this isn't an issue related to competence, but an issue related to
primogeniture-- therefore it is a disgrace for Christian women lead men in a
Christian congregation; which may be defined as: Where two or three are
gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them. (Matt
18:20)

That rule applies to home Bible studies too. If Christian men are present,
then Christian women are supposed to bite their tongue no matter if they
know the Bible better than the man leading the study.

BTW: A mixed-gender home Bible study without a Spirit-endowed male
expositor is not a Bible study at all; no, it's a bull session. In those
situations, it doesn't matter if women speak since the discussions are really
no more Spirit-directed than a common chat.

A natural question arises in cases of women like Anne Graham Lotz. Is she
out of order? No; because Anne's preaching is typically public rather than in
a church.

Here's a pertinent story I heard along that line:

Two prominent Bible expositors (I can't remember their names) were
strolling about town when they came across some soap-box preaching going
on in the town square. A woman was doing the preaching while her husband
conducted the music. One of the prominent expositors turned to the other
and said: What a disgrace! A woman preacher! The other responded: What a
disgrace there's not a man to take her place.

What's that's saying is: sometimes a woman is the best man for the job
(e.g. Deborah in the book of Judges). So then, though women aren't
permitted to speak in a mixed-gender Christian congregation, that doesn't
mean they can't speak to a mixed-gender public forum, or in the street; or
in a coliseum, or in a stadium, or in a convention center, or on radio and
television; or with a megaphone out on Pluto's moon Charon.

The best place for female prophets to exercise their gift in church is in a
women-only group; viz: male prophets can speak in a mixed gender group,
but female prophets are not supposed to; and if a man should invade a
women-only group led by women; I think he should be asked to leave.

124) 1Cor 14:35 . . If women have questions, they should ask their own
husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.

What's an inquiring wife to do if her husband is spiritually inept? I'd suggest
that women married to spiritually inept Christian men, and/or women
married to non-Christian men, and/or unmarried women; seek assistance
from one of the ladies in church known to be somewhat of a Bible expert
and/or known for possessing the gift of prophesy. But for God's sake, don't
seek assistance from another woman's husband; even if he's the pastor, or a
deacon, or an elder: it's not only disobedient; but that's also how rumors
(and other things) get started.

125) 1Cor 14:37-38 . . If anybody thinks he's a prophet or spiritually gifted,
let him acknowledge that what I am writing to you is the Lord's command.

If your Sunday school, or your catechism class, is being chaired by
somebody who disagrees with the Lord's commands regulating women's
hair, tongues, and/or prophecy; believe me you have a serious problem
because it indicates that your leader is only human rather than inspired.

==============================
 
Last edited:

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #108

-
126) 1Cor 14:38 . . But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant.

In other words: if somebody in a Christian church refuses to accept Paul as
an agent duly authorized to speak for Christ; then Christians are under
orders to ignore that person's opinion of themselves that they're a prophet
and/or spiritually gifted.

127) 1Cor 14:39-40 . .Therefore, brethren, be eager to prophesy, and do
not forbid speaking in tongues. But everything should be done in a sensible,
orderly manner.

I think there's been enough said about that already.

128) 1Cor 15:34 . . Come to your senses and stop sinning. For to your
shame I say that some of you don't have the knowledge of God.

That directive is in connection with some of the Corinthians' insistence that
dead people stay dead and will never recover.

†. 1Cor 15:12 . . Now if Christ is preached that He has been raised from the
dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the
dead?

Apparently some of the Corinthians couldn't see that Christ's resurrection is
evidence that it's possible for dead people to recover. However, a measure
of that blindness exists even today among people who insist that Christ
didn't rise from the dead with the body in which he was crucified. They insist
he rose from the dead with a so-called glorified body. But if that were true,
then Christ's prediction at John 2:19-22 would be easily invalidated.

The trick is: Christ's as-crucified body revived and was displayed to selected
people for the space of forty days. But on the way up to heaven as per Acts
1:9, his crucified body was transformed into the glorious body displayed in a
vision to Peter, James, and John at Matt 16:28-17:2.

According to 1Cor 15:51-53 and 1Thes 4:13-17, believers will undergo the
very same process; viz: their remains will first revive as they were and then
be transformed during the flight up to meet the Lord in the air. Pretty
exciting.

==============================
 
Last edited:

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #109

-
129) 1Cor 15:56-58 . .The sting of death is sin, and the power of sin is The
Commandments; but thanks be to God! He gives us the victory through our
Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, my dear brothers, stand firm. Let nothing
discourage you. Always give yourselves fully to the work of The Lord,
because you know that your labor in the Lord isn't futile.

Though Mother Teresa put up a very convincing public image during those
five decades of missionary activity in India, her private letters to spiritual
counselors reveal that the poor woman was never really sure that
Christianity's God even exists; and if He did exist, she was plagued with
dread that He didn't particularly like her and might be quite disposed to
condemn her. Though she never said so in public, there were was hardly
ever a time when she didn't truly wonder if God wanted her in India in the
first place.

Had Teresa's personality not been the D-9 Caterpillar tractor that it was, I
think the celebrity nun would have given up in India after only one year. But
as anyone who knew her will vouch, Teresa wasn't a quitter; no, she was a
little bulldog, a survivor; and poverty was her dream venue. However, bull
doggedness is not what Paul is talking about in 1Cor 15:56-58; no, quite the
contrary.

Just imagine if somebody had it in the back of their mind that they might be
giving the Lord unreserved quantities of their time, talent, and resources in
a thankless endeavor only to end up being condemned anyway as per Matt
7:22-23. Well, Paul assured the Corinthians that Christ's work on the cross
and in the grave guaranteed that wouldn't happen to them-- their
resurrection to a better life was in the bag; therefore they needn't fear about
spinning their wheels or jousting windmills.

Ironically; and at the time of his writing, the Corinthians were not all that
spiritual. (1Cor 3:1-3). However; though their work in the Lord was being
performed by Christians whose spirituality was basically substandard, they
were still useful; which tells me that it isn't necessary to be a super saint
before one can begin serving Christ. Just serve him and pay no attention to
your location on the curve.

130) 1Cor 16:1-3 . . Now about the collection for God's people: Do what I
told the Galatian churches to do. On the first day of every week, each one of
you should set aside a sum of money in keeping with his income, saving it
up, so that when I come no collections will have to be made. Then, when I
arrive, I will give letters of introduction to the men you approve and send
them with your gift to Jerusalem.

The "God's people" to whom Paul referred were Jewish Christians whose
church was located at Jerusalem. They were having it pretty rough in the
early days of Christianity.

Lest somebody should get the wrong idea, that wasn't a tithe. Christ left it
up to each individual in Corinth the amount that they felt like donating
towards the Jews' relief effort.

†. 2Cor 9:7 . . Each man should give what he has decided in his heart to
give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.

Tithes are not gifts; no, tithes are levied rather than donated out of the
goodness of one's heart. I don't give the government my taxes; no, they
take them from me by force of law; viz: I pay taxes against my will, both
reluctantly and under compulsion; and I have absolutely no voice in the
parentage of my income that they take. When it comes to taxes: I am not a
cheerful giver; no, not even close. Well; that is not the Christian way of
giving. Christians have a faith that works by love, not by law. (Gal 5:6)

It would be interesting to take a poll among America's churches just to see,
out of curiosity, how many have a program for assisting Jewish Christians
over in the modern State of Israel.

==============================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #110

-
131) 1Cor 16:13a . . Be on your guard, stand firm in the faith, be men of
courage; be strong.

Churches are like vegetable gardens in that they have to be nurtured or
weeds will take over and the soil will become fallow. And it's not just weeds.
Without irrigation, vegetables wither; while there's a pretty good number of
weeds out there that can get along without irrigation just fine. Well; the sad
reality is: there are Christian churches being led by pastors, deacons, and
elders who are just as arid as a Texas vernal pool in August.

†. 2Pet 2:15-17 . .Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray,
following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of
unrighteousness; but was rebuked for his iniquity: the mute burro speaking
with man's voice forbad the madness of the prophet. These are wells without
water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness
is reserved for ever.

Those kinds of church officers are in it only for the power, the career, the
prestige, and the income. Ergo: like Balaam, they're just prophets for profit
- and the sheep? bait fish for the barracudas.

The koiné Greek word for "men of courage" is andrizomai which means: to
act manly; which Webster's defines as: (1) having qualities generally
associated with a man; viz: strength and virility, and (2) appropriate in
character to a man.

Nowadays, what with the destructive influences of feminism abroad, it's
difficult to distinguish anymore between womanliness and manliness. Sexism
has been made a sin in feminist cultures; which Webster's defines as:
behavior, conditions, or attitudes that foster stereotypes of social roles
based on gender. Well, too bad for the feminists because the God of
Christianity is very sexist: take Him or leave Him; as is.

The koiné word for "strong" is krataioo (krat-ah-yo'-o) which means, in
common colloquialisms, to man-up, step up to the plate, and/or take the bull
by the horns. A man doesn't have to stand tall to be a man, but he does
have to stand up; and if perchance you're a man reading this: don't you
dare ever let women define manliness for you; no, let Christ define it for
you. If you permit women to define manliness, they will manipulate you; and
your self respect (if you get my drift) will be in their purses. Tomboys have
purses too so be especially wary around competitive she-males. They love
nothing better than to whittle a man's self respect down to that of a
squeaking little gerbil.

You know, if only Adam had been a man of courage and strength in his
relationship with Eve, the world wouldn't be in the mess it's in today.

132) 1Cor 16:14 . . Do everything in love.

In order to protect their church from ecumenism, church managers simply
have to be somewhat firm, assertive, and confrontational when the situation
calls for it. If one isn't sure how to do this in love, then they might take
some time to study 1Cor 13:1-8 with a commentary and/or read How To
Win Friends And Influence People by Dale Carnegie.

133) 1 Cor 16:15-18 . .You know that the household of Stephanas were the
first converts in Achaia, and they have devoted themselves to the service of
the saints. I urge you, brothers, to submit to such as these and to everyone
who joins in the work, and labors at it. I was glad when Stephanas,
Fortunatus and Achaicus arrived, because they have supplied what was
lacking from you. For they refreshed my spirit and yours also. Such men
deserve recognition.

Paul and his associates depended pretty heavily upon the hospitality of local
believers for accommodations and daily necessities. Believers do well to
follow the examples of Stephanas, Fortunatus and Achaicus either by
opening their homes to missionaries or by funding their stay in a motel and
providing them with a rental car. You can usually arrange this through your
local church. Believers who do so "deserve recognition." That doesn’t mean
they should demand recognition, but there is coming a day of evaluation for
believers when they'll be fully compensated. (1Cor 3:10-15, 1Cor 4:5, and
Rev 22:12)

134) 1Cor 16:20 . . Greet one another with a holy kiss.

Kissing was a common form of greeting in the old world; and still is in the
Middle East and certain parts of Europe; but here in America-- a super-sized
racial/cultural amalgam of customs from all over the known universe --it's
wise to dispense your kisses with discretion. Some of us don't even like to
be hugged, let alone bussed; and if you should perchance try to make
physical contact with an autistic Christian, you're liable to cause them a
panic attack; so go easy on the touchy-feely stuff.

The people to whom Paul referred as "one another" are one's fellow born
again Christians. We're not required to kiss unbelievers. You can be
courteous to them, yes (cf. Matt 5:47) but reserve especially warm greetings
for your siblings; viz: those who've undergone a second birth as per John
1:12-13 and John 3:3-8, and thus share your adoption into God's home as
per Rom 8:15-17.

==============================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #111

-
135) 1Cor 16:22 . . If anyone love not The Lord, let him be accursed.

One's love of the Lord begins with whole-hearted acceptance of his teachings.

†. John 14:15 . . If you love me, you will comply with what I command.

†. John 14:21 . .Whoever has my commands and obeys them, he is the one
who loves me.

†. John 14:23-24 . . If anyone loves me, he will obey my teaching . . He who
does not love me will not obey my teaching.

†. John 15:14 . .You are my friends if you do as I wish.

Ironically, there are Christians who do not believe their own beliefs. You see,
if they did, then they would have no problem whatsoever in applying 1Cor
16:22 to Buddhists like Steve Jobs. They might feel badly accepting a curse
upon Steve Jobs, but they would accept it because in their hearts they know
1Cor 16:22 is the Lord's wishes.

Picture a mountain with many roads around the base heading towards the
top. Well; Christianity accepts only one of those roads reaches the top; viz:
the rest are dead-ends and cul-de-sacs.

Now picture a huge pit, deep and wide, with many roads around the rim
heading towards the bottom. Well; Christianity accepts that every one of
those roads reaches the bottom; viz: there are no dead ends and/or cul-de
sacs. In other words; people can get to hell any number of ways; but only
one way to heaven.

Does a Muslim have to be a terrorist to be cursed? No; they only have to
follow Islam; same goes for Atheists, Nonreligious, Baha'i, Buddhists,
Chinese Universalists, Confucianists, Jains, Kabbalah mystics, Shintoists,
Spiritists, Taoists, Zoroastrians, Jews, Mormons, Sikhs, and Hindus— they're
all on a road to hell: they're cursed and there is nothing to be gained in
arguing about it.

How many people am I talking about? Well, as of mid 2009, worldwide there
were 7,305,000 Baha'i, 483,821,000 Buddhists, 454,579,800 Chinese
Universalists, 6,446,890 Confucianists, 935,460,000 Hindus, 5,669,000
Jains, 14,549,000 Jews, 13,000,000 Mormons, 1,523,212,150 Muslims,
2,782,800 Shintoists, 24,222,700 Sikhs, 13,810,000 Spiritists, 8,849,700
Taoists, 181,650 Zoroastrians, 639,907,110 Nonreligious, and 138,777,200
Atheists.

The grand total for just the non Christian groups in that list (sans Kabbalah)
is 4,272,574,000. The population of the world in mid 2009 was
approximately 6,776,763,237 people. Those 4,272,574,000 people
represented roughly 63% of the world; and that's not even counting all the
Christians who are Christians in name only. It's my guess that the tares
easily outnumber the wheat.

†. Matt 7:22-23 . . Many will say to me in that day: Lord, Master; have we
not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in
thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them: I
never knew you; depart from me, you that work iniquity.

==============================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #112

-
136) 2Cor 2:5-10 . . The punishment inflicted on him by the majority is
sufficient for him. Now instead, you ought to forgive and comfort him, so
that he will not be overwhelmed by excessive sorrow. I urge you, therefore,
to reaffirm your love for him.

The cause for which Paul wrote that section was a guy in the Corinthian
church sleeping with his stepmother (1Cor 5:1). Paul had commanded the
Corinthians to not only hold the man's feet to the fire, but also to ostracize
him.

Some time had passed since then, and the man was apparently regretting
his actions, and broken off the illicit relationship with his kin, so it was time
to let him back into the group. No doubt the humiliation of it all had a
tremendous impact upon his attitude-- probably upon the congregation's too
because at first their attitude wasn't all that good about it either. (cf. 1Cor
5:2)

Here in America scolding and ostracizing a church member would probably
just make them indignant rather than repentant.

137) 2Cor 2:9-11 . . If you forgive anyone, I also forgive him. And what I
have forgiven-- if there was anything to forgive --I have forgiven in the sight
of Christ for your sake, in order that Satan might not outwit us. For we are
not unaware of his schemes.

One of the opposition's tactics is to create disunity in a church. Sure enough
when that happens-- as when one portion of the congregation believes in
judging and ostracizing while the other doesn't --people start taking sides
and the church will end up divided into cliques and factions. According to the
lord and master of New Testament Christianity, a house divided against itself
cannot stand.

Paul mentioned that his extension of forgiveness was "in the sight of Christ".
Judging by the churlish behavior of a good many online Christians, I've come
to the conclusion a lot of them are unconcerned that everything they
compose for forums and message boards be in the sight of Christ.

138) 2Cor 5:20-21 . . We are therefore Christ's ambassadors, as though God
were making his appeal through us. We implore you on Christ's behalf: Be
reconciled to God.

There's two different aspects to reconciliation. One is a criminal justice kind
of reconciliation (Rom 5:6-11, Rom 6:3-11, 1John 2:2) and the other is a
fellowship kind of reconciliation. (Gen 4:1-7, Gen 5:22-24, Gen 6:9, Gen
17:1, 1John 1:3-7)

For example, a man and his wife may not be speaking to each other; and
sleeping in separate beds; but they're still married: they're just not getting
along; in other words, they're out of fellowship with one another. It's God's
wishes that His own walk with Him in fellowship while they're waiting for
their departure; and the Corinthians weren't doing very well at it.

In order to restore diplomatic relations between themselves and their Father
above, that congregation had to knuckle down and deal with sin in their
midst in accordance with their master's wishes rather than their own.
Compare Josh 7:2-26 where Yhvh's people couldn't win anymore battles
until they first dealt with a sin in their midst.

It's ironic that a fully functioning Christian church like the one at Corinth was
in need of reconciliation with God. How many Christian churches are just like
that today? They pride themselves in being Spirit-filled congregations, yet
their congregational attitude is completely out of touch with Christ. Yes,
Christian congregations are oftentimes out of touch and need to come to
their senses and reconnect or else they risk becoming like the church at
Laodicea where the central figure of Christianity is depicted outside the
building banging on the door trying to get someone's attention to let him in.
(cf. Rev 3:14-22)

139) 2Cor 6:1-2 . . As God's fellow workers we urge you not to receive
God's grace in vain; for He says: In the time of my favor I heard you, and in
the day of salvation I helped you. I tell you, now is the time of God's favor,
now is the day of salvation.

Some of Christ's followers are sort of on hold as they look forward to God's
patronage and providence after they die; but Paul says you can lay hold of
those benefits now. In other words: the cross not only qualifies people for
Heaven, but also for obtaining God's earthly patronage and providence.
However, that earthly aspect of the plan of salvation comes with a string
attached-- obedience.

†. John 15:1-7 . . No branch can bear fruit by itself; it must remain in the
vine. Neither can you bear fruit unless you remain in me. I am the vine; you
are the branches. If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much
fruit; apart from me you can do nothing. If anyone does not remain in me,
he is like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are
picked up, thrown into the fire and burned.

Nobody really wants to be a stick of ol' dried up yard debris, but that's what
happens when Christ's followers go off-reservation and follow their own
noses instead of walking in the light.

†. John 14:23-24 . . When somebody loves me, they will obey my teaching;
and my Father will love him, and we will come to him and make our home
with him. He who does not love me will not obey my teaching. These words
you hear are not my own; they belong to the Father who sent me.

In other words: according to the Father's testimony as an expert witness in
all matters pertaining to fellowship: a Christian not obeying Christ has
disassociated themselves from both Christ and his Father. (2John 1:9)

===========================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #113

-
140) 2Cor 6:14-18 . . Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers:
for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what
communion hath light with darkness? and what concord hath Christ with
Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? and what
agreement hath the temple of God with idols?

. . . for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in
them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my
people. Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith
the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, And will be
a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord
Almighty.

That commandment clearly forbids intermarriage between Christians and
non-Christians; e.g. Chelsea Clinton and Marc Mezvinsky. Failure to comply
with those instructions is not only grossly disobedient, but it's unwise and
can have tragic results; for example:

†. Gen 6:1-2 . .When men began to increase in number on the earth and
daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of
men were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.

If we assume that the "sons of God" were believers and the "daughters of
men" were not; then it would appear that back in Noah's day, believing men
threw caution to the wind and built themselves harems of unbelieving
women. What happened to those believing men when it came time for the
Flood? Well, for one thing; they had lost their piety.

†. Gen 7:1 . .The Lord then said to Noah: Go into the ark, you and your
whole family, because I have found you righteous in this generation.

None of the other sons of God in that day were righteous; hence they
weren't invited aboard the ark. All of those men-- whose wives were chosen
based solely upon sex appeal sans any spiritual prudence whatsoever -
perished in the Flood right along with their infidel wives and children. Let
that be a lesson to you.

†. 1Cor 10:11-12 . . Now all these things happened to them as examples,
and they were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages
have come. Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed lest he fall.

It is definitively not wise to make yourself one flesh with an unbelieving
spouse. It's a proven tactic for watering down, compromising, and even
extinguishing Bible beliefs and practices (e.g. Num 31:7-16). Solomon found
that out the hard way; but too late. (1Kgs 11 & 12)

In a mixed relationship-- one a born-again Christian and the other not --the
born-again Christian will be forced to compromise their convictions in order
to keep the relationship going. Compromise in the area of spiritual values is
not a good thing for born-again Christians who wish to be Christ's followers.
It will quickly cool their love for Christ and quite possibly result in the Lord
calling them on the carpet for being tepid; which Webster's defines as
lacking in passion, force, or zest, and/or marked by an absence of
enthusiasm or conviction.

Most people want love, romance, companionship, and a family of their own.
According to Gen 1:27-28, and Gen 2:21-24, those things are Divine
blessings, they're perfectly normal, nothing to be ashamed of; nor is there
anything intrinsically naughty or sinful about them. But a believer has to be
self controlled, and not permit their base nature to make them lose their
heads and ruin their chances for happiness.

Adult dating is where it starts. And adult dating isn't harmless. It leads to
other things, and it leads into commitments and promises that are not easily
reneged. The end result of adult dating is ultimately marriage and children
(quite possibly illegitimate children). Whose religion will prevail in the
marriage? Whose religion will be taught to the children? The believer's or the
infidel's? And ultimately, who will get the children's souls-- God, or the
Devil?

Some couples try to accommodate each other's beliefs by teaching their
children the concepts of both ideologies. For example, a marriage between a
Buddhist and a Christian. The children are given a choice between the
Dharma and the Bible; and between Siddhartha Gautama and Christ. That
may seem like a good idea, but it only creates confusion in the minds of the
children. Why are mom and dad not in agreement? Whose ideology is right?
Can both be right? Does it mean that one ideology is just as good as the
next?

Teaching their children more than one system of beliefs and practices is out
of the question for born-again, Bible-believing Christians because the Lord
and Master of Christianity demands their exclusive devotion. It's always
been that way; even for God's chosen people.

†. Deut 6:4-5 . . Hear, O Israel: Yhvh our God: Yhvh is one. Love Yhvh your
God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your strength.

†. Mark 12:28-31 . . One of the scribes came and heard them arguing, and
recognizing that he had answered them well; asked him: What
commandment is the foremost of all? Jesus answered: The foremost is
"Hear, O Israel! The Lord our God is one Lord; and you shall love the Lord
your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind,
and with all your strength."

I think there's a pretty good number of insubordinate Christians out there
who are essentially pagans and don't know it.

===========================
 
Jan 27, 2013
4,769
18
0
Re: Continued From Post #113

7 On the contrary, when they saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been entrusted with the gospel to the circumcised8 (for he who worked through Peter for his apostolic ministry to the circumcised worked also through me for mine to the Gentiles),9

"If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile and not like a Jew, how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?"Galatians 2


acts 15
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #114

-
141) 2Cor 7:1 . . Since we have these promises, dear friends, let us cleanse
ourselves from everything that contaminates body and spirit, perfecting
holiness out of deference to God's wishes.

The promises in view are those at 2Cor 6:14-18. Compliance with God's
wishes is the way to go to obtain them.

Q: If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? (Gen 4:7)

A: Quite the opposite: you will be accepted.

142) 2Cor 8:11-15 . . If the willingness is there, the gift is acceptable
according to what one has, not according to what he does not have. Our
desire is not that others might be relieved while you are hard pressed, but
that there might be equality. At the present time your plenty will supply
what they need, so that in turn their plenty will supply what you need. Then
there will be equality, as it is written: He who gathered much did not have
too much, and he who gathered little did not have too little.

That directive is an excellent passage for debunking the so-called Faith
Promise; which is a popular scheme for tricking church members into
pledging money they don't have while expecting God's providence will
somehow provide it. That is not the Lord's wish. By means of Paul, the Lord
says to give out of what you already have, not what you hope to have later;
I mean: it is not His wish to copy ENRON's mark-to-market accounting
practices and/or futures trading with pork bellies and soy beans.

143) 2Cor 9:7 . . Each man should give what he has decided in his heart to
give, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.

I have yet to meet a pressured giver who was cheerful about it. What Paul is
saying there is that the Lord would prefer you kept your money than give it
out of reluctance and/or resentment. And that goes for anything else on
your list of charities. If your heart isn't in it, scratch it off your list.

Church managers can be very creative when it comes to laying guilt trips on
their congregations in order to squeeze money out of them. One morning at
a church I was attending some years ago, a flyer was distributed to all the
Sunday school classes that pointed to the Israelites in Exodus 35:4-36:7 as
an example of pious generosity.

But what the flyer didn't point out is that those very same Israelites
worshipped a golden calf and indulged in revelry while Moses was up on a
mountain receiving the Ten Commandments, and also the very ones who
refused to invade the promised land when God told them to; resulting in
forty wasted years marching around in that awful Arabian desert till
everybody over the age of twenty from the original crowd was dead except
for just two guys: Joshua and Caleb.

Oh, and one of my very favorite scams is called Saving And Serving. In
other words; the congregation is talked into loaning their church the money
for an ambitious building program and promised to be paid monthly
mortgage payments from the church's budget; which of course is funded by
the congregation too. (chuckle) If that isn't the most pious of all Ponzi
schemes ever!

144) 2Cor 10:7 . . If anyone is confident that he belongs to Christ, he should
reconsider that we belong to Christ just as much as he.

It's amazing that any Christian's ego would be so inflated as to think
themselves holier than an apostle, however, there are some people out
there with a pretty bad case of conceit who are up to it. I can just hear the
sneer in their voices as they think to themselves: "What's so special about
him? He puts his pants on one leg at a time just like everybody else." That's
the voice of one of the most destructive human passions there is: malicious
rivalry. It got Abel murdered (1John 3:12) and it got Christ crucified. (Matt
27:15-18)

†. Mark 12:13 . . And they send unto him certain of the Pharisees and of the
Herodians, to catch him in his words.

Just look at that! The Lord's enemies actually stalked him, hoping he would
slip up and say something they could use against him. Who were the "they"
in that passage? None other than Judaism's religious elite.

†. Mark 11:17-18 . . And as he taught them, he said: Is it not written: My
house will be called a house of prayer for all nations? But you have made it
'a den of robbers. The chief priests and the teachers of the law heard this
and began looking for a way to kill him, for they feared him, because the
whole crowd was amazed at his teaching.

You know what kind of animal stalks? A predator. So people infected with
malicious rivalry are nothing in the world but human wildlife: feral beasts.

145) 2Cor 10:10-11 . . For some say: His letters are weighty and forceful,
but in person he is unimpressive and his speaking amounts to nothing. Such
people should realize that what we are in our letters when we are absent, we
will be in our actions when we are present.

Next to gossip, I'd have to say that rumors are another very effective
method for influencing how others think. As Hitler's propaganda minister
once said: "Repeat a lie often enough, and in tine the masses will accept it
as true". Sad but true: word of mouth oftentimes enjoys more acceptance
than the facts of a matter.

The people who made those comments about Paul apparently never met him
for themselves. They were just going by hear-say and their own imagination.
That's not love; no, that's malice. Real love is protective; it doesn't seek
opportunities to hurt someone's feelings, undermine their credibility, malign
their reputation, find fault, nor denigrate them solely to satisfy a blood lust
for bringing people down.

===========================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #116

-
146) 2Cor 10:17-18 . . But, let him who boasts, boast in the Lord. For it is
not the one who commends himself who is approved, but the one whom the
Lord commends.

It's unfortunate that some of Christ's followers have reached the point where
the only Bible teachers they will listen to anymore are those with a résumé
of accolades like doctorate degrees, books published, and positions held; as
if any of that validates their usefulness to God's purposes. One thing we
should always remember is that just because somebody is published, or that
somebody was educated in a seminary, doesn't make them eo ipso right.

Christians relying solely upon accredited sources are setting themselves up
for disappointment since it is God's Spirit who selects and empowers His own
teachers rather than colleges and seminaries.

†. 1 Cor 12:1 . . But one and the same Spirit works all these things,
distributing to each one individually: as He wills.

And sometimes the Spirit selects people to speak for God who seemingly
have no business speaking for Him at all; for example:

†. Amos 7:14-15 . .Then answered Amos, and said to Amaziah: I was no
prophet, neither was I a prophet's son; but I was an herdsman, and a
gatherer of sycamore fruit: And Yhvh took me as I followed the flock, and He
said unto me: Go, prophesy unto my people Israel.

Christ was a blue collar craftsman; a carpenter; which was a trade
considered at the level of uneducated society in his day.

†. Mark 6:3 . . Is not this the carpenter . . . and they were indignant.

†. John 7:14-15 . . Now about the midst of the feast Jesus went up into the
temple, and taught. And the Jews marveled, saying; How knoweth this man
letters, having never learned?

Peter was a commercial fishermen; another profession that required no
education.

†. Acts 4:13 . . Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and
perceived that they were uneducated ignorant men, they marveled

It has been my experience that people who rely solely upon accredited
sources do so because they have no choice; in other words; they're forced to
because they lack the anointing described below.

†. 1John 2:26-27 . . The anointing which you have received from Him abides
in you, and you do not need that anyone teach you; but as the same
anointing teaches you concerning all things, and is true, and is not a lie, and
just as it has taught you, you will abide in Him.

Christians need instruction; in fact instructors are a gift from Christ to his
church (Eph 4:11-15). But instruction alone cannot condition a Christian's
intuition to recognize the truth when they encounter it; viz: instruction alone
cannot give a Christian a feel for the truth, nor can instruction alone break
down a Christian's resistance to the truth. That's where the anointing comes
into play. It assists Christians to recognize and to accept the truth when they
encounter it; and assists them to sort it all out and make it click.

What that means is; the Lord's sheep should be able to recognize the truth
and accept it whether it's coming from an accredited ThD or a common rank
and file pew warmer; because the only person who can be safely trusted to
know the right interpretation anyway is God's Spirit.

†. 1Cor 2:14 . .The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that
come from the Spirit of God, for they are absurd to him : neither can he
comprehend them, because they are spiritually discerned.

What that's saying is that even if a non-anointed Christian should run across
a genuine Spirit-endowed teacher, they won't listen to him, no, they will
reject the Spirit-endowed teacher. They have to reject him because the man
without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of
God, for they are absurd to him: neither can he comprehend them, because
they are spiritually discerned.

I'm not saying there's something wrong with divinity school. I'm just saying
that graduation from one doesn't eo ipso recommend somebody's spiritual
competence since it's the Spirit's sovereign prerogative to select and
empower the men whom God wishes to represent His son and that's why it
isn't all that unusual for a man with his collar on backwards to have his head
on backwards too.

147) 2Cor 13:5 . . Examine yourselves, whether you're in the faith; test
your own selves. Don't you know of your own selves, how that Jesus Christ
is in you, unless you're all reprobates?

Peers and contemporaries tend to grade themselves on a curve, utilizing
proprietary standards. I don't think that's what Christ is recommending
because it's quite possible to be judged a saint by your peers and/or
contemporaries while judged a devil by God (cf. 1Cor 4:3-5). But actually,
Paul isn't speaking of conduct; no, he's speaking of something far more
crucial-- Christ's residency inside one's physical body. His absence is literally
a life-threatening condition.

†. Rom 8:9 . . If any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.

The spirit of Christ is also labeled "the spirit of His son" for example :

†. Gal 4:6 . .And because you are sons, God has sent forth the spirit of His
son into your hearts calling out: Abba! Father.

Abba isn't a name; it's an Aramaic filial vocative. What that means is; when
I'm out in the garage working alone and my son and his mother are in the
kitchen talking about me, the noun "dad" merely indicates my son's father.
But when my son wants to get his father's attention, and he calls out: Dad!
Where are you? then "dad" becomes a vocative.

What that boils down to is this: the spirit of His son always compels Christ's
sheep to call out to a father, never to a mother and the reason for that is
actually quite simple. God's son never prays to his mother; but always to his
Father; hence those inhabited by the spirit of the Father's son will do the
very same thing.

That, by the way, is a pretty good litmus test. If somebody is comfortable
praying to the Lord's mom or to a patron saint, it's a pretty good indicator
that the spirit of the Father's son is not in them because His son would never
do something like that; nor would he ever encourage others to.

===========================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #117

-
148) Gal 1:8-9 . . But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any
other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him
be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any
other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.

The koiné Greek word for "accursed" in that passage is anathema (an-ath'
em-ah) which means to ban and/or excommunicate.

Schools sometimes ban certain books from their libraries because they feel
that the language and/or the subject matter is inappropriate. Some may feel
that when schools do that they become a dictatorial throwback to China's
cultural revolution back in the last century. Be that as it may, bans are
sometimes for the greater good; e.g. smoking in movie theaters, hunting
and/or plinking within city limits, and bringing drugs and alcohol to rock
concerts.

I think that the people whom Paul targeted with Gal 1:8-9 are speakers
and/or Sunday school teachers that do not hold to the gospel precisely as
the apostles taught it. For example: it's amazing the number of "Christians"
out there who sincerely believe that some of Paul's teachings are not for
today. Those are the very ones you really have to be on guard against. If it
is not in your power to get rid of them, then at the very least refuse to lend
them your ears. That's only common sense.

Below is an interesting application of anathema.

†. 1Cor 12:3 . . I make known to you that no one speaking by God's spirit
calls Jesus accursed.

I don't know if Paul meant it to be or not; but that is a subtle reference to
Judaism's refusal to accept Jesus as its long-awaited Messiah. Consequently
Jesus is officially banned from Judaism's company; which is just the reverse
of Christianity's ready association with Christ.

149) Gal 5:1 . . Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath
made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage.

Let's say you tell a lie. Well; if you're covenanted with God to be truthful as
per Lev 19:11; then the lie will shoot yourself in the foot because the
covenant is contractual; viz: it obligates God to come down on you with a
curse for breach of contract (Deut 27:26, Jer 11:3-4). He has to levy a curse
against you or He himself would be in breach of contract. Maybe you're a bit
unreliable at honoring your commitments; but I assure that God is 110%
reliable at honoring His. A cursory review of the last 3,500 years of Jewish
history easily bears that out. To view a menu of curse options available to
God; just feast your glims on Lev 26:3-38, Deut 27:15-26, and Deut 28:1
69. I do not think it wise to yoke oneself to those curses.

FYI: There's basically two categories of commands in the Bible: binding
commands and non-binding commands.

The commands in the Old Testament are binding commands; viz: Yhvh's
people are under contract with God to comply with them; and He is under
contract with His people to enforce them; which means that when Yhvh's
people breach the contract by disobeying one of its commands; God is
obligated to slam them with any and/or all of the covenanted curses listed at
Lev 26:3-38, Deut 27:15-26, and Deut 28:1-69.

Christ's commands, on the other hand, are non-binding commands; viz:
Christians are not under contract with God to comply with them; nor is He
under contract with Christians to enforce them. So when a Christian
disobeys one of Christ's commands; God is under no obligation to slam them
with a curse. They might get slammed with discipline; but never with a
curse.

†. Rom 8:1 . .There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in
Christ Jesus.

===========================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From Post #118

-
150) Gal 5:2-3 . . Listen! I, Paul, tell you that if you let yourselves be
circumcised, Christ will be of no value to you at all. Again I declare to every
man who lets himself be circumcised that he is obligated to obey the whole
law.

The circumcision spoken of in the passage isn't the common medical kind,
but the ritual kind where a man converts to Judaism; which of course
obligates him to comply with the covenant that Yhvh's people agreed upon
with God as per Deut 29:9-15; and not just part of the covenant; but all of it
from start to finish. Sometimes a guy will do that just to get a Jewish girl
that he's taken a fancy to. Talk about a lamb to the slaughter!

151) Gal 5:13a . . You, my brethren, were called to be free. But do not use
your liberty to indulge the base nature;

Christians are sometimes accused of practicing a religion that gives people a
license to steal, so to speak. Well; that is very true to a certain extent
because Christians do have immunity from any, and all, of the curses that
Israel's covenant imposes on scofflaws as per Lev 26:3-38, Deut 27:15-26,
and Deut 28:1-69. However, God prefers that Christians not do whatever
they want; but instead do whatever He wants. (Rom 6:1-13)

152) Gal 5:16 . . I say then: walk in The Spirit, and you shall not fulfill the
lust of the base nature.

Some years ago, in a boatyard where I was employed on Shelter Island in
San Diego, I was listening to a young Christian boast of his dedication to
Christ. So I asked him: What about the command to walk in the Spirit? How
are you doing with that one?

Well, the brash, pleased-with-himself youngster admitted he didn't even
know what that meant, let alone how to do it. (chuckle) In regards to
"dedication" Mr. Super Saint hadn't even got to first base yet. (judging by
the fact that was on a third marriage last time I checked, I'd have to say he
never did get the hang of it.)

Anyway, there's nothing mystical about this. Walking in the Spirit is just
simply doing what God wants rather than letting your natural impulses
and/or your own thinking control your conduct all the time.

For example: item #1 contains these words: "Abstain from food tainted by
idols, from promiscuity, from the meat of strangled animals, and from
blood." When a Christian complies with those instructions; they're walking in
the Spirit; but when they're ignoring those instructions and eating whatever
they want and sleeping around without regard for God's feelings about it;
then they're fulfilling the lusts of the base nature. It's just that simple.

153) Gal 5:25 . . Since we live in the Spirit, let us also walk in the Spirit.

===========================
 

WebersHome

Senior Member
Dec 9, 2014
1,940
32
0
Continued From #119

-
154) Gal 5:26 . . Let us not be conceited, provoking one another, envying
one another.

Webster's defines "conceit" as: excessive self-appreciation of one's own
worth or virtue.

There's nothing intrinsically wrong with having strong core values and/or
believing in yourself, but if you should find yourself somewhat indignant
and/or resentful when others don't believe in you, or when they think very
little of your core values; then watch out because that's a symptom of
conceit, and it will hinder you from obeying the Lord's orders in regard to
getting along with fellow believers.

The koiné word for "envy" is phthoneo (fthon-eh'-o) which means: hostile
toward a rival, or towards someone believed to enjoy an advantage. In other
words; we're talking about a competitive spirit-- not the good-natured,
friendly kind but a malicious kind of competitive spirit that resents others
doing better than itself, or more popular than itself, or more recognized than
itself, or more admired than itself; viz; it's all about self.

Rivalry is a very destructive passion. It got Abel slain by his own brother,
and it got Christ slain by his own people. Rivalry makes otherwise sensible
people behave contrary to their own better judgment, and gets them
embroiled in oftentimes unnecessary vendettas.

If none of the above describes you; consider yourself fortunate.

†. Matt 5:3 . . Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of
heaven.

†. Matt 5:5 . . Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth.

The koiné word for "provoke" is prokaleomai (prok-al-eh'-om-ahee) which
means to challenge; viz: to get in somebody's face in an assertive,
confrontational manner; which is a kind of behavior that prevents people
from deserving identification with God's kin.

†. Matt 5:9 . . Blessed are the peaceable: for they shall be called the
children of God.

155) Gal 6:1a . . Brethren, even if a man is caught in the very act of any
trespass, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness;

The restoration process is specifically the turf of "spiritual" Christians. In a
church where people are conceited, assertive, confrontational, and embroiled
in petty rivalries; the spiritual ones are obviously going to be as scarce as
California Condors.

The koiné Greek word for "trespass" is interesting. It can refer to willful
misconduct and/or to unintentional misconduct. Seeing as how willful
misconduct is dealt with harshly and summarily as per 1Cor 5:1-13 while in
this situation gently, then I'd say Gal 6:1 is referring to unintentional
misconduct; which doesn't merit a public flogging; but rather a quiet talk;
and the more private the better in order to avoid embarrassing the
unintentional offender.

156) Gal 6:1b . . each one looking to yourself, lest you too be tempted.

The restorers should keep in mind that nobody's perfect (Jas 3:2). Sooner or
later they themselves will slip up and do or say something stupid; so the
golden rule is very appropriate in these situations; which reads: "So in
everything: do to others what you would have them do to you; for this sums
up the Law and the Prophets." (Matt 7:12)

===========================