What law is written on the heart?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
Michael,

Since neither of our salvation is in question, at least from each other, and since we don't seem likely to persuade each other; let's let the Holy Spirit persuade one or both of us of our error.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,395
113
I have been pondering this discussion and the present and or future application of the laws of God being written upon the heart of flesh as opposed to a heart of stone......this is a question based upon the fact that there seems to be validity to both lines of thought.....

Could it not be both a present and future from this standpoint.....?

A) For a lost man it would yet be a future application and ongoing process from the moment of belief..
B) For a saved man it would be a present context with an ongoing future application...

We know that it takes years and years of maturity, growth, failures and successes for a child of God to mature and come online as a mature, complete servant of God....Not saying this is fully what I believe, but does seem to make some sense.....There is a definite reference back to the O.T. but there is also a future application when applied to all the saints who would come on line AFTER this was written in the N.T........also seems to be a complete fulfillment in a yet future date........just a few points to ponder and like I said....not necessarily what I believe just some thoughts to ponder....
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
But is that not because he is quoting from Jeremiah 31:31 which was future tense from its original point?
I don't think that adequately explains it. If the writer of Hebrews believed the covenant to be fulfilled completely; one would expect a statement to that effect such as:

Lk 4:21
21 And he began to say unto them, This day is this scripture fulfilled in your ears.
KJV
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
I have been pondering this discussion and the present and or future application of the laws of God being written upon the heart of flesh as opposed to a heart of stone......this is a question based upon the fact that there seems to be validity to both lines of thought.....

Could it not be both a present and future from this standpoint.....?

A) For a lost man it would yet be a future application and ongoing process from the moment of belief..
B) For a saved man it would be a present context with an ongoing future application...

We know that it takes years and years of maturity, growth, failures and successes for a child of God to mature and come online as a mature, complete servant of God....Not saying this is fully what I believe, but does seem to make some sense.....There is a definite reference back to the O.T. but there is also a future application when applied to all the saints who would come on line AFTER this was written in the N.T........also seems to be a complete fulfillment in a yet future date........just a few points to ponder and like I said....not necessarily what I believe just some thoughts to ponder....
Indeed it could be and imo is both present and future. I think the notion of incomplete implementation is consistent with this.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
But is that not because he is quoting from Jeremiah 31:31 which was future tense from its original point?
The Hebrew language does not have a future tense. In Jeremiah 31:33-34 the imperfect is used to show incomplete action; which translates to English as our future tense. In Greek the imperfect shows action in progress which would read :
is being written instead of will write; but this is NOT USED.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,188
113
Ex 25:20
20 And the cherubims shall stretch forth their wings on high, covering the mercy seat with their wings, and their faces shall look one to another; toward the mercy seat shall the faces of the cherubims be.
KJV

The Hebrew word סֹכְכִ֤ים translated covering is the Greek word ἰλασμὸν in the Septuigent.


The same Greek word ἰλασμὸν is translated as propitiation in:

1 Jn 4:10
10 Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.
KJV


I believe Jesus (or His sacrifice) covers our sin from God's sight until the Law is indeed written on our hearts.
Galatians 5 seems to agree with your view that their is a future perfecting or a seed that has yet to grow fully.

Galatians 5:5-6
[SUP]5 [/SUP]For we through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousness by faith.
[SUP]6 [/SUP]For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.

The Spirit is what perfects us. But if it were fully grown, or if we were fully perfected we wouldn't be waiting for the hope of Righteousness. We would be perfectly righteous.
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
I honestly believe it is the false assumption that His name is "too holy" to be uttered. My faith has always shouted to me that His name is to be proclaimed amon the nations.Name in Hebrew has the very same connotations as it does in English and other languages. It is not just a label, it iis fame, reknown, notoriaty and more.

I believe Yahweh may be translated as Self Existing, because He is the Only One Who may make this claim. He is the Beginning with and the End. Nothing is that He has not called into existence, while He has always Been, transitively.

His name is Wonderful, Counselor, Prince of Peace, Everlasting Father, Almighty Go, and He is Self-Existing.

He will give us all His name, come the passage from this age to the Kingdom, but until then His titles are all quite valid, for they describe Him, as long as we use them with understanding,. He i`good, amazing. Paise God, amen.
I don't think that God would object to our saying His name if we knew how.

I don't think God is very offended when His name is mispronounced.

I do think that it is more respectful to translate His name 'I Am Always' than to knowingly mispronounce it.

We can even learn to sing the translation according to its cantilation. in the key of b-flat

staff.jpg
 

MarcR

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2015
5,486
183
63
I don't think that God would object to our saying His name if we knew how.

I don't think God is very offended when His name is mispronounced.

I do think that it is more respectful to translate His name 'I Am Always' than to knowingly mispronounce it.

We can even learn to sing the translation according to its cantilation. in the key of b-flat

View attachment 99751






From the viewpoint of respect, which would our earthly parents consider more respectful from their children: their first name or their relationship title? Doesn't God deserve at least the same respect? Shouldn't we then call Him father?
 

JaumeJ

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2011
21,229
6,526
113
The few times in my life when God has spoken to me, there were no words; the message was purely in the Holy Spirit. He is not concerned about our education in this age, nor about what accent we put on words.
I have called Him, "You are Who You are," and He has responded.
Our Father does no give a thought to any of His children speaking to Him with any particular name as long as the heart is right, and the soul is a willing soul.
How many times I have`shared certain linguistic knowledge of the names of God in Hebrew only to be met by total resistence and even anti-semetic attitudes of family members whom I suppose are real and false.
When I came to Yahweh, was after a prayer where I pleaded with "You are Who You are." The instant He filled me with His Holy Spirit, I ran to the Illini Union on campus and encounted my very good friend, Shelly, a Jew. He asked me, "Jack, what has happened to you." I replied, "God's spirit came into me, you God, Yahweh."
From my own blessed experience in study, being taught, meditating and prayer, I am quite certain our Father does not care how any name is pronounced relating to Him directly as long as the love and respect and honor are there.
People tend to run away from things they cannot get a handle upon when they should do as Mary would do, keep it in their hearts until the understanding or reasonaable rejection comes to them.

I know Jehova is wrong; it is obvious knowing the pronuciation key of Hebrew with any accent, yet when it is used, I know it is in reference to the God. People argue about Yahweh and Yahve when they know of Whom each is speaking. It wastes a lot of time. I have learned also to waste a lot of time, unhappily.

We are being perfected, even our language will be a pure language come the end of this age and we are given a pure language for all to know God and call Him by one name. It will most likely be in the Spirit, and not the language of Heber. Whatever the language will be, we will know then not to wast time, if there is such a thing, come His glorious and beautiful day.

God bless all in Jesus Christ, or do you call Him Yehsua?+++

I don't think that God would object to our saying His name if we knew how.

I don't think God is very offended when His name is mispronounced.



I do think that it is more respectful to translate His name 'I Am Always' than to knowingly mispronounce it.

We can even learn to sing the translation according to its cantilation. in the key of b-flat

View attachment 99751
 

KohenMatt

Senior Member
Jun 28, 2013
4,021
221
63
All of the Law is written on my heart, both Old and New. Why? Because God put it there.
 
Jul 27, 2011
1,622
89
0
What if i'm wrong obeying the law, and telling others it's a better life? Do some think the Almighty will strike me down for loving, and respecting Him enough to do so? The Almighty see's my heart, and He see's that i only want to see His people living in victory, and not living a beat down life in the world. We Have to be in the world for now, but we don't have to be of the world. In conclusion i will keep obeying what the Father say's, and telling others its a better life, and if Father is not happy with me, then i'll have to deal with that when the time comes, until then, i'll say, we'll see.