The way Paul speaks (as man, as unto carnal, not as unto spiritual)

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#1
Hey all, Peace be unto you in Christ Jesus our Lord.

I just returned to looking at this again. You know how Paul said he did speak (in various places) or how he makes a note of it for us? I had touched upon it before but this morning I just sat with it making notes of the various places.

But I always thought that was cool how he would drop the pen to note these when's (and I thought, perhaps he did so in the case of any misunderstandings that could come of his speaking).

Paul mentions that he speaks not after the Lord but how he speaks as a fool or foolishly at times ( such as in 2 Cr 11:3 & 17) or when he is speaking to those who know the law (as in Romans 7:1). Or how he states he is speaking as a man (back in Romans 3:5) or after the manner of men (as in Romans 6:19). Or when he said he did speak unto them as unto carnal not as unto spiritual (in 1 Cr 3:1). Even though Paul acknowledges they which are spiritual (and no more yet carnal) as in Gal 6:1. These words (as used) as representatives of ages (whether of babes, yet carnal, and the full age, which are spiritual)

Paul speaks of how he becomes like those he is speaking to in order to gain them (in 1 Cr 9:20, & an example Romans 7:1 )

I was just looking at a couple of places noted here (1 Corinth, Romans and Galations)

Here in Corinth Paul discerns their condition (which is discerned as yet carnal, and which walk like men) in this manner

1 Cr 3:3 For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions,
are ye not carnal, and walk as men?

In the above he would not speak unto them as unto spiritual but as unto carnal, (1 Cr 3:1)

Even here in Romans Paul said (as he reasoned with them),
I speak as a man.

Romans 3:5 But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say?
Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance? (I speak as a man)

And here Paul says this


Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual:
but I am carnal, sold under sin.

He writes the above as if he is (in the present) carnal. And even here in Corinth Paul says,


1 Cr 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual,
but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ.

I am not seeing Paul carnal (in the present) at all. Paul is relating to them as one yet carnal (in their own present) even as he could only speak to them as unto carnal (and not as unto spiritual).

Paul acknowledges
ye which are spiritual in Galations saying,

Gal 6:1
Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual,
restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.

So Paul acknowledges they which are spiritual. And here (in this) also seems to be an area where these can be tempted moreso in the area of pride (or being exalted above measure) perhaps even in this instance (over ones own brother) when not dealing with him who might be caught in a fault (especially when it come to the right spirit of meekness in themselves).

This might be obvious to alot of you here but I have just conversed with many believers who lock Paul into the "I am carnal" category for that one line (there) where he adressed how the law is spiritual but also how he said "but I am carnal" (as if he was speaking of his present condition) even remained such verses simply seeing him as becoming all things (presently so) unto all men (and speaking to them as they could hear him) which was not as unto spiritual but as unto carnal.

Paul is speaking to them as unto carnal, (not as unto spiritual) or as he says elsewhere, I speak unto you after the manner of men. And in this doing I am seeing Paul becoming all things to all men (in order to gain them) even as he speaks of doing the same (such as in 1 Cr 9:20).

Paul is helping them reverse what they used to yeild themselves to.

Romans 6:19
I speak after the manner of men because of the infirmity of your flesh:
for as ye
have yielded your members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity;
even so now
yield your members servants to righteousness unto holiness.

As they are yet carnal, and have not waxed strong in the Spirit yet.

From Romans 6:19 (above) to here...

Paul says,

Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual:
but I am carnal, sold under sin.

The two places in this manner,

Between milk (yet carnal, a babe)
and strong meat (spiritual, or full age)

That which is yet carnal is a babe (which was not where I see Paul being in the present teaching) but rather how he both related to (became all things to all men) and how he spoke to them (having been there) and being apt to teach concerning it.

1 Cr 3:1 And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual,
but as unto carnal,
even as unto babes in Christ.


Heb 5:13 For every one that useth milk is unskilful in *the word of righteousness*:
for he is a babe.

1 Cr 3:2
I have fed you with milk, and not with meat:
for hitherto ye were not able
to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.

Heb 5:14
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age,
even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.

Discerning the time by discerning others always reminded of this, because the Lord asks,

Mat 25:45
Who then is a faithful and wise servant,
whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season?

Paul is discerning their state

1 Cr 3:2
I have fed you with milk, and not with meat:
for hitherto ye were not able
to bear it, neither yet now are ye able.

Not able to bear it would seem to mean it is not due season for the same.

Paul didnt seem to force feed, and Peter encouraged them saying

1 Peter 2:1
Wherefore **laying aside** all malice, and all guile, and hypocrisies, and envies, and all evil speakings,

1 Peter 2:2As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the word, that ye may grow thereby:

So the sincere milk for babes is something to actually be desired that we may grow thereby, especially when laying aside these other things (which belong to the old man) and of the which we should put off (and grow up unto him) our Lord Jesus Christ.

I was going to start a blog because I suppose this is more of a study then a discussion, huh? I wasnt sure. I just thought I would post this rather then start a blog, I was torn between which though.

Anyway, if any of you can think of other verses I can incorporate into this ( in respects to his manner of speaking) that I might have missed (as it relates to this) please feel free to add them. I would really like to add to this one.

 
Jan 7, 2015
6,057
78
0
#2
I think people who are yet carnal and still living in the flesh, are the ones who want to see Paul like themselves struggling with sin. But Paul, even though he dumbed it down a bit for them (so to speak) still spoke many things spiritual and in a mystery in a lot of places, which many to this day still don't truly understand.
 
Mar 10, 2015
1,174
18
0
#3
Paul is talking about carnal Christians, yes I said Christians. Carnal Christians are believers who have not grown up spiritually by renewing their minds and only have a basic or babes understanding of Jesus. They do not grow past adolescent stage of Christianity and very seldom go on to spiritually maturity as talked about in Heb 5 and Heb 6.1-6.

One of the best examples of a carnal Christian are those that get upset and angry when someone takes their choice seat in church.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#4
I think people who are yet carnal and still living in the flesh, are the ones who want to see Paul like themselves struggling with sin. But Paul, even though he dumbed it down a bit for them (so to speak) still spoke many things spiritual and in a mystery in a lot of places, which many to this day still don't truly understand.
I certainly dont pretend to have all understanding myself.

Besides, alot of the things (as great as they might be when you have caught them) can't get you a front row seat in the kingdom of God let alone a cup of coffee and a warm doughnut (even if you could show it)

Seem to me to be a little of that "to know all mysteries" dilema,

Which, in the whole scheme of things, is like what?

I sure havent figured that one out yet.

I understand what you are saying. I think its natural* that someone touched with the feeling of their own weakness in the flesh (or perhaps their own feeling of powerlessness where they might be) look to keep Paul in that yet carnal state (always) with them. If I am catching what you are saying.

I guess if you cant keep him there, something has got to give and that would be on their part (not his).
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#5
Paul is talking about carnal Christians, yes I said Christians. Carnal Christians are believers who have not grown up spiritually by renewing their minds and only have a basic or babes understanding of Jesus. They do not grow past adolescent stage of Christianity and very seldom go on to spiritually maturity as talked about in Heb 5 and Heb 6.1-6.

One of the best examples of a carnal Christian are those that get upset and angry when someone takes their choice seat in church.
Yeah, Paul was the one who said babes in Christ, who were yet carnal.
 
Mar 10, 2015
1,174
18
0
#8
Which would make them carnally minded?
Romans 8.6-7 says:
[SUP]6 [/SUP]For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
[SUP]7 [/SUP]Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.

Just because you get saved and your spirit has been reconciled back to God , through what Jesus did on the cross, does not mean your mind has been renewed.

Ever see a new convert that smoked before he /she got saved, still smoking after getting saved?
Most on this chat board will tell you, they were never saved.

I would ask them to prove to me with chapter and verse in the NT, where it says once you are saved, your mind does not need to be renewed. Romans 8 and Romans 12 are your proof texts here, read them out and see for yourself.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#9
Romans 8.6-7 says:
[SUP]6 [/SUP]For to be carnally minded is death; but to be spiritually minded is life and peace.
[SUP]7 [/SUP]Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.
I knew the verse I just wanted to know if that is what you were meaning by the same.

Just because you get saved and your spirit has been reconciled back to God , through what Jesus did on the cross, does not mean your mind has been renewed.
Thats rightt, Paul says,

Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

Ever see a new convert that smoked before he /she got saved, still smoking after getting saved?
Most on this chat board will tell you, they were never saved.
Well I blow people off alot and there are people that might feel both ways.

I smoked myself.

In fact 23 years ago I was delivered of it in one day (without withdrawl symptoms).

A year later after that I figured that having one wouldnt hurt (as it was no big deal I could stop at one) and so when I picked up a pack (while getting gas one day) I had one, but it had stuck with me for many years. That was until I quit again.

Only the last time I quit had to actually deal with all the withdrawls weight gain (and all of that). Whereas the first time I had none of that (at all) it was easy street.

I would ask them to prove to me with chapter and verse in the NT, where it says once you are saved, your mind does not need to be renewed. Romans 8 and Romans 12 are your proof texts here, read them out and see for yourself.
Yeah well my mind actually was renewed I wasnt just a new convert, I just really wasnt convinced smoking was such the big deal people made it out to be. I saw it more like an indian peace pipe, or as you might see your grandfathers pipe smoking (in that type of way). Although it could be pounded into me by others (who were so convinced) I just wasnt convinced in my conscience. In fact when I quit I even did so in doub in respects to how I felt about it, being not convinced of it then either. I dont think its good for you or any of that, dont get me wrong.

And I really didnt want to come out and say that (or anything) because I have been in these cigarette thread conversations before. And I really didnt either expect or want to have this thread go down the cigarette path.

I would ask you to open up a cigarette thread, that might be a good idea and then you can just "go at it" all the condmenation or justifications flying back and forth between it all.
 
Mar 10, 2015
1,174
18
0
#10
I knew the verse I just wanted to know if that is what you were meaning by the same.



Thats rightt, Paul says,

Romans 12:2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.



Well I blow people off alot and there are people that might feel both ways.

I smoked myself.

In fact 23 years ago I was delivered of it in one day (without withdrawl symptoms).

A year later after that I figured that having one wouldnt hurt (as it was no big deal I could stop at one) and so when I picked up a pack (while getting gas one day) I had one, but it had stuck with me for many years. That was until I quit again.

Only the last time I quit had to actually deal with all the withdrawls weight gain (and all of that). Whereas the first time I had none of that (at all) it was easy street.



Yeah well my mind actually was renewed I wasnt just a new convert, I just really wasnt convinced smoking was such the big deal people made it out to be. I saw it more like an indian peace pipe, or as you might see your grandfathers pipe smoking (in that type of way). Although it could be pounded into me by others (who were so convinced) I just wasnt convinced in my conscience. In fact when I quit I even did so in doub in respects to how I felt about it, being not convinced of it then either. I dont think its good for you or any of that, dont get me wrong.

And I really didnt want to come out and say that (or anything) because I have been in these cigarette thread conversations before. And I really didnt either expect or want to have this thread go down the cigarette path.

I would ask you to open up a cigarette thread, that might be a good idea and then you can just "go at it" all the condmenation or justifications flying back and forth between it all.
I was a smoker for 20 years, so stop trying to say I am starting something I am not. It was just an example.
Sorry if you thought I was going somewhere I was not.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#11
I was a smoker for 20 years, so stop trying to say I am starting something I am not. It was just an example.
Sorry if you thought I was going somewhere I was not.
What I meant was bringing that up in a thread and then me answering (as I did) is like an invitation to go there often, and I didnt want this to turn into an argument over cigarettes because other folks do that.

And I dont care whether you had smoked or not that wasnt my issue.
 
L

Least

Guest
#12
Romans 7:14 For we know that the law is spiritual:
but I am carnal, sold under sin.

He writes the above as if he is (in the present) carnal. And even here in Corinth Paul says,
I believe that Paul is giving an example here, Romans ch. 8 carries it through.

Paul explains that if you walk by the spirit you will not fulfil the lusts of the flesh, and he also explains that the carnal mind is enmity with God, and isn't even subject to the laws of God, it can't be.

'Just a basic dictionary definition of "enmity" : the state or feeling of being actively opposed or hostile to someone or something.'
Philippians 3, is very good on this subject, Paul gives a first hand account of his own walk as an example for the church, and it isn't until 2 Timothy ch. 4, that it seems to be accomplished for Paul himself.

Isaiah 28:9-13 is also a really great reference point for this subject.

There's a dividing line there in vs. 12.

I'd post all of the verses, but didn't want to make too long of a post..:)
 
T

Tintin

Guest
#13
Paul is talking about carnal Christians, yes I said Christians. Carnal Christians are believers who have not grown up spiritually by renewing their minds and only have a basic or babes understanding of Jesus. They do not grow past adolescent stage of Christianity and very seldom go on to spiritually maturity as talked about in Heb 5 and Heb 6.1-6.

One of the best examples of a carnal Christian are those that get upset and angry when someone takes their choice seat in church.
Rejoice always, pray without seating, give thanks in all circumstances; for this is the will of God in Christ Jesus for you.

1st Falsealonians 5:16-18

;)
 
Mar 10, 2015
1,174
18
0
#14
What I meant was bringing that up in a thread and then me answering (as I did) is like an invitation to go there often, and I didnt want this to turn into an argument over cigarettes because other folks do that.

And I dont care whether you had smoked or not that wasnt my issue.

Spare me sister, it was clear what you meant
I would ask you to open up a cigarette thread, that might be a good idea and then you can just "go at it" all the condmenation or justifications flying back and forth between it all.
You got ruffled at me using smoking as an example and lashed out. If you are going to be this intellectually and blatantly dishonest about your intents, we have nothing more to discuss

I told oyu I was also a smoker, becaues you implied I judge smokers. Come to full age and stop riding coat tails of others.
 
D

DesiredHaven

Guest
#15
Spare me sister, it was clear what you meant


You got ruffled at me using smoking as an example and lashed out. If you are going to be this intellectually and blatantly dishonest about your intents, we have nothing more to discuss

I told oyu I was also a smoker, becaues you implied I judge smokers. Come to full age and stop riding coat tails of others.
Joshua_Generation, I said I was a smoker myself.

You had brought the issue of smoking it into the conversation.

Cant be any clearer then that, there was no lashing out. And my feathers certainly arent ruffled, to the contrary yours are all over the place.

I honestly dont care about the issue of smoking (beyond your mention and my response to the same) to go any further on this thread then that.

You were the one having an issue with those( others) who think that smokers were not saved (judging their salvation), I agreed (with a verse of scripture) stating that our minds need to be renewed and I admitted my mind WAS renewed even when I was still smoking, therefore I was not seeking to justify myself (or even excuse myself in it) whether to you or to others concerning it.

Its just that I dont care about about ((((their)))) condemnations (as yourself pointed out concerning them being saved) or even ((((your own)))) justifications (in respects to needing their mind renewed) in respects to smoking.

Which is why
I said open up another thread on cigarettes, so you all can "go at" all the condemnation (theirs) or justifications (yours) on the issue.

Seriously... and people wonder why I use bolds and colors because if you dont you need to wrangle over the simplest of things, sheesh...

I never said you were judging, get your feathers unruffled.

You misread exactly what I implied (I put it forth very clearly even as you had implied so much)