Which churches are teaching the ten commandments means nothing anymore?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#1
Seriously? I never heard this before. Who is teaching this pile of hooey? So which denoms/nondenoms are teaching this junk?
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#2
So, umm, like none? Then can someone tell me why so many are down on them? I'm confused.
 
Mar 10, 2015
1,174
18
0
#3
This topic has been rinsed and repeated several times. No need to do it again.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#4
Perhaps the 'non response' answers the question?
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#5
This topic has been rinsed and repeated several times. No need to do it again.
Want to clue me in on a title of such a thread then? Obviously, I've seen people assume this on threads, but I have no idea who is teaching this stuff. I'm not asking for a repeat of the topic, I'm asking who teaches it? Seems like it might even be more than one church/denom/nondenom.

And, hold on a minute. How have you seen it repeated and I've missed it all together? I just noticed. You've only been on her one month longer than I have. lol
 
Feb 7, 2015
22,418
413
0
#6
Want to clue me in on a title of such a thread then? Obviously, I've seen people assume this on threads, but I have no idea who is teaching this stuff. I'm not asking for a repeat of the topic, I'm asking who teaches it? Seems like it might even be more than one church/denom/nondenom.

And, hold on a minute. How have you seen it repeated and I've missed it all together? I just noticed. You've only been on her one month longer than I have. lol
Maybe he spends a lot of time reading past threads instead of trying to see if he can come up with things "new" and "catchy."
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#7
Actually there 613 Laws in the Old Covenant and not just the famous 10. However, when Jesus Christ died upon the cross, He instituted the New Covenant with his death and the Old Covenant Law had vanished away (and it became no longer binding). Believers now follow the Commands in the New Testament (Given to us by Jesus Christ and his apostles). There are 1,050 + New Testament Commands.

https://www.cai.org/bible-studies/1050-new-testament-commands

9 out of the 10 Commandments from the Old Covenant have been repeated in the New Covenant. The only Command that has not been repeated as being binding is the Sabbath Command.

There are many Christian groups that hold to this view; And it is a sound and Biblical teaching.
GCI.org (Grace Community International) is one of them.

https://www.gci.org/law/lawmoses

As for those groups who completely deny all of the 10 Commandments and or any kind of moral law, well... this would be Antinomian type groups.

You can learn more about that here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinomianism
 
Last edited:

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#8
Actually there 613 Laws in the Old Covenant and not just the famous 10. However, when Jesus Christ died upon the cross, He instituted the New Covenant with his death and the Old Covenant Law had vanished away (and it became no longer binding). Believers now follow the Commands in the New Testament (Given to us by Jesus Christ and his apostles). There are 1,050 + New Testament Commands.

https://www.cai.org/bible-studies/1050-new-testament-commands

9 out of the 10 Commandments from the Old Covenant have been repeated in the New Covenant. The only Command that has not been repeated as being binding is the Sabbath Command.

There are many Christian groups that hold to this view; And it is a sound and Biblical teaching.
GCI.org (Grace Community International) is one of them.

https://www.gci.org/law/lawmoses

As for those groups who completely deny all of the 10 Commandments and or any kind of moral law, well... this would be Antinomian type groups.

You can learn more about that here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinomianism
The Sabbath command is the one I see as binding. Of course it is the command to rest in Christ and His Work.

Therefore, while the promise of entering his rest still stands, let us fear lest any of you should seem to have failed to reach it. For good news came to us just as to them, but the message they heard did not benefit them, because they were not united by faith with those who listened. For we who have believed enter that rest, as he has said, "As I swore in my wrath, 'They shall not enter my rest,'" although his works were finished from the foundation of the world. For he has somewhere spoken of the seventh day in this way: "And God rested on the seventh day from all his works." And again in this passage he said, "They shall not enter my rest." Since therefore it remains for some to enter it, and those who formerly received the good news failed to enter because of disobedience, again he appoints a certain day, "Today," saying through David so long afterward, in the words already quoted, "Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts." For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on. So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God, for whoever has entered God's rest has also rested from his works as God did from his. Let us therefore strive to enter that rest, so that no one may fall by the same sort of disobedience.
(Heb 4:1-11)
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#9
Actually there 613 Laws in the Old Covenant and not just the famous 10. However, when Jesus Christ died upon the cross, He instituted the New Covenant with his death and the Old Covenant Law had vanished away (and it became no longer binding). Believers now follow the Commands in the New Testament (Given to us by Jesus Christ and his apostles). There are 1,050 + New Testament Commands.

https://www.cai.org/bible-studies/1050-new-testament-commands

9 out of the 10 Commandments from the Old Covenant have been repeated in the New Covenant. The only Command that has not been repeated as being binding is the Sabbath Command.

There are many Christian groups that hold to this view; And it is a sound and Biblical teaching.
GCI.org (Grace Community International) is one of them.

https://www.gci.org/law/lawmoses

As for those groups who completely deny all of the 10 Commandments and or any kind of moral law, well... this would be Antinomian type groups.

You can learn more about that here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antinomianism
Now we're getting some where. Okay, antinomianism (why can't they make these words five letters or less, or, at least easier to spell? lol) is the insult word. Who are these people? They've got to have names for themselves? I don't recognize them.

(I also think a lot of people think one of the Ten Commandments is dietary law, so whoever they are, no one ever made them memorize them. lol)
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#10
Maybe he spends a lot of time reading past threads instead of trying to see if he can come up with things "new" and "catchy."
If you ever get around to being useful again, let me know and I'll unignore ya.
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#11
The Sabbath command is the one I see as binding. Of course it is the command to rest in Christ and His Work.

Therefore, while the promise of entering his rest still stands, let us fear lest any of you should seem to have failed to reach it. For good news came to us just as to them, but the message they heard did not benefit them, because they were not united by faith with those who listened. For we who have believed enter that rest, as he has said, "As I swore in my wrath, 'They shall not enter my rest,'" although his works were finished from the foundation of the world. For he has somewhere spoken of the seventh day in this way: "And God rested on the seventh day from all his works." And again in this passage he said, "They shall not enter my rest." Since therefore it remains for some to enter it, and those who formerly received the good news failed to enter because of disobedience, again he appoints a certain day, "Today," saying through David so long afterward, in the words already quoted, "Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts." For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on. So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God, for whoever has entered God's rest has also rested from his works as God did from his. Let us therefore strive to enter that rest, so that no one may fall by the same sort of disobedience.
(Heb 4:1-11)
Pssst, I caught that too, but I'm trying to find out who these people are instead of debating the 10001 things we could debate. lol
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#12
Pssst, I caught that too, but I'm trying to find out who these people are instead of debating the 10001 things we could debate. lol
Honestly...I never bumped into anyone who taught that about the Commandments.
Are you sure someone is teaching that 'pile of hooey'? Or is it merely out of inquisitiveness?
 
A

atwhatcost

Guest
#13
Honestly...I never bumped into anyone who taught that about the Commandments.
Are you sure someone is teaching that 'pile of hooey'? Or is it merely out of inquisitiveness?
If I remember right, (and Jasn, please correct me if I'm not, because my memory isn't good), Jason is in the Four Square church. If I'm right, I can always check where Jason is getting his theology.

On a different note, did I just get you to talk LynnSpeak with "pile of hooey?" lol
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#15
If I remember right, (and Jasn, please correct me if I'm not, because my memory isn't good), Jason is in the Four Square church. If I'm right, I can always check where Jason is getting his theology.

On a different note, did I just get you to talk LynnSpeak with "pile of hooey?" lol
LOL, no I put baby quotes around it to reflect a saying someone else gave.
Foursquare, hmm Christ is Healer, Redeemer, Soon Coming King and umm oh well a triangle anyways. Are they teaching...not teaching, anything about the Big 10?
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#16
The Sabbath command is the one I see as binding. Of course it is the command to rest in Christ and His Work.

Therefore, while the promise of entering his rest still stands, let us fear lest any of you should seem to have failed to reach it. For good news came to us just as to them, but the message they heard did not benefit them, because they were not united by faith with those who listened. For we who have believed enter that rest, as he has said, "As I swore in my wrath, 'They shall not enter my rest,'" although his works were finished from the foundation of the world. For he has somewhere spoken of the seventh day in this way: "And God rested on the seventh day from all his works." And again in this passage he said, "They shall not enter my rest." Since therefore it remains for some to enter it, and those who formerly received the good news failed to enter because of disobedience, again he appoints a certain day, "Today," saying through David so long afterward, in the words already quoted, "Today, if you hear his voice, do not harden your hearts." For if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on. So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God, for whoever has entered God's rest has also rested from his works as God did from his. Let us therefore strive to enter that rest, so that no one may fall by the same sort of disobedience.
(Heb 4:1-11)
Read the context. It says, if Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on.

Also, Paul says we are not judge according to Sabbath days. That one man regards all days the same, etc. This would not be posssible if the Saturday Sabbath was still in effect.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#17
If I remember right, (and Jasn, please correct me if I'm not, because my memory isn't good), Jason is in the Four Square church. If I'm right, I can always check where Jason is getting his theology.

On a different note, did I just get you to talk LynnSpeak with "pile of hooey?" lol
Don't even know what the Four Square Church is. Actually, I get my learning from studying the Word of God by the Spirit.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#18
Now we're getting some where. Okay, antinomianism (why can't they make these words five letters or less, or, at least easier to spell? lol) is the insult word. Who are these people? They've got to have names for themselves? I don't recognize them.

(I also think a lot of people think one of the Ten Commandments is dietary law, so whoever they are, no one ever made them memorize them. lol)
I have ran into some Antinomians at Theology Online. I also talked with an Antinomian in person, too. The one who claimed they can do any kind of sin they want and still be saved was also a Mid Acts Dispensationalist (MAD). MAD proponents believe that the Bible teaches there is 2 or more gospels. The other Antinomian was just kind of all around hateful towards me that I didn't understand much of what they said (Except that they really hated me alot).

Antinomianism can also be applied in a lesser form for people who think they can sin even a little (And still be saved), too. It exists here, too (But it is more carefully concealed). Folks here say they strive to live holy lives, but if they do happen to sin, they are saved. For whether one sins a little or a lot, it makes no difference. One serious sin can separate a person from God if they do not confess and forsake that sin.
 
Last edited:

valiant

Senior Member
Mar 22, 2015
8,025
124
63
#19
Strictly speaking we are not bound by the ten commandments. Exodus 20.1 ff is in the form of a late 2nd millennium BC suzerainty treaty made between a suzerain lord and his people, in this case YHWH and Israel.

Having declared his name (I am YHWH your God) he then proceeds to outline what he has done for his people (who redeemed you out of the land of Egypt, from the house of bondage).

He then asserts his supreme authority ('you shall have no other gods before me'). And follows this up with details of what he requires of his people (the remainder of the ten commands).

As most of us were not redeemed from Egypt this is not therefore strictly speaking binding on us.

However what is binding on us is the sermon on the mount, the remainder of the teaching of Jesus and the ethics revealed in the New Testament, for we have been redeemed by Jesus Christ out of the hands of sin and Satan (I am speaking to true Christians).

But the fact that we have been redeemed also puts us in the clear before God. The One Who redeemed us made us accounted as righteous from ALL sin past, present and future (Rom 3.24-29), sanctified us (1 Cor 1.2; 11.6) and has covered us with His own righteousness (2 Cor 5.21; 1 Cor 1.30), perfecting us for ever (Heb 10.14).

And having redeemed us and 'saved' us, He is now at work within us bringing that salvation to completion (Phil 2.13; Eph 2.10), a work which He has guaranteed for us (1 Cor 1.8-9; Phil 2.6).

Some struggle on trying to cling on to Jesus coat tails. We who are His rest in His arms eternally secure.
 
Last edited:
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
#20
Paul says in Romans 13 that loving your neighbor fulfills the Law like not murdering, not stealing, not coveting, etc. So the moral law of the 10 Commandments is carried over. Meaning, 9 out of the 10 are carried over into the New Testament. The Sabbath is a ceremonial law and it is not a moral law. But the other 9 are moral laws of which you can see that they are mentioned again as Commandments in the New Testament.

So to say that all of the 10 Commandments is abolished is technically not correct to say.
 
Last edited: