Biblically sound teachers?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

ForthAngel

Senior Member
Aug 31, 2012
2,171
91
48
#2
These are my top 5

Paul Washer
Voddie Baucham
R.C. Sproul
Steve Lawson
John Piper
 

Vdp

Banned
Nov 18, 2015
479
8
0
#3
Also there is Charles Stanley and lets not forget all those who were here hundreds of years ago that has sound teachings.
 
C

coby

Guest
#4
Michael Brown
Derek Prince
Corrie ten Boom
Dan Mohler
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,540
3,503
113
#5
King James, bible believers, dispensational, rightly dividing the word of truth preachers.

Sam Gipp
James Knox
James Modlish
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,641
6,276
113
#6
King James, bible believers, dispensational, rightly dividing the word of truth preachers.

Sam Gipp
James Knox
James Modlish
um, their can be sound Biblical teaching without using the 1611 version of the Word. nothing wrong with the K.J.V. , but some turn it into an idol. do not do so.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,540
3,503
113
#7
I don't want to take this thread in that direction, but believing you have the words of God is not idolatry. The KJV has power as the words of God. All others will come and go, go out of print, be re-written, but not so with the KJV.

um, their can be sound Biblical teaching without using the 1611 version of the Word. nothing wrong with the K.J.V. , but some turn it into an idol. do not do so.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,641
6,276
113
#8
I don't want to take this thread in that direction, but believing you have the words of God is not idolatry. The KJV has power as the words of God. All others will come and go, go out of print, be re-written, but not so with the KJV.
then don't. simply understand that while the K.J.V. is fine, it is also fine to use another version. it's called choice.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#9
I hope there are many many more sound teachers.. Are our churches that inept?
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,540
3,503
113
#10
Agree, but you'll only go so far without the whole counsel of God.

then don't. simply understand that while the K.J.V. is fine, it is also fine to use another version. it's called choice.
 
Nov 22, 2015
20,436
1,430
0
#11
James Barron

Joseph Prince

Rob Rufus

Dan Mohler

Andrew Farley

Andrew Wommack
 
K

KennethC

Guest
#12
Any teacher that does not teach WOF, Calvinism, or New age doctrines !!!
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,641
6,276
113
#13
Agree, but you'll only go so far without the whole counsel of God.
once again, the Word of God is not in the 1611 v. only. the whole counsel of God can be read in different, modern versions. again, I caution against making an idol out of a book. if you or anyone wants to use the K.J.V., 100% fine. but do not try to make it mandatory for all.
 

phil36

Senior Member
Feb 12, 2009
8,260
2,111
113
51
#14
There are thousands upon thousands of preachers who faithfully preach the word, week in week out.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,704
3,649
113
#15
This should hold true for all teachers. If it held true for the Apostles, how much more for others...

Acts 17:11 KJVS
[11] These were more noble than those in Thessalonica, in that they received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,540
3,503
113
#16
Yep, it's a choice, but I'd bet that any of those preachers using other versions would not admit that they're preaching out of God's perfect Bible, that what they hold in their hand is the pure words of God.

once again, the Word of God is not in the 1611 v. only. the whole counsel of God can be read in different, modern versions. again, I caution against making an idol out of a book. if you or anyone wants to use the K.J.V., 100% fine. but do not try to make it mandatory for all.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,540
3,503
113
#17
I hope so, though I would say there are many preachers more concerned with numbers in the seat, money coming in, and wanting a bigger building.

There are thousands upon thousands of preachers who faithfully preach the word, week in week out.
 
P

popeye

Guest
#18
I am full gospel.

So who I listen to would be Wigglesworth,,Dr Brown,Missler,and others.

All you are going to see is who prefers what doctrine.

Believe,act on,and devour his word.

Share your uncompromising faith and revelation,and watch "Christians" attack you.

The word offends

Jesus offends.

Gotta love it.
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
#19
Most compatible with message boards:

Pope Sergius III
Dan Brown
Kenneth Copeland
Kathryn Kuhlman
Charlton Heston
Peter Popoff
Robert Tilton
Reverend Ike
Jessica Hahn

Barring these being available in your area, Adrian Rogers, the 13th apostle, also lookup guys like Ed Hindson, John Walvoord, J. Dwight Pentecost, Harry Ironside, J. Vernon Magee, Lehman Strauss, Arthur Pink, Lewis Chafer, John MacArthur, Jan Markell and company, Charles Stanley, A.W. Tozer, Theodore Epp, Warren Wiersbe, Irwin Lutzer, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian (please post if you find audio of the latter three).

Warning: If any of these people of God uttered a sentence or fragment thereof you don't agree with, and it's your desire to, therefore, consign them to the lowest pit of hell, just put a sock in it, go watch some cartoons, or contemplate how lonely it will be in heaven, with your private interpretations.