Sorry Calvinists. God elected Israel

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
C

Chuckt

Guest
#2
Isaiah 45:4 For Jacob my servant's sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name: I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#3
Problem is, most Calvinists will agree by saying the Church is Israel.
 
C

Chuckt

Guest
#4
Problem is, most Calvinists will agree by saying the Church is Israel.
Except Calvinists are not reading the Bible from the Greek but most likely from the King James and there were a few Calvinists which helped bias the translation through Bible translation:


King James Version
In the early 17th century there were many religious struggles going on: Catholics vs. Anglicans ....... the Prelate Party vs. the Puritans [Prelate put retrial over doctrine whereas Puritans were mainly Calvinists] ....... Calvinists vs. the Non-Calvinistic theologians ....... and many other such conflicts. These translators brought with them to their work of translation and revision their various religious backgrounds and biases. In fact, no matter how careful a translator is, or how honest and sincere, or how objective and unbiased he tries to be, his biases and beliefs will still affect his work to some noticeable degree. For example, certain passages in the KJV clearly reflect a Calvinistic perspective:

#1 --- In Acts 2:47 the KJV reads, "And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved." [were or were being saved (NASB, NIV, ASV, NKJV, CJB), added to the church (NKJV)]. The actual Greek verb form here is: "the ones who are being saved." The rewording of the KJV (from "are" to "should be") is felt by some scholars to reflect the doctrines of election and predetermination.

#2 --- In Galatians 5:17 the KJV reads: "...so that ye cannot do the things that ye would." This particular verb appears in the Subjunctive Mood in the Greek text; thus, it is a conditional statement, not an absolute statement! Its correct translation would be, "so that ye might not do..." By failing to correctly translate this verb form the KJV implies a lack of free will, which is another strong Calvinistic doctrine. [Do not do - (NIV, NKJV); May not do - (NASB, ASV); Don't always do - (GWT)]

#3 --- In Hebrews 6:6 the KJV [also NIV and NKJV] reads, "If they shall fall away." The word "if" is not in the original Greek text; it has been added by the KJV translators. The text actually reads, "and having fallen away." This is a statement of absolute fact, yet the KJV translators have changed it into a conditional statement. By making it more hypothetical, the implication is left with the reader that the statement is unlikely at best, thus upholding the Calvinistic doctrine of The Eternal Security of the Believer or "Once Saved, Always Saved" (the "P" in TULIP theology --- Perseverance of the Saints). [And they have fallen away - (NASB), and they fall away - (ASV), yet they have deserted Christ - (GWT)]

#4 --- In Hebrews 10:38 the KJV reads, "Now the just man shall live by faith; but if any man draw back, my soul shall have no pleasure in him." The words "any man" have been added to the text. The actual subject of the verb "draw back" is "the just man." The Calvinists, however, do not believe that the "just man" can draw back after having drawn near, so the wording of the verse was changed to better reflect their false doctrine. The correct reading of the verse is: "...but if he draw back," with the antecedent of "he" being "the just man." [For my iust man lyueth of feith; that if he withdrawith hym silf, he schal not plese to my soule. (Wycliffe Bible, 1384); If he - (ASV, NIV, NASB, GWT); if anyone - (KJV)]

#5 --- There are seven passages where the KJV [also NKJV]has the phrase "be converted" (Passive Voice), when these verbs are actually in the Active Voice. This changes the meaning of the verb. Instead of the person performing the action of the verb, the action of the verb is performed upon the person. The Calvinists believed that conversion was passive on man's part. The individual was acted upon from an outside source: the Holy Spirit. Thus, if God chose to save you, you were saved regardless of what your will in the matter might be. This is the "I" in TULIP theology --- Irresistible Grace of God. Acts 3:19 is an example of this doctrinal manipulation of the text. [Epistrefoo - (Strong's # 1949) to turn,] [repent and turn (or return) - (ASV, NIV, NASB), change and turn - (GWT)]
Translations Weaknesses of the King James Version KJV
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#5
Except Calvinists are not reading the Bible from the Greek but most likely from the King James and there were a few Calvinists which helped bias the translation through Bible translation:




Translations Weaknesses of the King James Version KJV
I'm not an apologist for Calvinists by any means only trying to see fair representation...but when it comes to the KJV some of the most ardent die hards are Arminians who never heard of early manuscripts dating hundreds of years before 1611. BTW, Calvinists have some top notch Greek scholars as well.
 
Last edited:

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,638
3,533
113
#6
Under the New Testament, Jesus Christ is God's elect:

Isaiah 42:1, "Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles."
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
#7
Just more Judiazers working to stir up the brethren here, that's all this thread is so far.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#8

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,685
13,375
113
#9
This passage caught my attention the other day:

1 Peter 1 (NIV)
1 Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to God's elect, strangers in the world, scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia,
2 who have been chosen according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, ...

The NASB does not have 'elect' here, but it does have 'chosen according to the foreknowledge'. It appears that the elect are those in Christ, by this passage. However, I haven't done any significant work on the subject, so I don't hold any particular view. Yet.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,638
3,533
113
#10
Under the New Testament, one must be "in Christ" to be part of God's elect.

Under the New Testament, Jesus Christ is God's elect:

Isaiah 42:1, "Behold my servant, whom I uphold; mine elect, in whom my soul delighteth; I have put my spirit upon him: he shall bring forth judgment to the Gentiles."
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#11
'Elect' is a relative term dependent on the purpose for God's choice. Israel is God's elect but some of the intended purposes for her election differ from that of the Church...and some overlap.
 

Grandpa

Senior Member
Jun 24, 2011
11,551
3,188
113
#12
Galatians 4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.


Galatians 3:26-29

[SUP]26 [/SUP]For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
[SUP]27 [/SUP]For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ.
[SUP]28 [/SUP]There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
[SUP]29 [/SUP]And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
 
J

JesusIsAll

Guest
#13
Sorry, but just reading the title to the video doesn't make it attractive, to me anyway. In the New Testament, the elect are those in Christ. In Old Testament, Israel is also mentioned as elect, no arguing they are not an elect people the Lord has specially dealt with. God is not done with Israel, they still also an elect people for His purposes, though unbelieving Jews not elect in New Testament terms.

As to Replacement Theology notions, the Lord is quite capable enough to use church if He means church, and Israel if He means Israel. This is another example how -isms of denominational gurus have injected false doctrines into the word of God, often Satanic anti-Semitism lurking behind some of these doctrines, another spirit, not the Holy Spirit.

Anybody saying New Testament elect are not Christians should really come up with something better to found their own denomination or cult following upon.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#14
Problem is, most Calvinists will agree by saying the Church is Israel.
Actually, I simply agree because it's apparent God chose Israel. I see God not changing between OT and NT, only the participants in the covenant change. The OT was a covenant between Jehovah and Man. Man broke it, (again and again and again.) So NT is a covenant between Jehovah and Jesus. God v. God. God still did the choosing, and he elected some before Jesus came, when Jesus came, and after Jesus came.

Not that big a deal, (unless you're one of the elect, and then it's the biggest deal ever!) Doesn't require manipulating God's word to say something I want it to say. It says what it says. God has himself a people. Always.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#15
I'm not an apologist for Calvinists by any means only trying to see fair representation...but when it comes to the KJV some of the most ardent die hards are Arminians who never heard of early manuscripts dating hundreds of years before 1611. BTW, Calvinists have some top notch Greek scholars as well.
Not to mention -- if folks want to get picky -- our Bible, (if we ever stuck to just one), was the Geneva, which is cool, since the KJV scholars used that too. When I first became a believer, I did have a KJV. (Hey, the missionary was handing them out for free. lol) I was Arminian back then. When we became Calvinists, it seems NIV was the one being used in all the churches. (Probably because some of the scholars were part of my denomination.) Last I heard it was the ESV, but that was a decade ago, so I have no idea what they're using today.

Really kills off the KJV assumption though, doesn't it? lol

And, I'm responding to you, crossnote, because you're willing to be fair.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#16
Actually, I simply agree because it's apparent God chose Israel. I see God not changing between OT and NT, only the participants in the covenant change. The OT was a covenant between Jehovah and Man. Man broke it, (again and again and again.) So NT is a covenant between Jehovah and Jesus. God v. God. God still did the choosing, and he elected some before Jesus came, when Jesus came, and after Jesus came.

Not that big a deal, (unless you're one of the elect, and then it's the biggest deal ever!) Doesn't require manipulating God's word to say something I want it to say. It says what it says. God has himself a people. Always.
There are individuals and there are nations. God has chosen individuals for certain purposes and nations for other certain purposes. Last I checked the Church is not a nation of this world.
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#17
Just more Judiazers working to stir up the brethren here, that's all this thread is so far.
I finally figured out what a Judiazer is -- "Someone who doesn't think like me."
 
D

Depleted

Guest
#18
'Elect' is a relative term dependent on the purpose for God's choice. Israel is God's elect but some of the intended purposes for her election differ from that of the Church...and some overlap.
(Real questions because I didn't know this.)
Really? How?
 

DP

Banned
Sep 27, 2015
3,325
41
0
#19
I finally figured out what a Judiazer is -- "Someone who doesn't think like me."
That's a good thing then that you don't think like them, because someone raising silly arguments over who is one of God's elect and who is not is an abominable task that will not produce fruit.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#20
Israel is elect among the nations. This is not an individual election but a national election. Elect to be the receiver and giver of Gods word to the nations.

Those who are in Christ are elect unto eternal life. Predestined from before the foundation of the world to inherit eternal life through Christ.

Election on a personal level. God casts one vote for you. The devil casts one vote for you. You must cast the deciding vote.

John 3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.


For the cause of Christ
Roger