Joyce Meyer said what!?!

[Bushido8000]

I totally and completely disagree with that.

Oh cmon! Almost every one of Nirvana's songs could have been a radio hit. Alice in Chains had nothing on them.

 

[Karraster]

That was never intended to edify you. I meant just what I said.... put your brain in gear when you get the urge to post nonsense like that.

The truth is nonsense? Call light dark much?

 

[Donkeyfish07]

all seeing eye and she also teaches the little gods philosophy. both are luciferian doctrines.

The fact that a woman is presuming to teach at all is enough for me to not listen to her. Lol. I just ignore those kinds of people.

That being said, not in her defense but for common sense's sake.....God does see all. Bashing on her for using the particular phrase she did in the video is being a weeee bit too critical imo.

 

[Sirk]

What I wanna know is if Joyce is a member of the illuminaughty.

 

[jaybird88]

I understand, but if I go and say to someone, guess what so and so said in order to belittle them, isn't that the same thing here?
I don't raise this to finger point or condemn, as some may not realise they are doing they are doing.

i dont like gossip/finger pointing anymore than you do. the fighting amongst denominations over ticky tac doctrines and scriptures interpretations gets old and goes no where.

but i think somethings do need to be called out. how critical was Jesus and John about the Jewish leadership and its corruption. we have lots of Christian leadership today thats completly corrupted, how much damage are they doing? i dont like turning a blind eye to it but like you said we have to be careful and not get carried away.

 

[Willie-T]

Oh cmon! Almost every one of Nirvana's songs could have been a radio hit. Alice in Chains had nothing on them.

Ok..... I disagree with a third of it. LOL

 

[Willie-T]

What I wanna know is if Joyce is a member of the illuminaughty.

I think she joined right after I did.

 

[Stephen63]

Pleeze understand that the video was NOT to bash JM, but to show her teaching something that is totally illuministic. I had no clue folks would run rampant with it. My intent was to expose the Illuminati's involvement in the church & who's working for them. *SHEESH*

 

[Donkeyfish07]

I think she joined right after I did.

I didn't see you at the last lizard people convention brother. You are slacking in your duties. Hisssssss

 

[williamjordan]

Conservative Christians do not post things like this. We try to understand what the other side correctly to offer a sound refutation. Only liberal Christians post nonsensical stuff.. much like a Dan Brown and his conspiracy theories.

This is right up there with Dan Brown (author of the Da Vinci Code), and the Constantine conspiracy theorists.

 

[jaybird88]

That being said, not in her defense but for common sense's sake.....God does see all. Bashing on her for using the particular phrase she did in the video is being a weeee bit too critical imo.

Jesus was very wise, would you refer to Him as the serpent? in luciferian belief "all seeing eye" is a title of Satan.

 

[Willie-T]

I didn't see you at the last lizard people convention brother. You are slacking in your duties. Hisssssss

C'mon! You can't expect me to make EVERY meeting, can you?

 

[Stephen63]

Jesus was very wise, would you refer to Him as the serpent? in luciferian belief "all seeing eye" is a title of Satan.

I'm glad somebody understands.

 

[Willie-T]

Jesus was very wise, would you refer to Him as the serpent? in luciferian belief "all seeing eye" is a title of Satan.

Yeah, but while you are familiar with Luciferian Beliefs, she may not be.

 

[Donkeyfish07]

Pleeze understand that the video was NOT to bash JM, but to show her teaching something that is totally illuministic. I had no clue folks would run rampant with it. My intent was to expose the Illuminati's involvement in the church & who's working for them. *SHEESH*

I don't think anyone is bashing you brother, I certainly am not. Just the original video producer definitely looked too deep into that statement. I am totally redpilled on illuminism, I know it exists but people take it to ridiculous extents sometimes.

Jesus was very wise, would you refer to Him as the serpent? in luciferian belief "all seeing eye" is a title of Satan.

Of course not, I am aware of the terminology and it's usage.....but my original post was basically saying....you should have known she was a false teacher because she is a woman taking a preachers role upon herself. Not to mention other things. Nitpicking over one phrase that is debatable is swatting at a gnat.

 

[jaybird88]

Conservative Christians do not post things like this. We try to understand what the other side correctly to offer a sound refutation. Only liberal Christians post nonsensical stuff.. much like a Dan Brown and his conspiracy theories.

This is right up there with Dan Brown (author of the Da Vinci Code), and the Constantine conspiracy theorists.

Jesus and the 12 had no problem calling out false teachers.
should we consider if these things hold water or laugh it off and call them dan brown conspiracy theorist. i bet all those that laughed at Jeremiah wish they would have listened.

 

[Stephen63]

1 Corinthians 3:1-3 (KJV)
[SUP]1 [/SUP]And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. [SUP]2 [/SUP]I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. [SUP]3 [/SUP]For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?

I'm guilty of setting my hopes too high..... for that I'm sorry I posted this thread.

 

[breno785au]

1 Corinthians 3:1-3 (KJV)
[SUP]1 [/SUP]And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. [SUP]2 [/SUP]I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. [SUP]3 [/SUP]For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?

I'm guilty of setting my hopes too high..... for that I'm sorry I posted this thread.

Unfortunately that scripture has been ripped right out of its context

 

[Karraster]

1 Corinthians 3:1-3 (KJV)
[SUP]1 [/SUP]And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. [SUP]2 [/SUP]I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye able. [SUP]3 [/SUP]For ye are yet carnal: for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions, are ye not carnal, and walk as men?

I'm guilty of setting my hopes too high..... for that I'm sorry I posted this thread.

You saw a danger and gave a warning. Reminds me of Ezekiel 33. Would that more of us would have that much love for his fellows, and courage. Thank you. Tho I did know of this one, I may not know of the next.

 

[BeyondET]

The fact that a woman is presuming to teach at all is enough for me to not listen to her. Lol. I just ignore those kinds of people.

Well in my opinion two verses does not mean women can't teach. surely we all are equal in that sense for any man or woman can teach for there was prophetess in scripture.