I think i should elaborate on this a little so that the thread can be understood more clearly so as to enable people to chip in their contributions..
Yes there is only ONE gospel, which is that of our SALVATION.
I agree with you. As others have already responded, I think the basic message was preached by them all. Jesus is the King and it is his death, burial, and Resurrection that saves.
However, Paul and peter did not preached the same gospel; even Jesus during his earthly ministry preached the gospel of the kingdom of God. For instance Jesus came announcing the gospel of the kingdom of God and this gospel doesn't address salvation.
I disagree. Peter lays out in Acts 2 pretty much the same message that Paul does in 1 Corinthians 15. Jesus' death, burial, and Resurrection saves.
Also, I think salvation is the
main theme of Jesus' mission. It can be found in many places but here are a few examples:
John 3:17: "For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be
saved."
Luke 9:56: "For the Son of man is not come to destroy men's lives, but to
save them."
Matthew 1:21: "And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Jesus: for he shall
save his people from their sins."
Matthew 18:11: "For the Son of man is come to
save that which was lost."
Rather it speaks of the arrival of God to reposes the claim he had, to assert his authority over the fallen cosmos. That is why he healed the sick, raised the dead and cast our demons(Lk 11:20).
I agree. That is
part of what will happen with the coming of the King. But that isn't
all that happens.
if Jesus was preaching the gospel of the kingdom during his earthly ministry and didn't mention the aspects of salvation( his death burial resurrection etc),
He did mention His death, burial, and resurrection:
Matthew 16:21: "From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day."
Matthew 17:23: "And they shall kill him, and the third day he shall be raised again. And they were exceeding sorry."
Luke 9:22: "Saying, The Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be slain, and be raised the third day."
implies that the gospel of the kingdom of God is not the gospel of our salvation.That is why one cannot use the gospel of the kingdom of God to introduce someone to salvation.
The idea of there being more than one Gospel is new to me, I will admit. But from what I have seen....I remain unconvinced.
You seem to be saying that Jesus spoke of the Gospel of the Kingdom which doesn't include the message of salvation.
Yet in His own words we see:
That He came to save the world. (salvation)
The He would need to be killed and arise from burial 3 days later (death, burial, resurrection)
That believing in Him and in what He says saves. (see John 3:16)
That the Kingdom will be restored, etc. can be a part of that as well. But that is the same basic Gospel message that Peter preaches in Acts 2 and that Paul does in 1 Corinthians 15.
There is equally the different between the gospel Paul preached and that preached by peter. peter preached preached the gospel of circumcision(Gal2:7); in other words, the fulfillment of prophecy, the fulfillment of scriptures,(Acts chapter 2) while Paul preach gospel of our salvation revealed to him by the ascended Lord Jesus; that is, the gospel of the revelation of the mystery( Rom 16:25, Eph 6:19)
You just referenced Acts 2. I think if we read that carefully we can see that Peter included in his preaching the fact that the death, burial, and Resurrection of Jesus saves. Yes, that is the fulfillment of the O.T. scriptures and prophecy and Peter says that because his audience is primarily Jewish there. But he does include the other aspects of the Gospel as well.
I'm not saying that there aren't some differences in what Peter and Paul preached. Paul primarily had a Gentile audience and they probably didn't care about O.T. prophecies to the Jewish people. But Peter's audience would care about that.
What I am saying is that I don't see that the differences that are there require the idea of more than one Gospel.
However these gospels do not conflict one another; they are just messages in sequence. They are addressed to different groups and there is an interim taking place.
Pls feel free to add something to these statements, or you can even refute it. i am ok with that. i am out to learn. blessed.
I agree. Plus the sortof radical idea that the Gentiles would be included...well, I don't think that idea came until a little later. I think maybe Acts 10 to Peter and then to Paul after his conversion.
Peace.