So interesting that the teaching quotes Psalm 89, yet 119 'Ministries' does not teach the Law as it is written, but a watered-down, 'keepable' law of their own creation:
30 If his children forsake my law, and walk not in my judgments;
31 If they break my statutes, and keep not my commandments;
32 Then will I visit their transgression with the rod, and their iniquity with stripes.
33 Nevertheless my lovingkindness will I not utterly take from him, nor suffer my faithfulness to fail.
34 My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips. (from Psalm 89)
And they are correct in saying that God has not broken the Old Covenant, but they do break it AND disrespect the Law as it was given by preaching their watered-down version.
God did bring the New Covenant, promised in Jeremiah 31 because Israel did break the Old Covenant, and the New Covenant also made a way for those 'far away and with no hope' (Gentiles, see Eph. 2) to enter into relationship with God through faith in Christ.
Once we enter into faith in Christ, we are dead to the Law and alive in Christ, and Scripture reiterates that we are released from the Law (see Rom. 7-10, Gal. 2, Eph. 2, Col. 2).
Go ahead and attempt to keep the Law - But keep it the way GOD wrote it, and not the watered-down gruel that Law 'keepers' like 119 Ministries serve you. For the Law was designed to show you that you cannot keep it (just as Israel never could) and to point you to the solution to that problem, Christ!
As for the video - a plausible theory, because Jesus taught the Law to those born under the Law. That said, He ALSO told a parable about the Good Shepherd Who had 100 sheep and one was lost. That Shepherd, much like the woman, did not rest until the lost sheep was found.
Using Luke 15:10 to say that the angels rejoice when one comes back to the seventh day Sabbath - Really?! Are they serious?
Especially when the context of the chapter goes on to give the account of the parable of the Prodigal, which is all about the lost son returning to the Father, not to the Sabbath. Ask yourself: Was the rejoicing that followed because he came back to a seventh day Sabbath?
Another misleading teaching by 119 'Ministries' which asks flawed questions, drawing false conclusions.
-JGIG