Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
R

Ralph-

Guest
Revelation 2:11 - "He who overcomes shall not be hurt by the second death."

1 John 5:4, we read - "Everyone who is born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world--our faith.

Revelation 3:5 is another verse that impacts this issue. "He who overcomes I will never blot out his name from the book of life." The "overcomer" mentioned in this letter to Sardis is the Believer/Christian. Compare this with 1 John 5:4: "Everyone who is born of God overcomes the world. And this is the victory that has overcome the world--our faith.
Only genuine believers are victorious and will receive eternal life.
That's why works are required to be saved when Jesus comes back. Only born again people have works of faith. And which is why the people in 1 Corinthians 3, and the sexually immoral man in 1 Corinthians 5 do not show us that you do not have to have works to be saved when Jesus comes back as has been argued here (but then denied being argued).

If you have no works of obedience when Jesus comes back you are not born again. You will not be saved. The works less person in 1 Corinthians 3 is not the morally deficient, disobedient man who is still saved despite his disobedience. He is the believer who has no successful works of ministerial service to be rewarded in the life to come. And the fornicator in 1 Corinthians 5 is not saved despite his moral disobedience and all that's going to happen is he dies and Jesus whisks him off to paradise. No, he must first die to the flesh and stop living in moral failure so that he can be saved when Jesus comes back.


Certain people read Revelation 3:5 as if God’s pen is poised and ready to strike out the name of any Christian who does not overcome every possible struggle in life that there is to overcome. They read into it like this: "If you don't overcome every struggle in life and win the victory, then you’re going to lose your salvation!
You said it yourself. If you are not an overcomer then you are not born again. Whether you lost your salvation or never had it to begin with is irrelevant. Because either way if you do not have works when Jesus comes back you will be rejected as an unbeliever.

Once saved always saved is a distraction to this important truth. You don't have to know the answer to whether once saved always saved is true or not. All you need to know is saved people must have works to go along with their faith and will be saved when Jesus comes back. If they don't then they show themselves to be unsaved not born again people at the resurrection. People who don't have works when Jesus comes back will not be saved. They are not born again.



It's a struggle and an endeavor for unbelievers to let go of their works and take hold of Christ through faith.
Unbelievers do not have works of obedience. They can't let go of something they are not even producing to begin with. What unbelievers need to let go of is the vain attempt to produce works in the hope they'll be justified by those works.

So this is not about discarding works for the sake of works for fear they are you trying to earn your own salvation as is being pushed in this thread. This is about discarding the hope that your vain attempt at being righteous is enough to earn you salvation. See the difference? This distorted talk about not working has to stop. This isn't about not working and only having faith, and if the works magically come along all by themselves for the ride that's just a bonus. This is about purposely being obedient to the impulse of the Spirit within in works of righteousness, not suppressing Him, because you have faith in Christ.

But, most importantly, in light of what we actually see in the church today, fake believers should let go of the multitude of their works of service in the church. They think their Bible studies, confident boasts of God's grace, witnessing, church programs, church attendance and involvement, their deacon ministries, etc. are the works that they think make it okay to be morally deficient and disobedient and unchanged that way. This is by far the real problem in the church today. Not people living moral lives thinking that earns them salvation. The problem is people in the church thinking their works of service make it okay that they are disobedient, lawless, immoral people. This is by far the real problem that is not being addressed among believers.



The believe in vain is to not truly believe in the first place.

1 Corinthians 15:1,2 - Moreover, brethren, I declare to you the gospel which I preached to you, which also you received and in which you stand, by which also you are saved, if you hold fast that word which I preached to you--unless you believed in vain.

*To believe in vain is to believe without cause or without effect, to no purpose. If, as some are saying in Corinth, there is no resurrection, then faith is vain and worthless (vs. 14). The people who fail to hold fast to the word (the gospel) that Paul preached in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4, demonstrated that they "believed in vain" (did not truly believe).

There is only ONE way - John 3:15,16,18; 6:40,47; 11:25,26; 10:9; 14:6.
Let's be careful here. The Corinthians really did believe. Paul is pointing out that even if their faith is sincere it is vain if the resurrection they genuinely believe in did not really happen. The vain belief he is addressing is a faith that is sincere yet believes something that is not true. Vain belief in this case is not fake belief. It is belief in something that is fake. You strike me as being a smart, reasonable person. I'm confident you can see this.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,869
9,601
113
Thank you for the resources, Preacher4truth... :)

I watched the video and downloaded the pdf file..
 

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
For me the key is: He only did and said what the Father did.

So even if thoughts and emotions came to tempt Him, He didn’t let them consume and control Him. He was lead by His Father.

Being aware of my emotions doesn’t mean they control me. Being aware of the temptations in the world doesn’t mean I’m sinning.

Looking on a woman TO lust feels different to me. It feels like the idea is being lead by lust.

And also it’s says this is adultery, it’s breaking a covenant.

What about lusting after your spouse? Is that sin? I don’t think so. So there’s more going on in that Scripture than a quick surface read might show.

In some Scripture Paul said that he coveted. He wanted spiritual things.

So for me, I’m not at all nor will I ever say Jesus sinned, but I will have a healthy discussion of what is and isn’t sin.

And if I’m flat out wrong and these things ARE sin, Jesus never did them.

it's the looking on, to lust
& He was not drawn away - did He even have "His own lust?"
without blemish, zeal for the house of the LORD consumed Him
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
I cannot believe Jesus needed to empathize with our sinful emotions?

Empathy is a human emotion that bears the burden and can relate to a persons pain not their sin.




it's the looking on, to lust
& He was not drawn away - did He even have "His own lust?"
without blemish, zeal for the house of the LORD consumed Him
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,880
26,042
113
it's the looking on, to lust
& He was not drawn away - did He even have "His own lust?"
without blemish, zeal for the house of the LORD consumed Him
You are asking the wrong person, post. My position has been pretty clear, so I am not sure why you bring this to me. Ask the other person, who believes He did.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,880
26,042
113
For me the key is: He only did and said what the Father did.
I had the same thought :)

So even if thoughts and emotions came to tempt Him, He didn’t let them consume and control Him. He was lead by His Father.
Jesus was fully submitted to the Father's will, yes.

Being aware of my emotions doesn’t mean they control me. Being aware of the temptations in the world doesn’t mean I’m sinning.
Exactly :)

Looking on a woman TO lust feels different to me. It feels like the idea is being lead by lust.

And also it’s says this is adultery, it’s breaking a covenant.
It is breaking a commandment. It is clearly sin.

What about lusting after your spouse? Is that sin? I don’t think so. So there’s more going on in that Scripture than a quick surface read might show.
Desiring your own spouse is not sinful.

In some Scripture Paul said that he coveted. He wanted spiritual things.
Do you mean 1 Cor 12:31?

So for me, I’m not at all nor will I ever say Jesus sinned, but I will have a healthy discussion of what is and isn’t sin.

And if I’m flat out wrong and these things ARE sin, Jesus never did them.
Amen. I am glad we agree :) Quite frankly I find it very disturbing that anyone who calls themselves a Christian could suggest that Jesus sinned.
 
U

UnderGrace

Guest
I think there is a big difference between desiring your own spouse and lusting.

In the world lust has become synonymous with desire but it is not.

Perhaps again it is semantics, but I agree on this important topic the words are important.


I had the same thought :)

Jesus was fully submitted to the Father's will, yes.

Exactly :)

It is breaking a commandment. It is clearly sin.

Desiring your own spouse is not sinful.

Do you mean 1 Cor 12:31?

Amen. I am glad we agree :) Quite frankly I find it very disturbing that anyone who calls themselves a Christian could suggest that Jesus sinned.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,880
26,042
113
It's rather telling, really... lol
What does it tell? That you opened can of worms with your repeatedly saying that Jesus probably did sin, saying it was just your thoughts, you'd bet on it? You leaving the thread for the night does not put the topic to bed. :p
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,880
26,042
113
One has to remember, the word said he was TEMPTED in all ways as we are. Temptation is not sin,, When temptation takes one away (when they are drawn away) it brings forth sin.
Why are you telling me this? I have already stated such. Some of you are acting like I said or did something wrong to question the idea that Jesus lusted.
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,869
9,601
113
It wasn't a can of worms. It was an observation, based on the fact that He had human emotions just as we do.. And in order to understand what WE feel, HE had to have some knowledge of how it felt. If not during His life, then most assuredly on the cross.. :) And it's good to question things in the bible.


What does it tell? That you opened can of worms with your repeatedly saying that Jesus probably did sin, saying it was just your thoughts, you'd bet on it? You leaving the thread for the night does not put the topic to bed. :p
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,880
26,042
113
It wasn't a can of worms. It was an observation, based on the fact that He had human emotions just as we do.. And in order to understand what WE feel, HE had to have some knowledge of how it felt. If not during His life, then most assuredly on the cross.. :) And it's good to question things in the bible.
It sure wasn't a can of kittens. Gosh, Blue, nobody said anything about not questioning things in the Bible. The fact remains, you said things that showed you believed Jesus sinned. Hopefully the ensuing discussion has given you pause to re-evaluate your beliefs in that regard.
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,869
9,601
113
I could also bet that the sky is purple.. Doesn't make it true.. lol

What does it tell? That you opened can of worms with your repeatedly saying that Jesus probably did sin, saying it was just your thoughts, you'd bet on it? You leaving the thread for the night does not put the topic to bed. :p
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,869
9,601
113
No, I suggested that He COULD have sinned, since He was fully human. I NEVER said that He DID sin.. Saying "I bet" does not imply that He DID sin.. It was just a thought I had that He could have. However, Preacher and McGee have shown me otherwise. :) Now let's move on and discuss other things, mkay??


It sure wasn't a can of kittens. Gosh, Blue, nobody said anything about not questioning things in the Bible. The fact remains, you said things that showed you believed Jesus sinned.
 
N

NoNameMcgee

Guest
at the end of the day
semantics or not

emotions, thoughts and temptations are seperate things
Jesus did not have a carnal mind

and He also never sinned

even on the inside

we should all agree on at least this



i see magenta as defending our savior from a falsehood about His character

and blue as a woman who got some things wrong last night


there shouldnt be malice here


we should be greatful for godly reproof
and for wisdom we did not yet have

as the bible clearly states
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Z

Zi

Guest
Im failing to see how this makes sense with anything Blue said.. this is when one is married.. unless you're going to take it to the bride and bridegroom argument...
Jesus said, "But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." Jesus equates lust with adultery; hopefully nobody is going to argue about adultery being sin? Oh, wait, they already have :p

It was James who said.
"But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed. Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death."
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,880
26,042
113
No, I suggested that He COULD have sinned, since He was fully human. I NEVER said that He DID sin.. Saying "I bet" does not imply that He DID sin.. It was just a thought I had that He could have. However, Preacher and McGee have shown me otherwise. :) Now let's move on and discuss other things, mkay??
I did not say you said He sinned. You said that while PLAINLY showing you believed He did sin, though. And that has been the point of the discussion, to convince you that Jesus did NOT sin. If you want to stop talking about it, Blue, stop talking about it.
 

blue_ladybug

Senior Member
Feb 21, 2014
70,869
9,601
113
I DID stop talking about it. :) However, you keep making comments on it. Now let's move on, I'm done discussing this..

I did not say you said He sinned. You said that while PLAINLY showing you believed He did sin, though. And that has been the point of the discussion, to convince you that Jesus did NOT sin. If you want to stop talking about it, Blue, stop talking about it.