Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 28
Like Tree1Likes

Bible Discussion Forum

Ask (or answer) Bible questions here. Join or start a Bible discussion now!

Thread: Handy To Know

  1. #1
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Handy To Know

    -
    Hello; and welcome to the beginning of a collection of odds and ends from
    the Bible that come in handy now and then for just about everybody.

    /

  2. #2
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    The Difference Between The Old Testament And The New

    This major division in the Bible is primarily editorial; viz: it's man-made
    instead of God-made; but the division is pretty harmless and actually quite
    useful.

    In a nutshell:

    1• The simplest difference is chronological, i.e. the Old Testament focuses
    upon the Jews' religious history prior to Christ's birth, while the New focuses
    upon the world's introduction to Christianity in connection with Christ's
    crucifixion and resurrection.

    2• "Old Testament" refers to the covenant that Yhvh's people agreed upon
    with God as per Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.

    3• "New Testament" refers to the covenant that Yhvh's people will eventually
    agree upon with God as per Jeremiah 31:31-34.

    /

  3. #3
    Senior Member FlSnookman7's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 27th, 2015
    Age
    48
    Posts
    616
    Rep Power
    44

    Default Re: Handy To Know

    Quote Originally Posted by WebersHome View Post
    -
    The Difference Between The Old Testament And The New

    This major division in the Bible is primarily editorial; viz: it's man-made
    instead of God-made; but the division is pretty harmless and actually quite
    useful.

    In a nutshell:

    1• The simplest difference is chronological, i.e. the Old Testament focuses
    upon the Jews' religious history prior to Christ's birth, while the New focuses
    upon the world's introduction to Christianity in connection with Christ's
    crucifixion and resurrection.

    2• "Old Testament" refers to the covenant that Yhvh's people agreed upon
    with God as per Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy.

    3• "New Testament" refers to the covenant that Yhvh's people will eventually
    agree upon with God as per Jeremiah 31:31-34.

    /
    With all due respect I must disagree. The entire bible points to Jesus Christ. The old covenant was between God and man while the new covenant is between Jesus and God the Father.
    The old testament is all the books before Jesus walked the earth as a human. The new testament starts with Matthew but the new covenant starts in Acts.

  4. #4
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    The Everlasting Gospel

    This particular gospel is a bounce from the first chapter of Genesis.

    Rev 14:6-7 . . And I saw another angel flying through the sky, carrying the
    everlasting gospel to preach to the people who dwell on the earth-- to every
    nation, tribe, language, and people. Fear God! he shouted. Give glory to
    Him! For the time has come when He will sit as judge. Worship Him who
    made heaven and earth, the sea, and all the springs of water!

    The everlasting gospel is very elementary. Pretty much all it says is:

    1• There is a supreme being.

    2• He deserves respect.

    3• There's a frightful reckoning looming on the horizon, and

    4• The cosmos-- all of its forms of life, matter, and energy --is the product
    of intelligent design.

    /

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    August 27th, 2017
    Age
    36
    Posts
    527
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Handy To Know

    Luke 11:

    30 For as Jonah became a sign to the people of Nineveh, so will the Son of Man be to this generation. 31 The queen of the South will rise up at the judgment with the men of this generation and condemn them, for she came from the ends of the earth to hear the wisdom of Solomon, and behold, something greater than Solomon is here. 32 The men of Nineveh will rise up at the judgment with this generation and condemn it, for they repented at the preaching of Jonah, and behold, something greater than Jonah is here.

    (ESV)

    I like the comparison when thinking about The Old Testament and The New Testament.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    February 28th, 2016
    Age
    69
    Posts
    4,964
    Rep Power
    123

    Default Re: Handy To Know

    (The Olde and The New) WHAT???

  7. #7
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    Light

    Gen 1:3 . . Then God said "Let there be light" and there was light.

    The creation of light was a very, very intricate process. First God had to
    create particulate matter, and along with those particles their specific
    properties, including mass. Then He had to invent the laws of nature to
    govern how matter behaves in combination with and/or in the presence of,
    other kinds of matter in order to generate electromagnetic radiation.

    Light's properties are a bit curious. It exists as waves in a variety of lengths
    and frequencies, and also as theoretical particles called photons. And though
    light has no mass; it's influenced by gravity. Light is also quite invisible. For
    example: you can see the Sun when you look at it, and you can see the
    Moon when sunlight reflects from its surface. But none of the Sun's light is
    visible in the void between them and that's because light isn't matter; it's
    energy.

    The same laws that make it possible for matter to generate electromagnetic
    radiation also make other conditions possible too; e.g. fire, wind, water, ice,
    soil, rain, life, centrifugal force, thermodynamics, fusion, dark energy,
    gravity, atoms, organic molecules, magnetism, color, radiation, refraction,
    reflection, high energy X-rays and gamma rays, temperature, pressure,
    force, inertia, sound, friction, and electricity; et al. So the creation of light
    was a pretty big deal; yet Genesis scarcely gives its origin passing mention.

    Gen 1:1-2 . .The earth was formless and void, and darkness was over the
    surface of the deep

    That statement reveals the planet's condition prior to the creation of light;
    and no mystery there because sans the natural laws that make light
    possible, the earth's particulate matter would never have coalesced into
    something coherent.

    2Cor 4:6 verifies that light wasn't introduced into the cosmos from outside in
    order to dispel the darkness and brighten things up a bit; but rather, it
    radiated out of the cosmos from inside-- from itself --indicating that the
    cosmos was created to be self-illuminating by means of the various
    interactions of the matter that God made for it; including, but not limited to,
    the Higgs Boson.

    NOTE: It's curious to me that most people have no trouble readily conceding
    that everything else in the first chapter of Genesis is natural, e.g. the
    cosmos, the earth, water, sky, dry land, the Sun, the Moon, the stars, aqua
    life, winged life, terra life, flora life, and human life.

    But when it comes to light they choke; finding it impossible within
    themselves to believe that Genesis just might be consistent in its description
    of the creative process. I mean, if all those other things are natural, why
    wouldn't light be natural too? In point of fact, without natural light, planet
    Earth would become a cold dead world right quick.

    /

  8. #8
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    The Length Of A Creation Day

    Gen 1:5b . . And there was evening and there was morning, a first Day.

    According to Gen 1:24-31, God created humans and all land animals on the
    sixth day; which has to include dinosaurs because on no other day did God
    create land animals but the sixth.

    Hard-core Bible thumpers insist the days of creation were 24-hour calendar
    days in length; but scientific dating methods have easily proven that
    dinosaurs preceded human life by several million years. So then, in my
    estimation, the days of creation should be taken to represent epochs of
    indeterminable length rather than 24-hour calendar days.

    That's not an unreasonable estimation; for example:

    "These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were
    created, in the day that Jehovah God made earth and heaven." (Gen 2:4)

    The Hebrew word for "day" in that verse is yowm (yome) which is the very
    same word for each of the six days of God's creation labors. Since yowm in
    Gen 2:4 refers to a period of time obviously much longer than a 24-hour
    calendar day; it justifies suggesting that each of the six days of creation
    were longer than 24 hours apiece too. In other words: yowm is ambiguous
    and not all that easy to interpret sometimes.

    Another useful hint as to the length of the days of creation is located in the
    sixth chapter of Genesis where Noah is instructed to coat the interior and
    exterior of his ark with a substance the Bible calls "pitch". The Hebrew word
    is kopher (ko'-fer) which indicates a material called bitumen: a naturally
    occurring kind of asphalt formed from the remains of ancient, microscopic
    algae (diatoms) and other once-living things. In order for bitumen to be
    available in Noah's day, the organisms from whence it was formed had to
    have existed on the earth several thousands of years before him.

    The discovery of fossilized sea lilies near the summit of Mt Everest proves
    that the Himalayan land mass has not always been mountainous; but at one
    time was the floor of an ancient sea bed. This is confirmed by the "yellow
    band" below Everest's summit consisting of limestone: a type of rock made
    from calcite sediments containing the skeletal remains of countless trillions
    of organisms who lived, not on dry land, but in an ocean. The tectonic forces
    that pushed the Himalayans up from below sea level to their current height
    work very slowly and require untold eons to accomplish their task.

    So then, why can't Bible thumpers accept a six-epoch explanation? Because
    they're hung up on the expression "evening and morning"

    The interesting thing is: there were no physical evenings and mornings till
    the fourth day when the Sun was created and brought on line. So I suggest
    that the expression "evening and morning" is simply a convenient way to
    indicate the simultaneous wrap of one epoch and the beginning of another.

    Anyway; this "day" thing has been a chronic problem for just about
    everybody who takes Genesis seriously. It's typically assumed that the days
    of creation consisted of twenty-four hours apiece; so we end up stumped
    when trying to figure out how to cope with the estimated 4.5 billion-year age
    of the earth, and factor in the various eras, e.g. Triassic, Jurassic, Mesozoic,
    Cenozoic, Cretaceous, etc, plus the ice ages and the mass extinction events.

    It just never seems to occur to us that it might be okay in some cases to go
    ahead and think outside the box. When we do that-- when we allow
    ourselves to think outside the box --that's when we begin to really
    appreciate the contributions science has made towards providing modern
    men a window into the Earth's amazing past.

    Galileo believed that science and religion are allies rather than enemies--
    two different languages telling the same story. In other words: science and
    religion compliment each other-- science answers questions that religion
    doesn't answer, and religion answers questions that science cannot answer;
    viz: science and religion are not enemies; no, to the contrary, science and
    religion assist each other in their respective quests to get to the bottom of
    some of the cosmos' greatest mysteries.

    /

  9. #9
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    To Infinity And Beyond

    Gen 1:16 . . He also made the stars.

    Celestial objects require some special consideration because of their
    apparent distances and the apparent time it takes for their light to reach the
    Earth.

    For example: last decade, an analysis of the light that Hubble telescope
    detected coming from a distant galaxy named A1689-zD1 suggested it's
    apparent distance at approximately 12.8 billion light years.

    Chronologically; the cosmos' creator began constructing the Earth before He
    began constructing the stars; which indicates that as a physical structure,
    the Earth should be older than A1689-zD1. But geologists have pretty good
    reason to believe the Earth to be only something like 4.5 billion years
    old; while A1689-zD1 appears to be a minimum 12.8 billion years old.

    So then, it seems reasonable to conclude that A1689-zD1 is Earth's senior
    by at least 8.3 billion years. But there's a rub. Light's journey through
    space is complicated by some curious mysteries.

    1• The available data suggests that the universe is expanding in all
    directions. And not only is it expanding; but the velocity of its expansion
    isn't steady, nor is it slowing down as might be expected; but rather,
    contrary to common sense and Newton's standard laws of gravity; the
    velocity of the cosmos' expansion is accelerating due to a mysterious force
    which, for convenience sake, has been labeled dark energy.

    Plus, the expansion isn't uniform. Galaxies farthest from our own appear to
    be moving away faster than those closer in; which means of course that
    viewed from those farthest galaxies; our own would appear to be moving
    away faster than those closer in because the expansion is moving us too.

    Ergo: many of the galaxies seen by powerful telescopes are quite a bit more
    spread out now than when they were born. How much more I don't know;
    but if the age of the Earth is really and truly 4.5 billion years, then it's my
    guess the difference is significant.

    2• Light has no detectable mass, yet is effected by gravity; so that light's
    path through the cosmos is not always the shortest distance between two
    points; which suggests to me that A1689-zD1 is nearer than its estimated
    12.8 billion light years.

    3• Although the speed of light is constant in a vacuum, the void is a bit more
    complicated due to the fact that it's state isn't steady. There are forces in
    space influencing not only light's path, but also its velocity. There was a time
    when scientists sincerely believed that although light could be slowed down,
    it could not be sped up; now they're not so sure.

    4• Light doesn't decay. In other words: there is no detectable difference in
    age between the cosmos' first light, and the light emitted by the screen of
    an iPhone.

    5• The more that scientists study the cosmos, the more things they discover
    about it that cause them to question what they believed in the past. Today's
    scientific truth is only valid until another truth comes along to cancel it.

    All the above suggests to me that A1689-zD1's apparent distance has no
    bearing upon its age; viz: the estimated age of the cosmos is only loosely
    theoretical rather than actual. In other words: current dating methods are
    unreliable and subject to revision. It's very possibly true that the Earth really
    did precede the stars just as the Bible says.

    Now; a consideration that shouldn't be overlooked is that Gen 1:16 refers
    only to stars visible to the author's naked eye, which would limit the
    category to those of the Milky Way. In point of fact, as recent as the
    beginning of the last century, most astronomers sincerely believed that the
    Milky Way contained the sum total of all the stars in the universe; up until
    Edwin Hubble showed that the Milky Way is just one of many galaxies-- now
    estimated to number as many as 200 billion in the observable universe.

    God challenged Abraham to count the stars (Gen 15:5). But of course
    without optical assistance, Abraham was limited to the stars of the Milky
    Way; whose apparent diameter is estimated to be a mere 100-150,000 light
    years.

    The final say of course is the Bible. According to Gen 1:15, stars illuminated
    the earth on the day that God made them, which was prior to His creation of
    humanity. In other words: it's not unreasonable to believe that God didn't
    wait till starlight reached the earth on its own, but punched it straight
    through in order to begin illuminating the earth immediately.

    But what's the point of putting all those objects out there in space? Well, for
    one thing, they're not only brain teasers; but they're actually quite pretty.
    Celestial objects decorate the night sky like the ornamentation people put up
    during holidays. The night sky would sure be a bore if it was totally black.
    Decorated with stars; the night sky is like a beautiful tapestry, or a celestial
    Sistine Chapel.

    "The heavens declare the glory of God, the sky proclaims His handiwork."
    (Ps 19:2)

    Stars makes better sense that way than to try and find some other meaning
    for them. I believe the universe is simply a magnificent work of art-- just as
    intriguing, if not more so, than the works of Picasso, Rembrandt,
    Michelangelo, Monet, Vermeer, and da Vinci --testifying to the genius of an
    engineer-artist without peer.

    "For what can be known about God is evident to them, because God made it
    evident to them. Ever since the creation of the world, His invisible attributes
    of eternal power and divinity have been able to be understood and perceived
    in what He has made." (Rom 1:19-20)

    /

  10. #10
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    Day And Night

    Gen 1:4b-5a . . God separated the light from the darkness. God called the
    light Day, and the darkness He called Night.

    Day and Night simply label two distinct, and opposite, conditions-- the
    absence of light, and/or the absence of darkness. Defining those conditions
    may seem like a superfluous detail, but when analyzing the chronology of
    Christ's crucifixion and resurrection, it's essential to keep days and nights
    separate. When people attempt to define "day" as a twenty-four hour
    amalgam of light and darkness, they invariably come up with some rather
    convoluted interpretations of Matt 12:40.

    Gen 1:14 . . God said: Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to
    distinguish Day from Night

    On the first day; God defined Day as a condition of light; and defined Night
    as a condition of darkness. Here, it's further defined that Day, as pertains to
    life on Earth, is when the sun is up; and Night is when the sun is down.

    These definitions occur so early in the Bible that they easily escape the
    memories of Bible students as they slip into the reflexive habit of always
    thinking of Days as 24-hour events. That's okay for calendars but can lead
    to gross misunderstandings when interpreting biblical schedules, predictions,
    and/or chronologies.

    Gen 1:15-18a . . God made the two great lights, the greater light to
    dominate the day and the lesser light to dominate the night, and the stars.
    And God set them in the expanse of the sky to shine upon the earth, to
    dominate the day and the night, and to distinguish light from darkness.

    That passage not only defines "day" as when the sun is up, and "night" as
    when the sun is down; but it further defines night as when the stars are out;
    and yet people still don't think God means it.

    Christ defined Day and Night as they were practiced when he was here.

    John 11:9 . . Jesus answered: are there not twelve hours in the day? A
    man who walks by day will not stumble, for he sees by this world's light.

    "this world's light" is the sun; which Christ defined as "by day". So if Christ's
    "day" was defined as when the sun was up; then Christ's "night" had to be
    defined as when the sun was down.

    So then, when Christ predicted his death to last for three days and three
    nights, he obviously meant the hours of daytime and nighttime as they were
    understood when he was here rather than some other era otherwise the
    people in his own time wouldn't have known when to expect his crucified
    body to come back to life.

    NOTE: Daytimes divided into twelve divisions were regulated by what's
    known as temporal hours; which vary in length in accordance with the time
    of year. There are times of the year at Jerusalem's latitude when daytime
    consists of less than 12 normal hours of sunlight, and sometimes more; but
    when Christ was here; the official number of daytime hours was always 12
    regardless.

    I don't know exactly why the Jews of that era divided their daytimes into
    twelve divisions regardless of the seasons, but I suspect it was just a
    convenient way to operate the government and conduct civil affairs;
    including the Temple's activities (e.g. the daily morning and evening
    sacrifices)

    /

  11. #11
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    The Image And Likeness Of God

    Gen 1:26a . . And God said: Let us make Man in our image, after our
    likeness.

    Because of the terms "image and likeness" there are some who believe that
    man's creator is a human being; or at least resembles one. But according to
    Christ, creation's God is non physical.

    "God is spirit" (John 4:24)

    Spirit isn't solid. (Luke 24:36-39)

    Moses warned Yhvh's people to avoid making any kind of mannequin,
    figurine, totem pole, or statue representing God since no one has any true
    concept of what creation's God actually looks like in person. (Ex 4:10-19)

    There exists absolutely nothing in nature physically resembling its creator;
    except maybe the air in front of your face-- neither Man, nor beast, nor
    plant, nor bird, nor bug, nor reptile nor anything out in the void (Rom 1:21
    23). Concepts that portray creation's God as a human being are purely
    fantasy. (Rom 1:25)

    Gen 1:26b . . let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air,
    over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move
    along the ground.

    Humanity's right to dominate the earth is where we find its image and
    likeness of God. In other words: Man's image and likeness of God is all about
    sovereignty, power, control, and authority. (cf. Gen 44:18)

    The word for "rule" is from radah (raw-daw') and means: to tread down, i.e.
    subjugate; specifically: to crumble off.

    I saw a pretty interesting bumper sticker some time ago that went like this:

    We are not above the Earth;
    We are of the Earth.

    Well . . I respect the Native American cultural feelings behind that
    statement; and must admit that I agree with it whole-heartedly. But
    creation's creator decreed that though Man is of the earth; he is very
    definitely above it too, and has the God-given right to subjugate every living
    thing on the planet including its forests, its grasses, its rivers, its seas, its
    soil, its rocks, its air, its minerals, its mountains, its valleys, and even its
    tectonic plates and the earth's very atmosphere itself. And that's not the end
    of it. According to Heb 2:8, humanity is on track to take control of even
    more.

    /
    garee likes this.

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    March 28th, 2016
    Age
    69
    Posts
    3,602
    Rep Power
    51

    Default Re: Handy To Know

    Quote Originally Posted by FlSnookman7 View Post
    With all due respect I must disagree. The entire bible points to Jesus Christ. The old covenant was between God and man while the new covenant is between Jesus and God the Father.
    The old testament is all the books before Jesus walked the earth as a human. The new testament starts with Matthew but the new covenant starts in Acts.

    All one and the same testament written by the finger of God . The Old testament saints that had the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Christ in them by the Spirit of Christ they looked ahead to the suffering of Christ before hand and the glory that followed (the opening of the graves of Old testament men) who did have the Spirit of Christ in them . We look back to the same suffering demonstration afterward and the glory that did follow ,as the "time of reformation".... the rightly dividing principle . The same vantage point.

    1Pe 1:11 Searching what, or what manner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify, when it testified beforehand the sufferings of Christ, and the glory that should follow.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    December 6th, 2015
    Age
    64
    Posts
    617
    Rep Power
    10

    Default Re: Handy To Know

    Quote Originally Posted by WebersHome View Post
    -
    The Everlasting Gospel

    This particular gospel is a bounce from the first chapter of Genesis.

    Rev 14:6-7 . . And I saw another angel flying through the sky, carrying the
    everlasting gospel to preach to the people who dwell on the earth-- to every
    nation, tribe, language, and people. Fear God! he shouted. Give glory to
    Him! For the time has come when He will sit as judge. Worship Him who
    made heaven and earth, the sea, and all the springs of water!

    The everlasting gospel is very elementary. Pretty much all it says is:

    1• There is a supreme being.

    2• He deserves respect.

    3• There's a frightful reckoning looming on the horizon, and

    4• The cosmos-- all of its forms of life, matter, and energy --is the product
    of intelligent design.

    /
    To these eyeballs, this sounds very much like the "credo" for masons, shriners, and even the 12 step program! And like every/anything, man gets their hands on, it becomes corrupted!


    There are many many "spiritual entitites" out there claiming their "supremeness", OVER man! Merely, "objects" (not even gonna give "these" the respect they may well demand from man), that " go bump", in the darkness! Ever wonder why, when looking upon some pretty looking building, yea, even a church, or more particularily, some "cathedral", and see the pretty little gorgoyles looking down? And even, on "public" buldings, the using of ornated columns? (ashterah poles!) Remember the "celebration" of children "frollicking" around the "maypole?" ...Baal worshipers, or at least followers of!.....
    (Cutting through the chaff)

    "You GO Lord Of The Harvest!"




  14. #14
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    Big Daddy

    The Phylogenetic Tree Of Life is an interesting scientific diagram that traces
    all forms of life back to a singular genetic heritage regardless of species. In
    other words; if you started with a raccoon, and followed it's branch down the
    tree far enough, you'd eventually intersect with another branch that you
    could then trace to mushrooms. The tree is sort of the equivalent of a Big
    Bang of living things.

    The branch on that tree that interests me the most is the one that traces
    human life. According to the diagram; any two people you might select-- no
    matter what their age, race, or gender --if traced back far enough, can
    eventually be linked to a common ancestor; which of course is no surprise to
    Bible students.

    Gen 2:21-23 . .Yhvh God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he
    slept; then He took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh at that place. And
    the God fashioned into a woman the rib which He had taken from the man,
    and brought her to the man. And the man said: This is now bone of my
    bones, and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was
    taken out of Man.

    The Hebrew for "rib" in that passage is tsela' (tsay-law') and Gen 2:21-23
    contains the only two places in the entire Old Testament where it's
    translated with an English word representing a skeletal bone. In the other
    twenty-nine places, it's translated "side"

    In other words: Eve wasn't constructed directly from the dust of the earth as
    was Adam. She was constructed from a human tissue sample amputated
    from Adam's body; ergo: Eve got her flesh and her life from Adam;
    consequently any and all human life produced by Eve's flesh is Adam's flesh.

    Gen 3:20 . . Adam named his wife Eve, because she would be the mother
    of all people everywhere.

    Acts 17:26 . . He made from one man every variety of mankind to live on
    all the face of the earth

    It was apparently the creator's deliberate design that all human life be
    biologically related to a sole source of human life-- the one and only human
    life that God created directly from the earth's dust; viz: Adam.

    So then; it is not quite accurate to say that Christ didn't have a human
    father because if Christ was biologically related to his mother, and if his
    mother was biologically related to Eve, then Christ is biologically related to
    Adam just like everybody else.

    /

  15. #15
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    Why Adam Didn't Drop Dead

    Gen 2:15-17 . .The Lord God took the man and placed him in the garden
    of Eden, to till it and tend it. And the Lord God commanded the man, saying:
    Of every tree of the garden you are free to eat; but as for the tree of
    knowledge of good and bad, you must not eat of it; for in the day you eat of
    it, you shall die.

    That passage has always been an embarrassment for Bible thumpers
    because Adam didn't drop dead the instant he tasted the forbidden fruit. In
    point of fact, he continued to live outside the garden of Eden for another 800
    years after the birth of his son Seth. (Gen 5:4)

    So; is there a reasonable explanation for this apparent discrepancy?

    Well; first off let me point out that in order for the threat to resonate in
    Adam's thinking; it had to be related to death as Adam understood death in
    his day, rather than death as the Bible thumpers understand it in their day.
    In other words: Adam didn't expect to die spiritually. No, he expected to die
    normally; viz: physically; like as in pass away.

    How can I be so sure that God meant normal death instead of spiritual
    death? Because according to Gen 3:19 that's how it worked out; and to
    make sure Adam stayed normally dead, God blocked his access to the tree
    of life. (Gen 3:22-24)

    Anyway; the trick is: Adam wasn't told he would die the instant he tasted
    the fruit. God's exact words were "in the day"

    Well; according to Gen 2:4, the Hebrew word for "day" is a bit ambiguous. It
    can easily indicate a period of time much, much longer than 24 hours' viz;
    the "day" of Adam's death began the moment he ate the fruit.

    That was a milestone in human history. Up till Adam tasted the fruit, the
    only days on record were the six of creation, and the one when God ceased
    creating. Adam inaugurated a new day by tasting the fruit-- the day of
    death.

    "Sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this
    way death came to all men" (Rom 5:12)

    Well; like Jack Palance's character Curly in the movie City Slickers said: "The
    day ain't over yet"

    Ecc 7:2 . . It is better to go to a house of mourning than to go to a house
    of gaiety, for death is the destiny of every man; the living should take this
    seriously.

    /

  16. #16
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    Why Everyone Has To Die At Least Once

    Prior to Moses an official code of divine law, containing lethal consequences,
    had yet to be issued.

    Rom 5:13-14 . . Before the law was given, sin was in the world. But sin is
    not taken into account when there is no law. Nevertheless, death reigned
    from the time of Adam to the time of Moses, even over those who did not sin
    by breaking a command, as did Adam.

    The answer is: they all had to die not because of breaking an official code of
    divine law; but because of Adam breaking just one (Gen 2:16-17). His
    disobedience in the matter of the forbidden fruit effected his entire posterity:
    both the good and the bad; the young and the old.

    This is really difficult for some people to get their heads around.
    Nevertheless, it's very important to accept it whether one understands it or
    not because Paul applies this principle in his effort to explain why it is that
    believers never have to worry about being condemned for their sins. (Rom
    5:12-21)

    NOTE: Opponents are often quick to point out that Ezek 18:20 says that
    children don't share their father's guilt. But hey, which came first? Adam or
    Ezekiel? So then, since Adam's incident came along many years before
    Ezekiel's prophecy, then God was at liberty back then to reckon Adam's
    posterity as joint principals in his act of disobedience.

    Rom 5:12 . . Sin entered the world through one man, and death through
    sin; and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned.

    "all sinned" has no reference to all's own personal sins; just Adam's, i.e. his
    sin became everyone's sin, even everyone yet to be born.

    /

  17. #17
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    Why Cain Was Rejected

    Gen 4:2b . . Abel became a keeper of sheep, and Cain became a tiller of the soil.

    Both men worked at honorable professions and their skills were essential to the Adams' survival. Humans at this time were vegetarians so Cain farmed and raised the family's food; while Abel kept them clothed and shod by tending flocks for leather; and possibly fleece too.

    Gen 4:3-4a . . In the course of time, Cain brought an offering to The Lord from the fruit of the soil; and Abel, for his part, brought the choicest of the firstlings of his flock.

    There's no indication in this scene suggesting that the items they brought were sacrifices for sin. The Hebrew word for "offering" is from minchah (min-khaw') and means: to apportion, i.e. bestow; a donation; euphemistically, tribute; specifically a sacrificial offering (usually bloodless and voluntary).

    Since the offerings were minchah type offerings-- which are essentially gifts rather than atonements --it would be wrong to insist Abel slew his firstling and/or burned it to ashes. In point of fact, holocaust offerings are indicated by the word 'olah (o-law') instead of minchah; for example Gen 8:20 and Gen 22:2.

    Ancient rabbis understood the brothers' offerings to be a "first fruits" kind of oblation.

    T. And it was at the end of days, on the fourteenth of Nisan, that Kain brought of the produce of the earth, the seed of cotton (or line), an oblation of first things before the Lord; and Habel brought of the firstlings of the flock. (Targum Jonathan)

    Seeing as how Cain was a farmer, then in his case, an amount of produce was the appropriate first fruits offering, and seeing as how Abel was an animal husbandman, then in his case a head of livestock was the appropriate first fruits offering.

    I think it's safe to assume the brothers were no longer boys, but rather, responsible men in this particular scene because God treated them that way. This incident is not said to be the very first time they brought gifts to God. The brothers (and very likely their parents too), probably had been bringing gifts for many years; ever since they were of age. And up to this point, apparently both men were doing everything right and God was just as much pleased with Cain and his gifts as He was with Abel and his gifts.

    But where did they get this religion of theirs? Well; wasn't Abel a prophet?

    "Therefore this generation will be held responsible for the blood of all the prophets that has been shed since the beginning of the world, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who was killed between the altar and the sanctuary." (Luke 11:50-51a)

    It's evident then that the offerings were a legitimate part of a God-given religion rather than a pagan ritual. (cf. Heb 11:4)

    Gen 4:4b-5a . .The Lord paid heed to Abel and his offering, but to Cain and his offering He paid no heed.

    The language and grammar of that verse indicate that God not only snubbed Cain's offering; but also Cain himself; so that his offering wasn't the only issue: Cain himself was an issue too.

    Cain was of a good family. He wasn't the product of poverty or an inner city barrio or dilapidated public housing. His mother wasn't cruel and/or thoughtless, nor did she neglect or abandon him. He wasn't in a gang, didn't carry a church key, a shank, an ice pick, or a gun; didn't smoke weed, drink, snort coke, take meth, gamble or chase women.

    Cain worked for a living in an honest profession. He wasn't a thief, wasn't a predatory lender, wasn't a Wall Street barracuda, a dishonest investment banker, or an unscrupulous social network mogul. He wasn't a cheap politician, wasn't a terrorist, wasn't on the take, wasn't lazy, nor did he associate with the wrong crowd. He was very religious and worshipped the exact same God that his brother worshipped, and the rituals he practiced were correct and timely.

    The man did everything a model citizen is supposed to do; yet he, and subsequently his gift, were soundly rejected. What?

    Well; for one thing; at this point in his life, in spite of appearances; Cain was actually impious. (1John 3:12)

    In what way was he impious? Well, my first guess would be friction between him and his brother. It is unacceptable to worship God while the worshipper's relationship with their brother is dysfunctional.

    "Therefore if you bring your gift to the altar, and there remember that your brother has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar, and go your way. First be reconciled to your brother, and then come and offer your gift." (Matt 5:23-24)

    Gen 4:5b-7a . . Cain was much distressed and his face fell. And the Lord said to Cain: Why are you distressed, and why is your face fallen? If you do what is right, will you not be accepted?

    Cain knew the drill; viz: it's conduct first and worship second. That can be readily seen played out in the first chapter of Isaiah where Yhvh's people are depicted practicing their God-given worship to perfection. They were attending Temple on a timely basis, praying up a storm, offering all the correct sacrifices and offerings, observing the Sabbath, and all the holy days of obligation. But God soundly rejected all of that because their conduct was unbecoming.

    Bottom line is: Abel and his offering were acceptable because Abel's conduct was acceptable; while Cain and his offering were unacceptable because Cain's conduct was unacceptable. So then, from Cain and Abel we learn that the key to acceptable worship is acceptable conduct. The two are joined at the hip; so to speak. And that being the case; I'd have to say that there are a number of Christians attending church every Sunday morning who really ought to stay home and not come back until they clean up the things in their lives that they know very well are rubbing God the wrong way.

    1John 1:5-6 . . This then is the message which we have heard of him, and declare unto you, that God is light, and in him is no darkness at all. If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth

    /

  18. #18
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    Why God Didn't Execute Cain For Murder

    Gen 4:12-13 . . If you till the soil, it shall no longer yield its strength to
    you. You shall become a ceaseless wanderer on earth. Cain said to the Lord:
    My punishment is too great to bear!

    Cain's punishment was relatively lenient. In point of fact, it wasn't
    punishment at all, it was discipline. It's true that Cain would struggle to
    survive; but at least he was allowed to live. His kid brother was dead. How is
    that fair?

    Q: How did Cain get off with only a slap on the wrist? Why wasn't he
    executed for murder since God himself mandates capital punishment for
    murderers as per Gen 9:5-6, Ex 21:12-14, Lev 24:17, Lev 24:21, and Num
    35:31-34? Does God practice a double standard?

    A: Murder is intrinsically wrong, yes; and it's intrinsically a sin, yes;
    however; it hasn't always been a capital sin. According to Deut 5:2-4, Rom
    4:15, Rom 5:13, and Gal 3:17, law enacted ex post facto is too late; viz: law
    can't be enforced until after it's enacted, not even divine law; which is
    precisely why God didn't have to execute Cain for murder.

    /

  19. #19
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    From Whence Cain Got A Wife

    Adam was created directly from the dust of the earth. Not so Eve. She was
    constructed from a human tissue sample amputated from Adam's body. In
    other words: Eve's flesh was biologically just as much Adam's flesh as
    Adam's except for gender; viz: Eve wasn't a discrete species of human life,
    rather; she was the flip side of the same coin.

    After God created Adam and Eve, He wrapped the work and has been on a
    creation sabbatical every since.

    According to the Bible, all human life thereafter came from Eve's flesh.

    Gen 3:20 . . Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the
    mother of all the living.

    It was apparently the creator's deliberate design that all human life descend
    from a solo specimen.

    Acts 17:26 . . From one man He made every nation of men, that they
    should inhabit the whole earth.

    The Greek word for "nation of men" is ethnos (eth'-nos) which pertains to
    racial diversity.

    Bottom line: The flesh of Cain's wife descended from his mother's flesh.

    An even more convincing example of prehistoric incest is Noah and his three
    sons and their wives. Nobody else survived the Flood; ergo: Shem's, Ham's,
    and Japheth's children all married amongst themselves.

    Gen 9:18-19 . . Now the sons of Noah who came out of the ark were Shem
    and Ham and Japheth. These three were the sons of Noah; and from these
    the whole earth was populated.

    Obviously the human genome was very pure back in those days. The proof
    of it is pre-historic human life's amazing longevity-- Adam lived to be 930,
    and Noah to 950.

    Now as to the "sin" of incest; according to Deut 5:2-4, Rom 4:15, Rom 5:13,
    and Gal 3:17; God doesn't enforce His laws ex post facto: viz: they are not
    retroactive. So then, it would be a gross miscarriage of justice to prosecute
    pre-historic people for incest because it wasn't prohibited in their day; and
    wouldn't be until later in Moses'.

    /

  20. #20
    Senior Member WebersHome's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 9th, 2014
    Age
    73
    Posts
    1,562
    Blog Entries
    293
    Rep Power
    9

    Post Re: Handy To Know

    -
    How The Critters Got To Noah

    Gen 6:3 . . And Yhvh said: My Spirit shall not strive with man forever. Yet
    his days shall be one hundred and twenty years.

    Some feel that God set the limits of human longevity in that verse. But
    people still continued to live long lives for a great number of years
    afterwards. Even Abraham, who lived many, many years after the Flood,
    didn't die till he was 175 years old. No; it's far more reasonable to conclude
    that God was announcing a deadline; viz: the antediluvians had 120 years
    left to get ready to meet their maker. But you think that alarmed anybody?
    Heck no. They went right on; business as usual.

    "And as it was in the days of Noah, so it will be also in the days of the Son of
    Man: They ate, they drank, they married wives, they were given in
    marriage, until the day that Noah entered the ark, and the Flood came and
    destroyed them all." (Luke 17:26-27)

    The time of God's patience is sometimes long; but never unlimited; viz:
    reprieves are not acquittals-- though God bear a great while, He never bears
    forever.

    Gen 6:12-14 . . God saw how corrupt the earth had become, for all the
    people on earth had corrupted their ways. So God said to Noah: I am going
    to put an end to all people, for the earth is filled with violence because of
    them. I am about to destroy them with the earth. Make yourself an ark

    Gen 6:17 . . For My part, I am about to bring the Flood-- waters upon the
    earth --to destroy all flesh under the sky in which there is breath of life;
    everything on earth shall perish.

    Gen 6:19-20 . . And of all that lives, of all flesh, you shall take two of each
    into the ark to keep alive with you; they shall be male and female. From
    birds of every kind, cattle of every kind, every kind of creeping thing on
    earth, two of each shall come to you to stay alive.

    Fortunately Noah didn't have to go on safari to round up his passengers.
    God said two of each "shall come to you" (cf. Gen 7:9, Gen 7:15) which
    implies of course that species who failed to come got left behind and went
    extinct in the Flood. There was plenty of time for them to make it because
    Noah was 120 years building the ark and getting it ready.

    A man named Dave Kunst walked across today's world in just a little over 4
    years from June 1970 to October 1974. Kunst walked a total of 14,450
    miles, crossing four continents and thirteen countries, wearing out 21 pair of
    shoes, and walking more than 20 million steps. That was an odd thing to do,
    but does prove it can be done in a relatively short time; so 120 years was
    plenty enough for all the critters to make it on over to Noah's place in time
    for the Folly's maiden voyage.

    If the ark were to launch in 2017, critters would have been on the move
    towards it since 1897-- eight years before the Wright Brothers historical
    flight, and fifteen years before the Titanic foundered --and probably
    reproduced many times along the way since there are not all that many
    species that live to see 120 years of age.

    But how did they cross oceans? In the past that was doubtless a thorny
    theological problem. But with today's knowledge of the geological science of
    plate tectonics, the answer is as simple as two plus two. Scientists now know
    that continental land masses can be shifted, and in point of fact the dry
    parts brought so close together as to form one single super continent.

    Scientists also know about subduction and magma hot spots and pressure
    points that can raise and lower the earth's crust like a service elevator; for
    example according to Gen 14:3, the area now known as the Dead Sea was
    once known as the Vale of Siddim. Sometime in the distant past the earth's
    crust rose in that region, blocking the Jordan River's natural drainage into
    the gulf of Aqaba; thus trapping it's waters in a huge basin from which they
    cannot escape. Subduction causes the earth to wrinkle, bulge, and form
    mountain ranges and hill country.

    "He established the earth upon its foundations, so that it will not totter
    forever and ever. Thou didst cover it with the deep as with a garment; the
    waters were standing above the mountains. At Thy rebuke they fled; at the
    sound of Thy thunder they hurried away. The mountains rose; the valleys
    sank down to the place which Thou didst establish for them. Thou didst set a
    boundary that they may not pass over; that they may not return to cover
    the earth." (Ps 104:5-9)

    That portion of Psalm 104 is probably speaking of Gen 1:9-10. It's handy for
    showing that God is capable of molding the Earth's lithosphere into any
    geological configuration He pleases to push sea beds up and form land
    bridges; thus expediting migrations from all over the world over to Noah's
    diggings.

    This idea is by no means novel. For example: in 2014, a 9,000 year-old
    stone structure utilized to capture caribou was discovered 120 feet below the
    surface of Lake Huron; and is the most complex structure of its kind in the
    Great Lakes region.

    The structure consists of two parallel lanes of stones leading to a cul-de-sac.
    Within the lanes are three circular hunting blinds where prehistoric hunters
    hid while taking aim at caribou. The structure's size and design suggest that
    hunting was probably a group effort, with one group driving caribou down
    the lanes towards the blinds while another group waited to attack.

    The site-- discovered by using sonar technology on the Alpena-Amberley
    Ridge, 35 miles southeast of Alpena Michigan --was once a dry land corridor
    connecting northeastern Michigan to southern Ontario.

    Ten miles off the coast of Alabama in 60 feet of water in the Gulf of Mexico,
    are the remains of a Bald Cypress grove that's estimated to be eight to
    fourteen thousand years old; testifying that the earth's topography was
    quite a bit different in the ancient past.

    Actually the Earth's mantle is one continuous (albeit fractured) shell anyway,
    although its profile is so irregular that dry land sticks up above sea level at
    various high spots; which is a good thing because if the mantle were
    smooth, the world would be quite flooded all the time. In point of fact, if the
    Earth's mantle were perfectly smooth, like a billiard ball, there's enough
    indigenous water on it to cover the crust to a depth of 9,000 feet of water.
    That would be equivalent to a global ocean approximately 1.7 miles deep.

    Geological processes normally take thousands of years to accomplish, but
    those processes can be sped up considerably by the cosmos' creator, who
    has absolute control over everything-- not just the earth's geological
    processes; but all the rest of nature's processes too.

    /

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. False Flag and Inside Job buttons - Keep these handy
    By 1still_waters in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: July 22nd, 2016, 01:21 PM
  2. Amos is handy
    By crossnote in forum Bible Discussion Forum
    Replies: 190
    Last Post: February 26th, 2014, 05:33 PM
  3. Help... need a handy man NOW.
    By Jordache in forum Miscellaneous
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: July 19th, 2013, 06:55 PM