Nothing arbitrary or magical. It is how God explains time.
Matt 24 42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
43 But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.
44 Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.
Likewise Peter introduced the Church Age as the last days, and in his letters he explained that a day is like a thousand years.
Its just the way it is
Matt 24 42 Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come.
43 But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up.
44 Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.
Likewise Peter introduced the Church Age as the last days, and in his letters he explained that a day is like a thousand years.
Its just the way it is
i'm hoping to make it clear to you how silly it is to arbitrarily decide that any given mention of a "day" in scripture should be mathemagically understood as a thousand years.
The apostles understood that 3 days meant 3 days - so why dispute them and tell us it's 3,000 years? want to know what Jesus meant when He said He would rebuild the temple in three days? read on - it's explained in the very next sentence: He was speaking of the temple of His body.
if you can decide capriciously that this should be 3,000 years, that it's really about brick and mortar, even though the scripture tells us it's neither of these things, why can't i also arbitrarily decide that He won't even be resurrected until sometime in the 3000's and that all of what's written about His rising from the dead was speaking 'prophetically' looking forward to that time, instead of literally? why can't i change the 40 days and 40 nights Noah spent in the ark into 40,000 years?
oh, because it doesn't make sense?
well Jesus Himself building a temple - or as you say, demanding that one be built - in the year 3070 or so seems to me to make equally little sense.
The apostles understood that 3 days meant 3 days - so why dispute them and tell us it's 3,000 years? want to know what Jesus meant when He said He would rebuild the temple in three days? read on - it's explained in the very next sentence: He was speaking of the temple of His body.
if you can decide capriciously that this should be 3,000 years, that it's really about brick and mortar, even though the scripture tells us it's neither of these things, why can't i also arbitrarily decide that He won't even be resurrected until sometime in the 3000's and that all of what's written about His rising from the dead was speaking 'prophetically' looking forward to that time, instead of literally? why can't i change the 40 days and 40 nights Noah spent in the ark into 40,000 years?
oh, because it doesn't make sense?
well Jesus Himself building a temple - or as you say, demanding that one be built - in the year 3070 or so seems to me to make equally little sense.