Freely ye have received, freely give

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,167
12,763
113
#1
Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give. Matthew 10:8
Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price. Isaiah 55:1

For some inexplicable reason, almost all radio and television preachers have chosen to ignore these Scriptures and made it a habit to ask for donations to their ministries (good or bad).

When Jesus sent forth His twelve disciples (eleven of whom would eventually become apostles) he not only empowered them to heal every kind of sickness and disease, including leprosy, but also to cast out demons, and to raise the dead. Those were tremendous capabilities, yet they were to be used without money and without price. That corresponds to the offer of salvation in Isaiah, which is also without money and without price. This is all because of God’s grace, which is abundant and free.

So how is it that those who minister the Word do not apply this fundamental Gospel principle? Not only do many of them fail to apply it, but then some go on to manipulate their audiences, and eventually take those Christians contributions and make them into their personal wealth. After that many wallow in self-indulgence, and purchase expensive houses, cars, goods, and luxuries (just like the rich man in the parable of Lazarus and the rich man), while poor beggars gather crumbs and poor Christians struggle to survive worldwide. As a result, Christianity has acquired a bad name because of a handful of parasites parading as preachers.

When the Lord entered the temple at Jerusalem on two occasions – one at the beginning and one at the end of His earthly ministry – He took a scourge and drove off all those who were abusing the temple precincts to make a huge profit. However, His judgment is held in abeyance now, until He comes to judge the earth. But the world mocks Christianity by pointing to preachers who do not obey the Lord.

There is no question that genuine evangelists, pastors, and teachers should be financially supported within their local churches. But those who step out in faith cannot ask for any donations at any time, and must simply leave the matter in God’s hands. George Mueller of Bristol is a good example for all preachers, since God did provide for the orphans and Christians schools under his care by whatever means He chose. Mueller never once asked for financial support from people but always directly from the Lord. There are very few preachers who follow his example, which is quite amazing.

A closely related matter is Christian giving within the churches, and how it is not being taught properly. The Old Covenant principle was to give tithes for the work of the temple, and in fact the amounts added up to more than ten percent. But Christian giving under the New Covenant operates on a different principle – sacrificial giving by “living sacrifices”. Which could translate in many cases to giving the Lord 90% and retaining just 10% (or less) for the necessities of life. But then a tremendous responsibility rests on the shoulders of elders and deacons that not a single penny should be squandered or abused.

The New Testament makes it clear that the gifts and offerings of Christians should be applied to (a) assisting needy brothers and sisters in their hour of need, (b) supporting widows and orphans with no other means, (c) compensating those within the church who labor in the Word and doctrine – pastors and elders who minister the Word and don’t waste their time in administration (which is the responsibility of deacons), and (d) supporting missionaries as they travel to take the Gospel to far off lands. However, pouring cash into ornate buildings and “cathedrals” was never the plan. And supporting the lavish lifestyles of those who would make merchandise of the Gospel would be considered an abomination.
 
Sep 12, 2017
65
2
0
#2
Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give. Matthew 10:8
Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price. Isaiah 55:1

For some inexplicable reason, almost all radio and television preachers have chosen to ignore these Scriptures and made it a habit to ask for donations to their ministries (good or bad).

When Jesus sent forth His twelve disciples (eleven of whom would eventually become apostles) he not only empowered them to heal every kind of sickness and disease, including leprosy, but also to cast out demons, and to raise the dead. Those were tremendous capabilities, yet they were to be used without money and without price. That corresponds to the offer of salvation in Isaiah, which is also without money and without price. This is all because of God’s grace, which is abundant and free.

So how is it that those who minister the Word do not apply this fundamental Gospel principle? Not only do many of them fail to apply it, but then some go on to manipulate their audiences, and eventually take those Christians contributions and make them into their personal wealth. After that many wallow in self-indulgence, and purchase expensive houses, cars, goods, and luxuries (just like the rich man in the parable of Lazarus and the rich man), while poor beggars gather crumbs and poor Christians struggle to survive worldwide. As a result, Christianity has acquired a bad name because of a handful of parasites parading as preachers.

When the Lord entered the temple at Jerusalem on two occasions – one at the beginning and one at the end of His earthly ministry – He took a scourge and drove off all those who were abusing the temple precincts to make a huge profit. However, His judgment is held in abeyance now, until He comes to judge the earth. But the world mocks Christianity by pointing to preachers who do not obey the Lord.

There is no question that genuine evangelists, pastors, and teachers should be financially supported within their local churches. But those who step out in faith cannot ask for any donations at any time, and must simply leave the matter in God’s hands. George Mueller of Bristol is a good example for all preachers, since God did provide for the orphans and Christians schools under his care by whatever means He chose. Mueller never once asked for financial support from people but always directly from the Lord. There are very few preachers who follow his example, which is quite amazing.

A closely related matter is Christian giving within the churches, and how it is not being taught properly. The Old Covenant principle was to give tithes for the work of the temple, and in fact the amounts added up to more than ten percent. But Christian giving under the New Covenant operates on a different principle – sacrificial giving by “living sacrifices”. Which could translate in many cases to giving the Lord 90% and retaining just 10% (or less) for the necessities of life. But then a tremendous responsibility rests on the shoulders of elders and deacons that not a single penny should be squandered or abused.

The New Testament makes it clear that the gifts and offerings of Christians should be applied to (a) assisting needy brothers and sisters in their hour of need, (b) supporting widows and orphans with no other means, (c) compensating those within the church who labor in the Word and doctrine – pastors and elders who minister the Word and don’t waste their time in administration (which is the responsibility of deacons), and (d) supporting missionaries as they travel to take the Gospel to far off lands. However, pouring cash into ornate buildings and “cathedrals” was never the plan. And supporting the lavish lifestyles of those who would make merchandise of the Gospel would be considered an abomination.
You seem to be studious, so have you ever looked to see how wealthy the Sanhedrin, High Priest and Pharisees were? The system was corrupt for centuries before Jesus was sent into his ministry. now compare that with those who promote prosperity gospel and it is everything you say it is.I do not think it is right to make pastors and deacons poor either. I think a balance is in order.

I never believed in the mega, purpose driven church model by Rick Warren. I think a healthy church is one that grows outside of itself. A church size of about 175-250 is about the right size.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,173
2,536
113
#3
I have to admit I was very much angered by this person I saw on youtube with her ministry channel. I was watching videos on bible prophecy kind of just browsing and seeing if I can find any credible teachers to listen to while do things and I cam across this one lady who at first glance seemed ok but when I clicked on here 30 minute long video she spent about 15 of it saying how she is disappointed in the numbers of donation for her ministry and said how if people cannot give to the number needed she cannot continue her ministry and they would not see her again. I was infuriated by her, I mean how many preachers have no donations yet are even on the streets preaching and teaching and youtube is far more easy than the streets and yet she is saying how disappointed she is in the amount of donations? If I had a youtube ministry I wouldn't need money from others to continue my ministry because it was never about money.

I don't even get very much money to begin with I get 400 a month not even enough to live in the crappiest apartment with food and water and electricity, I want to work so badly but my body won't let me and yet God has provided me a home with electricity food water clothing ect. my needs are met and even though I only have 400 to be able to use I still use it to help others as much as possible rarely ever is my money spent entirely on me. From what I saw this lady is more than capable of making money that I could only dream of without her donations and so it infuriates me when people like this put a price on God's work.

Because you know, if I'm not payed to the extent I want then screw doing God's work:/
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#4
well, there are hirelings and then there are the sons and daughters

'pays' to know who is which

forgive the pun
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,167
12,763
113
#5
I don't even get very much money to begin with I get 400 a month not even enough to live in the crappiest apartment with food and water and electricity, I want to work so badly but my body won't let me and yet God has provided me a home with electricity food water clothing ect. my needs are met...
Blain,
This fits right in with this thread, since according to Scripture, your church should be aware of your situation and should have made provision for you to supplement your extremely low income. $400 hardly covers anything in this day and age.

When Paul was in his travels, he appealed to others churches to help him assist the poor Christians in Jerusalem, so that is the principle to be applied in your case. Not that you will go begging to your church, but the elders would take personal responsibility for you (and other Christians in similar circumstances within your congregation). That is how the offerings of Christians fulfil the obligations of churches.

As for this female preacher lecturing her audience about cash, that is clearly an abomination.
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,173
2,536
113
#6
Blain,
This fits right in with this thread, since according to Scripture, your church should be aware of your situation and should have made provision for you to supplement your extremely low income. $400 hardly covers anything in this day and age.

When Paul was in his travels, he appealed to others churches to help him assist the poor Christians in Jerusalem, so that is the principle to be applied in your case. Not that you will go begging to your church, but the elders would take personal responsibility for you (and other Christians in similar circumstances within your congregation). That is how the offerings of Christians fulfil the obligations of churches.

As for this female preacher lecturing her audience about cash, that is clearly an abomination.
Well honestly I have yet to find the right church for me and so cc is basically my church, and I am not comfortable accepting money from others i have a major issue with that. When we were close to losing the house a few of my friends here in cc gave what they could and it was very difficult for me to accept it.
I am all for giving money but I have a very hard time accepting it from others, I much more prefer to be able to make a difference in peoples lives with what little money i can give than to burden people by accepting it from them.
 
Sep 12, 2017
65
2
0
#7
Well honestly I have yet to find the right church for me and so cc is basically my church, and I am not comfortable accepting money from others i have a major issue with that. When we were close to losing the house a few of my friends here in cc gave what they could and it was very difficult for me to accept it.
I am all for giving money but I have a very hard time accepting it from others, I much more prefer to be able to make a difference in peoples lives with what little money i can give than to burden people by accepting it from them.
Hebrews 7.7
[SUP]7 [/SUP]But without any dispute the lesser is blessed by the greater.

I know it might be hard to receive from others, but not receiving their blessing to you, is obstructing their obedience to God who probably told them to give to you. The above verse fits everyone here at one time or another and in both positions[the lesser and the greater] anyone who says differently is a liar. I am thankful you received their blessing. Do not feel bad because one day you will be the greater giving to the lesser and will not want to be rejected for being obedient
 

Blain

The Word Weaver
Aug 28, 2012
19,173
2,536
113
#8
Hebrews 7.7
[SUP]7 [/SUP]But without any dispute the lesser is blessed by the greater.

I know it might be hard to receive from others, but not receiving their blessing to you, is obstructing their obedience to God who probably told them to give to you. The above verse fits everyone here at one time or another and in both positions[the lesser and the greater] anyone who says differently is a liar. I am thankful you received their blessing. Do not feel bad because one day you will be the greater giving to the lesser and will not want to be rejected for being obedient
That is a day I truly am excited for, I have even told God that if he gave me a million dollars but the catch was I could not use any of it for myself and it was only to bless others I would jump at that deal in a heart beat. I myself don't need much to be happy the only reason I want to have much is so that I can give that much more, but regardless if I am ever financially blessed like that or not I make it a point to do what I can every day even if it isn't much and that kind of life style has it's own blessings
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,167
12,763
113
#9
I do not think it is right to make pastors and deacons poor either. I think a balance is in order.
Correct. They all should be able to meet their needs as well as put something aside for emergencies etc.

I never believed in the mega, purpose driven church model by Rick Warren. I think a healthy church is one that grows outside of itself. A church size of about 175-250 is about the right size.
Rick Warren is a false teacher. But you are right about the church size. Mega churches do more harm than good.
 

Zmouth

Senior Member
Nov 21, 2012
3,391
134
63
#10
Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give. Matthew 10:8
Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price. Isaiah 55:1

For some inexplicable reason, almost all radio and television preachers have chosen to ignore these Scriptures and made it a habit to ask for donations to their ministries (good or bad).


[FONT=&quot]I guess you didn't get the Paul's memo about principles;

[/FONT]
"Therefore leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on unto perfection;..." Heb 6:1



 

OneFaith

Senior Member
Sep 5, 2016
2,270
369
83
#11
Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils: freely ye have received, freely give. Matthew 10:8
Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price. Isaiah 55:1

For some inexplicable reason, almost all radio and television preachers have chosen to ignore these Scriptures and made it a habit to ask for donations to their ministries (good or bad).

When Jesus sent forth His twelve disciples (eleven of whom would eventually become apostles) he not only empowered them to heal every kind of sickness and disease, including leprosy, but also to cast out demons, and to raise the dead. Those were tremendous capabilities, yet they were to be used without money and without price. That corresponds to the offer of salvation in Isaiah, which is also without money and without price. This is all because of God’s grace, which is abundant and free.

So how is it that those who minister the Word do not apply this fundamental Gospel principle? Not only do many of them fail to apply it, but then some go on to manipulate their audiences, and eventually take those Christians contributions and make them into their personal wealth. After that many wallow in self-indulgence, and purchase expensive houses, cars, goods, and luxuries (just like the rich man in the parable of Lazarus and the rich man), while poor beggars gather crumbs and poor Christians struggle to survive worldwide. As a result, Christianity has acquired a bad name because of a handful of parasites parading as preachers.

When the Lord entered the temple at Jerusalem on two occasions – one at the beginning and one at the end of His earthly ministry – He took a scourge and drove off all those who were abusing the temple precincts to make a huge profit. However, His judgment is held in abeyance now, until He comes to judge the earth. But the world mocks Christianity by pointing to preachers who do not obey the Lord.

There is no question that genuine evangelists, pastors, and teachers should be financially supported within their local churches. But those who step out in faith cannot ask for any donations at any time, and must simply leave the matter in God’s hands. George Mueller of Bristol is a good example for all preachers, since God did provide for the orphans and Christians schools under his care by whatever means He chose. Mueller never once asked for financial support from people but always directly from the Lord. There are very few preachers who follow his example, which is quite amazing.

A closely related matter is Christian giving within the churches, and how it is not being taught properly. The Old Covenant principle was to give tithes for the work of the temple, and in fact the amounts added up to more than ten percent. But Christian giving under the New Covenant operates on a different principle – sacrificial giving by “living sacrifices”. Which could translate in many cases to giving the Lord 90% and retaining just 10% (or less) for the necessities of life. But then a tremendous responsibility rests on the shoulders of elders and deacons that not a single penny should be squandered or abused.

The New Testament makes it clear that the gifts and offerings of Christians should be applied to (a) assisting needy brothers and sisters in their hour of need, (b) supporting widows and orphans with no other means, (c) compensating those within the church who labor in the Word and doctrine – pastors and elders who minister the Word and don’t waste their time in administration (which is the responsibility of deacons), and (d) supporting missionaries as they travel to take the Gospel to far off lands. However, pouring cash into ornate buildings and “cathedrals” was never the plan. And supporting the lavish lifestyles of those who would make merchandise of the Gospel would be considered an abomination.
I'm glad you recognize one of the signs of a false church. There is one TV airing that never requests money, and they send out free dvds and correspondence. It's called "In Search of the Lord's Way." I found them to be very biblically sound. They also stream on YouTube.
 
Last edited:

joaniemarie

Senior Member
Jan 4, 2017
3,198
303
83
#12
It's easy to say what we would do with someone else's life. But the reality of it is we don't know what other people are doing OR not doing and should not dwell on it either. It does no good and actually it does harm to speculate. It does what is called "genders strife"

It also puts us in a trap of envy. ., comparing our selves by ourselves and by others. The Bible says that is not wise.
 
Apr 15, 2017
2,867
653
113
#13
We are only to go by our needs,and help others with their needs.

Freely you have received,freely give.

If someone spends 300,000 dollars to print out Bibles,would someone think it is right to charge money for the Bible to at least get their 300,000 dollars back,and not make a profit.

Those that are rich that come to the Lord have to distribute their money.

But if they have money to be able to print out Bibles,then they would have money for their needs situation,then they should not charge money at all for they are to distribute their money,and only go by their needs.

There is many people that have their needs covered,but want to make a profit off the word of God,either by printed material,or by telling the word of God,which is wrong.

For we only go by our needs,but God said He would provide that,so they should not try to make a profit off people,but not all seek the kingdom of God,and His righteousness,so God is not obligated to provide their needs.

Act 2:44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
Act 2:45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

Act 4:32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
Act 4:34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
Act 4:35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.

This is how the Church is supposed to conduct themselves in which no one would lack.

Rev 3:15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
Rev 3:16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.
Rev 3:17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked.

But this is how a lot of them want to conduct themselves.

If we have money to try to make money,our needs should be covered if we have money like that,so why try to make a profit if we are supposed to distribute our money to the poor.

And we should not try to make a profit for spreading God's word.

We should not try to make a profit off God's word whether we have an abundance of money,or not,and if they want to say donate,according to the Bible it is actually for the poor,for the early Church sold all they had,things that were not needful,and laid the money at the apostles feet,and they distributed to every one that had need.

The apostles did not say,alright now I can go get that brand new 35 year chariot,with the 2 horsepower speed,and take that vacation in India,but they distributed the money to the poor.

Actually all money coming in to the Church,or for anyone asking for donations is all for people's needs,and to further the kingdom of God,and that is it,not for their personal use.

But like a lot of people say,it is better old school,because it was not long after that Jesus addressed the first Church in Revelation,and said they left their first love,which is the love of people,and to repent.
 
Sep 12, 2017
65
2
0
#14
That is a day I truly am excited for, I have even told God that if he gave me a million dollars but the catch was I could not use any of it for myself and it was only to bless others I would jump at that deal in a heart beat. I myself don't need much to be happy the only reason I want to have much is so that I can give that much more, but regardless if I am ever financially blessed like that or not I make it a point to do what I can every day even if it isn't much and that kind of life style has it's own blessings
well said.
 
Sep 12, 2017
65
2
0
#15
Correct. They all should be able to meet their needs as well as put something aside for emergencies etc.


Rick Warren is a false teacher. But you are right about the church size. Mega churches do more harm than good.
Just for clarification, I do not endorse Rick Warren and also recognize him to be a false teacher. I apologize if I seemed to endorse him. Warren's "purpose driven" church books are actually based on the marketing plan to regrow Ford Motor Company when Lee Iaccoca took over Ford, in the early 60's. If you read them side by side it is the same thing, just worded differently.

As far as church size, A church should recognize, those called to be pastors/elder/teachers and begin training, equipping and maturing them them. When the church size reaches 175-250, then the church sends out those pastors/elders/teachers to start another work at least 50 miles or more from the sending church. These men of God are then covered by the pastors/elders of the sending church. This is then repeated in same fashion. The new work could be started as a home based effort in the beginning. Also the new work is not a "campus" having a "campus pastor" who hosts a movie of the Sr. Pastor giving a 3 point motivational speech. The new work and workers are autonomous to the area they are sent and have full authority to preach, teach, heal, deliver and manifest the kingdom of God to the area they were sent to.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,555
13,320
113
#16
We are only to go by our needs,and help others with their needs.

...

Act 2:44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common;
Act 2:45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.

Act 4:32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
Act 4:34 Neither was there any among them that lacked: for as many as were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold,
Act 4:35 And laid them down at the apostles' feet: and distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.

This is how the Church is supposed to conduct themselves in which no one would lack.

Rev 3:15 I know thy works, that thou art neither cold nor hot: I would thou wert cold or hot.
Rev 3:16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.
Rev 3:17 Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing; and knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked.

But this is how a lot of them want to conduct themselves.
MattforJesus, you are making a simple but common hermeneutical error. You are assuming that because the Bible reports something, that such is directive or didactic (teaching) and applicable to all Christians. There is nothing in either of these passages to commend the generous behavior in Acts, or to condemn the wealth in Revelation.

In Acts, the believers did such things ... no instruction to do so, and no criticism for not doing so. The Lord's judgment came upon those who pretended to conform without actually doing so, and lied about their actions.

In Revelation, the problem was not wealth per se, but rather the idea that their wealth was sufficient, and that they had no need of anything else (God, specifically).

It's generally a bad idea to make doctrine from narrative, unless the narrative contains clear instruction. Passages such as these must be balanced against the narratives of Abraham, David, Solomon, and others in Scripture who were very wealthy and were not condemned simply for their wealth. Neither having wealth nor being poor are, by themselves, good or bad.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,167
12,763
113
#17
In Acts, the believers did such things ... no instruction to do so, and no criticism for not doing so.
This is incorrect. Everything recorded in Scripture is for our instruction (2 Tim 3:16,17). What the Christians in the Jerusalem church did was immediately after the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, so it was according to the Spirit's direction. It was a true display of God's love in action. Furthermore, the Lord had already taught His disciples His NEW commandment -- love one another as I have loved you. And Scripture makes it clear that sharing our possessions with our brothers and sisters is a true expression of God's love. So when the Holy Spirit makes a record of this, it is to teach us to do the same -- not an academic exercise to be simply read and subsequently ignored.

Unfortunately, there are many Christians today who refuse to learn from what is implied in Scripture, and always want to see everything stated explicitly. Well that is not how God teaches us, and many things are implied in Scripture. For example, the Sabbatarians always come along and say "Where did Jesus EXPLICITLY teach us to observe the Lord's Day as the day of worship, rest, and good works?" But that is already implicit in the New Testament, therefore the first day of the week has become the "Christian sabbath" since the time of the apostles.
 
Sep 12, 2017
65
2
0
#18
This is incorrect. Everything recorded in Scripture is for our instruction (2 Tim 3:16,17). What the Christians in the Jerusalem church did was immediately after the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, so it was according to the Spirit's direction. It was a true display of God's love in action. Furthermore, the Lord had already taught His disciples His NEW commandment -- love one another as I have loved you. And Scripture makes it clear that sharing our possessions with our brothers and sisters is a true expression of God's love. So when the Holy Spirit makes a record of this, it is to teach us to do the same -- not an academic exercise to be simply read and subsequently ignored.

Unfortunately, there are many Christians today who refuse to learn from what is implied in Scripture, and always want to see everything stated explicitly. Well that is not how God teaches us, and many things are implied in Scripture. For example, the Sabbatarians always come along and say "Where did Jesus EXPLICITLY teach us to observe the Lord's Day as the day of worship, rest, and good works?" But that is already implicit in the New Testament, therefore the first day of the week has become the "Christian sabbath" since the time of the apostles.
2 Corinthians 8 & 9 are just one example of what you are saying.
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,555
13,320
113
#19
This is incorrect. Everything recorded in Scripture is for our instruction (2 Tim 3:16,17).
Judas went out and hanged himself.

Any other silly notions you care to assert?
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,167
12,763
113
#20
Judas went out and hanged himself.
That too is for our instruction. Because Judas refused to truly repent, he hanged himself and thus became the Son of Perdition.

While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name: those that thou gavest me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition; that the scripture might be fulfilled. (John 17:12)