Is the Bible inerrant inspired word of God?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Is the Bible the inerrant inspired word of God?

  • Yes

    Votes: 23 92.0%
  • No

    Votes: 2 8.0%

  • Total voters
    25
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#21
How do you know Paul meant Scriptures?

The context seems to be more about his preachings (you heard from us).
Um, because he says right there it was the word of God. What else did he preach?

Why not just accept being refuted once in a while? Goodness sake man...
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,339
2,427
113
#22
If we do not believe in the total message of the Bible, then we become judge and arbitrator of the truth. Instead of God!

All those human things are so important. Jesus came to earth as a human, and dwelt among us. He experienced what we experience. He was also tempted! Therefore, God knows that human experience, specifically as reported in the Bible are part of his Word to us.

I will relate again the 2 years I walked away from the Bible, and God, because I wasn't healed of RA. I was in pain, I was spiritually bereft! God told me to read the Psalms over and over.

What I discovered reading 5 psalms a day for 2 years, was that the Bible is about real people, who suffer, rejoice, dance, weep, and live on this earth. The other thing I found, was that these very real people were still able (except for imprecatory psalms like Psalm 88) were still able to praise God in spite of the circumstances of their lives.

I love the humanness of the Bible. God put that in there for a specific reason, including "bring me my cloak." We can learn so much from a simple statement like that! It points to the fact that Paul was human, too! And he experienced cold, and he had friends to help him on his earthly part of the journey. It points away from gnosticism, and that our bodies, our lives on this earth mean nothing!

When you talk away statements like "bring me my cloak" you literally tear out support for the Bible truth that God created us to live on this earth. And then there is the historical importance, of where Paul was, where he had been, which helps us understand what Paul was going through as he wrote the key doctrines in his epistles.

I rest my case! Rant over!


I think Angela makes a lot of good points, and you could add a lot more points to this list to support it.

I think the traditional orthodox view is that everything the authors penned was inspired, and was intended by God to be on the page.


Just to be clear, I like Trofimus just fine, but I'll have to disagree with some of his views on scripture.
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#23
Um, because he says right there it was the word of God. What else did he preach?

Why not just accept being refuted once in a while? Goodness sake man...
So according to you, Paul was just quoting Scriptures? I do not think so.

The new covenant was about many new teachings and those teachings were from apostles and prophets.

Sorry, but this is not about being or not being refuted, it just doest not fit the historical context.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#24
I read my Bible with full assurance that every word is right and pure. If I had one thought that it contained errors, then I would not read and study my Bible. How about you? Do you have full assurance in the words that you read are from God? Do you trust every word?
By your own words you don't even believe all of Scripture, you pick and choose which context to place yourself into, and out of and mishandle the word. We've already been through this, you're in grave error on many things.

And please, don't address me with your cultic deceptions about the errant version you implement any longer. It's to ad nauseam. Thank you.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#25
So according...Paul was just quoting Scriptures? I do not think so.

The new covenant was about many new teachings and those teachings were from apostles and prophets.

Sorry, but this is not about being or not beign refuted, it just doest not fit the historical context.
No, not according to me, according to Scripture. Gather me some fathers that were solid that teach what you do about the above passage, that is wasn't Scripture that Paul was preaching.

The same things you hold in your hand are the same things Paul preached. Face it, your idea of the word of God is not exactly biblical.

Your ideas here lend to Catholic beliefs. Are you swimming in the Tiber?
 
Last edited:
Jul 23, 2017
879
31
0
#26
No.

1. A word of God is a direct saying of God.

2. Scriptures were written by men inspired by the Spirit. They contains direct words of God and many human-like things (like "bring me a cloak I left in Troas").

3. Bible is a specific translation of a specific compilation of source texts. These texts are various quality copies of Scriptures.
this is why u can believe in lies like evolution
 

trofimus

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2015
10,684
794
113
#27
The same things you hold in your hand are the same things Paul preached. Face it, your idea of the word of God is not exactly biblical.
I am pretty sure Paul preached many things, not just what is written in my Bible.

And my post was not about that. But about the Scripture you quoted.

But you seem to be in a bad mood today, so let us let it be.
 

shrume

Senior Member
Jun 26, 2017
2,193
463
83
#31
I believe that the scriptures, the original writings of the holy men of God who received the revelation as to what to write, are flawless, 100% pure and accurate. Unfortunately, there are no surviving autographs. All we have today are copies of copies. I cannot remember the exact number, but there are something like 6000 Greek manuscripts of the NT, and no two of them match exactly. But I believe that with careful analysis, and the aid of computers, we can put together an extremely accurate copy of the Greek NT. As I understand it, the confidence in the accuracy of the Hebrew scriptures (the OT) is generally very high.

But even if we had a flawless copy of both the Hebrew and the Greek scriptures, there is still the problem of translation. Translation is difficult work. Often equally qualified translators will disagree on the best way to translate a phrase or verse. And no matter how honest the translators try to be with the text, there will still be situations where the theology of the translator gets brought over into their translation.

That said, I believe we can read almost any translation of the Bible (KJV, ESV, NIV, NJB, and others) and come to understand the gospel. The Bible is trustworthy.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
#32
Oh, hey trofimus, here's the proof and to what Paul was referring to in 1 Thessalonians 2:13, it is the background of what happened:

Act 17:1 Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a synagogue of the Jews.

Act 17:2 And Paul went in, as was his custom, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures,

Act 17:3 explaining and proving that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus, whom I proclaim to you, is the Christ.”

Act 17:4 And some of them were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, as did a great many of the devout Greeks and not a few of the leading women.


He reminds them again of this event here:

And we also thank God constantly for this, that when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men but as what it really is, the word of God, which is at work in you believers. -1 Thessalonians 2:13

Like I told you, and as Scripture says, Paul preached to them the Word of God, which is, again, just like I stated, the Scriptures.

Why not just concede, for once, and accept being refuted without calling another "angry" over it? LOL??? :D
 
Last edited:
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#33
No.

1. A word of God is a direct saying of God.

2. Scriptures were written by men inspired by the Spirit. They contains direct words of God and many human-like things (like "bring me a cloak I left in Troas").

3. Bible is a specific translation of a specific compilation of source texts. These texts are various quality copies of Scriptures.
I believe that as well, the scriptures have been translated many times but men, though the message is inerrant.

The bible is God inspired with a human component involved, and humans make errors from time to time, that is what makes the bible believable and real.
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#34
Luke 1:1-4 is a example of inspired Words written by a man using his own words to relay the message. like wise there are many statements of narrative aspects of the message within the bible.

1Many have undertaken to compose an account of the things that have been fulfilled among us, 2just as they were handed down to us by the initial eyewitnesses and servants of the word. 3Therefore, having carefully investigated everything from the beginning, it seemed good also to me to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, 4so that you may know the certainty of the things you have been taught.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#35
2 Tim 3:16-17 has already been presented to demonstrate that the bible came not by the will of man but by the determinate will of Jehovah God. Many times God tells us how His word is perfect and eternal.

Jesus when He was about to leave and return to heaven said He was leaving the Holy Spirit to open the word of God to us and to give is the truth from the word of God.

Now if you do not believe that the bible is the word of God and is completely reliable, inerrant and complete you really have a problem. Faith the faith that is critical to salvation is produced by hearing the word of God. You know Romans 10:17.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#36
2 Tim 3:16-17 has already been presented to demonstrate that the bible came not by the will of man but by the determinate will of Jehovah God. Many times God tells us how His word is perfect and eternal.

Jesus when He was about to leave and return to heaven said He was leaving the Holy Spirit to open the word of God to us and to give is the truth from the word of God.

Now if you do not believe that the bible is the word of God and is completely reliable, inerrant and complete you really have a problem. Faith the faith that is critical to salvation is produced by hearing the word of God. You know Romans 10:17.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
Indeed your are correct, the first step is (hearing the Word of God) not the other way around (to read the word of God first).

without this basic step towards God then you will have a hard time getting the message from the book, it would be just simple words with no message and meaning about from it.
 

Hizikyah

Senior Member
Aug 25, 2013
11,634
372
0
#37
I say yes*

With as asterisk;

*The original manuscripts are the word of the Most High, altered manuscripts are not the Word and translations are intrepratations, they can match but not all match the originals, and some things are lost in translation.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,638
3,533
113
#38
By your own words you don't even believe all of Scripture, you pick and choose which context to place yourself into, and out of and mishandle the word. We've already been through this, you're in grave error on many things.
False. Could you please give examples...

I believe every word in my Bible. I just don't think every word in my Bible is for me to obey. I rightly divide the word of truth.
 
Sep 6, 2017
1,331
13
0
#39
The real issue is were does the enemy attack Christians, it is in just as the thread says, and people love their bible versions for example KJV lovers will debate and argue and fight over with the NIV lovers and so on, there are over a hundred bible translations, who can say with 100% accuracy that their bible is error free without mistranslations etc. ? none

people don't even know that is were the enemies play ground is, how many people can satan get to argue and fuss over what bible is the correct inerrant word of God. satan is interested changing hearts and creating malice, animosities and frustrations over the bible. when people get upset over what bible is the correct bible to read, he wins and Christians lose that's the sad thing about it.
 

John146

Senior Member
Jan 13, 2016
16,638
3,533
113
#40
The real issue is were does the enemy attack Christians, it is in just as the thread says, and people love their bible versions for example KJV lovers will debate and argue and fight over with the NIV lovers and so on, there are over a hundred bible translations, who can say with 100% accuracy that their bible is error free without mistranslations etc. ? none

people don't even know that is were the enemies play ground is, how many people can satan get to argue and fuss over what bible is the correct inerrant word of God. satan is interested changing hearts and creating malice, animosities and frustrations over the bible. when people get upset over what bible is the correct bible to read, he wins and Christians lose that's the sad thing about it.
From the beginning, Satan's attack has been on the word of God. Satan's attack is changing the word of God. Satan's attack is getting man to doubt the truth of every word of God.