N6 you highlighted or made bold, "the world" to make it seem as though the Son came to save the world, but you negelected to point of the key word, "might" be saved. To truely understand why the word "might" was used we need to go further into the context of verses 18-20 and 21 to see how those that believe, believed.
John 3:18-21 “Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God.19 And this is the judgment: the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil.20 For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed.21 But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God.”
Whoever in the world does not believe is condemned already, they love their wicked darkness, rather then the light (Son) and they do not come to the light (Son) because they hate the light (Son) or as Paul says in Romans 8:7-8 “For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot.8 Those who are in the flesh cannot please God.”
But whoever does come to the light (Son), they do it so that it may be seen that his works were done by God or that they believe because they are born again by the Father as Peter tells us in I Peter 1:1-3
“To those who are elect exiles of the Dispersion in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia,2 according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in the sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience to Jesus Christ and for sprinkling with his blood: May grace and peace be multiplied to you.
3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ! According to his great mercy, he has caused us to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,”
The Father causes us to be born again and He grants it to use as well and He does it by His foreknowledge, which is not Him looking into the future. It is a realational knowing, in the same way Adam knew his wife and intimate relationship and the Spirit is involved in this giving of life or being born again John 6:63, 65 “It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh is no help at all. The words that I have spoken to you are spirit and life…..65 And he said, “This is why I told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by the Father.”
I an NO Calvinist, but I believe in the Biblical Doctrines of Grace and I do not read John 3:16-17 in this way, For God so loved the ELECT, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the ELECT; but that the ELECT through him might be saved.
This is the way that people that do not understand the Biblical Doctrines of Grace, misrepresent those that do, as to how they read these verses, which is dishonest. We actually read God's word the way it is written, if the apostle or the prophet is using the word we, our, us or we all, we read it as he is including himself with those that are like him or believers in God/Christ. We understand that an apostle or a prophet is a believer in the Lord and by using us, we, our(s)elf or we all they are associating with other believers or the children of Israel, not the world or sinners. If they are speaking of the world or sinners, they use the word they('re), them(self), those, thier basic pronouns to associate or disassociate.
Please do not take this as talking down to anyone, it is simply stating how I/we read the Word of God or any other work of literature. It should be the way everyone should read this way. Like they, "believe what you rear, not reading what you believe" it is the way everyone should read the Bible, in it's context. I have said it before, it is a shame that pastors preach or teach the Bible out of context, because it is teaching their members to read the Bible in the same way. When the Bible was not written in that way, it is written with a storyline that is to be followed contextually and with the cultural backround. Like Matthew 5:38-39
“You have heard that it was said, ‘An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth.’39 But I say to you, Do not resist the one who is evil. But if anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.”
The cultural backround here is if someone slaps you on your right cheek they used their left hand and in the Jewish culture, they used their left hand to clean themselves after a bowel movement. This is the highest form of disrespect in the Jewish culture, then by turning the other cheek, you are offering them the chance to slap you with the backhand of the left hand, which is an even higher forum of resrepect or weakness on your side.