This is kind of weird! Strong's is a back translation from the KJV. In fact, I don't use it for that reason. The KJV is not a good or reliable translation, having been translated from 7 corrupted and very later manuscripts.
If you want to deal with the Greek, you need to use a LEXICON. That translates the Greek from English, rather than a concordance, which translates from English, to Greek, back to English. A lexicon requires learning the alphabet, and understanding grammar.
These word studies people post in this forum, although sometimes right, are what is known as "English concordance Word Studies." Never make a doctrine out of word studies.
I will say, that KJV contains no errors that affect doctrine, when properly read in context. But, because so many words are archaic, obscure or have changed meanings, it is simply not the best Bible version to use. Because all those "old" words result in a LOT of bad doctrine. But that is the fault of the person not understanding what the KJV says, in that 400 year old language.
A youtube video by the likes of Ruckman and/or Riplinger is kind of a funny joke, right? I mean, even Nehemiah, who uses the KJV does not like them.
Here is my suggestion. In the interest of fairness and looking at both sides of the issues, why don't you read, The KJV Only Controversy by James R White. If those other people are in fact right, well, then you should still come out believing what you believed after watching the Riplinger video. Which, IMHO, is wrong!
Here are some links for you to read, in the interests of objectivity. You do know what that means, right? It means you read about both sides of a debate, and make up your own mind. Don't let anyone make up your mind for you. Well, except God!
Daniel Wallace, who wrote the second article, is the best Greek grammarian in the world. I know he has a lot of good to say about modern versions. To say nothing of being on the translations committees for several modern versions.
ARTICLES:
"Is Your Modern Translation Corrupt? Answering the Allegations of KJV Only Advocates"
by James R. White
"The 'Conspiracy' Behind the New Bible Translations" by Daniel Wallace
"The Debate Over the King James Version" by Rick Wade
"Is the King James Version the Only Bible Christians Should Trust and Read?"
— Part 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 by John Ankerberg and John Weldon
RECOMMENDED BOOKS:
"The King James Only Controversy" by James R. White
Answering those who claim that only the King James Version is the Word of God, this book examines allegations that modern translators conspired to corrupt Scripture and lead believers away from the true Christian faith. Endorsed by Norman Geisler, D.A. Carson, Hank Hanegraaff, J. I. Packer, John MacArthur, and Bruce Metzger,
"The King James Version Debate" by D.A. Carson
King James Only Controversy