Matthew (Levi) knew Jesus and was His disciple, and yes Matthew is considered a genuine letter.
Luke: Did not know Jesus directly, but gathered His information from eye witnesses and the Apostles. Luke was very careful and detailed in His account.
Mark: Did not know Jesus, and was actually the traveling companion of Paul and Barnabas (who later caused them to split up) *read Acts( which was also written by Luke).* It is said, though not proven, that Peter (the disciple/Apostle) may have dictated the Gospel of Mark to him. It is known that Peter took Mark on to be a disciple for a time.
John: This book is the most widely debated because it's content differs from the others. However, it is thought of to be written by the Apostle John, who knew Jesus very well, and who also outlived the rest of the Apostles. John may have written the book from a different perspective to shed light on areas that the other gospels did not cover, which would make John's Gospel the last to be written.
What do you say?
Luke: Did not know Jesus directly, but gathered His information from eye witnesses and the Apostles. Luke was very careful and detailed in His account.
Mark: Did not know Jesus, and was actually the traveling companion of Paul and Barnabas (who later caused them to split up) *read Acts( which was also written by Luke).* It is said, though not proven, that Peter (the disciple/Apostle) may have dictated the Gospel of Mark to him. It is known that Peter took Mark on to be a disciple for a time.
John: This book is the most widely debated because it's content differs from the others. However, it is thought of to be written by the Apostle John, who knew Jesus very well, and who also outlived the rest of the Apostles. John may have written the book from a different perspective to shed light on areas that the other gospels did not cover, which would make John's Gospel the last to be written.
What do you say?