Page 2 of 19 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 365
Like Tree694Likes

Bible Discussion Forum

Ask (or answer) Bible questions here. Join or start a Bible discussion now!

Thread: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

  1. #21
    Senior Member hornetguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 18th, 2016
    Age
    63
    Posts
    4,886
    Rep Power
    185

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by John146 View Post
    Let's start a NASB only thread. Oh, wait, nobody actually thinks the NASB is the pure, holy words of God.

    How about an ESV only thread? No, that won't work either.

    How about a NIV only thread? Nope.
    Nobody is going to start a thread like that, because none of us do "translation worship".... None of us are so anal-retentive about having the "exact, pure words of God"... every jot/tittle/comma/letter like you are.

    I don't believe the NASB is the ONLY translation of the Bible that is good. I believe there are several, including the KJV translation.
    No man is really saved unless he is in his heart obedient to Christ. C.H. Spurgeon

  2. #22
    Senior Member dcontroversal's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 12th, 2013
    Age
    51
    Posts
    29,780
    Blog Entries
    5
    Rep Power
    456

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by John146 View Post
    Not one time has anyone ever eluded to this false accusation. I exalt God's word and as a result, we exalt the Savior.
    Oh...really....I have seen it by inference, actions, deeds and by default.....I have heard it....I have seen men in complete IGNORANCE say that Paul and JESUS preached from the KING JAMES, say that IF the KING JAMES was good enough for PAUL it was good enough for them....HAVE SEEN people on this site say that any other version is of the devil and that the KING JAMES is INSPIRED of GOD...blah, blah, blah......it is NOTHING more than a TRANSLATION/TRANSLITERATION made BY ANGLICANS and the very PREFACE states clearly that IT WAS COMPARED to the ENGLISH versions that came before it....

    AND I USE a CAMBRIDGE BERKSHIRE LEATHER BLACK LETTER WIDE MARGIN KING JIMMY.....MY MAIN BIBLE...so please....do not accuse me of being ANTI-KING JIMMY.....but rather I have a PROPER PERSPECTIVE.........
    Angela53510, Budman, Laish and 1 others like this.

  3. #23
    Senior Member Billyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 8th, 2014
    Age
    76
    Posts
    3,102
    Rep Power
    112

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    2 Peter 1:5 Because you have these blessings, do all you can to add to your life these things: to your faith add goodness; to your goodness add knowledge; 6 to your knowledge add self-control; to your self-control add patience; to your patience add devotion to God; 7 to your devotion add kindness toward your brothers and sisters in Christ, and to this kindness add love.

  4. #24
    Senior Member Budman's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 9th, 2014
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,861
    Rep Power
    159

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by Billyd View Post

    I'm stealing that.

  5. #25
    Senior Member Depleted's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 13th, 2015
    Age
    62
    Posts
    22,175
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    509

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by hornetguy View Post
    Nobody is going to start a thread like that, because none of us do "translation worship".... None of us are so anal-retentive about having the "exact, pure words of God"... every jot/tittle/comma/letter like you are.

    I don't believe the NASB is the ONLY translation of the Bible that is good. I believe there are several, including the KJV translation.


    Errr, correction. I am that anal retentive. Then again, that's why I've got to have my eSword, so I can check out several versions, and then what scholars say, and, oh, oh, let's not forget the concordances.

    Which is also why I cannot go with just one version. To me that's more diarrhetic to go just-one-version. I'm trying to keep it in rather than...


    Oops, could not keep that metaphor going without grossing even myself out.
    Lynn

    Still woman, but no lady.

    And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. Rom. 8:28

  6. #26
    Senior Member Depleted's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 13th, 2015
    Age
    62
    Posts
    22,175
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    509

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by Billyd View Post
    I saw a muscle twitch, so still needs beating.
    Lynn

    Still woman, but no lady.

    And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. Rom. 8:28

  7. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    January 13th, 2016
    Age
    46
    Posts
    4,732
    Rep Power
    66

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by hornetguy View Post
    Nobody is going to start a thread like that, because none of us do "translation worship".... None of us are so anal-retentive about having the "exact, pure words of God"... every jot/tittle/comma/letter like you are.

    I don't believe the NASB is the ONLY translation of the Bible that is good. I believe there are several, including the KJV translation.
    My point exactly. You have nothing to rely upon as the word of God.

  8. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    January 13th, 2016
    Age
    46
    Posts
    4,732
    Rep Power
    66

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by dcontroversal View Post
    Oh...really....I have seen it by inference, actions, deeds and by default.....I have heard it....I have seen men in complete IGNORANCE say that Paul and JESUS preached from the KING JAMES, say that IF the KING JAMES was good enough for PAUL it was good enough for them....HAVE SEEN people on this site say that any other version is of the devil and that the KING JAMES is INSPIRED of GOD...blah, blah, blah......it is NOTHING more than a TRANSLATION/TRANSLITERATION made BY ANGLICANS and the very PREFACE states clearly that IT WAS COMPARED to the ENGLISH versions that came before it....

    AND I USE a CAMBRIDGE BERKSHIRE LEATHER BLACK LETTER WIDE MARGIN KING JIMMY.....MY MAIN BIBLE...so please....do not accuse me of being ANTI-KING JIMMY.....but rather I have a PROPER PERSPECTIVE.........
    Nothing of what you said implies worship, just a firm belief in the KJV as the preserved words of God.

  9. #29
    Senior Member trofimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 17th, 2015
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,624
    Rep Power
    174

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by John146 View Post
    My point exactly. You have nothing to rely upon as the word of God.
    Your self-ilusion is not an evidence that others lack something.

    You invented your own definition of reliability, which fails in the KJV as often as in other translations. You avoid that reality by using double standards.


    Thats the KJV Onlyism in a nutshell:

    1. Own definitions of what is needed
    2. Your own definition is not applicable to the KJV
    3. Which you solve by double standards (what is a proof of error in "modern" translations, does not matter in KJV).

    ---

    Anybody, who is interested, can see it there:
    The King James Bible
    No need to repeat it from the beginning.
    Last edited by trofimus; February 12th, 2018 at 01:08 PM.
    Do not be worried about many things - only one thing is needed (Lk 10:41-42).

  10. #30
    Senior Member Dino246's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 30th, 2015
    Age
    48
    Posts
    4,654
    Rep Power
    226

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by John146 View Post
    Not one time has anyone ever eluded to this false accusation. I exalt God's word and as a result, we exalt the Savior.
    You hold to an illusion regarding word usage. Only the context of your statement alludes to the correct term. It seems that for all your reading of KJV English, some realities have eluded your grasp.

  11. #31
    Senior Member dcontroversal's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 12th, 2013
    Age
    51
    Posts
    29,780
    Blog Entries
    5
    Rep Power
    456

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by John146 View Post
    Nothing of what you said implies worship, just a firm belief in the KJV as the preserved words of God.

    Maybe read it again with glasses on this time......and yes indeed it does belie the worship of a version........and is the epitome of how ridiculous it is to push the king James the way many who have gone to seed on this issue do....

  12. #32
    Senior Member eternally-gratefull's Avatar
    Join Date
    March 14th, 2011
    Age
    52
    Posts
    51,999
    Rep Power
    483

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Feeding, a lot of feeding going on.
    dcontroversal likes this.
    Eternally Grateful for the grace God has shown a wretched soul such as myself.

    Rom 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus,

  13. #33
    Senior Member SovereignGrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 28th, 2016
    Age
    47
    Posts
    5,424
    Rep Power
    171

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by KingJamesVersionBibleOnly View Post
    A KING JAMES VERSION SERMON:

    - Hebrews 4:12
    - Psalm 12:6-7

    Notice the word "preserve", meaning God's word is already present in our times.

    - Galatians 1:6-7 (of 1:1-12)

    Notice "of Christ", meaning sadly there are trying Christians attracted by the overwhelming affection of Christ, only to be misled by a Gospel that is not "of Christ"

    - 2 Corinthians 11:3-4

    Scriptural changes differing in meaning broadly spread through the many so called, "modern English Bible Translations" published since the King James Version Bible (KJV) or its birth in 1611 as the Authorized Version (AV).

    Here is our History:

    The King James Version Bible: Translated from the Textus Receptus and finished in 1611; Through God's will a breakthrough for the Protestant Reformation, for Christian believers with beliefs protestant to the Roman Catholic Church.

    The MOST respected Bible, standing out as a strong spiritual asset.
    The one and only true word of God (in the English Language).
    The Holy Bible.

    - Proverbs 30:5-6

    Pre 1611 (Old Testament):
    Was known to be in the Hebrew Language.

    Pre 1611 (New Testament):
    Before year 1611, The New Testament was present on earth in the Greek language; in texts known as the Textus Receptus, Yet, not yet translated into the English Language.

    Pre 1611 English Bible translations (To solve confusion):
    These books were not known to be as spiritually profitable, but are very evident that the puritan reformer group in their day were not happy with Catholicism and the Roman Catholic Church, desperate and determined for liberty in faith.

    Man, go back under your bridge and wait for those three goats.

    I bet this is a KJVO’er on here whose made up another account to keep spreading their stupidity.
    Angela53510, MarcR, Laish and 1 others like this.
    "There are two Christs in all of us who are saved."
    KJV1611

    "The Christ in me IS NOT the same Christ that's in someone who came to understand Christ a different way than I did."
    KJV1611


    "I don't have the same standard as you, I could care less what the originals say."
    KJV1611

  14. #34
    Senior Member trofimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 17th, 2015
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,624
    Rep Power
    174

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Do not be worried about many things - only one thing is needed (Lk 10:41-42).

  15. #35
    Senior Member SovereignGrace's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 28th, 2016
    Age
    47
    Posts
    5,424
    Rep Power
    171

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by John146 View Post
    My point exactly. You have nothing to rely upon as the word of God.
    Sometimes I wonder if ye blokes knoweth how to getteth thineselves outeth of the rain.
    "There are two Christs in all of us who are saved."
    KJV1611

    "The Christ in me IS NOT the same Christ that's in someone who came to understand Christ a different way than I did."
    KJV1611


    "I don't have the same standard as you, I could care less what the originals say."
    KJV1611

  16. #36
    Senior Member trofimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 17th, 2015
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,624
    Rep Power
    174

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by SovereignGrace View Post
    Sometimes I wonder if ye blokes knoweth how to getteth thineselves outeth of the rain.
    What did you say?

    Do not be worried about many things - only one thing is needed (Lk 10:41-42).

  17. #37
    Senior Member Lucy-Pevensie's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 20th, 2017
    Age
    51
    Posts
    2,284
    Rep Power
    151

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by Budman View Post
    I'm stealing that.
    You're going to give it to Ralphy aren't you?
    Ezekiel 36
    *Then they will know that I am the Lord*




  18. #38
    Senior Member preacher4truth's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 28th, 2016
    Age
    53
    Posts
    5,975
    Rep Power
    253

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by SovereignGrace View Post
    Sometimes I wonder if ye blokes knoweth how to getteth thineselves outeth of the rain.
    LOLeth...!!!
    People are offended that God is God.

    Oh, my brethren! bold-hearted men are always called mean-spirited by cowards. - Charles Spurgeon

    Open Theism and Molinism, two inept theological camps, do err in this sense; God doesn't have an R&D department, He does all things perfectly.

    A god who can be fashioned by our own thoughts is no more a god than an image produced by our own hands. - Charles Spurgeon


  19. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 23rd, 2016
    Age
    52
    Posts
    2,028
    Rep Power
    90

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Did anyone notice this guy makes only one post with quite the name: probably a prankster? or a college student doing a research assignment? or someone just having fun? or . . . .

  20. #40
    Senior Member trofimus's Avatar
    Join Date
    August 17th, 2015
    Age
    34
    Posts
    8,624
    Rep Power
    174

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by Chester View Post
    Did anyone notice this guy makes only one post with quite the name: probably a prankster? or a college student doing a research assignment? or someone just having fun? or . . . .
    We all noticed, thats why we are making fun of it
    Do not be worried about many things - only one thing is needed (Lk 10:41-42).

Page 2 of 19 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 27th, 2015, 01:25 PM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: March 28th, 2014, 01:14 PM
  3. Replies: 535
    Last Post: January 7th, 2014, 05:54 AM
  4. The New King James Version (NKJV): Another counterfeit and bogus bible
    By ChosenbyHim in forum Bible Discussion Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: July 25th, 2012, 01:45 AM
  5. King James Version (KJV) Bible English translation errors!
    By Scotth1960 in forum Bible Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 13th, 2011, 12:29 PM

Tags for this Thread