Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 365
Like Tree694Likes

Bible Discussion Forum

Ask (or answer) Bible questions here. Join or start a Bible discussion now!

Thread: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

  1. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 23rd, 2016
    Age
    51
    Posts
    1,562
    Rep Power
    55

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by SovereignGrace View Post
    Man, go back under your bridge and wait for those three goats.

    I bet this is a KJVO’er on here whose made up another account to keep spreading their stupidity.
    Or, maybe it was Sovereign grace who made up another account just so we all could have some fun! LOL!

  2. #42
    Senior Member Depleted's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 13th, 2015
    Age
    61
    Posts
    20,016
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    415

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by Lucy-Pevensie View Post
    You're going to give it to Ralphy aren't you?
    Ralphy sees minor muscle twitches too. lol
    Lynn

    Still woman, but no lady.

    And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. Rom. 8:28

  3. #43
    Senior Member Depleted's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 13th, 2015
    Age
    61
    Posts
    20,016
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    415

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by Chester View Post
    Or, maybe it was Sovereign grace who made up another account just so we all could have some fun! LOL!
    Real question. (Not to be mistaken for scoldy question.) Do you ever go to the Miscellaneous forum? Sov gives us the fun there. (Oh, and please do check out his thread on pictures of other CCers. I really would love to see how you see folks on this site. It's fun/funny.)
    Lynn

    Still woman, but no lady.

    And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose. Rom. 8:28

  4. #44
    Senior Member Angela53510's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 24th, 2011
    Age
    64
    Posts
    9,438
    Blog Entries
    2
    Rep Power
    331

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    I know I am late to the thread, but I have to say it!

    Oh no! Not again!

    That’s all!
    Budman, MarcR, Dino246 and 4 others like this.
    "And He has said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness.” Most gladly, therefore, I will rather boast about my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may dwell in me." 2 Cor. 12:9 NASB

  5. #45
    Member KingJamesVersionBibleOnly's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 12th, 2018
    Age
    23
    Posts
    46
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by Depleted View Post


    The Bible has been around for 1900 years. King Jimmy's version has only been around for 400 years. KJV IS a modern Bible. Unless you just need the finger exercise of typing out all this junk, assume ain't no one buy other KJVonlyist are buying your manure. And since KJVOnlyist already believe KJVonly, you're not even convincing to them.

    The discussion is about "English Bibles"
    & God's word has been around, in my opinion obviously in the Textus Receptus, if we are looking at the New Testament before it was in English.

  6. #46
    Member KingJamesVersionBibleOnly's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 12th, 2018
    Age
    23
    Posts
    46
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    In this endeavor I don't understand why I should have to teach a lost person that I would rather feel the sanctification of God then refer to Sodomy in separation.

    - Walking in the New man.

  7. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    January 13th, 2016
    Age
    46
    Posts
    4,211
    Rep Power
    59

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by SovereignGrace View Post
    Sometimes I wonder if ye blokes knoweth how to getteth thineselves outeth of the rain.
    And yet, none of you new version guys can point to anything as your final authority on what God has said. It doesn't exist.

  8. #48
    Member KingJamesVersionBibleOnly's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 12th, 2018
    Age
    23
    Posts
    46
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by hornetguy View Post
    Nobody is going to start a thread like that, because none of us do "translation worship".... None of us are so anal-retentive about having the "exact, pure words of God"... every jot/tittle/comma/letter like you are.

    I don't believe the NASB is the ONLY translation of the Bible that is good. I believe there are several, including the KJV translation.
    Quote Originally Posted by Depleted View Post


    Errr, correction. I am that anal retentive. Then again, that's why I've got to have my eSword, so I can check out several versions, and then what scholars say, and, oh, oh, let's not forget the concordances.

    Which is also why I cannot go with just one version. To me that's more diarrhetic to go just-one-version. I'm trying to keep it in rather than...


    Oops, could not keep that metaphor going without grossing even myself out.


    In a Christian endeavor I don't understand why I should have to teach a lost person that I would rather feel the sanctification of God then refer to Sodomy in separation.

    - Walking in the New man.

  9. #49
    Senior Member Dino246's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 1st, 2015
    Age
    47
    Posts
    3,762
    Rep Power
    169

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by KingJamesVersionBibleOnly View Post
    In this endeavor I don't understand why I should have to teach a lost person that I would rather feel the sanctification of God then refer to Sodomy in separation.

    - Walking in the New man.
    Wut?

    Is there any connection at all between this post and your opening post?
    Angela53510, MarcR, Laish and 3 others like this.

  10. #50
    Member KingJamesVersionBibleOnly's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 12th, 2018
    Age
    23
    Posts
    46
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by hornetguy View Post
    Nobody is going to start a thread like that, because none of us do "translation worship".... None of us are so anal-retentive about having the "exact, pure words of God"... every jot/tittle/comma/letter like you are.

    I don't believe the NASB is the ONLY translation of the Bible that is good. I believe there are several, including the KJV translation.

    In a Christian endeavor I don't understand why I should have to teach a lost person that I would rather feel the sanctification of God then refer to Sodomy in separation.

    - Walking in the New man.

  11. #51
    Senior Member Dino246's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 1st, 2015
    Age
    47
    Posts
    3,762
    Rep Power
    169

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by John146 View Post
    And yet, none of you new version guys can point to anything as your final authority on what God has said. It doesn't exist.
    You shall not be heard for your repetitious babble.

  12. #52
    Senior Member preacher4truth's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 28th, 2016
    Age
    53
    Posts
    5,524
    Rep Power
    209

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by John146 View Post
    And yet, none of you new version guys can point to anything as your final authority on what God has said. It doesn't exist.
    Actually we do, in the several modern versions where God's Word exists. We're smart enough to know there is no translation on earth that is a word for word translation from the extant mss. and languages into any language today.

    We are also aware that the KJV doesn't magically erase the double standard you have that; 1) God's Word must be translated word for word to be preserved, true and pure; 2) Yet, although your version does not accomplish this, it is blindly accepted as if it does -or- it is accepted as if it doesn't really matter since the King Jimmy is magic and all.
    People are offended that God is God.

    Oh, my brethren! bold-hearted men are always called mean-spirited by cowards. - Charles Spurgeon

    Open Theism and Molinism, two inept theological camps, do err in this sense; God doesn't have an R&D department, He does all things perfectly.

    A god who can be fashioned by our own thoughts is no more a god than an image produced by our own hands. - Charles Spurgeon


  13. #53
    Member KingJamesVersionBibleOnly's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 12th, 2018
    Age
    23
    Posts
    46
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by KingJamesVersionBibleOnly View Post


    In a Christian endeavor I don't understand why I should have to teach a lost person that I would rather feel the sanctification of God then refer to Sodomy in separation.

    - Walking in the New man.
    Sorry Hornetguy, Didn't mean to include you in the quote .

  14. #54
    Member KingJamesVersionBibleOnly's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 12th, 2018
    Age
    23
    Posts
    46
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by Dino246 View Post
    Wut?

    Is there any connection at all between this post and your opening post?
    No, Not at all.

  15. #55
    Member KingJamesVersionBibleOnly's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 12th, 2018
    Age
    23
    Posts
    46
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by preacher4truth View Post
    Actually we do, in the several modern versions where God's Word exists. We're smart enough to know there is no translation on earth that is a word for word translation from the extant mss. and languages into any language today.

    We are also aware that the KJV doesn't magically erase the double standard you have that; 1) God's Word must be translated word for word to be preserved, true and pure; 2) Yet, although your version does not accomplish this, it is blindly accepted as if it does -or- it is accepted as if it doesn't really matter since the King Jimmy is magic and all.
    - 2 Cor. 11:3-4
    This is very old scripture, yet you are so ignorant.
    & look at in KJV text.
    Last edited by KingJamesVersionBibleOnly; 1 Week Ago at 07:58 PM.

  16. #56
    Senior Member Dino246's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 1st, 2015
    Age
    47
    Posts
    3,762
    Rep Power
    169

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by KingJamesVersionBibleOnly View Post
    No, Not at all.
    So, what is the point of it, especially now that you have posted it three times?
    Angela53510 likes this.

  17. #57
    Member KingJamesVersionBibleOnly's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 12th, 2018
    Age
    23
    Posts
    46
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by preacher4truth View Post
    Actually we do, in the several modern versions where God's Word exists. We're smart enough to know there is no translation on earth that is a word for word translation from the extant mss. and languages into any language today.

    We are also aware that the KJV doesn't magically erase the double standard you have that; 1) God's Word must be translated word for word to be preserved, true and pure; 2) Yet, although your version does not accomplish this, it is blindly accepted as if it does -or- it is accepted as if it doesn't really matter since the King Jimmy is magic and all.
    & look at in KJV text.

  18. #58
    Senior Member NotmebutHim's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 17th, 2015
    Age
    41
    Posts
    1,055
    Rep Power
    44

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    One thing I have noticed is that when I watch (or try to watch) various YouTube videos where the pastor or preacher is speaking against a certain heresy or errant movement, he will almost inevitably connect the KJV to it. What I mean is that the person will say that one of the reasons to reject whatever errant doctrine is being discussed is because it undermines the KJV. Usually, in my experience, this happens when Bible version/translation issues are not pertinent to the doctrinal issue at hand.

    I'll just be sitting there listening to the preacher talk about the specific heresy and then he'll say something to the effect of "it goes against the King James Bible" or "don't use any of the corrupt or devil-inspired versions". At that point, I just have to stop the video and go elsewhere because I'm thinking "well you've lost my ear right there". It's like full-stop, you know?

    I find that one of the indicators of someone being KJVO is if he/she makes a special point to say during the sermon or speech that the KJV is being used, especially, as I mentioned above, it really has no connection to the subject matter of the sermon or speech.
    So you're telling me this is a signature line??

  19. #59
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    January 13th, 2016
    Age
    46
    Posts
    4,211
    Rep Power
    59

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by preacher4truth View Post
    Actually we do, in the several modern versions where God's Word exists. We're smart enough to know there is no translation on earth that is a word for word translation from the extant mss. and languages into any language today.

    We are also aware that the KJV doesn't magically erase the double standard you have that; 1) God's Word must be translated word for word to be preserved, true and pure; 2) Yet, although your version does not accomplish this, it is blindly accepted as if it does -or- it is accepted as if it doesn't really matter since the King Jimmy is magic and all.
    We do...we don't...we do...we don't...

  20. #60
    Senior Member preacher4truth's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 28th, 2016
    Age
    53
    Posts
    5,524
    Rep Power
    209

    Default Re: KING JAMES VERSION BIBLE VS. MODERN ENGLISH BIBLE

    Quote Originally Posted by John146 View Post
    We do...we don't...we do...we don't...
    Yes, that's all you have as a retort, this instead of facing the truth of what was stated and addressing the facts. What a shameful and completely disingenuous response.

    But I get it, in order to be a valid citizen of KJVO cultism, you cannot accept refutation or facts. To do so would cause separation anxiety in you, while causing you to be disowned by your peers. You're afraid of that.

    You cannot stand on your own, face facts, accept reason, and think for yourself to the extent you are able to admit you do not own a word for word translation of Scripture. Everything must be weighed as to the cost of becoming an outcast from among the sectarians with whom you affiliate. That is called the fear of man, and you're ensnared.

    I feel sorry for you, you are not allowed to know or admit the truth because you know full well it will cost you the applause of your sect.
    People are offended that God is God.

    Oh, my brethren! bold-hearted men are always called mean-spirited by cowards. - Charles Spurgeon

    Open Theism and Molinism, two inept theological camps, do err in this sense; God doesn't have an R&D department, He does all things perfectly.

    A god who can be fashioned by our own thoughts is no more a god than an image produced by our own hands. - Charles Spurgeon


Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 27th, 2015, 02:25 PM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: March 28th, 2014, 02:14 PM
  3. Replies: 535
    Last Post: January 7th, 2014, 06:54 AM
  4. The New King James Version (NKJV): Another counterfeit and bogus bible
    By ChosenbyHim in forum Bible Discussion Forum
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: July 25th, 2012, 02:45 AM
  5. King James Version (KJV) Bible English translation errors!
    By Scotth1960 in forum Bible Discussion Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 13th, 2011, 01:29 PM

Tags for this Thread