Was Cain the son of the LORD?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
CainHarmbank

CainHarmbank

Banned
#1
Jan 13, 2018
166
0
0
#1
There are rumors that this is the case.

And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.

"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"

It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.

Pretty simply put isn't it?

I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
 
CS1

CS1

Well-known member
#2
May 23, 2012
12,337
4,057
113
#2
CainHarmbank said:
There are rumors that this is the case.

And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.

"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"

It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.

Pretty simply put isn't it?

I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
Click to expand...
that is a big stretch and out of context.
""And Adam knew his wife;"

cause and effect
cause= Adam knew his wife = sexual relations
effect = conceived = pregnant with child

who was glorfied = God = "I have gotten a man from the LORD" = God was the one who gave man and women the ability to have children.
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#3
Jul 3, 2015
55,885
26,047
113
#3
CainHarmbank said:
There are rumors that this is the case.

And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.

"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"

It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.

Pretty simply put isn't it?

I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
Click to expand...
No. .
 
A

Ariel82

Guest
#4
#4
And God gives the breathe of life to all living things
 
C

craigb9876

Junior Member
#5
Sep 4, 2016
30
5
8
#5
What that passage means is that she is happy the lord has given her a male child just like anyone thanks the lord what he provides.
 
tourist

tourist

Senior Member
#6
Mar 13, 2014
41,313
16,301
113
69
Tennessee
#6
CainHarmbank said:
There are rumors that this is the case.

And if you interpret Genesis 4:1 of the KJV literally, it confirms the rumors.

"And Adam knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the LORD"

It does not say Adam begat Cain and it says I (Eve) have gotten a man from the LORD.

Pretty simply put isn't it?

I wonder what the folks on these boards might have to say...
Click to expand...
The Lord gave Eve a son that was named Cain as the Lord gives everything that is good. The Lord is not the father, Adam was because he knew his wife and she concieved. That means they had sex. That's how babies are made in case that you didn't you know.

Most folks here would say that your hypothesis is lunacy.
 
CainHarmbank

CainHarmbank

Banned
#7
Jan 13, 2018
166
0
0
#7
Just wondering what people here think the LORD really is.
Do you not think the LORD is an individual person?
If the LORD is an individual person, and Adam impregnated Eve, then Eve got a son from Adam, not the LORD.
 
Gabriel2020

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
#8
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
#8
Cain and Abel was twins. At the time Adam laid with her(knew her) ,she bore Cain first,and then Abel followed behind him. It does not say Adam laid with her again and she concieved to have Abel. These two were born before the fall.
 
Gabriel2020

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
#9
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
#9
That means blessed by God to have children.
 
G

graceNpeace

Senior Member
#10
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
#10
CainHarmbank said:
Just wondering what people here think the LORD really is.
Do you not think the LORD is an individual person?
If the LORD is an individual person, and Adam impregnated Eve, then Eve got a son from Adam, not the LORD.
Click to expand...
Do you not think that the Lord is God?
The same God that Genesis 1 and 2 shows is the creator God of the heavens and the earth???

The context is abundantly clear to me....
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#11
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#11
CainHarmbank said:
Just wondering what people here think the LORD really is.
Do you not think the LORD is an individual person?
If the LORD is an individual person, and Adam impregnated Eve, then Eve got a son from Adam, not the LORD.
Click to expand...

Eve got herself from God.

He is her Maker. He made her by hand.

first pregnancy in the history of time: no experienced, matronly woman to tell Eve what was happening to her. she and Adam more than anyone, ever, know that the LORD is the provider, sustainer and creator of all things.

i try to keep thi in mind when i try to understand what she meant, when she said she received something from God. :rolleyes:
 
Magenta

Magenta

Senior Member
#12
Jul 3, 2015
55,885
26,047
113
#12
Gabriel2020 said:
Cain and Abel was twins. At the time Adam laid with her(knew her) ,she bore Cain first,and then Abel followed behind him. It does not say Adam laid with her again and she concieved to have Abel. These two were born before the fall.
Click to expand...
Adam and Eve had already been cast out of the garden before the births of Cain and Abel are noted. There is no reason to assume Cain and Abel were twins.
 
Gabriel2020

Gabriel2020

Senior Member
#13
May 6, 2017
1,099
41
48
#13
I'm not assuming. revelation of this is revealed through scripture.
 
CainHarmbank

CainHarmbank

Banned
#14
Jan 13, 2018
166
0
0
#14
graceNpeace said:
Do you not think that the Lord is God?
The same God that Genesis 1 and 2 shows is the creator God of the heavens and the earth???

The context is abundantly clear to me....
Click to expand...
Genesis 1 and 2 do not seem to me as coming from the same context.

Can you clarify?
 
posthuman

posthuman

Senior Member
#16
Jul 31, 2013
36,665
13,127
113
#16
CainHarmbank said:
Genesis 1 and 2 do not seem to me as coming from the same context.

Can you clarify?
Click to expand...

there's not any such thing, really, as "Genesis 1 and 2" -- that's a relatively recent and entirely human construct to make referencing the text easier.

it's all one book. so you're saying that you think the first two pages of this book don't seem to be coming from the same context. . . ?

can you clarify?
 
CainHarmbank

CainHarmbank

Banned
#17
Jan 13, 2018
166
0
0
#17
posthuman said:

Eve got herself from God.

He is her Maker. He made her by hand.

first pregnancy in the history of time: no experienced, matronly woman to tell Eve what was happening to her. she and Adam more than anyone, ever, know that the LORD is the provider, sustainer and creator of all things.

i try to keep thi in mind when i try to understand what she meant, when she said she received something from God. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Why are there many different ethnicities?
 
CainHarmbank

CainHarmbank

Banned
#19
Jan 13, 2018
166
0
0
#19
posthuman said:

there's not any such thing, really, as "Genesis 1 and 2" -- that's a relatively recent and entirely human construct to make referencing the text easier.

it's all one book. so you're saying that you think the first two pages of this book don't seem to be coming from the same context. . . ?

can you clarify?
Click to expand...
Chapter 1 is a greater context of creation.
Chapter 2 is a lesser context, like an interesting subset that is only a small part of what was already created.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.