Charles Taze Russell and the Bible Students

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
J

johnnyyy

Guest
#1
A few months ago I met some people who practiced another "denomination" that I had no clue existed. They are not associated with Jehovah Witnesses besides having the same founder kind of. They read the Bible mainly but always like to reference the study books written by Charles Taze Russell. They also believe that Jesus returned in the 1800's invisibly.
Bible Student movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They also focus on this specific chart they use to explain the end times.
Chart of The Ages

Does anyone have any experience with a "Russell Bible Student" or knowledge involving their doctrine?
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#2
A few months ago I met some people who practiced another "denomination" that I had no clue existed. They are not associated with Jehovah Witnesses besides having the same founder kind of. They read the Bible mainly but always like to reference the study books written by Charles Taze Russell. They also believe that Jesus returned in the 1800's invisibly.
Bible Student movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They also focus on this specific chart they use to explain the end times.
Chart of The Ages

Does anyone have any experience with a "Russell Bible Student" or knowledge involving their doctrine?
hi
they're called (among other names) UNITARIANS.
we have some here at CC, and others here who affirm thier doctrines and beliefs.
they should be able to answer your questions.

BUT DO NOT QUESTION THOSE BELIEFS: the only requirement for entering heaven is believing the simple words of scripture that Jesus is the son of God. nothing more. it doesn't matter if Jesus was created in Mary's womb, or if He partook of the Divine Nature at His Baptism, or if He was just a really obedient man who gained God's favour.

so, accept Unitarianism and Arianism as legitimate Christianity (Jehovah's Witnesses, too since they also revere Jesus, even though he was just a created entity) or be an obnoxious and divisive figure in the church, and WE DON'T WANT THAT.

STOP BRINGING UP DOCTRINE! NOBODY CARES. SO STUDY ALL YOU WAT, ASK QUESTIONS, BUT KEEP YOURMOUTH SHUT ABOUT ANY UNORTHODOX DOGMA, SINCE THERE IS NO ORTHODOXY.

we all get to believe whatever we want, and you better not even suggest otherwise.

CAN'T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#3
A few months ago I met some people who practiced another "denomination" that I had no clue existed. They are not associated with Jehovah Witnesses besides having the same founder kind of. They read the Bible mainly but always like to reference the study books written by Charles Taze Russell. They also believe that Jesus returned in the 1800's invisibly.
Bible Student movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They also focus on this specific chart they use to explain the end times.
Chart of The Ages

Does anyone have any experience with a "Russell Bible Student" or knowledge involving their doctrine?
oh.
i'm sorry.
i got the cul.....i mean the other church (belief) wrong.

here's something i had previously posted (before i had an angelic visit and was told i have been totally wrong) on another thread about unitarianim which is NOW ORTHODOX CHRISTIANITY. my traditional orhtodox beliefs turned out ot be a trick of satan designed to keep me from the real truth.

i'm excited to start posting on my NEW BELIEF SYSTEM, which i will post a new thread on.

it's a combination of all the beliefs until YESTERDAY (WHICH I AM SO THANKFUL FOR HAVING HAD MY PREVIOUS FOUNDATION SHAKEN), at which time i looked over the posts covering doctrines i had previously rejected....NOW I GET IT!

easy to get mixed up since i had apparently electro-shock therapy while spending 2 months on a psychiatric ward12 years ago (an agonizing and very painful and difficult time) before i got saved.

I DIDN'T KNOW THEY HAD CONDUCTED SECRET EXPERIMENTS ON ME UNTIL A MEMBER HERE POINTED IT OUT! can you believe it? thank you WESTAND/GLOWING! i am so indebted to you and Arnold Murray whom i have actually been suspicious of, but i'll post on my new thread about why i now embrace his teachings. thanks again GLOWING/WE STAND!

so johnny, anything i say can't be trusted. but i'll just babble on...that's okay here; LOTS OF PEOPLE DO IT. and since i won't use my intellect (since apparently i'm braindead) NO ONE CAN CRITICIZE ME SINCE I MUST APPROACH MY NEW BELIEFS WITH THE MIND OF A CHILD.

i'm actually glad though because it means i don't have to study anymore (since its all been striving through the works of a braindead intellect) that was apparently erased (possibly reprogrammed to become satan incarnate?) AND I DIDN'T EVEN KNOW IT! LOLOLOLOL!

~

anyways, the "STUDENTS" (Russell) have come up here before.

someone (can't remember who and who cares, really?) had gotten upset by looking at their site as a result of the good brothers here FINALLY repeating so many times that JESUS ISN'T GOD...(i am so grateful to them for thier persistence on the matter since i was becoming a Pharisee! BY BELIEVING JESUS WAS GOD! wow MAN AM I GLAD I GOT THAT RESOLVED).

here's the site the guy looked at that made him doubt the deity of Christ. unfortunately he is stilll convinced that Jesus was divine (CAN YOU IMAGINE?)....but i am hoping the unitarians and arians can can help the young man see the light. i might be able to convince people to accept the good doctrines i now embrace when i post my new thread....if i can rememeber what my beliefs are since i am braindead.

but that doesn't matter: WHATEVER I WANT TO BELIEVE IS COOL - DON'T CRITICIZE ME!

and as long as i continually remind people that i am not using my mind but am just believing what i post, I AM OFF LIMITS. no accountability because i WANT TO BE CALLED A CHRISTIAN TOO, and anyone who questions my beliefs is a BULLY, ARROGANT, RUSE, UNCHRISTIAN, A PHARISEE, A SCHOLAR, ONE OF THOSE TYPES AND JUST PLAIN DECEIVED.

what's really cool about my new Christian religion is that the bible doesn't matter so you can't use it against me: I'VE GRADUATED PAST THAT NOW because i am now a prophet also. so, PREPARE YE TO HEAR OH HARLOT CHURCH FOR I HAVE IT THAT I AM TO SPEAK TO YOU. but i'll do that later.


now where was i?......




















oh yes!
here's the unitarian aspect of my new religion (there are some links there that flesh out the rest of my religion in this regard....feel free to click around: i'll be happy to answer questions). i know quite a bit about my new religion since i was once an enemy of it all, but THANKFULLY MY EYES WERE OPENED AND NOW I CAN FELLOWSHIP WITH THOSE WHO BELIEFS WAS PREVIOUS DISMAYED OVER....beacuse i can believe whatever i want to, and i am still a CHRISTIAN - don't CRITICIZE ME! :

yes, the Unitarian doctrine.

Unitarianism is a religion known primarily for holding that God is only one person, in contrast to the doctrine of the Trinity (God as three persons in one), and that God is a separate being from Jesus Christ.[1] Unitarians are also known for the rejection of other common Christian teachings[2] such as the salvation-related doctrines of original sin and predestination,[3][4] and biblical inerrancy.[5]

See also







Religion portal
Unitarianism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


more to come!

YAY! this is so good.

i thought i was saved by a saviour who was actually God and that i had been a blind dead inner who He called and washed by Grace BUT COME ON!

HOW OLD FASHIONED AND COMPLICATED IS THAT?

no, my new religion is so much better.....hopefully i can convince some of you die-hard orthodox christians WITH MY PROPHECIES AND GOLD DUST AND SECRETS FROM THE HOLY PLACE, and the stuff i learned from Arnold Murray at Shepherd's Chapel and the Unitarian/Arians....plus the Chrisadelphians have some neat stuff i've added in.

there's also the fact that i now believe i have the gift of prophecy (which i have 'a word' for someone here....you know who you are), AND, i can raise people from the dead, drink poison, walk on water (i'm actually like jesus...i'm not him, buti'm like him).

i'm also now an Apostle, and so i have instruction for all you loathsome lazy workers of iniquity who are pretending to be Christians while you sit there reading your Bibles and going to chrch: HYPOCRITES!

~

ECUSE me for a moment while i go talk to God...He's here right now and want to have a face to face about someone here.....

what's that?

oh! God told me you university types and trinitarians don't know him at all.

i asked God what he meant and he said zone, see all those phonies out there who profess to know me? they draw near to me with their lips but they've never really known me?

i said, yes Lord, i think i see them. what's wrong with them Loord.

God said, they believe they know me from the scriptures. they gather in groups and think i'll hear them. but you dear zone: you are chosen because you have drawn near to me in humilty and i have made you a prophet to the nations, and apostle and have given you extraordinary powers.

i said thank you God!

God said...no problem. see you later in the holy secret place.

so anyways......going to make a thread on my new beliefs....after i go into the secret place and have my deadbrain restarted by Lectio Divina and contemplative prayer.

i have a call to make to Mike Bickle and Mr Wagner who i now believe are actually meant to rule the church: i gotta find out what MY PURPOSE IS.

back later!
 
Last edited:
M

MaggieMye

Guest
#4
Charles Taze Russell is one of the FOUNDERS of the Jehovah's Witnesses. They are a cult. Russell is a false prophet.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/513182/Charles-Taze-Russell
and also a Mason: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsU45pBvRNU

Zone: Even the DEVIL BELIEVES that Jesus is the Son of God. It take more than just believing that to receive heaven. One MUST be born again and have faith that is not dead; faith without works is dead.

Do not mislead people by telling them they only need to believe that Jesus is the Son of God, cuz the devil believes and he is NOT going to heaven. Get your Biblical facts straight.

Maggie
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#5
Charles Taze Russell is one of the FOUNDERS of the Jehovah's Witnesses. They are a cult. Russell is a false prophet.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/513182/Charles-Taze-Russell
and also a Mason: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsU45pBvRNU

Zone: Even the DEVIL BELIEVES that Jesus is the Son of God. It take more than just believing that to receive heaven. One MUST be born again and have faith that is not dead; faith without works is dead.

Do not mislead people by telling them they only need to believe that Jesus is the Son of God, cuz the devil believes and he is NOT going to heaven. Get your Biblical facts straight.

Maggie
TODAYS' POSTS ARE SATIRE.

SEE MY NEW RELIGION THREAD (SATIRE)

don't criticize me: I AM A PROPHET AND APOSTLE AND A CHRISTIAN AND I CAN SAY AND BELIEVE WHATEVER I WANT TO - GOD TOLD ME THAT THIS MORNING.

help me out in the NAR section of my NEW RELIGION thread maggie.

i think i found my purpose.
 
A

ASK

Guest
#6
"TODAYS' POSTS ARE SATIRE."

Lol. Very nice, I was truly stunned.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#7
"TODAYS' POSTS ARE SATIRE."

Lol. Very nice, I was truly stunned.
LOL.
watch for ZONE'S NEW RELIGION.

you're welcome to contribute ON THE CONDITION THAT IT GOES AGAINST ORTHODOXY, OK?

but don't even think about posting if you love the bible, church or theology.
and most assuredly DO NOT MENTION the idea that jesus is god.

i may be forced to call down fire from heaven on you.

dont criticize me - i am CHOSEN, and you are NOT.
 
Feb 16, 2011
2,957
24
0
#8
I don't think the Jehovah's withness little study helps are worth anything. Some crap that is supposed to be something. The Bible is what I believe. I might tell someone off if I have to have a "special" book to help me read the Bible. They are a joke of false prophesy all the time! I'm not so sure they believe enough truth to be saved. They say things that sound the same but have different meanings.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#9
I don't think the Jehovah's withness little study helps are worth anything. Some crap that is supposed to be something. The Bible is what I believe. I might tell someone off if I have to have a "special" book to help me read the Bible. They are a joke of false prophesy all the time! I'm not so sure they believe enough truth to be saved. They say things that sound the same but have different meanings.
HI JONATHAN.

that's what i USED to think also.

but i have a NEW RELIGION.

i hope to be able to convert everyone at CC to it, EXCEPT the "bible-believing head knowledge pharisee types....YUCK - heretiks).

anyways....see you soon! (OH! don't bring a bible - just come expecting your BEST LIFE NOW. NAME it and CLAIM IT! yay!....I'M BELIEVING GOD FOR A CADDY, with lifts and an awesome SUB).

the prophet and apostle
zone

(SATIRE)
 
M

MaggieMye

Guest
#10
Zone: I sincerely hope that you are jesting by claiming to be an apostle. You are nowhwere NEAR being a biblical apostle. PERIOD.


Jesting, right??

Maggie
 
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#11
lol what did I tell you zone?

Satire is primarily a literary genre or form, although in practice it can also be found in the graphic and performing arts. In satire, vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, and society itself, into improvement.[1] Although satire is usually meant to be funny, its greater purpose is often constructive social criticism, using wit as a weapon.
A common feature of satire is strong irony or sarcasm—"in satire, irony is militant"[2]—but parody, burlesque, exaggeration, juxtaposition, comparison, analogy, and double entendre are all frequently used in satirical speech and writing. This "militant" irony or sarcasm often professes to approve (or at least accept as natural) the very things the satirist wishes to attack.
Satire is nowadays found in many artistic forms of expression, including literature, plays, commentary, and media such as lyrics
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#12
Zone: I sincerely hope that you are jesting by claiming to be an apostle. You are nowhwere NEAR being a biblical apostle. PERIOD.


Jesting, right??

Maggie
maggie:

what's a "biblical apostle"?

Apostles are the highest rank in the foundation under jesus (who isnt god anyways).

I SAID I AM AN APOSTLE, and i answer to NO MAN.

my words are authoritative and come directly from jesus (but since he isnt god maybe my words arent really authoritative?)....

anyways:

WHO DARES TO CRITICIZE ME? i might have to put them on ignore if they have the audacity to question my OFFICE.

I SAID I AM AN APOSTLE, and unless there's another in this place, WHAT I SAY GOES.

by the way: ALL THE APOSTLES are ALSO PROPHETS (though not all prophets are apostles).

any way you slice it, i outrank EVERYBODY in every area.

now if the assembly would please just get on with its PURPOSE.

after i talk to god i'll send an epistle concerning your instructions.

the apostle and prophet
zone.

(SATIRE)
 
Feb 16, 2011
2,957
24
0
#13
maggie:

what's a "biblical apostle"?

Apostles are the highest rank in the foundation under jesus (who isnt god anyways).

I SAID I AM AN APOSTLE, and i answer to NO MAN.

my words are authoritative and come directly from jesus (but since he isnt god maybe my words arent really authoritative?)....

anyways:

WHO DARES TO CRITICIZE ME? i might have to put them on ignore if they have the audacity to question my OFFICE.

I SAID I AM AN APOSTLE, and unless there's another in this place, WHAT I SAY GOES.

by the way: ALL THE APOSTLES are ALSO PROPHETS (though not all prophets are apostles).

any way you slice it, i outrank EVERYBODY in every area.

now if the asse
 
Feb 16, 2011
2,957
24
0
#14
Apostles are men! Prophets can be women. Besides I'm a prophet and I never heard you do prophesy! I think you are a bad joker!
 
M

MaggieMye

Guest
#15
That Zone is an apostle?? Satire? there is sacrcasm. but no irony, no humor, no parody, burlesque, exaggeration, juxtaposition, comparison, analogy, and double entendre. But in your words is found great fecitiousness; and so if your claim is NOT in jest and you are not TRYING to be funny (maybe it's my midwestern sense of humor that just doesn't grasp it if you are), then your words are fillled with great pride.

Maggie
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#16
Apostles are men! Prophets can be women. Besides I'm a prophet and I never heard you do prophesy! I think you are a bad joker!
(SATIRE)

hi jonathan.

i used to be a cessationist : those idiots believe the apostles and prophets Jesus appointed at the birth of the church DIED, and when the NT was canonized there was no longer any higher authority than scripture....:D can you believe it? what Pharisees.

now.

what do you mean Apostles are men? god is DOING A NEW THING. he told me that.

GOD TOLD ME I AM AN APOSTLE.

he said

zone, because you have sought my face and since i have a great calling on your life, i am now appointing you as Apostle to CC.

~

are you going to challenge that jonathan?

if what i said is true, i outrank you.

i just got my gifts and offices last night, so i'll be giving prophecies shortly: there are TONS of them.

you can test my prophecies if you want to, but since i am an Apostle, my word is final (i talk to god daily in person but i won't be writing any of it down because god is doing a NEW THING).

i am also a prophet:

since the prophets are subject to the prophets, i must insist that i test YOUR prophecies: that's biblical, right (except scripture might not be inerrant so i can say whatever i want to).

i'll be posting a NEW RELIGION thread where i lay out the NEW FOUNDATION.

since i am an Apostle, what i say goes.

DO NOT CRITICIZE WHAT YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND: it may be a sign of dead faith.

or, forbid you would grieve the spirit.

singed with a seal,
the apostle and prophet
zone

~

here's some reading material for any who may have suspected their calling to the offices i got last night. there's an "entry level" office for newbie apostles but i got the full-on office last night, so DON'T JUDGE ME OR TEST ME OR CRITIQUE WHAT I SAY.

i am a prophet and an apostle and a christian and i can say, believe and TEACH ANYTHING i want.

you might be in danger of the unpardonable sin by questioning me so STOP IT.

put your bible away AND GET ON WITH THE MEAT, OK?

(SATIRE)

~

Understanding How Apostles Minister in Different Spheres

A Special Ministry Today Interview

Foundational or governmental gifts: The basic text is Ephesians 4:11: “And He Himself gave some to be apostles, some prophets, some evangelists, and some pastors and teachers.” I like to call these foundational or governmental gifts or offices. Others call them “fivefold ministry” or “ascension gifts.” Now that these offices are being recognized, it is important to develop agreed-upon protocol as to how they should relate to each other positively. I have worked on apostles/prophets in Apostles and Prophets: The Foundation of the Church (Regal Books) and pastors/prophets in Pastors & Prophets: Protocol for Healthy Churches. I now see that some work needs to be done on apostles/apostles because it is becoming clear that there are many different kinds of apostles who minister in many different spheres.

Definition of apostle: An apostle is a Christian leader gifted, taught, commissioned, and sent by God with the authority to establish the foundational government of the church within an assigned sphere of ministry by hearing what the Spirit is saying to the churches and by setting things in order accordingly for the growth and maturity of the church.

What I have excluded in this definition: There are three biblical characteristics of apostles which some include in their definition of apostle, but which I have chosen not to include: (1) signs and wonders (2 Cor. 12:12), (2) seeing Jesus personally (1 Cor. 9:1), and (3) planting churches (1 Cor. 3:10). My reason for this is that I do not understand these three qualities to be non-negotiables. They characterize many, perhaps most, apostles. But if a given individual lacks the anointing for one or more of them, this, in my opinion, would not exclude that individual from being a legitimate apostle.

Hyphenated apostles: Before considering the different ways that apostles minister in different spheres, it is important to recognize that many apostles are “hyphenated apostles.” They are frequently hyphenated with other government offices, such as Apostle-Prophet or Pastor-Apostle or Apostle-Evangelist, etc. They can also be hyphenated within the different ministry categories pertaining to apostles, such as horizontal apostle-vertical apostle or convening apostle-mobilizing apostle, etc.

The title “Apostle”: There continues to be discussion as to the necessity of actually applying the title “apostle” to individuals in the church today. Some argue that functioning as an apostle is enough without needing to use the title. My conclusion is the contrary. While I concede that the function is the most essential consideration, I also believe that there is increased power in the use of the title “apostle.” The function, in my opinion, will be more anointed and more of a service to the church if the title is used.

Jesus Himself was the one who coined the new term “apostle,” (Luke 6:13) (It does not appear in the Old Testament.), and I suspect that He had a distinct purpose for doing it. Later on, both Paul and Peter introduced themselves in their epistles with the title “apostle.” Today we freely use the titles “pastor” or “reverend” or “bishop” or “evangelist” or “doctor” (i.e., teacher), and there seems to be little reason, other than a possible fear of change, to exclude the title “apostle” as a designation for contemporary church leaders.

It is also important to recognize that “apostle” occurs in one of the lists of spiritual gifts in 1 Corinthians 12 (see 1 Cor. 12:28). The gift and its accompanying office are significant enough to be declared, along with prophets, as the foundation of the church (see Eph. 2:20).

The adjective alone is not enough: Some advocates of the apostolic movement have chosen to use the adjective “apostolic” in their writings to the exclusion of the noun “apostle.” They speak of “apostolic leadership” or “apostolic churches” or “apostolic ministry” with the implication that by doing so they are describing apostles. There are at least two reasons for this.

(1) Some use the adjective and not the noun because they do not believe that the gift and office of apostle are operative in the church today. A case in point is the American Assemblies of God. An official public denominational position statement was issued by the General Presbytery of the General Council of the Assemblies of God on August 11, 2000 under the title, “Endtime Revival—Spirit-Led and Spirit-Controlled: A Response Paper to Resolution 16.” Under a subsection, “Deviant Teachings Disapproved,” one of what is referred to as a departure from scripture which threatens the life and stability of local churches is “The problematic teaching that present-day offices of apostles and prophets should govern church ministries at all levels.” This teaching is attributed to “persons with an independent spirit and an exaggerated estimate of their importance to the kingdom of God.” Such persons are “wrongly interpreting 1 Corinthians 12:28 and Ephesians 2:20 and 4:11.” This paper argues that “The leadership of the local church, according to the Pastoral Epistles, is in the hands of elders/presbyters and deacons. There is no indication in these last writings of continuing offices of apostles and prophets, though the ministry functions still continue.” The section ends by arguing for the adjective, not the noun: “We affirm that there are, and ought to be, apostolic- and prophetic-type ministries in the Church, without individuals being identified as filling such an office.”

Just as a footnote, David Cartledge of the Australian Assemblies of God, in his book Apostolic Revolution (Paraclete Institute), attributes this position of the American Assemblies of God to “Pentecostal Cessationists!” (p. 236).

(2) Another reason given for this by those who do believe that the office of apostle is operational today is that the adjective could provide more of an entry level approach for others who might not yet be ready to recognize the office implied by the noun “apostle.” This was the case with the first book on the apostolic movement published in Australia, Out There! The Church of the 21st Century, edited by Ben Gray. However, as John Eckhardt points out in his book Leadershift, every church should be an apostolic church, every believer should be apostolic, every teacher should be apostolic, every evangelist should be apostolic, and so on. If this is the case, which I agree with, then the adjective “apostolic” is not specific enough to substitute for “apostle” as a noun.

Apostolic Spheres. Among practicing apostles, I have found a relatively low level of practical understanding of apostolic spheres. All apostles recognize that they have divine authority, but not all are aware that this authority is only activated within a divinely-appointed sphere. Once apostles get outside of their sphere, they have no more authority than any other member of the body of Christ. Paul relates spheres to authority in 2 Cor. 10. In verse 8 he “boasts” of his authority, leading to verses 13-16 in which he deals with spheres. He says, for example, “We, however, will not boast beyond measure, but within the limits of the sphere which God appointed us—a sphere which especially includes you” (2 Cor. 10:13). This reflects Paul’s remarkable statement in 1 Cor. 9:2: “If I am not an apostle to others, yet doubtless I am to you.”

Toward a useful terminology. The current apostolic movement is so new, and it is developing at such a dizzying speed, that a considerable amount of confusion has arisen. Who is an apostle? Are all apostles the same? How do bona fide apostles minister? I believe that the answers to these and other similar questions will emerge through a phenomenological approach. This is the methodology that I have used to arrive at a continually-developing set of conclusions. Terminology that accurately describes current apostolic phenomena will greatly help dispel the confusion. Here is a terminology that seems to me to be helpful, at least at this moment:


Vertical Apostles
  • Ecclesiastical apostles. Apostles who are given authority over a sphere which includes a number of churches, presumably in an apostolic network headed up by the apostle.
  • Functional apostles. Apostles who are given authority over those who have an ongoing ministry in a certain specific sphere of service which has defined boundaries of participation.
  • Apostolic Team Members. Apostles whose apostolic ministry functions in conjunction with an apostle who is seen as the leader of a team of one or more other peer-level vertical apostles. They may be assigned specific spheres by the leading apostle. These are more than administrators or assistants or armor-bearers.
  • Congregational apostles. Apostles functioning as senior pastors of dynamic, growing churches of more than 700-800.
Horizontal Apostles


  • Convening apostles. Apostles who have authority to call together on a regular basis peer-level leaders who minister in a defined field.
  • Ambassadorial apostles. Apostles who have itinerant, frequently international, ministries of catalyzing and nurturing apostolic movements on a broad scale.
  • Mobilizing apostles. Apostles who have the authority to take leadership in bringing together qualified leaders in the body of Christ for a specific cause or project.
  • Territorial apostles. Apostles who have been given authority for leading a certain segment of the body of Christ in a given territorial sphere such as a city or state.
Marketplace Apostles It seems clear that some marketplace apostles would be vertical (perhaps within a large company) while others would be horizontal (bringing together peer-level marketplace apostles). The more we work with marketplace apostles, the more clarity will come in due time.

Please note: Dr.Wagner functions as a horizontal apostle within a sphere of recognized apostles. As such, Dr.Wagner does not provide apostolic 'covering' or accountability as a vertical apostle.

http://www.globalharvest.org/spheres.htm

~

am i ever glad i dumped stupid scholarship for super-gifts and experiences. this is cool.


(SATIRE)
 
M

MaggieMye

Guest
#17
Hello? The men and women that were apostles in the NT time of Jesus did die a physical death. There is nothing to say that they were immortal. NOTHING!! No verses anywhere. HOWEVER, being apostels and prophets is not WHO they were, but WHAT they did. It was a POSITION of authority in Christ FOR THE EQUIPPING of the church. The Chursh is in CONSTANT NEED OF EQUIPPING!!!
It is THAT simple. Those called of God today to fill the offices of apostle, prophet, evangelist, teacher and pastor are DOING THE WORK; fulfilling the OFFICE.

The FOUNDATION of a building cannot be removed of the building falls. Even though the titles of apostle and prophet were, for a very long time, not used, the offices still remained...in obscurity, but STILL in effect. God is NOT a respector of persons; He does not withhold that type of guidance and structural/constructional overseeing from any century's portion of the Body.
No cessationist can give even ONE reference showing that ANY of the FIVE offices were eliminated or separated.
If anyone on this board believes otherwise then step up and show some scripture or admit that you are wrong!
Maggie
 
Feb 16, 2011
2,957
24
0
#18
I really don't think you talk to Jehovah, Zone. Besides that's not funny to joke about! I've had visions! I've given prophecy and been used in tounges in interpretation! I also have talents! Don't joke about God, Zone!
 
M

MaggieMye

Guest
#19
Jonathan: Having visions and prophesying and speaking in tongues does not make anyone an apostle OR prophet.

Maggie
 
G

Graybeard

Guest
#20
Zone is "zoned out":D