Pentecost vs charismatic pentecost

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

roaringkitten

Guest
#1
charismatic quotes in purple:

"The question we as believers must answer is this: Will we flow with the plans and purposes of God for this hour or will we hinder revival? I'm concerned that many are in danger of creating a false comfort zone for themselves. By the position they're taking, they are saying: 'I'm not sure about this present move. I'm just going to wait and see what happens.' But Jesus said, 'He who is not with Me is against Me' (Matt. 12:30, NKJV). Pentecost was not -- and is not -- an option. God considers us to be either for or against what He is doing at any given time" ("Flowing With Revival," p. 14).

Read Acts 2:1-47 about Pentecost. One thing you will immediately notice, is that this event was used for evangelism. Many nations heard the gospel being preached in their own native language(vs. 9-11). They were accused by mockers of being drunk(vs 13) because they were hearing tongues in each nation's own language and it was gibberish to them. The people were "pricked in their heart" and asked "what must we do?"(vs 37). They were called to repentance(vs. 38).

The Holy Spirit cannot contradict himself(Galatians 5:22-23), and God is not the author of confusion(1 Corinthians 14:33). It would be confusing if the Holy Spirit acted drunk through a person(eg: swaggering), because the common man would say he was drunk, while a charismatic would say its was Holy Spirit! In fact, if you were to step back one verse in Galatians 5:21 you would see that God condemns drunkenness! Many charismatics preach about being drunk in the spirit. Rodney Brown teaches that if there is physical drunkenness, then there must also be spiritual drunkenness. Here is what the Word says about being drunk:

"And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit; Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord; Giving thanks always for all things unto God and the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ; Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God." Ephesians 5:18-21

Charismatics will use accusations from mockers in the Word, to defend acting like drunkards in their revival meetings. As the Word says, the Holy Spirit wont contradict Himself and imitate something evil like drunkenness. So, it wasn't because the preachers were acting drunk at Pentecost, that they were being accused of being drunk. They were filled with the Holy Spirit(Acts 2:4). Peter even defended his testimony from the lies of the accusers(Acts 2:15)!

The Word says there should be decency and order in the church(1 Corinthians 14:40). Barking, howling, groaning, roaring, shrieking loudly, punching people in the stomach, slapping people in the face, having people thrown across the stage, swaggering like a drunkard are frequent phenomena witnessed at charismatic meetings and churches. This does not line up with Scripture because it is not something that is "decent" and "orderly".


"Howard-Browne's reputation grew during the next four years, and he established the Rodney Howard-Browne Evangelistic Association in Louisville, Kentucky. In the spring of 1993 his big break came when
Assemblies of God pastor Karl Strader invited him to preach in Lakeland, Florida, at Carpenter's Home Church" (Julia Duin, "Praise the Lord and pass the New Wine," 8/94, Charisma, p.23).


The results of Pentecost in the Bible were persecution, beatings, and jailings of the preachers, not increased reputations. In Acts 4 they get threatened. In Acts 14:19 Paul was dragged out of the city for dead as he had been stoned. In Acts 16:19-24, Paul and Silas were accused of troubling the city(vs. 20), were beaten and thrown into prison(vs 22-23). In Acts 21:30-33, Paul stirred up Jerusalem to the point they were trying to kill him(vs. 30-31), and were beating him until soldiers came to take him to prison(vs. 32-33).

The charismatic version of pentecost is "a new break" and "reputation grew" as an example in the above quote. Where is the persecution that charismatics should be receiving? Because in the Word, the apostles were persecuted for preaching the gospel! It was mostly hardship! To charismatics, its joy, joy, joy, and laughter! Even catholicism, and other cults, New Agers, etc rejoice over holy laughter with the ecumenism movement!

"Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you! for so did their fathers to the false prophets." Luke 6:26

In fact, as Christians, we will face persecutions for standing for the Lord uncompromisingly(1 John 2:15-17, John 15:18-20, 2 Timothy 3:12). I get called a liar, a stirrer of trouble, etc when I tell the lost about sins, repentance, and salvation! Some will even physically threaten me. I expect persecution when witnessing to the lost, and also when I expose false doctrine. I've lost friends for standing up for the Lord. I dont want any praise for what I told you, I only want to serve God and obey Him, all glory goes to Him alone. If it means I have to suffer for obeying Psalm 94:16 , then so be it.

Dont trust experience over the Word of God. I've already shown you where a charismatic leader admitted there is no precedence for such bizarre phenomenon in Scripture(which is true). Many use the argument to look at the fruit as the measuring stick for whether something be from God. The Word says to look at the fruit AND the Word to discern truth from error(Isaiah 8:20, 2 Timothy 3:16, Matthew 12:33, Luke 6:43-45). By just looking at the fruit of someone without the Word is folly. Because even a non-Christian who gave to the poor and is generous is heading to the lake of fire if he does not trust in Jesus as the Savior. There are many who in fact, hope to enter into heaven on the merits/even partly on the merits of their good deeds, but are unsaved and hypocrites(Matthew 7:21-23). Dont just trust your pastor because he told you something. Be like the Bereans who searched the Scriptures daily to see if the claims were in fact true(Acts 17:11). Trusting in man more than God can be devastating(Proverbs 16:25, Psalm 118:8, Jeremiah 17:5, Romans 3:4). Charismatics and others who promote false doctrine, twist Scripture and take verses out of context to fit their own ideology, not rightly dividing the Word(2 Timothy 2:15). I am rebuking false doctrine which is what the Word commands me to do(2 Timothy 4:2-4, Ephesians 5:11).
This isn't a hate campaign against charismatics, like many think it is. I pray for professing Christians who are caught up in this deception. And for those who mock me for standing up for the Lord, I pray for you too.


 
Jan 31, 2009
2,225
11
0
#2
why did all other of the post get deleted?? oops wrong thread
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#3
As the Word says, the Holy Spirit wont contradict Himself and imitate something evil like drunkenness. So, it wasn't because the preachers were acting drunk at Pentecost, that they were being accused of being drunk.
And they were accused of being drunk because they did appear drunk. Otherwise they would have simply said "these people are speaking gibberish" and not mention drunkeness at all. If they were merely speaking in another language they could not understand, how is that appearing drunk? I could also refer to the old testament when Saul took off his clothes and prophesied, being in ectasy in the Holy Spirit. 1 Sam 19:24 He also stripped off his clothes, and he too prophesied before Samuel and lay down naked all that day and all that night. Therefore they say, "Is Saul also among the prophets?" But you might say the Spirit would never do that, ok then, if you like to tell the Spirit what he can and can't do, not my problem.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#4
Yeah these folks are what could be called the 'error bin'. I don't see why folks even go to the bin and hang around it. It's just fulla error. Eventually folks will wake up and not be lead astray by every wind and wave of new 'teaching'.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#5
And they were accused of being drunk because they did appear drunk. Otherwise they would have simply said "these people are speaking gibberish" and not mention drunkeness at all. If they were merely speaking in another language they could not understand, how is that appearing drunk? I could also refer to the old testament when Saul took off his clothes and prophesied, being in ectasy in the Holy Spirit. 1 Sam 19:24 He also stripped off his clothes, and he too prophesied before Samuel and lay down naked all that day and all that night. Therefore they say, "Is Saul also among the prophets?" But you might say the Spirit would never do that, ok then, if you like to tell the Spirit what he can and can't do, not my problem.
I dunno. Maybe saying these follks are drunk is more fun than saying, are they speakin gibberish. If I see folks running around crazy, I may not say, hey why are they runnin around crazy, I may say, are they drunk???

think about it..tons of people talking all at once in different languages....even if you did understand them...it still looks odd and might provoke the reaction...'are these folks drunk??"

You're viewing these verses through your charasmatic lense of 'holy spirit drunkenness'..............But non charasmatics view these as folks seeing other folks talking all together and it being viewed as intense madness!

And using Saul as an example of what happens under normative times of being under the influence of the holy spirit??? Eh. No , not so much of a credible example to me.
 
Last edited:
1

1still_waters

Guest
#6
Some would dismiss certain doctrines and teachings because of the negative fruits they produce, yet these same people cling to their charasmatic movements despite the negatives fruits that are produced. This is quite a confusing inconsistency to me too.
 
C

carpetmanswife

Guest
#7
:D *borrowed from our own 1stillwaters * :p;)
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#8
I dunno. Maybe saying these follks are drunk is more fun than saying, are they speakin gibberish. If I see folks running around crazy, I may not say, hey why are they runnin around crazy, I may say, are they drunk???

think about it..tons of people talking all at once in different languages....even if you did understand them...it still looks odd and might provoke the reaction...'are these folks drunk??"
I respectfully disagree. In the mall for example I hear many different people speaking different languages ( its so multi cultural) , that I would not conclude they were drunk unless they were also staggering about , perhaps falling over and perhaps expressing loud emotions like laughter etc. Where Pentecost took place, being in a multi cultural location too, I doubt that hearing all sorts of different languages would not have been uncommon. So it must have been something else other than the fact they spoke in different languages, that convinced some they were drunk.

You're viewing these verses through your charasmatic lense of 'holy spirit drunkenness'..............But non charasmatics view these as folks seeing other folks talking all together and it being viewed as intense madness!
I'm also viewing these through my lense of experience with the Holy Spirit both personally and what I have observed in others. "Drunk" is probably the best word to describe it. Perhaps non charasmatics who reject the gifts of the Spirit are more like those Jews in the crowd mocking those speaking in tongues and appearing drunk, than the christians experiencing it hmm.

And using Saul as an example of what happens under normative times of being under the influence of the holy spirit??? Eh. No , not so much of a credible example to me.
Are you saying , Saul was not really influenced or controlled by the Spirit , despite it saying the Spirit came upon him?
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#9
I respectfully disagree. In the mall for example I hear many different people speaking different languages ( its so multi cultural) , that I would not conclude they were drunk unless they were also staggering about , perhaps falling over and perhaps expressing loud emotions like laughter etc. Where Pentecost took place, being in a multi cultural location too, I doubt that hearing all sorts of different languages would not have been uncommon. So it must have been something else other than the fact they spoke in different languages, that convinced some they were drunk.



I'm also viewing these through my lense of experience with the Holy Spirit both personally and what I have observed in others. "Drunk" is probably the best word to describe it. Perhaps non charasmatics who reject the gifts of the Spirit are more like those Jews in the crowd mocking those speaking in tongues and appearing drunk, than the christians experiencing it hmm.



Are you saying , Saul was not really influenced or controlled by the Spirit , despite it saying the Spirit came upon him?
Yeah well i see your quotes and raise you a reply!

Ok let's look at this again.

You want to say these folks must of been engaged in some kind of spirit filled drunkenness.

If this is the case, then how could they of at the same time been acting so coherent that others heard them speaking the things of God with great clarity??

The Bible says these people were speaking coherent words. It doesn't say they were saying jibber jabber that no one couldn't understand.

5Now there were staying in Jerusalem God-fearing Jews from every nation under heaven. 6When they heard this sound, a crowd came together in bewilderment, because each one heard them speaking in his own language.

11 (both Jews and converts to Judaism); Cretans and Arabs-we hear them declaring the wonders of God in our own tongues!" 12Amazed and perplexed, they asked one another, "What does this mean?"

So clearly these folks were speaking in coherent words, able to be understood.

Now in our modern day situations where folks are supposedly 'drunk in the Spirit' they are usually laughing and not really able to speak and be sober.

So given the context of Acts and given what some want to label as modern day drunk in the spirit, you have to decide which was happening?

Were these people drunk in the spirit and incoherent? if you answer yes, then you're neglecting the part of the text that shows them as saying clear words and praises to God that were understood!

I think you're failing to grasp the 'scene of the event'. You see what's been written, but you may not really comprehend how chaotic it was.

We know from Acts 1 there were at least 120 folks around who were Christians and gathered there.

15In those days Peter stood up among the believers[c] (a group numbering about a hundred and twenty) 16and said,

Now picture it with me. Don't just read, but picture it.

You're in temple. All the sudden you hear a loud noise of around 120 people being loud.

You decide to go check out the ruckus. Upon getting there you see 120 people, coherently speaking words at the same time that you understand and that others can understand. Yet it seems like mass chaos cuz man, that's 120 people just going on and on!!!

Sure you understand them, but who in their right mind gets in a group of people and does this kinda stuff??? It's just so odd!!!!!!!!!

What might you think to yourself???

Oh man, maybe they're drunk???
 
Last edited:
1

1still_waters

Guest
#10
As far as my Saul reference. At that time of his life Saul was sooooooo far from God, that I wouldn't consider him a valid example of conduct to follow.
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#11
Anyways it's been fun engaging in some rare back and forth and back and forth. I'm outta here. Have fun.
 

BLC

Banned
Feb 28, 2009
711
4
0
#12
And they were accused of being drunk because they did appear drunk. Otherwise they would have simply said "these people are speaking gibberish" and not mention drunkeness at all. If they were merely speaking in another language they could not understand, how is that appearing drunk? I could also refer to the old testament when Saul took off his clothes and prophesied, being in ectasy in the Holy Spirit. 1 Sam 19:24 He also stripped off his clothes, and he too prophesied before Samuel and lay down naked all that day and all that night. Therefore they say, "Is Saul also among the prophets?" But you might say the Spirit would never do that, ok then, if you like to tell the Spirit what he can and can't do, not my problem.
The next time you get all filled up with the Holy Spirit and feel like taking your cloths off, make sure you do it in a safe and private place and not in sight of others because you will be arrested for indecent exposure and that will go on your record. You will be known not just as and extrovert. If you want to be careless and not use discretion, go right ahead. I am sure that the scriptures are sufficient in letting your moderation be made known unto all men (Phil 4:5) even when you are filled with joy unspeakable (1Pt 1:8).
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#13
The next time you get all filled up with the Holy Spirit and feel like taking your cloths off, make sure you do it in a safe and private place and not in sight of others because you will be arrested for indecent exposure and that will go on your record. You will be known not just as and extrovert. If you want to be careless and not use discretion, go right ahead. I am sure that the scriptures are sufficient in letting your moderation be made known unto all men (Phil 4:5) even when you are filled with joy unspeakable (1Pt 1:8).
lol@ joy unspeakable.
 
K

KingdomGeneration

Guest
#14
Some would dismiss certain doctrines and teachings because of the negative fruits they produce, yet these same people cling to their charasmatic movements despite the negatives fruits that are produced. This is quite a confusing inconsistency to me too.
You can always go to a church that produces no fruit it all. They're everywhere these days.
 
K

KingdomGeneration

Guest
#15
I stand behind the statement I made earlier in another thread. I warn my fellow charismatics all the time about making sure that any manifestations are in deed authentic. If people are not getting saved, healed, and delivered, all are fruits of the Holy Spirit that man can not replicate on His own, then one needs to investogate whats going on.
 
L

lil-rush

Guest
#16
The Word says there should be decency and order in the church(1 Corinthians 14:40). Barking, howling, groaning, roaring, shrieking loudly, punching people in the stomach, slapping people in the face, having people thrown across the stage, swaggering like a drunkard are frequent phenomena witnessed at charismatic meetings and churches. This does not line up with Scripture because it is not something that is "decent" and "orderly".
I don't know how many Charismatic churches you've been to, but when I went to one (and I spent most of my life at a Charismatic church) there was never barking, punching, slapping, or throwing people across the stage.

Yes, people were laughing, crying out to Jesus, shouting for joy, running around the sanctuary, and yes people were passing out in the Spirit, but it never got violent.

Personally, I'm not a huge fan of speaking in tongues for the simple reason that I didn't like the way my previous church made people feel if they could not speak in tongues, but in reading 1 Cor 14:26-40 it would appear that scripture is speaking solely of speaking in tongues, and of nothing else.

The results of Pentecost in the Bible were persecution, beatings, and jailings of the preachers, not increased reputations. In Acts 4 they get threatened. In Acts 14:19 Paul was dragged out of the city for dead as he had been stoned. In Acts 16:19-24, Paul and Silas were accused of troubling the city(vs. 20), were beaten and thrown into prison(vs 22-23). In Acts 21:30-33, Paul stirred up Jerusalem to the point they were trying to kill him(vs. 30-31), and were beating him until soldiers came to take him to prison(vs. 32-33).
I don't know what denomination you are, but I am willing to bet your denomination must be fake too since your denomination has most likely not experienced the same persecution the Christians and Messianics did in Paul's time.

The charismatic version of pentecost is "a new break" and "reputation grew" as an example in the above quote. Where is the persecution that charismatics should be receiving? Because in the Word, the apostles were persecuted for preaching the gospel! It was mostly hardship! To charismatics, its joy, joy, joy, and laughter
Even catholicism, and other cults, New Agers, etc rejoice over holy laughter with the ecumenism movement!
You're joking right? Charismatics gain more persecution than most other Protestant denominations do. Both from non-believers and from believers alike. People who are saved, but not Charismatic, attack Charismatics and say how their denomination is false and all their beliefs are bunk. Case in point, this thread is an attack by a fellow believer on Charismatics. Non-believers attack Charismatics not only because they're wild and "crazy" but because they're Christians.

In fact, as Christians, we will face persecutions for standing for the Lord uncompromisingly(1 John 2:15-17, John 15:18-20, 2 Timothy 3:12). I get called a liar, a stirrer of trouble, etc when I tell the lost about sins, repentance, and salvation! Some will even physically threaten me. I expect persecution when witnessing to the lost, and also when I expose false doctrine. I've lost friends for standing up for the Lord. I dont want any praise for what I told you, I only want to serve God and obey Him, all glory goes to Him alone. If it means I have to suffer for obeying Psalm 94:16 , then so be it.
Have you ever gone evangelising with Charismatics? Have you been with every Charismatic every minute of their life to see how they are treated when they share their beliefs with non-believers? How on earth would you know if they are not given the same treatment as you, or not?

It seems to me your whole argument is based on a bountiful amount of generalizations based on what you read online and see on TV.


I am not a Charismatic, but since I did spend most of my life going to a Charismatic church I think I have enough personal experience to say that your overall argument against Charismatics is off-base. Charismatics, just like any other denomination, have their faults, but this does not mean every thing about this is false and unBiblical. I could give you a list of off-base teachings practiced at my previous church, but that does not mean that just because that Charismatic church taught that that every person who went to that church believed those teachings or was a deceived, twisted believer.

I would suggest you move away from attacking groups of people in general, and delve into specifics. Better yet, don't even mention denominations when you wish to refute a belief. Just refute the belief and leave the denomination out of it. It would work wonders to making what you have to say much more acceptable to your readers.
 
B

Baruch

Guest
#17
I stand behind the statement I made earlier in another thread. I warn my fellow charismatics all the time about making sure that any manifestations are in deed authentic. If people are not getting saved, healed, and delivered, all are fruits of the Holy Spirit that man can not replicate on His own, then one needs to investogate whats going on.
I am glad to see that you are practising dsicernment, but....are you sure that is the valid rule of thumb to go by?

Matthew 21:21Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity. 24Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock: 25And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock. 26And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand: 27And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

The fruits of the Spirit are these: love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith,
meekness, temperance:

But to discern falsehood is by this singular method... how you approach God the Father in worship.

John 14:6Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Matthew 7:13Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: 14Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. 15Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?

Again, if anyone still believe it is okay to seek after the Holy Spirit when He is in them, then why is this instruction given to avoid false spirits as well as false prophets below? Why is it that whenever believers broaden the Way in approaching God in worship by going after more of the Holy Spirit as if He has to come, they fail to see how ecumenical and inclusive this "move" of the spirit is and yet catholics are still catholics as carnal believers are still carnal? The fruit of the false prophet is how it gathers all kinds and yet they still remain the same in practise and sinful living, but all that has really changed is the way they worship, serving and glorifying something else in His name. Thus the reason why below.

Luke 13:24Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.

FYI May God cause the increase.
 
B

Baruch

Guest
#18
I don't know how many Charismatic churches you've been to, but when I went to one (and I spent most of my life at a Charismatic church) there was never barking, punching, slapping, or throwing people across the stage.

Yes, people were laughing, crying out to Jesus, shouting for joy, running around the sanctuary, and yes people were passing out in the Spirit, but it never got violent.

Personally, I'm not a huge fan of speaking in tongues for the simple reason that I didn't like the way my previous church made people feel if they could not speak in tongues, but in reading 1 Cor 14:26-40 it would appear that scripture is speaking solely of speaking in tongues, and of nothing else.


Next time you come across a charismatic, ask if he or she has experienced or witnessed the barking, punching, slapping, or throwing people across the stage. You are a researcher or was that just for the debate team? Apply that researching expertise and investigate. Lean on the Lord Jesus for discernment, but as a fair warning... Jesus said not to go there so... if anyone hyping about a move of the "Spirit"... heed His warning and don't go there. Just interview those that were there.

People passing out in the "Spirit" is my application of a house that has been broken through by a thief and great is the fall of it. Matthew 7:13-27 That is what a wayward believer gets for not heeding this commandment in approaching God the Father through the Son in worship or prayer. John 14:6 People are falling away literally from the faith when they seek another spirit to receive as if they had not received the Holy Spirit. This is the prophetic warning coming true now: 1 Timothy 4:1-2

1 Corinthians 14th chapter was about exhorting the gift of prophesy and to seek that gift above all.. yes.. ALL spiritual gifts and as believers today are getting carried away with tongues as if that is the one God wants them to have and to seek after.. yet Paul, as led by the Holy Spirit, is giving a different focus... prophesy is to be sought after over ALL spiritual gifts... then Paul went to downplaying tongues as to why prophesy is better than tongues THROUGHOUT the whole chapter. If you read the whole chapter in context, you would see that and why Paul had to make sure that after all that downplaying of tongues, he says not to forbid speaking in tongues but let everything be done in decency and in order just so that no one thought he was speaking against tongues entirely.

What you described as going on in that charismatic church is one of disorder and chaos which God is not the author of. Those verses were included in your reference out of thyat chapter so do apply them for discernment... and yes... Jesus has to give you wisdom in discerning that by the scriptures.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#19
You decide to go check out the ruckus. Upon getting there you see 120 people, coherently speaking words at the same time that you understand and that others can understand. Yet it seems like mass chaos cuz man, that's 120 people just going on and on!!!
Obviously they had little self control, which is a fruit of the Spirit. God is not a God of confusion and disorder remember. So these scenes at Pentecost must not have been from God :p. See what I mean, we could interpret the whole bible in this way if you like, according to what you are used to in church, like sober expressionless faces, nice quiet organ music and stale air, no one saying peek-a-boo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.