Continuationism vs cessastionism?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Aug 18, 2011
971
7
0
#1
It is only after many hours of research that I have come to a conclusion on this topic that seems to be as hot a debate today than ever. After checking in on both sides of the issue fairly thoroughly (as there is enough literature on this topic to keep one busy for years) and having taken in account of both sides of the debate it would seem to a logical and open mind that some gifts have never ceased.
That is also to say that if one says that there are demons at work in the world (which most would agree there are) there then has to be the Holy Spirit at work in the world as well guiding things along according to Gods plan and in some way countering ever the forces of evil ensuring all things unfold according to Gods plan.
So in coming to this conclusion one would have to admit that gifts of some nature still do exist even today.

Here's the catch due to the unfortunate P.T. Barnum approach of Evangelical and Charismatical ministries (with all good intent aside) and the many denominational fractures going all the way back to the first church at Antioch when Paul said "when I am gone there will be those who shall come in among you as wolves among the sheep and will spare not the flock"
We can see with our historical glasses that every time man pulled away from God and did not follow his commandments that God would punish him for his sins. There are so many examples without looking at scripture in the last 2000 years let alone including it as well. For example;
434-453 A.D. Attila the hun scourges all of the baltic countries going as far as the Rhine river and northern Italy but failing to take Rome and Constantinople though.
Was this divine punishment to the Christians of the day for their lack of faith or just another heavyweight of his day conquering for the sake of conquest itself?

800 A.D. Charlemagne conquers most of Europe and is crowned Holy Roman Emperor.
When looking at this try to see it from an outside perspective looking in.
Was this merely a King conquering empire or was it divine in nature?
Was it nothing more than pope leo III trying to save his own skin or did God intervene to protect the church for a greater purpose as yet not revealed

1200A.D. The mongol hordes of Ghengis Khan ravage the asian continent and into Europe as far as Modern day France building what remained the largest Empire ever built until The height of the Victorian era when it was said that the sun never set on the English empire.
Was Ghengis really sent by God as he himself stated as the great slayer of wicked men lost in their pride and lust?
Were the Christian people of the day punished for falling away from God as the jews who were exiled to Babylon for their falling away?

Yet the church and the teachings of Christ survived none the less.

1600 A.D. The great split in the Catholic church with the age of enlightenment and reformationist period in full swing and Protestantism becoming widely accepted in Germany, England,France etc.
Was this a manifestation in itself coming to save the church yet again for what some of the day considered heresies I.E. selling of indulgences , purgatory etc.?
Did Wycliffe actually prophesy about Martin Luther?

It would seem to an intellectual mind that even though the Word has had its share of detractors and attackers, those whose sole purpose was to destroy it, that it is very much alive and well and thriving.

This could not happen unless there were an unseen force which most men cannot see (yet some may feel) that was directing it all along ergo THE HOLY SPIRIT IS VERY MUCH AT WORK EVERY DAY.
If we do not see evidence for this, that's because of one of several reasons;
1 We refuse to see it because of our beliefs or interpretations of said doctrines therefore it doesn't exist and we only focus on that, that we wish to see or have been taught..............Lack of desire for the Holy Spirit to manifest itself in yourself due to taught doctrine that it cannot be so.......(cessationism?)
2 We haven't looked for it in earnest because we do not believe we will find it ergo..... lack of faith

In saying this though we have to be very vigilant of false doctrine (which if Sola Scriptura is applied with understanding and a true love for the spirit of the Word is recognizable for what it is)
To say to a man who believes he has been healed of a sickness or depraved character by faith alone (his faith or someone elses) "that is poppycock" is to gainsay his faith (judge not lest ye be judged) or deny that the spirit is in him at all
Unfortunately as I said earlier the Evangelical and Charismatical movements and their P.T. Barnum approach to spiritualism have done much damage to this Idea of Moderate Continuationism and in so doing have "not spared many of the flock" and caused further divisions within Christianity as a whole.

In conclusion I would have to say gifts of some magnitude most certainly exist today to refute the existence of said gifts is to deny that the Lord has authority over the world which is obviously not the case and to deny that the holy spirit is at work for the purpose of Gods greater glory.
Also much discernment must be shown when recognizing these gifts for what they are and to give thanks and glory to him whom whom has bestowed them namely God and to rebuke those who would perform trickery in place of good works so as to further their own imaginings of glory instead of Gods.

Selah




 
Aug 18, 2011
971
7
0
#2
Come on Doc. get in here I see ya I'm sure when zoney, uncle fes, abiding and the gang all read this their gonna tear into it like a lion into a gazelle on the Serengetti plain! But to me it seems to make alot of sense especially when viewed from outside the box.
 
Aug 25, 2011
689
3
0
52
#3
Given unto every generation under man: The Gospel of Jesus Christ shall and will be perserved!
 
C

Crossfire

Guest
#4
It is only after many hours of research that I have come to a conclusion on this topic that seems to be as hot a debate today than ever. After checking in on both sides of the issue fairly thoroughly (as there is enough literature on this topic to keep one busy for years) and having taken in account of both sides of the debate it would seem to a logical and open mind that some gifts have never ceased.
That is also to say that if one says that there are demons at work in the world (which most would agree there are) there then has to be the Holy Spirit at work in the world as well guiding things along according to Gods plan and in some way countering ever the forces of evil ensuring all things unfold according to Gods plan.
So in coming to this conclusion one would have to admit that gifts of some nature still do exist even today.

Here's the catch due to the unfortunate P.T. Barnum approach of Evangelical and Charismatical ministries (with all good intent aside) and the many denominational fractures going all the way back to the first church at Antioch when Paul said "when I am gone there will be those who shall come in among you as wolves among the sheep and will spare not the flock"
We can see with our historical glasses that every time man pulled away from God and did not follow his commandments that God would punish him for his sins. There are so many examples without looking at scripture in the last 2000 years let alone including it as well. For example;
434-453 A.D. Attila the hun scourges all of the baltic countries going as far as the Rhine river and northern Italy but failing to take Rome and Constantinople though.
Was this divine punishment to the Christians of the day for their lack of faith or just another heavyweight of his day conquering for the sake of conquest itself?

800 A.D. Charlemagne conquers most of Europe and is crowned Holy Roman Emperor.
When looking at this try to see it from an outside perspective looking in.
Was this merely a King conquering empire or was it divine in nature?
Was it nothing more than pope leo III trying to save his own skin or did God intervene to protect the church for a greater purpose as yet not revealed

1200A.D. The mongol hordes of Ghengis Khan ravage the asian continent and into Europe as far as Modern day France building what remained the largest Empire ever built until The height of the Victorian era when it was said that the sun never set on the English empire.
Was Ghengis really sent by God as he himself stated as the great slayer of wicked men lost in their pride and lust?
Were the Christian people of the day punished for falling away from God as the jews who were exiled to Babylon for their falling away?

Yet the church and the teachings of Christ survived none the less.

1600 A.D. The great split in the Catholic church with the age of enlightenment and reformationist period in full swing and Protestantism becoming widely accepted in Germany, England,France etc.
Was this a manifestation in itself coming to save the church yet again for what some of the day considered heresies I.E. selling of indulgences , purgatory etc.?
Did Wycliffe actually prophesy about Martin Luther?

It would seem to an intellectual mind that even though the Word has had its share of detractors and attackers, those whose sole purpose was to destroy it, that it is very much alive and well and thriving.

This could not happen unless there were an unseen force which most men cannot see (yet some may feel) that was directing it all along ergo THE HOLY SPIRIT IS VERY MUCH AT WORK EVERY DAY.
If we do not see evidence for this, that's because of one of several reasons;
1 We refuse to see it because of our beliefs or interpretations of said doctrines therefore it doesn't exist and we only focus on that, that we wish to see or have been taught..............Lack of desire for the Holy Spirit to manifest itself in yourself due to taught doctrine that it cannot be so.......(cessationism?)
2 We haven't looked for it in earnest because we do not believe we will find it ergo..... lack of faith

In saying this though we have to be very vigilant of false doctrine (which if Sola Scriptura is applied with understanding and a true love for the spirit of the Word is recognizable for what it is)
To say to a man who believes he has been healed of a sickness or depraved character by faith alone (his faith or someone elses) "that is poppycock" is to gainsay his faith (judge not lest ye be judged) or deny that the spirit is in him at all
Unfortunately as I said earlier the Evangelical and Charismatical movements and their P.T. Barnum approach to spiritualism have done much damage to this Idea of Moderate Continuationism and in so doing have "not spared many of the flock" and caused further divisions within Christianity as a whole.

In conclusion I would have to say gifts of some magnitude most certainly exist today to refute the existence of said gifts is to deny that the Lord has authority over the world which is obviously not the case and to deny that the holy spirit is at work for the purpose of Gods greater glory.
Also much discernment must be shown when recognizing these gifts for what they are and to give thanks and glory to him whom whom has bestowed them namely God and to rebuke those who would perform trickery in place of good works so as to further their own imaginings of glory instead of Gods.

Selah
While I would not have taken this approach, you do make some valid points. I tend to lean toward moderate continuationism also and I would agree that certain Charismatic circles have turned the gifts of the Holy Spirit into some sort of circus side show. However, I'm not quite sure how Evangelicalism fits into your line of thinking.

Anyways you have a blessed day.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#5
Im wondering why you list my name. Since ive never claimed to be a cessationist, nor ever said anything but to the fact that God always had and always will have full authority and sovereignty over all His creation. Ive quoted scripture that says He appoints kings and takes them down. Although Ive made threads and tried
to produce dialogue, ive never denied any gift except apostles and prophets at the level of those at the beginning of the church...the ones mentioned that will be represented by 12 pillars in New Jerusalem.

But i rekon you have the right to be as presumptious as everyone else in these forums. It seems like there is just a virus of that sort in here.
And who in their right mind would think God wasnt God anyway. This is just careless Muskokaman. But nothing unusual for the forums.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#7
I liked that thread Doc. Same here mostly. Im not shy to call on a fake or false gift tho.
And I never will be. Its not that i always will..its just that im not fearful to do it when it
needs done.
 

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#8
In saying this though we have to be very vigilant of false doctrine (which if Sola Scriptura is applied with understanding and a true love for the spirit of the Word is recognizable for what it is)
Sola Scriptura is no longer useful if the revelatory offices and gifts are continuing (Apostles/prophet/knowledge/languages).

we have one or the other:

a completed canon whereby we may say Sola Scriptura, each man able to access the mature/complete revealed will of God

OR

Apostles (who were also prophets) in charge of managing all those partial gifts, and using it all to lay the foundation continually, not one member knowing anything more than was either personally revealed to him (language) or by what the travelling Apostles says by word or by letter.

....

cessationism does not:

say the Holy Spirit is not active and working and regenerating, performing His commission fully.

say The Lord is not able to heal or strike down, to answer prayer with signs

say God will not perform miracles today.

..........

cessationism is dealing STRICTLY with the Acts (tongues which are languages) and the partial revelatory gifts recorced being misused at corinth: all these were partial and ceased.

God works Providentially as He alays has, and the Holy Spirit together with the word is able to bring men to saving faith....this is what the church has believed for 1900 years.


if the partial gifts are operating today, none of us can or should claim SOLA SCRIPTURA.

but i have been told this issue really doesn't matter much. so i'll not say much more about it.
 
Last edited:

zone

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2010
27,214
164
63
#9
Combating Charismatic Theology: Phil Johnson

Combating Charismatic Theology* -- Phil Johnson


Cessationist Frank Turk:

I affirm that Reformation theology requires the personal action of God the Holy Spirit for the life of the Church.

I affirm that miracles happen today. No sense in prayer and believing in a sovereign God if he's not going to ever be sovereign, right?

I affirm that God is utterly capable of, and completely willing, to demonstrate "signs and wonders" at any time, in any place, according to his good pleasure and for his great purpose.

I affirm the real presence of the Holy Spirit in the church of Jesus Christ as Jesus said He would be present in John 13-15.

I affirm that the normative working of the Holy Spirit in the life of the church begins with conviction of sin and regeneration, and continues through sanctification, and through the outworking of personal gifts (e.g. - Gal 5:22-23, 1 Cor 13:4-7) for the edification of the (local) church.

I affirm the uniqueness of the office of apostle in the founding of the church.

I affirm that leadership in the church is a task wholly-empowered by the Holy Spirit to men meeting the scriptural qualifications, and that the objectives of this leadership are wholly-defined by the Holy Spirit explicitly through Scripture and implicitly as the gifts of leaders are applied to a real people in a local church.

............................................................


I deny that this work necessarily includes speaking in tongues (as in Acts 2 as well as in so-called "private prayer langauges"), healing the sick or raising the dead by explicit command, prophecy in the sense that Isaiah and John the Baptist were prophets, or any other "sign-and-wonder"-like exhibition. That is: I deny that these actions are necessary for the post-apostolic church to function as God intended.

I deny that there is any man alive today who is gifted to perform miracles as Christ and the Apostles where gifted to perform miracles.

I deny that this activity is common, normative, necessary, or in the best interest of God's people to been seen as common, normative and/or necessary. God in fact warns us against seeking signs rather than the thing signified repeatedly in the OT and NT.

I deny that this means that all believers or even all local churches will be equipped with apostles called and equipped as the 12 and Paul were called and equipped. A telling example is the role of apostles in delivering Scripture to the church.

I deny that explicitly-supernatural outworkings, or events the Bible calls "signs and wonders" (e.g. - Acts 2:1-11, Acts 3:3-7, Acts 5:1-11, Acts 9:32-35, etc.) are either normative or necessary for the on-going life of the church.

I deny the necessity of apostles for the on-going life of the church.

I deny that church leadership is like business leadership -- that is, a system of techniques that have outcomes measurable by secular metrics of success -- and further deny that merely-competant management processes yield the fruit of the Holy Spirit

Pyromaniacs: Open Letter to Mark Driscoll


i say yea and amen to all the above.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
#10
It is only after many hours of research that I have come to a conclusion on this topic that seems to be as hot a debate today than ever. After checking in on both sides of the issue fairly thoroughly (as there is enough literature on this topic to keep one busy for years) and having taken in account of both sides of the debate it would seem to a logical and open mind that some gifts have never ceased.
That is also to say that if one says that there are demons at work in the world (which most would agree there are) there then has to be the Holy Spirit at work in the world as well guiding things along according to Gods plan and in some way countering ever the forces of evil ensuring all things unfold according to Gods plan.
So in coming to this conclusion one would have to admit that gifts of some nature still do exist even today.

Here's the catch due to the unfortunate P.T. Barnum approach of Evangelical and Charismatical ministries (with all good intent aside) and the many denominational fractures going all the way back to the first church at Antioch when Paul said "when I am gone there will be those who shall come in among you as wolves among the sheep and will spare not the flock"
We can see with our historical glasses that every time man pulled away from God and did not follow his commandments that God would punish him for his sins. There are so many examples without looking at scripture in the last 2000 years let alone including it as well. For example;
434-453 A.D. Attila the hun scourges all of the baltic countries going as far as the Rhine river and northern Italy but failing to take Rome and Constantinople though.
Was this divine punishment to the Christians of the day for their lack of faith or just another heavyweight of his day conquering for the sake of conquest itself?

800 A.D. Charlemagne conquers most of Europe and is crowned Holy Roman Emperor.
When looking at this try to see it from an outside perspective looking in.
Was this merely a King conquering empire or was it divine in nature?
Was it nothing more than pope leo III trying to save his own skin or did God intervene to protect the church for a greater purpose as yet not revealed

1200A.D. The mongol hordes of Ghengis Khan ravage the asian continent and into Europe as far as Modern day France building what remained the largest Empire ever built until The height of the Victorian era when it was said that the sun never set on the English empire.
Was Ghengis really sent by God as he himself stated as the great slayer of wicked men lost in their pride and lust?
Were the Christian people of the day punished for falling away from God as the jews who were exiled to Babylon for their falling away?

Yet the church and the teachings of Christ survived none the less.

1600 A.D. The great split in the Catholic church with the age of enlightenment and reformationist period in full swing and Protestantism becoming widely accepted in Germany, England,France etc.
Was this a manifestation in itself coming to save the church yet again for what some of the day considered heresies I.E. selling of indulgences , purgatory etc.?
Did Wycliffe actually prophesy about Martin Luther?

It would seem to an intellectual mind that even though the Word has had its share of detractors and attackers, those whose sole purpose was to destroy it, that it is very much alive and well and thriving.

This could not happen unless there were an unseen force which most men cannot see (yet some may feel) that was directing it all along ergo THE HOLY SPIRIT IS VERY MUCH AT WORK EVERY DAY.
If we do not see evidence for this, that's because of one of several reasons;
1 We refuse to see it because of our beliefs or interpretations of said doctrines therefore it doesn't exist and we only focus on that, that we wish to see or have been taught..............Lack of desire for the Holy Spirit to manifest itself in yourself due to taught doctrine that it cannot be so.......(cessationism?)
2 We haven't looked for it in earnest because we do not believe we will find it ergo..... lack of faith

In saying this though we have to be very vigilant of false doctrine (which if Sola Scriptura is applied with understanding and a true love for the spirit of the Word is recognizable for what it is)
To say to a man who believes he has been healed of a sickness or depraved character by faith alone (his faith or someone elses) "that is poppycock" is to gainsay his faith (judge not lest ye be judged) or deny that the spirit is in him at all
Unfortunately as I said earlier the Evangelical and Charismatical movements and their P.T. Barnum approach to spiritualism have done much damage to this Idea of Moderate Continuationism and in so doing have "not spared many of the flock" and caused further divisions within Christianity as a whole.

In conclusion I would have to say gifts of some magnitude most certainly exist today to refute the existence of said gifts is to deny that the Lord has authority over the world which is obviously not the case and to deny that the holy spirit is at work for the purpose of Gods greater glory.
Also much discernment must be shown when recognizing these gifts for what they are and to give thanks and glory to him whom whom has bestowed them namely God and to rebuke those who would perform trickery in place of good works so as to further their own imaginings of glory instead of Gods.

Selah
1. No one claims the HS is not at work today. We just claim he does not work today like he did when the church was being started. We can see in every institution ever created by God that things started out with many signs and wonders, and as time went on these signs ceased (ISreal spent 400 years with no prophet. Although during this time the nation as a whole was in rebellion still, and had been since before babylon took them, It never stopped God from bringin in prophets in the past)

2. God sent the church out into the world, Go therefore and make disciples) He did not tell them to put on a circus show to bring people in. If Charsmatism was a true force. They would be out in hospitals healing people who really need healed. They would be at funeral homes, raising people from the dead. They would be out in the world. where people need God. Not sitting in fancy churches. Paying money to advertise "come to God be healed, see the power of God at work." Come to our expensive church building, see out pastor drive expensive cars and wear thousand dollar suits. And then when someone comes (as many charismatic churches I have seen do) say the amount of money you give will determine the amount of healing you will receive.

3. If there is a word God wants us to know that can not be found in scripture (prophesy) where are these words. I have asked many to show me one thing God wanted us to know which can not be found in scripture. Have yet to hear one thing. So whats up with this?

4. The HS is at work. Just not like many want to say he works.
 
C

Consumed

Guest
#11
Jer 32:27
Everything is according to His will - sovereign
 
Aug 18, 2011
971
7
0
#12
Im wondering why you list my name. Since ive never claimed to be a cessationist, nor ever said anything but to the fact that God always had and always will have full authority and sovereignty over all His creation. Ive quoted scripture that says He appoints kings and takes them down. Although Ive made threads and tried
to produce dialogue, ive never denied any gift except apostles and prophets at the level of those at the beginning of the church...the ones mentioned that will be represented by 12 pillars in New Jerusalem.

But i rekon you have the right to be as presumptious as everyone else in these forums. It seems like there is just a virus of that sort in here.
And who in their right mind would think God wasnt God anyway. This is just careless Muskokaman. But nothing unusual for the forums.
My apologies if Ive offended Abiding twas not my intent and careless ness may happen near 4 am when eyes are dreary.
 
Feb 23, 2011
1,708
13
0
#15
Only one passage of scripture addresses cessation. The subject is a matter of interpretation and conceptualization. Few will change their view if they're convinced they hold the truth, just like every other doctrinal position.

Cessation and Continuation are both abused at their extremes. It's unfortunate that there's much more rhetoric and opinion than true exegesis. I spent several years praying and fasting while reading and studying for a clear exegetical understanding that wasn't based on my own or others' pre-supposed disposition. I doubt sharing the entire exegesis will be of any effect on most, even though most positions are "staked out" based on something other than a careful study of the original language.

"That which is perfect (teleios)" is NOT the completed canon according to a thorough exegesis of that passage. That doesn't warrant the rampant wholesale abuse, misuse, and perversion of gifts that deemphasizes the Giver and also exalts the unknown words of tongues over the Word that was made flesh.
 
Aug 18, 2011
971
7
0
#16
Sola Scriptura is no longer useful if the revelatory offices and gifts are continuing (Apostles/prophet/knowledge/languages).

we have one or the other:

a completed canon whereby we may say Sola Scriptura, each man able to access the mature/complete revealed will of God

OR

Apostles (who were also prophets) in charge of managing all those partial gifts, and using it all to lay the foundation continually, not one member knowing anything more than was either personally revealed to him (language) or by what the travelling Apostles says by word or by letter.

....

cessationism does not:

say the Holy Spirit is not active and working and regenerating, performing His commission fully.

say The Lord is not able to heal or strike down, to answer prayer with signs

say God will not perform miracles today.

..........

cessationism is dealing STRICTLY with the Acts (tongues which are languages) and the partial revelatory gifts recorced being misused at corinth: all these were partial and ceased.

God works Providentially as He alays has, and the Holy Spirit together with the word is able to bring men to saving faith....this is what the church has believed for 1900 years.


if the partial gifts are operating today, none of us can or should claim SOLA SCRIPTURA.

but i have been told this issue really doesn't matter much. so i'll not say much more about it.
1 we would all have to agree on when the canon was finished since we cannot either Catholics Protestants or Orthodoxy then logically one has to fall back to acceptance that the gifts even if only being used partially are still very much in effect as Jesus hasn't returned yet for their ceasement
2 To say these gifts are not at work or in use is to say that the Holy Spirit is not at work which is false
3 If we still can see visible signs of the holy spirit manifesting itself in signs miracles etc. then one has to conclude that the whole cessationist Arguement is nullified
4 Cessationism according to the research I have done includes (tongues, healing and prophecy and all gifts related to such occurences)
5 Sola Scriptura as you pointed out to me my dear friend and teacher is most valuble. Regardless of who's doctrine we are reading from (within reason) the spirit of the word is very powerful and has and is very capable of motivating men to whatever ends the Lord has designed for them.(still in effect)and regardless of how it may have been added to or detracted from the power is still in the message. Westerners rely heavily on the Antiochian method of teaching While Easterners rely more on the Alexandrian method of metaphor etc. Both have their place and should not be dismissed soley on the basis of either belief or disbelief.
6 As I stated the fracturing of the church into many divisions is analogous of a tree with God as the stump, Jesus as the trunk and The modern religous Landscape as the branches some bear much good fruit some bear little and others completely die off.
7 My goal with this post was not to condemn but to find common ground from which Gods church on earth can be restored to it's former glory as it was in the days of Paul. Charasmaticism (to me anyway) would seem to suggest those like Benny Hinn and the like who perform a sideshow rather than the works of God

Anyways gotta go works calling I will come back in a while and see what has transpired

Selah
 
Feb 23, 2011
1,708
13
0
#17
Are people being physically raised from the dead?

If not then you have to admit to some kind of cessationism.

you may have to adapt your Def.
Conversely, if there were even one raised from the dead, there would have to be some kind of continuation.

However, the real test is scripture and its appropriate exegesis. Opinion, assertion, and affiliation are meaningless for any degree of either "side".
 
Last edited:
A

AnandaHya

Guest
#18
"That which is perfect (teleios)" is NOT the completed canon according to a thorough exegesis of that passage. That doesn't warrant the rampant wholesale abuse, misuse, and perversion of gifts that deemphasizes the Giver and also exalts the unknown words of tongues over the Word that was made flesh.
Yep JESUS SUPREME LORD AND SAVIOR AMEN!
 
Aug 12, 2010
2,819
12
0
#20
7 My goal with this post was not to condemn but to find common ground from which Gods church on earth can be restored to it's former glory as it was in the days of Paul. Charasmaticism (to me anyway) would seem to suggest those like Benny Hinn and the like who perform a sideshow rather than the works of God

What makes you think the Church is not as glorious as it ever was?

Why the need for a RESTORATION?