Who Is Jesus Christ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Alfance

Guest
#1
Praise the Lord
****** [FONT=&quot]Who Is Jesus Christ?[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]“I am the Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the Ending, says the Lord, Who is and Who was and Who is to come, the Almighty” (Revelation 1:8)[/FONT][FONT=&quot]

[/FONT] The Most Glorious of Truths

There is no truth more greatly opposed by mankind, which can justifiably lead us to suspect, or truly believe, that it is the greatest truth of all. This I believe: Anyone who knows this truth in the heart of hearts, and not just in the head, stands in the perfect will and ordained rest of God.
Jesus Christ, Almighty God

Jesus Christ, by living in complete submission to God, which could only come by a pureness of heart in a spirit untainted by sin, served as a conduit of Light that fully illuminated the Being of God. We do not know the great honor of God, until we see Him honored by Christ. We do not know the great glory of God, until we see Him glorified by Christ. We do not know the great power of God, until we see His power in Christ. We do not know Him by faith, until we come into the faith of Christ. Jesus Christ, His life wholly subsumed by God, is the very expression of God, and is the only Way that all men can know Him.
Could Jesus Christ Have Sinned?

We have before us a most solemn question and, appropriately, a most solemn answer to that question with an inescapable conclusion. Has a great and holy man, who somehow miraculously escaped sinning, saved us, or have we been saved by a sure and perfect Savior, One Who made no gamble and took no chances, One Who was sure to do the job?
The Son of Man and His Mission in the Israel of God

Who is the Messiah, if not God? Who is this Son of Man that fulfills the Law and the Prophets? What does it mean for those who believe and the rest of the world? What a day it is when the Messiah appears!
 
May 3, 2009
246
2
0
#2
quote]

GOD THE SON

"We have also as a Physician the Lord our God, Jesus the Christ, the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin "
Ignatius of Antioch,To the Ephesians,7(A.D. 110),in ANF,1:52

"For if you had understood what has been written by the prophets, you would not have denied that He was God, Son of the only, unbegotten, unutterable God."
Justin Martyr,Dialogue with Trypho,121(A.D. 155),in ANF,1:263

"God was in the beginning; but the beginning, we have been taught, is the power of the Logos. For the Lord of the universe, who is Himself the necessary ground of all being, inasmuch as no creature was yet in existence, was alone; but inasmuch as He was all power, Himself the necessary ground of things visible and invisible, with Him were all things; with Him, by Logos-power, the Logos Himself also, who was in Him, subsists. And by His simple will the Logos springs forth; and the Logos, not coming forth in vain, becomes the first-begotten work of the Father. Him (the Logos) we know to be the beginning of the world. But He came into being by participation, not by abscission; for what is cut off is separated from the original substance, but that which comes by participation, making its choice of function, does not render him deficient from whom it is taken. For just as from one torch many fires are lighted, but the light of the first torch is not lessened by the kindling of many torches, so the Logos, coming forth from the Logos-power of the Father, has not divested of the Logos-power Him who begat Him."
Tatian the Syrian,Oration Against the Greeks,5(c.A.D.175),in ANF,II:67

"We do not act as fools, O Greeks, nor utter idle tales, when we announce that God was born in the form of a man."
Tatian the Syrian,Oration Against the Greeks,21(c.A.D.175),in ANF,II:74

"But the Son of God is the Logos of the Father, in idea and in operation; for after the pattern of Him and by Him were all things made, the Father and the Son being one. And, the Son being in the Father and the Father in the Son, in oneness and power of spirit, the understanding and reason of the Father is the Son of God. But if, in your surpassing intelligence, it occurs to you to inquire what is meant by the Son, I will state briefly that He is the first product of the Father, not as having been brought into existence (for from the beginning, God, who is the eternal mind, had the Logos in Himself, being from eternity instinct with Logos "
Athenagoras,Plea for Christians,10(A.D. 177),in ANF,II:133

"We have already asserted that God made the world, and all which it contains, by His Word, and Reason, and Power. It is abundantly plain that your philosophers, too, regard the Logos--that is, the Word and Reason--as the Creator of the universe...And we, in like manner, hold that the Word, and Reason, and Power, by which we have said God made all, have spirit as their proper and essential substratum, in which the Word has inbeing to give forth utterances, and reason abides to dispose and arrange, and power is over all to execute. We have been taught that He proceeds forth from God, and in that procession He is generated; so that He is the Son of God, and is called God from unity of substance with God. For God, too, is a Spirit. Even when the ray is shot from the sun, it is still part of the parent mass; the sun will still be in the ray, because it is a ray of the sun--there is no division of substance, but merely an extension. Thus Christ is Spirit of Spirit, and God of God, as light of light is kindled. The material matrix remains entire and unimpaired, though you derive from it any number of shoots possessed of its qualities; so, too, that which has come forth out of God is at once God and the Son of God, and the two are one. In this way also, as He is Spirit of Spirit and God of God, He is made a second in manner of existence--in position, not in nature; and He did not withdraw from the original source, but went forth. This ray of God, then, as it was always foretold in ancient times, descending into a certain virgin, and made flesh in her womb, is in His birth God and man united."
Tertullian,Apology,21(A.D. 197),in ANF,III:34-35

"But nothing exists, the cause of whose existence is not supplied by God. Nothing, then, is hated by God, nor yet by the Word. For both are one--that is, God."
Clement of Alexandria,The Instructor,I:8(A.D. 202),in ANF,II:225

"And thus there appeared another beside Himself. But when I say another, I do not mean that there are two Gods, but that it is only as light of light, or as water from a fountain, or as a ray from the sun. For there is but one power, which is from the All; and the Father is the All, from whom cometh this Power, the Word. And this is the mind which came forth into the world, and was manifested as the Son of God."
Hippolytus,Against the Heresy of One Noetus,11(A.D. 210),in ANF,V:227

"The Logos alone of this God is from God himself; wherefore also the Logos is God, being the substance of God."
Hippolytus,Refutation against All Heresies,10:29(A.D. 220),in ANF,V:151

"Secondly, That Jesus Christ Himself, who came (into the world), was born of the Father before all creatures; that, after He had been the servant of the Father in the creation of all things--'For by Him were all things made'--He in the last times, divesting Himself (of His glory), became a man, and was incarnate although God, and while made a man remained the God which He was; that He assumed a body like to our own, differing in this respect only, that it was born of a virgin and of the Holy Spirit: that this Jesus Christ was truly born, and did truly suffer, and did not endure this death common (to man) in appearance only, but did truly die; that He did truly rise from the dead; and that after His resurrection He conversed with His disciples, and was taken up (into heaven)."
Origen,First Principles,Pref 4(A.D. 230),in ANF,IV:240
 
May 3, 2009
246
2
0
#3
"For Scripture as much announces Christ as also God, as it announces God Himself as man."
Novatian,Concerning the Trinity,11(A.D. 235),in ANF,V:620

"If of Christ; he could not become His temple, since he denies that Christ is God."
Cyprian,To Jubaianus,Epistle 72[73]:12(A.D. 256),in ANF,V:382

"But since He{Jesus] is God in reality and without any shadow of doubt, do you think that we will deny that He is worshipped by us with all the fervour we are capable of, and assumed as the guardian of our body? Is that Christ of yours a god, then? some raving, wrathful, and excited man will say. A god, we will reply."
Arnobius,Against the Heathen,1:42(A.D. 305),in ANF,VI:424

"He became both the Son of God through the Spirit, and the Son of man through the flesh,--that is, both God and man."
Lactantius,Divine Institutes,4:13(A.D. 310),in ANF,VII:112

"...And in one Lord Jesus Christ,the Son of God,begotten from the Father,only-begotten,that is,from the substance of the Father,God from God,light from light,true God from true God,begotten not made,of one substance with the Father..."
Creed of Nicea(A.D. 325),in ECC,215

"Believe also in the Son of God, One and Only, our Lord Jesus Christ, Who was be-gotten God of God, begotten Life of Life, begotten Light of Light, Who is in all things likes to Him that begat, Who received not His being in time, but was before all ages eternally and incomprehensibly begotten of the Father: The Wisdom and the Power of God, and His Righteousness personally subsisting: Who sitteth on the right hand of the Father before all ages."
Cyril of Jerusalem,Catechetical Lectures,4:7(A.D. 350),in NPNF2,VII:20-21

"ince the generation of the Son from the Father is not according to the nature of men, and not only like, but also inseparable from the essence of the Father, and He and the Father are one, as He has said Himself, and the Word is ever in the Father and the Father in the Word, as the radiance stands towards the light (for this the phrase itself indicates), therefore the Council, as understanding this, suitably wrote 'one in essence,' that they might both defeat the perverseness of the heretics, and shew that the Word was other than originated things."
Athanasius,Defence of the Nicene Council,20(A.D. 350),in NPNF2,IV:164

"On this account and reasonably, having said before, 'I and the Father are One,' He added, 'I in the Father and the Father in Me,' by way of shewing the identity of Godhead and the unity of Essence. For they are one, not as one thing divided into two parts, and these nothing but one, nor as one thing twice named, so that the Same becomes at one time Father, at another His own Son, for this Sabellius holding was judged an heretic. But They are two, because the Father is Father and is not also Son, and the Son is Son and not also Father; but the nature is one; (for the offspring is not unlike its parent, for it is his image), and all that is the Father's, is the Son's. Wherefore neither is the Son another God, for He was not procured from without, else were there many, if a godhead be procured foreign from the Father's; for if the Son be other, as an Offspring, still He is the Same as God; and He and the Father are one in propriety and peculiarity of nature, and in the identity of the one Godhead, as has been said. For the radiance also is light, not second to the sun, nor a different light, nor from participation of it, but a whole and proper offspring of it. And such an offspring is necessarily one light; and no one would say that they are two lights, but sun and radiance two, yet one the light from the sun enlightening in its radiance all things. So also the Godhead of the Son is the Father's; whence also it is indivisible; and thus there is one God and none other but He. And so, since they are one, and the Godhead itself one, the same things are said of the Son, which are said of the Father, except His being said to be Father:--for instance, that He is God, 'And the Word was God;' Almighty, 'Thus saith He which was and is and is to come, the Almighty;' Lord, 'One Lord Jesus Christ;' that He is Light, 'I am the Light;' that He wipes out sins, 'that ye may know,' He says, 'that the Son of man hath power upon earth to forgive sins;' and so with other attributes. For 'all things,' says the Son Himself, 'whatsoever the Father hath, are Mine;' and again, 'And Mine are Thine.' "
Athanasius,Orations,III:4(A.D. 362),in NPNF2,IV:395

"But, since in Christ there is the fulness of the Godhead, we have herein a revelation of God the Father joining to raise us in Him Who died; and we must confess that Christ Jesus is none other than God in all the fulness of the Deity."
Hilary of Poitiers,On the Trinity,1:13(A.D. 359),in NPNF2,IX:44

"Thus you cannot add together God the Father and God the Son, and count Them as two Gods, for They Two are One God. You cannot confuse Them together, for They Two are not One Person. And so the Apostolic faith rejects two gods; for it knows nothing of two Fathers or two Sons."
Hilary of Poitiers,On the Trinity,7:31(A.D. 359),in NPNF2,IX:131-132

"Worshipping as we do God of God, we both confess the distinction of the Persons, and at the same time abide by the Monarchy. We do not fritter away the theology in a divided plurality, because one Form, so to say, united in the invariableness of the Godhead, is beheld in God the Father, and in God the Only begotten. For the Son is in the Father and the Father in the Son; since such as is the latter, such is the former, and such as is the former, such is the latter; and herein is the Unity. So that according to the distinction of Persons, both are one and one, and according to the community of Nature, one. How, then, if one and one, are there not two Gods? Because we speak of a king, and of the king's image, and not of two kings. The majesty is not cloven in two, nor the glory divided. The sovereignty and authority over us is one, and so the doxology ascribed by us is not plural but one; because the honour paid to the image passes on to the prototype. Now what in the one case the image is by reason of imitation, that in the other case the Son is by nature; and as in works of art the likeness is dependent on the form, so in the case or the divine and uncompounded nature the union consists in the communion of the Godhead. One, moreover, is the Holy Spirit, and we speak of Him singly, conjoined as He is to the one Father through the one Son, and through Himself completing the adorable and blessed Trinity. Of Him the intimate relationship to the Father and the Son is sufficiently declared by the fact of His not being ranked in the plurality of the creation, but being spoken of singly; for he is not one of many, but One. For as there is one Father and one Son, so is there one Holy Ghost. He is consequently as far removed from created Nature as reason requires the singular to be removed from compound and plural bodies; and He is in such wise united to the Father and to the Son as unit has affinity with unit."
Basil,On the Spirit,45(A.D. 375),in NPNF2,VIII:28

"In my opinion He is called Son because He is identical with the Father in Essence; and not only for this reason, but also because He is Of Him. And He is called Only-Begotten, not because He is the only Son and of the Father alone, and only a Son; but also because the manner of His Sonship is peculiar to Himself and not shared by bodies."
Gregory of Nazianzen,Oration,30:20(ante A.D. 389),in NPNF2,VII:316

"And Christ also, after having said that I receive not testimony from man' (c. v. 34), in order that He may not seem to the foolish to clash with Himself, by declaring at one time There is another that beareth witness of Me and I know that his witness is true' (c. v. 32) (for He pointed to John;) and at another, I receive not testimony from man' (c. v. 34); He immediately adds the solution of the doubt, But these things I say' for your own sake, that ye might be saved.' As though He had said, that I am God, and the really-Begotten Son of God, and am of that Simple and Blessed Essence, I need none to witness to Me; and even though none would do so, yet am not I by this anything diminished in My Essence; but because I care for the salvation of the many, I have descended to such humility as to commit the witness of Me to a man.' "
Chrysostom John,Homily on John,VI:7(c.A.D. 391),in NPNF1,XIV:26

" Further, that none may fall into error, let a man attend to those signs vouchsafed us by holy Scripture, whereby we may know the Son. He is called the Word, the Son, the Power of God, the Wisdom of God.The Word, because He is without blemish; the Power, because He is perfect; the Son, because He is begotten of the Father; the Wisdom, because He is one with the Father, one in eternity, one in Divinity. Not that the Father is one Person with the Son; between Father and Son is the plain distinction that comes of generation; so that Christ is God of God, Everlasting of Everlasting, Fulness of Fulness. Now these are not mere names, but signs of power manifesting itself in works for while there is fulness of Godhead in the Father, there is also fulness of Godhead in the Son, not diverse, but one. The Godhead is nothing confused, for it is an unity: nothing manifold, for in it there is no difference."
Ambrose,On the Christian Faith,1:2,16-17(A.D. 380),in NPNF2,X:203-204

"We believe...in one Lord Jesus Christ, the only-begotten from the Father before all ages, light from light, true God from true God, begotten not made, of one substance with the Father..."
Creed of Constantinople(A.D. 381),in ECC, 297

"If anyone does not say that the Son of God is true God just as [His] Father is true God [and] He is all-powerful and omniscient and equal to the Father, he is a heretic."
Council of Rome,Tome of Pope Damasus,Canon 12(A.D. 382),in DEN,31

"At what point, then, does Eunomius assent to the truth? When he says that the Lord Himself, being the Son of the living God, not being ashamed of His birth from the Virgin, often named Himself, in His own sayings, 'the Son of Man'? For this phrase we also allege for proof of the community of essence, because the name of Son' shows the community of nature to be equal in both cases. For as He is called the Son of Man by reason of the kindred of His flesh to her of whom He was born, so also He is conceived, surely, as the Son of God, by reason of the connection of His essence with that from which He has His existence, and this argument is the greatest weapon of the truth. For nothing so clearly points to Him Who is the mediator between God and man' (as the great Apostle called Him), as the name of Son,' equally applicable to either nature, Divine or Human. For the same Person is Son of God, and was made, in the Incarnation, Son of Man, that, by His communion with each, He might link together by Himself what were divided by nature. Now if, in becoming Son of Man, he were without participation in human nature, it would be logical to say that neither. does He share in the Divine essence, though He is Son of God. But if the whole compound nature of man was in Him (for He was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin), it is surely necessary to believe that every property of the transcendent essence is also in Him, as the Word Son' claims for Him both alike--the Human in the man, but in the God the Divine."
Gregory of Nyssa,Against Eunomius,3:4(A.D. 384),in NPNF2,V:145

"But if the Son is said to be sent by the Father on this account, that the one is the Father, and the other the Son, this does not in any manner hinder us from believing the Son to be equal, and consubstantial, and co-eternal with the Father, and yet to have been sent as Son by the Father. Not because the one is greater, the other less; but because the one is Father, the other Son; the one begetter, the other begotten; the one, He from whom He is who is sent; the other, He who is from Him who sends."
Augustine,On the Trinity,4:20(A.D. 416),in NPNF1,III:83

"The Word of God, then, the only-begotten Son of the Father, in all things like and equal to the Father, God of God, Light of Light, Wisdom of Wisdom, Essence of Essence, is altogether that which the Father is, yet is not the Father, because the one is Son, the other is Father. And hence He knows all that the Father knows; but to Him to know, as to be, is from the Father, for to know and to be is there one. And therefore, as to be is not to the Father from the Son, so neither is to know. Accordingly, as though uttering Himself, the Father begat the Word equal to Himself in all things; for He would not have uttered Himself wholly and perfectly, if there were in His Word anything more or less than in Himself."
Augustine,On the Trinity,15:14(A.D. 416),in NPNF1,III:213
 
Jan 31, 2009
2,225
11
0
#4
He is the one that died that I might I life through Him, now My life is no longer My life but rather I live it for Him, so He is as Thomas said :



Joh 20:28And Thomas answered and said unto him, MY LORD AND MY GOD.
 
A

awings7

Guest
#5
Is it possible to just post something without writting a book.

Jesus Christ is God come in the flesh, how simple is that??
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#6
Jesus Christ is God incarnate, the Lamb come to take away the sins of the world, the Lion of Judah who will return to reign as King.
 

Sharp

Senior Member
May 5, 2009
2,565
20
38
#7
Jesus of Nazareth (c 4 BC/BCE – c 30 AD/CE),[1] also known as Jesus Christ, is the central figure of Christianity, and within most denominations he is venerated as the Son of God and as God incarnate. Christians also view him as the Messiah foretold in the Old Testament; Judaism rejects this claim. Islam considers Jesus a prophet, while several other religions revere him in some way.
The principal sources of information regarding Jesus' life and teachings are the four canonical gospels, especially the Synoptic Gospels,[4][5] though some scholars argue that other texts (such as the Gospel of Thomas) are as relevant as the canonical gospels to the historical Jesus.[6] Most critical scholars in the fields of history and biblical studies believe that some parts of the New Testament are useful for reconstructing Jesus' life,[7][8][9][10] agreeing that he was a Jew who was regarded as a teacher and healer. They also generally accept that he was baptized by John the Baptist, and was crucified in Jerusalem on the orders of the Roman Prefect of Judaea, Pontius Pilate, on the charge of sedition against the Roman Empire.[11][12] Aside from these few conclusions, academic studies remain inconclusive about the chronology, the central message of Jesus' preaching, his social class, cultural environment, and religious orientation.[13] Scholars offer competing descriptions of Jesus as the awaited Messiah,[14] as a self-described Messiah, as the leader of an apocalyptic movement, as an itinerant sage, as a charismatic healer, and as the founder of an independent religious movement.
Christian views of Jesus (see also Christology) center on the belief that Jesus is divine, is the Messiah whose coming was prophesied in the Old Testament, and that he was resurrected after his crucifixion. Christians predominantly believe that Jesus is the "Son of God" (generally meaning that he is God the Son, the second person in the Trinity), who came to provide salvation and reconciliation with God by his death for their sins. Other Christian beliefs include Jesus' virgin birth, performance of miracles, ascension into Heaven, and a future Second Coming. While the doctrine of the Trinity is widely accepted by Christians, a minority instead hold nontrinitarian beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus.[15]
In Islam, Jesus (Arabic: عيسى‎, commonly transliterated as Isa) is considered one of God's important prophets,[16][17] a bringer of scripture, and a worker of miracles. Jesus is also called "Messiah", but Islam does not teach that he was divine. Islam teaches that Jesus ascended bodily to heaven,[18] rather than the traditional Christian belief of the death and resurrection of Jesus.
 

starfield

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2009
3,393
58
48
#9
Jesus is the promised Messiah of Israel (the Son of Man), the Prince of Peace, the divine living within human flesh, everlasting Father, and the way to Heaven.
 
S

Slepsog4

Guest
#10
Jesus (Iesous; Yeshua < Yoshua<Yehoshua = Yahweh is Salvation); his name means savior. He is the Christ (Messiah), the long awaited anointed one. The heir to the throne of David. He is God incarnate. He is Lord. He is the Son of the Living God.
 
May 21, 2009
3,955
25
0
#11
Is it possible to just post something without writting a book.

Jesus Christ is God come in the flesh, how simple is that??
Ha ha, good one. My first thought was he's God son. I can't read all those long things. Have fun.
 
K

kaffeine

Guest
#12
jesus is lord
 
D

doubleedge

Guest
#13
I believe we've been born into an age of deception, where even the TRUE name of God (YHWH YHVH, YaHWeH YeHoVeH - Kum Bi (Yah) - Si (Yah) Humba - Hallelu(yah) - YAH... Rastafari) & His son Jesus (Yah'shuwah) are found only by those who seek. If God is real, and The Messiah is Truth, than the names we call should also be real and true. The word jesus in latin is pronounced hey zeus and in greek means hail zeus (christ=the anointed one), while Yah'shuwah (who came in His Father's name) means Yah is salvation! Stop me if I'm wrong! It isn't my intention to deceive or mislead anybody. I just have a feeling that the world is about to go through some huge changes.
 
C

Cup-of-Ruin

Guest
#14
I believe we've been born into an age of deception, where even the TRUE name of God (YHWH YHVH, YaHWeH YeHoVeH - Kum Bi (Yah) - Si (Yah) Humba - Hallelu(yah) - YAH... Rastafari) & His son Jesus (Yah'shuwah) are found only by those who seek. If God is real, and The Messiah is Truth, than the names we call should also be real and true. The word jesus in latin is pronounced hey zeus and in greek means hail zeus (christ=the anointed one), while Yah'shuwah (who came in His Father's name) means Yah is salvation! Stop me if I'm wrong! It isn't my intention to deceive or mislead anybody. I just have a feeling that the world is about to go through some huge changes.
Well I will stop you and tell you that you are wrong. mostly I think people have good intentions when wanting to honour God with a sacred name like Jehovah or Yahwey. However "sacred" names for the supreme Being originated in the Ancient Near East and were non-Israelite. There is evidence that the Tetragrammaton that is found in the Talmudic texts of the Masorete Jews - YHWH is a god worshiped by ancient races but there is no evidence that this name was used by the true Israelites. The name itself is adopted from an Aramaean deity and most likely came into the kingdom of Israel as an apostate worship, it appears that the name became somewhat official to the kingdom of Israel when the Edomites joined the Jerusalem Temple approx. 150 year before Christ. The oldest appearence on record for the 'sacred' name YHWH is in Egypt 1400 BC - found as an inscription in an Amon temple of AmenhotepIII (1417-1379BC) http://www.bibleandscience.com/archaeology/exodus.htm the name being associated with Seir (Edom), other evidence placing the god YHWY in Syria, but the Egyption lists do not accociate the name with the Israelites. Inside the geographical location of the holy land the first appearence of the name YHWH is on the Mesha Stele 9th Cen. BC) Mesha was the king of Moab who recounted in the inscription how Moab's diety YHWH delivered Moab from control of it's neighbour Israel. So it seems that this diety has been associated with Moab and Edom since at least the 14thCen. BC. Evidence is also found in the Dead Sea Scrolls where we find 'Lord God' scatched out and rubbed out and the tetragrammaton put in it's place, and this seems to have evolved as a practice from about the time John Hyrcanus forced the Edomites to convert to the religion of the Jerusalem Temple and the Israelites. It was not long after that the Edomites were found to have taken complete control of Jerusalem under the Herodians.

The Tetragrammaton is a magic name that has long been associated with Cabalists going back to ancient Chaldea, it was this sacred name that was not to be uttered and it was by this name that the Edomite Jews who were opponents of Christ and his Israelite disciples, declared that the miracles of Christ were performed (Francois Lenormant - Chaldean Magic Origin and Development).

Out of the 54 sacred names of Jewish Cabalah the main one is YHWH, it is historically accurate to locate the name of YHWH among Edom, Syria and Moab, so the name must have come to Jerusalem via the Edomites under Herod, and would have then been transplanted by jewish scribes into many of the temple scrolls, this pagan god's name has found it's way into the English Bibles via the KJV which was copied from the Talmudic Masorete manuscripts that contained the name of their pagan god.

The God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel who as Christians is our true God never used any personal name or secret name or magic name, He had know need to, as He had no equals or peers, therefore there is no name, only titles of which He has many. The Greek Old Testament which is the oldest known OT of 285BC never used a sacred name for God, nor was the name YHWH identified by Philo or Josephus or Eusebius or even the jewish Aristeas the Exegete who wrote a commentry on the Greek Septuagint. The Masoretic text from which the KJV is derived includes the word YHWH over 6000 times! But it would have been impossible for Moses to use this name as the Masorete Hebrew was not in existence as a language at the time. Now I find it hard to believe that Moses would adopt a forign diety as his Lord God the great "I AM"!

It appears as a very subtle trick is being constructed over the centuries, sometimes more effective then others, and that is to get the true Israelites who became our Christian forebears and today those of us seeking the true God and true Scripture, to superimpose a pagan diety on to holy scripture, the magic name of a pagan lord whose sacred personal name is 'Yahwey' or YHWH of 'Jehovah', this is all but Talmudic phariseeism, jewish cabalah, magic ineffible secret name paganism!

Kurios Theos, Lord God! that is a title and our GOD has titles, in Sanskrit that would be the title of 'Dyus' in Phoenician - 'Dias' in Greek 'Theos' or, in Latin 'Deus' and never given any personal name. the name 'Jesus' is the proper pronounciation in English the true Greek name is IESU.

You may want to consider what I say or not, it is up to you, I can only while I am here with you present true and accurate knowledge, I do this as a service to my Lord Jesus Christ, I have no interest in what you choose to accept or not, that matter is between you and God, there is a Lord God of the Bible, and Jesus Christ, Father and Son, our God is One! If someone wants to call upon a pagan god named Yahwey and feel that you are in possesssion of a personal secret name then you contradict the Word, for the God of our Bible has no personal or secret name that is used for ritual, we are warned to stay away from secret names and jewish mysticism and magic, so be careful, what you choose.
 
D

doubleedge

Guest
#15
U must not have noticed that those are all different languages. Thank U however for that new insight. I too have noticed that we are in a time of deception. So what Ur saying is that the one name that has NEVER changed was in fact evil and not slandered. The historically new name Jesus (pronounced in the Latin hey zeus) meaning hail zeus in Greek could not possibly be any better. In fact, to say jesus christ is to say hail zeus the anointed one.
 
D

doubleedge

Guest
#16
P.S. - I think Ur information, while very "enlightening", is inconsistent with ACTUAL history. All Ur information is from the people who are responsible for the current state of the world.
 
D

doubleedge

Guest
#17
Forgive the constant hits... I'm typine on my PS3 - Anyway, Errors & lies in translation are to blame for the lost sheep. The Word of God includes ALL of man. The Word says that MANY will be deceived, how is it than that I've encountered so many like Urself. I never said U were wrong, in fact the scriptures suggest that The Name of God would be heavily disputed in the last days (Mark 13:22)!
 
D

doubleedge

Guest
#18
The very language U speak was meant to deceive U. The "holy" Vedas & sanskrit are responsible for Greek, German, Latin, & English. It was with the advent of these languages that the deceiver was able to confuse those who were called but not chosen.
 
D

doubleedge

Guest
#19
seek syllable meanings & U will find TRUTH
 
S

Slepsog4

Guest
#20
The word jesus in latin is pronounced hey zeus and in greek means hail zeus (christ=the anointed one)
That has to be one of the DUMBEST, MOST IGNORANT assertions ever made.

Jesus (English) comes from Latin (Iesus) from Greek (Iesous) from Aramaic (Yeshua) from Hebrew (Yehoshua). It is a long line of transliteration for close pronunciation. The meaning is derived from the original source language. Jesus means Savior from the Hebrew which literally meant Yahweh is Salvation.

Matthew 1:21 tells the meaning of Jesus' name "And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins."

The term Christ is transliterated from Greek into English and is a translation of the Hebrew term "Mashiach" or Messiah which means anointed one.

The term Zeus is totally and absolutely unrelated to the name of Jesus.

Zeus was part of the Greek Pantheon of gods.

The Latin or Roman equivalent was Jupiter.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.