Protestants ask, Catholics answer.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
A

Ancilla

Guest
#1
I am pleased to inform you that not all devote Catholics have left this website in light of the offensive things that have been written here. This is a thread for Protestants and other non-Roman Christians to ASK our Catholic brothers and sisters in Christ questions about what we may not understand about their church, doctrine and traditions. This is NOT a place to accuse them of heresy!!!!!!!!

I was lamenting on Christian Chick's thread about how I feared that all the good Catholics have left due to offensive content and how now we can't ask them questions. I recieved a wonderful e-mail from Leone XIII saying that he'll answer any questions I may have. I wanted to share his answers with the rest of you and save him from writing it all out again.

I'll say it again. This is about understanding each other and not about accusing anyone of heresy.

Oh, and I should say that we got to remember that not all Catholics necessarily believe the same things, just as not all Protestants believe the same thing. In fact there are many things that Protestants believe that I have a hard time understanding how they are justified Biblically.

What I wrote:

"I was on a Catholic on-line store and it (I can't find the webpage now) said that the Virgin Mary appeared to someone and said that if someone was wearing a scapular when they died they'd be saved, regardless of their spiritual status. Do a lot of Catholics believe that? My second question is why do Catholics seem to me to emphasize Mary and the Saints over Jesus? Why do people have shrines to Mary but not to Jesus? Why do Catholics believe that Mary was sinless and taken up to Heaven in the Assumption?

On the podcast I listen to about learning from Catholics, Campolo (a Baptist pastor) said that Protestant look at the Gospels through Paul rather than Catholics who look at the Episles through Jesus. Paul and the Episles are great, but maybe Protestants aren't paying enough attention to the Gospels, which is more important than anything. I'm critical of other Protestants when they overlook the what Jesus said about caring for the poor. I mean, it's not that I'm critical of them for not doing more for the poor. I'm critical of them for ignoring that passage of scripture."

What he wrote:

The Brown Scapular is a private devotion practiced by many of the faithful--it is a symbol of devotion to Mary, which I will go on to explain. When we are devoted to a cause, do we not wear symbols of it? Surely you wore your school colors at some point, if you go to a sporting event, we wear our team's colors. The Scapular is sort of the "team colors" for Jesus and Mary. What you're referring to about "being saved regardless of spiritual state" is simply not the case of what we believe about the Scapular. First off, the Scapular is a private devotion, meaning that no one is obligated to wear it. The promise attached to it comes from the vision had by St. Simon Stock, an English Carmelite monk. Mary gave him the Scapular--which for monks and nuns is a long, flowing work apron of sorts--as a sign of their commitment to God. The smaller Scapular that you seem to be more acquainted with is a devotional version of that--adopted by the faithful who wanted to share in the spiritual life of the Carmelites. The inscription which appears on most Scapulars, "Whosoever dies wearing this Scapular shall not suffer eternal fire," simply means that whomever is faithful to sharing in the life of prayer of that community will go to heaven--this life entails regular prayer, chastity according to one's state in life, and faithful wearing of the Scapular. Do these things not already bring us into union with God? Prayer, chastity, and wearing the Scapular--a manifestation of not denying Christ before men--bring us closer to God and prepare us for heaven. So the Scapular, then, is not some kind of magical amulet that gets you into heaven, it's not a "get-out-of-Hell-free" card as some would like to think, it is a reminder to pray and live chastely.

As for devotion to the saints, the way you have phrased your question is somewhat troublesome: I know of no Catholic who has devotion to Mary and the Saints over and above their devotion to Christ, and in fact, this is impossible. We honor Mary and the Saints because they were conformed to Christ fully both in life and in death--for a Saint is simply one who is in heaven. By recognizing them, we are inspired to greater faith and hope that we, too, can attain heaven. Furthermore, our faith in Christ is increased by their example--they knew and loved Christ, and so we must be like them. That is why there are so many saints from so many walks of life--God gives us the saints as exemplars, and each one of us can find one to relate to.

The Saints are furthermore Christians just as much as we are. When one dies and attains to the glory of God in heaven, he is more alive than he is on earth. He is also fully united to the will of God. The will of God is that we pray for one another, so why would we not continue to pray for one another in accord with God's will once we have reached heaven? Devotion to the Saints, then, is not only about honoring what they achieved by God's grace (and in turn, glorifying God for pouring out that grace), but is also about invoking their intercession, asking them to pray for us. If it acceptible for you to pray for me, and I for you, and any Christian to pray for any other, why is it not acceptible for me to ask my brethren in Christ who are already with Christ to pray for me? They have attained to the fullness of charity and grace in heaven, and so surely they would not deny the request of their poor brother on earth!

As for why Catholics "have shrines to Mary but not to Jesus," this is not entirely true. Again, by honoring Mary and the Saints, we honor Christ, who made them Saints. You cite vague anecdotal evidence here, and there may well be some Catholics whose decorating scheme incorporates a shrine of Mary and no pictures of Jesus--but that doesn't mean that Jesus is not on their hearts. Indeed, anyone who seeks to imitate the life of Mary--her humility, her acceptance of the will of God in spite of her lowly state--will surely find Jesus as she did. The Church teaches that we must not give any man honor that is due to God, but that does not mean that we cannot honor holy men and thank God that they have been made holy.

As for your observation about Protestants reading the Gospels through Paul, I have noticed this as well--It is an increasing trend to see many Protestants in debate only reference Paul, and then to only bring him up out of context. Out of his historical context, and divorced from unity with the rest of Scripture, throwing out verses of Paul is meaningless. All of Scripture must be taken together and understood in context. One analogy I have used for this phenomenon is that some Protestants see Scripture as a pile of glass shards, and they pick up those shards and throw them to try to cut with them. Catholics take those little bits of glass and work them together into a beautiful stained-glass window, with the light of the Holy Spirit shining through. Once you begin to read Scripture in this way--not each verse off by itself or each book in a vacuum, but together as a unified font of wisdom from the One True God--then you will begin to understand it fully and completely, and come to be nourished by Christ through it.
 
L

Lindqvist

Guest
#3
A general question to Catholics: Aren't saints more like guides and teachers? You pray through them in some sort of emulation?

I'll put it in an example in hope of making myself understood.
If I want to pray for safe seas while I go abroad I pray to the Saint of Sailors as he has been put in charge by God to watch over that area. I'm still praying to God I'm just using sort of spiritual focus. Like people who clutch their cross while praying.

And on the note of Mary getting to much attention. She shagged God and gave birth to the Saviour, I think she deserves all the credit a woman can possibly get. Yes for those that take offense to the joke: I'm going to hell for way worse reasons so spare me the comments or send them in private.

On a sad note though. The RCC did a survey on which saint they prayed too. Jesus came in on a strong sixth place...
 
L

LeoneXIII

Guest
#4
On a sad note though. The RCC did a survey on which saint they prayed too. Jesus came in on a strong sixth place...

I would love to see a source for this. I've never heard of any such survey, and the "RCC" itself does not conduct surveys like that. Some publication may have, but the responses of the individual faithful have no bearing on what the Church itself teaches.
 
Jul 17, 2009
353
0
0
#5
Why do Catholics bow to statues?
I started a thread on icons (Orthodox Catholics don't have statues). Lots of these issues pop up. The Theotokos etc. The post is called, re-visiting the 2 commandment (if I remember).

I'm taking a wild guess here but I assume that RCC don't bow TO statues so much as they bow in their presence? They know that the statue is not actually Mary and or the Saint depicted.

Again, I'm just throwing a Hail Mary out there (punny!).

I do wish Catholics were more vocal but in many threads where chatters get so personal and attack happy, can't blame them. Imagine if every other thread you read went something like this, "the protestants are the anti-christ, the protestants are so unbiblical, the protestants aren't even Christians, the protestants massacred thousands, the protestants changed this and that, I think this part in the bible where it talks negatively about so and so refers to the protestants, the protestants think they're the one True Church, etc."

Would you really be able to convince the mob other-wise? It would seem almost futile.



God bless
 
Jul 17, 2009
353
0
0
#6
I would love to see a source for this. I've never heard of any such survey, and the "RCC" itself does not conduct surveys like that. Some publication may have, but the responses of the individual faithful have no bearing on what the Church itself teaches.

Yeah, that comes from the mockumentary called, Religulous. It wasn't all Catholics everywhere but I think some living around the Vatican etc. At best it's hearsay. Even in the movie, the Catholic Priest said that it was likely just some cafeteria Catholics. As if Catholics are alone in the pew-warming department.

And I agree, you can't take the comments of an individual or a few individuals and say they're representative of the faith.
 
W

wwjd_kilden

Guest
#7
Does the catholic church teach that sins are forgiven (only) trough prayers or other "rituals" that a priest tells the person to say/ do a certain amount of times? (i.e. Hail Mary)
 
L

Lindqvist

Guest
#8
I would love to see a source for this. I've never heard of any such survey, and the "RCC" itself does not conduct surveys like that. Some publication may have, but the responses of the individual faithful have no bearing on what the Church itself teaches.
Father Reginald Foster is an American Catholic priest and friar of the order of Discalced Carmelites, born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, November 14, 1939 (1939-11-14) (age 69). He works in the "Latin Letters" section of the Secretariat of State in the Vatican. This section is the successor to the historical "Briefs to Princes." Father Foster became one of the Pope's Latinists in the late 1960s.[1][2]
Foster is an expert in Latin literature, especially Cicero, and is an internationally-recognized authority on the Latin language.[3]
He appears in Bill Maher's 2008 documentary Religulous.


Well being a Father with some experience I doubt he would lie in international TV. I can't find the actual report as I don't really know what I am looking for, it's never mentioned by name. And of course I agree that it's not the church teaching in itself that has this view. I'm quite certain that the RCC teaches that Jesus comes first. But it's a funny thing to mention.
 
L

Lindqvist

Guest
#9
Why do Catholics bow to statues?
I would imagine that it's a respect thing more cultural than religous. The japanese for example bow all the time to anyone of superior rank or status.
As do the chinese (funny thing watching an entire factory trying to make themselves shorter than my very short mother)
While I was in the army I'm pretty sure that there's a law that says you have to salute the flag and any portraits of the king. Not happening very often though.
 
J

Jordan9

Guest
#10
Hey

First of all, I have to say that I absolutely LOVE the Catholic church. I fell in love with it when I went to my first Mass with a Catholic friend. I am currently considering conversion.

Anyway, my question is in regards to the papacy. I agree with the Catholic interpretation of Jesus saying to Peter, "You are a rock..." but what I am having trouble with is all the anti-Popes, the papacy at Avignon, the popes who were bloodthirsty sinners, etc. throughout the course of history. Do instances like these negate apostolic succession in anyway? Why or why not?

Thanks in advance for the answers, and I hope to "come home to Rome" someday.
 
L

LeoneXIII

Guest
#11
Father Reginald Foster is an American Catholic priest and friar of the order of Discalced Carmelites, born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, November 14, 1939 (1939-11-14) (age 69). He works in the "Latin Letters" section of the Secretariat of State in the Vatican. This section is the successor to the historical "Briefs to Princes." Father Foster became one of the Pope's Latinists in the late 1960s.[1][2]
Foster is an expert in Latin literature, especially Cicero, and is an internationally-recognized authority on the Latin language.[3]
He appears in Bill Maher's 2008 documentary Religulous.


Well being a Father with some experience I doubt he would lie in international TV. I can't find the actual report as I don't really know what I am looking for, it's never mentioned by name. And of course I agree that it's not the church teaching in itself that has this view. I'm quite certain that the RCC teaches that Jesus comes first. But it's a funny thing to mention.
It is a funny thing to mention, but it highlights a lament that a lot of Catholics these days have about their brethren--that most Catholics do not know their faith as well as they ought. This has really been the case for around a generation, but things are vastly improving. The same could probably be said of other Christians, as well, no? Once again, the faithful are not representative of the teachings of their faith, but rather of how well they have been taught.

Also, I'd have to say, getting information about the Catholic Church from Bill Maher is probably ill-advised.
 
L

Lindqvist

Guest
#12
No where do I state that other churches are better and if it was read that way I apologise. I could state wierd things with other churches but that would just fuel the fire and it's not what this thread is about. Going back into hiding now.
 
A

Ancilla

Guest
#13
Now, I know I said Protestants (like me) should only ask the questions and not make statements, but I'll throw this one out there:

My perception is that Catholicism is deeply ingrained in the culture of Catholic countries (or their descendants over here). My perception is that people in Protestant countries who do not have a relationship with Jesus will live very secular lives and still celebrate Christmas. But in Catholic countries when people don't know Jesus they may still wear a crucifix, have a St. Christopher metal on car dash and that kind of thing. I fear that those become superstitions for people. So I think that self-proclaimed Catholics who don't have an active relationship with Jesus must be distinguished from the belief and practices of those who do.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#14
I would like to know why at Easter time I got communion wafer in catholic church but no wine. I felt cheated, especially on Easter day.
If I went to Church of England I would have got both.
 
A

Ancilla

Guest
#15
Yeah, only Catholics get wine at a Catholic church. My parents are going to Spain next spring and they'll be there during Holy Week and Easter so they're going to make sure they know where they can find a church where they can get communion on Easter.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#16
At this service no one got wine, not even the Catholics. lol.
 
L

LeoneXIII

Guest
#17
Actually, only Catholics should receive Holy Communion in a Catholic Church to begin with. Further, it is not necessary to receive both the bread and the wine, and for many centuries, only the bread was given. This is because we believe that the Lord is truly present, Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity, under both the bread and the wine, so only receiving one results in a full communion.
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#18
Does the catholic church teach that sins are forgiven (only) trough prayers or other "rituals" that a priest tells the person to say/ do a certain amount of times? (i.e. Hail Mary)
No. You're forgiven through Christ. The priest in the confessional is merely the mouthpiece for Christ. Indeed, in many many guides to the sacrament of confession, we are exhorted to remember that we confess not to the priest, but to Christ Himself. The priest is merely one of the tools Christ uses to help us. Sometimes it's useful to actually hear the words "You are forgiven."

As far as penances go, they're not what forgives you. Think of it as a sort of spiritual after care. You were sick with sin, you went to the Great Physician (Jesus) and afterward one of the nurses gave you some pamphlets on avoiding getting sick again (the penance). :)
 
W

wwjd_kilden

Guest
#19
aahhh. Ok

Leone:
- Why should only Catholics recieve commuion in the catholic church? sounds strange to me
 

dscherck

Banned [Reason: persistent, ongoing Catholic heres
Aug 3, 2009
1,272
3
0
#20
aahhh. Ok

Leone:
- Why should only Catholics recieve commuion in the catholic church? sounds strange to me
Well, Catholics believe that the bread and wine become the literal Flesh and Blood of Our Lord. We take the words of Paul who wrote, "For any one who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment upon himself. That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died" (1 Cor. 11:29–30).

We fear that those who partake of the Eucharist and see it as merely symbolic might be subject to this warning and instead of being healed, might be harming themselves.

A more in depth article discussing the Catholic POV is here: http://www.catholic.com/library/Who_Can_Receive_Communion.asp

Hope the link helps!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.