Who is the Father?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#21
Cup of Ruin, the verse in Isaiah does not say Jesus is the Father.
Barnes commentary says:

The everlasting Father - The Chaldee renders this expression, ‘The man abiding forever.’ The Vulgate, ‘The Father of the future age.’ Lowth, ‘The Father of the everlasting age.’ Literally, it is the Father of eternity, עד אבי 'ĕby ‛ad. The word rendered "everlasting," עד ‛ad, properly denotes "eternity," and is used to express "forever;" see Psa_9:6, Psa_9:19; Psa_19:10. It is often used in connection with עולם ‛ôlâm, thus, עולם ועד vā‛ed ‛ôlâm, "forever and ever;" Psa_10:16; Psa_21:5; Psa_45:7. The Hebrews used the term father in a great variety of senses - as a literal father, a grandfather, an ancestor, a ruler, an instructor. The phrase may either mean the same as the Eternal Father, and the sense will be, that the Messiah will not, as must be the ease with an earthly king, however excellent, leave his people destitute after a short reign, but will rule over them and bless them forever (Hengstenberg); or it may be used in accordance with a custom usual in Hebrew and in Arabic, where he who possesses a thing is called the father of it.

Gill commentary makes clear that:

The everlasting Father; which does not design any relation of Christ in the Godhead; and there is but one Father in the Godhead, and that is the first Person; indeed Christ and the Father are one, and the Father is in him, and he is in the Father, and he that has seen the one has seen the other, and yet they are distinct, Christ is not the Father; the Son and Spirit may be considered with the first Person as Father, in creation and regeneration, they being jointly concerned therein, but not in the Trinity: it is easy to make it appear Christ is not the Father, but is distinct from him, since he is said to be with the Father from eternity, to be the Son of the Father in truth and love, his own Son, his only begotten and beloved Son; Christ frequently calls the first Person his Father, prayed to him as such, and is our advocate with him, as well as the way unto him; he is said to be sent by the Father, to come from him, and to go to him; and many things are said of Christ that cannot be said of the Father, as his being made flesh, suffering and dying in the room of his people; and the Father is said to do many things unto him, as to anoint him, to seal him, to show him all he did, to commit all judgment to him, and give him to have life in himself as he had: but Christ is a Father with respect to chosen men, who were given him as his children and offspring in covenant; who are adopted into that family that is named of him, and who are regenerated by his Spirit and grace: and to these he is an "everlasting Father"; he was so from everlasting; for regeneration and faith do not make men children, but make them appear to be so; God's elect are children previous to the Spirit's work upon them, and even to the incarnation and death of Christ; adoption is an act of the will of God in covenant from eternity: and Christ is a Father to these unto everlasting; he will never die, and they shall never be left fatherless; he and they will ever continue in this relation; he as such supplies them with everlasting provisions, he clothes them with everlasting raiment, he gives them an everlasting portion, promotes them to everlasting honour, saves them with an everlasting salvation, bearing an everlasting love to them. Some render the words, "the Father of eternity" (s); the author of eternal life, who has procured it for his people, and gives it to them; or to whom eternity belongs, who inhabits it, and is possessed of it, is the everlasting I AM, was before all persons and things, was set up in an office capacity from everlasting, and had a glory with the Father before the world was, in whom eternal election, and with whom the everlasting covenant, were made. The Septuagint version is, "the Father of the world to come" (t); of the Gospel dispensation; so called, Heb_2:5 the legal dispensation, when in being, was the then present world, at the end of which Christ came; this is now at an end, and a new state of things has taken place, which with respect to the Old Testament saints was the world to come, and of this Christ is the Father or author; as the law came by Moses, and he was the father of the legal dispensation, grace and truth are come by Christ, the Father and author of the Gospel dispensation; the doctrines of it are from him, and the ordinances of it by him; and he is the father of that state or world to come after the resurrection, the New Jerusalem church state, and also of the ultimate glory.
 
C

Cup-of-Ruin

Guest
#22
'Snail, save the Barnes and Gill or MacDonald 'commentarys'...i'm not interested.

There is no first, second and third members or 'persons' of the Godhead.

Dear me, how is the Son going to marry the Father's bride????

Which Apostle stated a 'trinity' doctrine?

The Lord swears by Himself!

The Lord takes His own council, God can pray to Himself, He can contemplate, most of the time when humans pray, they are simply praying to themselves as they can contemplate and talk to themselves, we take our own council, yet it is said that God cannot?
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#23
'Snail, save the Barnes and Gill or MacDonald 'commentarys'...i'm not interested.
Which is a pity because they have theological credentials - you don't.

There is no first, second and third members or 'persons' of the Godhead.
So you don't believe in the Trinity? Ok.

Which Apostle stated a 'trinity' doctrine?
Which didn't? which called Jesus "Father"? Nil.

The Lord takes His own council, God can pray to Himself, He can contemplate, most of the time when humans pray, they are simply praying to themselves as they can contemplate and talk to themselves, we take our own council, yet it is said that God cannot?
God counsels and prays to himself? Just when I thought I'd heard it all...lol
 
C

Cup-of-Ruin

Guest
#24
Which is a pity because they have theological credentials - you don't.
I wonder what 'theological credentials' Peter had?



Which didn't? which called Jesus "Father"? Nil.
Thomas confesses Jesus to be God and Lord over him, the sense is singular, one, no other, and indeed, Paul agrees in 1 Corinthians 8:6 "To us there is but one God the father", and God Himself says "There is no one else besides Me", Malachi: "Hath not one God created us", Jesus; I AM the first and the last, the Alpha and Omega", Jesus is saying He is the beginning and the end, Jesus refers to Himself as the Holy Spirit, it is He Jesus that is the Comforter and the Spirit of Truth.



God counsels and prays to himself? Just when I thought I'd heard it all...lol
There is nothing funny about that
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#26
I wonder what 'theological credentials' Peter had?
None, but Peter also had the Holy Spirit and common sense. So do the men who wrote those bible commentaries. It is plainly apparent that you do not.

Thomas confesses Jesus to be God and Lord over him, the sense is singular, one, no other, and indeed, Paul agrees in 1 Corinthians 8:6 "To us there is but one God the father", and God Himself says "There is no one else besides Me", Malachi: "Hath not one God created us", Jesus; I AM the first and the last, the Alpha and Omega", Jesus is saying He is the beginning and the end, Jesus refers to Himself as the Holy Spirit, it is He Jesus that is the Comforter and the Spirit of Truth.
Nonsense. If you bother to read the whole of verse 8:6, it clearly separates the Father from the Son, and does not say what you mean it to say at all:

"yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom all things came and for whom we live; and there is but one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things came and through whom we live."


What you said is terribly confusing, much like anything you say is confusing and outright wrong. Jesus is not the Holy Spirit, Jesus is not the Father in that sense. Read Gill's commentary.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#27
Are you saying Jesus is not God? Even trinitarians believe this.
I fail to see the relationship between what I said and the divinity of Jesus.
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#28
I fail to see the relationship between what I said and the divinity of Jesus.
You said it was laughable to think God would consult himself. If Jesus is God and the Father is God, wouldn't that be God consulting with God? Therefore to believe that it is laughable would have to mean one of them, presumally Jesus, is not God. Am i unserstanding your statement about God not cuonsulted with God incorrectly?
 
Last edited:
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#29
I wonder what 'theological credentials' Peter had?
None, but Peter also had the Holy Spirit and common sense. So do the men who wrote those bible commentaries. It is plainly apparent that you do not.
lol......that is hilarious, however I would not go by comentaries, but instead I would be taught by the Holy Spirit Himself.
 
Jan 31, 2009
2,225
11
0
#30
if we are trying to determine if Jesus is God then consider these scriptures


Heb 1:1God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets,Heb 1:2Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;

Now hebrews 1 and I suggest you read the whole chapter But God The Father Is speaking and then He says:

Heb 1:8But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.Heb 1:9Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows.


this is not the Son saying O God, but rather the father saying to the Son O, GOD. so If God called the Son God then I feel pretty safe about doing it also
 
Apr 23, 2009
2,253
5
0
#31
I think we all agree Jesus is God, I am just trying to get at what Mahogony is really saying.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#32
I'm a Trinitarian. In the modalist understanding, God praying to Himself makes no sense, as Cup of Ruin explained it. "we all talk to ourselves". Talking to oneself is a sign of insanity and I don't think God needs to do that.
 
Last edited:
C

Cup-of-Ruin

Guest
#33
I'm a Trinitarian. In the modalist understanding, God praying to Himself makes no sense, as Cup of Ruin explained it. "we all talk to ourselves". Talking to oneself is a sign of insanity and I don't think God needs to do that.
Do you know waht logos means? the 'word' - logos is God's own contemplation revealed and manifest in physical reality, universal divine reason is as John says the 'word'; the idea, the reason was with God in the beginning meaning God reasoned, He thought and contemplated on His own, and the idea - the reason for this was God - the reason was God, so He could be God!

The more one participates in God's universal Divine Intelligence, and contemplates what God communicates, and His ultimate communication that He has ever given is Christ as God says; "Hear Him", that is a commandment from on high - listen to what He has to say!

God desired to become physically manifest to His creation in the physical body of Jesus Christ, it was His idea from the beginning to do this!

Deuteronmy 32:39

"See now that I, even I AM He, And there is no god with Me."

"He is the Rock, His work is perfect"

"Is He thy Father that hath bought thee"


The Lord God is NOT 3 persons, who is the Rock? who has bought thee? Jesus of Nazareth, He is God, and He proclaimed Himself God of heaven and earth and it will be He who judges me, and it is He who will be my Lord and my Saviour and there is no one else, there is no other God!
 
Jan 31, 2009
2,225
11
0
#34
one God three parts, take a pie cut it into three equal parts, until i come along and take a piece of the pie we still have a whole Pie, three equal beings one whole and Holy God. I used to have a problem with God sitting on the right hand of Himself, just as you do with Him praying to himself , But hey He is God, and does God (the creator) tell the creation, or does the creation tell the creator what He can do. Hey, He is God
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#35
Cup for someone who says they understand the meaning of the word logos, you do not, obviously, understand the difference between the words Son and Father.



God desired to become physically manifest to His creation in the physical body of Jesus Christ,
Yes, God the Son, was manifest in the flesh. Not, God the Father. The Father did not come to earth, the Son did.

The Lord God is NOT 3 persons, who is the Rock? who has bought thee? Jesus of Nazareth, He is God, and He proclaimed Himself God of heaven and earth and it will be He who judges me, and it is He who will be my Lord and my Saviour and there is no one else, there is no other God!
So you're not a Trinitarian. Got it.
 

wattie

Senior Member
Feb 24, 2009
3,023
1,020
113
New Zealand
#36
Trinitarian doesn't have to mean 3 seperate beings..

One God who has a triune nature.. is Trinitarian!

Not trinitarian would be believing there is no Holy Spirit.. or Son.. just the Father I would have thought.

But in the end.. this whole thread doesn't matter a huge amount as long as all 3 - Father, Son and Holy Spirit are equally God. Son as divine as the FAther is.. Holy Spirit as divine as them aswell..

You get away from basic christian doctrine once you start saying Jesus was a lesser God.. or not God.

But.. in studying Jesus' name.. He links to the Father's name anyway..

Jesus’ name traced back – links to

H3068
[FONT=&quot]יהוה[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]yehôvâh[/FONT]
yeh-ho-vaw'
From H1961; (the) self Existent or eternal; Jehovah, Jewish national name of God: - Jehovah, the Lord. Compare H3050, H3069.

Jesus is LORD—Lord links back to H3068 - Jehovah

(Joh 8:56) Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.

(Joh 8:57) Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

(Joh 8:58) Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

Gen 18:32 And he said, Oh let not the Lord be angry, and I will speak yet but this once: Peradventure ten shall be found there. And he said, I will not destroy it for ten's sake.
Gen 18:33 And the LORD went his way, as soon as he had left communing with Abraham: and Abraham returned unto his place.

Lord – links back to Jehovah

Exo 3:14 And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.

God- In Exo 3:14 = Elohiym
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#37
The Trinity doctrine never confuses the Father with the Son or vice versa, by saying the Father is the Son or the Son is the Father, never. Their co-joined but distinct roles and persons must be maintained.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#38
So we can say the Son is like the Father, we can say the Son shows or manifests the Father. But we shouldn't say the Son is the Father. That's modalism, not Trinity.
 
C

Cup-of-Ruin

Guest
#39
But.. in studying Jesus' name.. He links to the Father's name anyway..

Jesus’ name traced back – links to

H3068
[FONT=&quot]יהוה[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]yehôvâh[/FONT]
yeh-ho-vaw'
From H1961; (the) self Existent or eternal; Jehovah, Jewish national name of God: - Jehovah, the Lord. Compare H3050, H3069.

Jesus is LORD—Lord links back to H3068 - Jehovah
For starters there is no J or V in the Hebrew language, 'Jehovah' does not appear in English until after the Reformation, and it comes out of the Tetragrammaton which is sacred name oral tradition from Chaldee, which has nothing at all to do with the Lord God of the Bible. In fact the word 'Jehovah' did not even exist until the 1611 KJV Masorete Priests inserted it into scripture, and we have along tradition of this, corrupt scribes used to scratch out the titles for God in scripture and write these silly 'sacred name' babylonian letters and names rubbish into scripture. Jesus' name does not in any way link to 'Jehovah', God's Name has never been 'Jehovah' that's just a silly made up word, I mean look at JW's, do you think they know what there talking about??
 
C

Cup-of-Ruin

Guest
#40
So we can say the Son is like the Father, we can say the Son shows or manifests the Father. But we shouldn't say the Son is the Father. That's modalism, not Trinity.
The Son is the Father, they are one and the same, One God! And it's not pieces of a pie, or equal third shares, it's just one, that is what the Scripture says, nowhere in God's Bible does God say, I'm 3 persons in one body, i'm third share in a company of god, it just says One! It's either one or it is multiple, cannot claim both, it does not work, it becomes unreasonable, it becomes as a 'trinity' mystery, God never states His divine nature as being a trinity of seperate identities, 3 is not even His divine number, 7 is!

"I AM, Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending" Saith The Lord "Which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty." - Jesus Christ

I mean how much clearer does He have to make it? We as Christians were not 'trinitarians' we're Christians - and God says 'Hear Him', hear who? Jesus! What does He say, He says I AM! Jesus declares Himself the Almighty, Alpha and Omega, beginning and the end, everything, he's not a bit part player!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.