1
I've read the book three times.
I didn't see any glaring errors in the book.
Yet I hear much chirping about the wrongness of the purpose driven approach.
I don't know if said chirping is the result of taking a snippet of what he said here and a snippet there, and then weaving it into this massive assertion that he's a false teacher. Cuz I know that can be done to almost anyone.
Or is the chirping due to him actually teaching overtly wrong heresies?
So can someone please explain to me what is wrong with the purpose driven life?
Can you do it without taking a snippet here and snippet there, and inflating it into something worse than it is by elaborate conjecture and emotionalism?
Can you also do it in a succinct-ish way?
Namely give a brief smoking gun quote/clip/video/etc?
I want to get to the bottom of this, because after reading it, any apparent HUGE heresies have honestly gone over my head, that is if said heresies exist.
I didn't see any glaring errors in the book.
Yet I hear much chirping about the wrongness of the purpose driven approach.
I don't know if said chirping is the result of taking a snippet of what he said here and a snippet there, and then weaving it into this massive assertion that he's a false teacher. Cuz I know that can be done to almost anyone.
Or is the chirping due to him actually teaching overtly wrong heresies?
So can someone please explain to me what is wrong with the purpose driven life?
Can you do it without taking a snippet here and snippet there, and inflating it into something worse than it is by elaborate conjecture and emotionalism?
Can you also do it in a succinct-ish way?
Namely give a brief smoking gun quote/clip/video/etc?
I want to get to the bottom of this, because after reading it, any apparent HUGE heresies have honestly gone over my head, that is if said heresies exist.