R
richierich121
Guest
this looks like a battlefield instead of a discussing everyone fighting to prove who is right instead of discussing among each other and look to the bible for the anwser
thats a first nice post lol think youll do well in this christian cage fight ding ding .this looks like a battlefield instead of a discussing everyone fighting to prove who is right instead of discussing among each other and look to the bible for the anwser
not exactly new..had to make an alt account just came back to tell everyone bye, since i didn't get the opportunity too and was banned ban for no reason, hope one day everyone can actually work as brothers and sisters to find a solution to this never ending battle among ourselves, we have alot of denominations and creed and everyone fighting to support their beliefsthats a first nice post lol think youll do well in this christian cage fight ding ding .
welcome to christian chat,, are we fighting or is iron sharpening iron , or are we ministering to the saints,
I think the subject has got a bit better,
Can i ask you a few questions, Your new are you a christian, Do you have any views on this topic or any of the comennts you've read, feel free to rebuke me bro, peace be with you in the name of the farther the son and the holy spirit
Thankyou for your honesty and you seem sincere and to want to to try and sought things out, people make mistakes, and people sometimes get annoyed, with faith strenth and courage you can fight these things, through christ, and faith condemnation, gets easier to deal with as your faith grows,not exactly new..had to make an alt account just came back to tell everyone bye, since i didn't get the opportunity too and was banned ban for no reason, hope one day everyone can actually work as brothers and sisters to find a solution to this never ending battle among ourselves, we have alot of denominations and creed and everyone fighting to support their beliefs
the fact that we have so many religions under the christian name should say something, everyone got their own theology to things but instead of fighting for what your beliefs are about something why can't we discuss it and work together to find the true doctrine of God.. i hope one day everyone can do, take care
sincerely, Josh God bless
not exactly new..had to make an alt account just came back to tell everyone bye, since i didn't get the opportunity too and was banned ban for no reason, hope one day everyone can actually work as brothers and sisters to find a solution to this never ending battle among ourselves, we have alot of denominations and creed and everyone fighting to support their beliefs
the fact that we have so many religions under the christian name should say something, everyone got their own theology to things but instead of fighting for what your beliefs are about something why can't we discuss it and work together to find the true doctrine of God.. i hope one day everyone can do, take care
sincerely, Josh God bless
He must not be the one true GOD, then (even though he is GOD).
I am able to do nothing from myself. As I hear, I judge, and my judgment is just, because I do not seek my own will, but the will of the one [true GOD] who sent me. John 5:30
Yes, i agree there is no trinity.
Jesus taught his disciples to pray: “Our Father which art in heaven, hallowed be thy name.” Our heavenly Father, whose name is Jehovah, is described in the Bible as being superior to his Son. For example, Jehovah is “from everlasting to everlasting.” But the Bible says that Jesus is “the firstborn of every creature.” That Jehovah is greater than Jesus, Jesus himself taught when he said: “My Father is greater than I.” (Matthew 6:9; Psalm 90:1, 2; Colossians 1:15; John 14:28, King James Version) Yet, the Trinity doctrine holds that the Father and the Son are “equally God.”The Father’s superiority over the Son, as well as the fact that the Father is a separate person, is highlighted also in the prayers of Jesus, such as the one before his execution:“Father, if you wish, remove this cup [that is, an ignominious death] from me.Nevertheless, let, not my will, but yours take place.” (Luke 22:42) If God and Jesus are “one in essence,” as the Trinity doctrine says, how could Jesus’ will, or wish, seem different from that of his Father?—Hebrews 5:7, 8; 9:24.
Furthermore, if Jehovah and Jesus were the same, how could one of them be aware of things of which the other was not? Jesus, for instance, said regarding the time of the world’s judgment: “Concerning that day or the hour nobody knows, neither the angels in heaven nor the Son, but the Father.”—Mark 13:32.
@GraceBeUntoYou you do know that FromTheBible has been banned i wll try to study your post and make a repsonse, can i just ask what your objective is here and what the point is your trying to make with this post,
As indicated earlier, I have a ton of input to this discussion. I wanted to get this posted earlier, but my schedule has really kept me from doing so. I will have more to offer over the weekend, where I will further discuss at length other Pauline passages such as 1 Corinthians 8.6, and Philippians 2.6.
You said that the Doctrine of the Trinity asserts the equality of the Father, and the Son (“that the Father and the Son are ‘equally God’”), but then instead of taking the time to do a little extra research, and determine what is meant by equality, what is it that you do? You cite several out of context passages that have absolutely no bearing on the subject.
Every Trinitarian creed under the sun, and on God’s green earth confesses that this equality is one of ontology,
“being of one substance with the Father” – Nicene Creed
“consubstantial with the Father according to the Godhead, and consubstantial with us according to the Manhood” – Chalcedonian Creed
“equal to the Father in divinity, subordinate to the Father in humanity” – Athanasian Creed
Yet, by citing passages such as John 14.28, your argument misses the mark completely. It strays away from ontology, and focuses primarily on issues of the Son’s authority in light of the incarnation. You’ve created the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition. More on this in my discussion of Philippians 2.
As it has already been pointed out, when Paul speaks of Christ as the “Firstborn,” he is not depicting Christ as the first-created of God’s created order. Of course, “Firstborn,” as it is used throughout the Old Testament is often used in reference to the preeminence of an individual, and is clearly seen in the highly Messianic Psalm, in which David (who here is a typification of the coming Messiah, Jesus Christ), the youngest amongst the sons of Jesse (1 Sam 16.11-13), is described and appointed as God’s “firstborn, the highest of the kings of the earth” (Psalm 89.27). It is Christ, as the Son of God, who is the “Firstborn” in the sense that He is the “heir” of all things, for everything that belongs to the Father also belongs to the Son (John 16.15, 17.10). As the “firstborn” is the heir to all of his father’s estate, so too is Christ the heir of all the Heavenly Father’s estate, namely, all of creation (Col 1.15, Heb 1.2, Psalm 2.7-8).
We could discuss partitive genitives (“one of the students of the class”), or genitives of subordination (“King over Israel”) and its correlative analogous genitive (“King of Israel”), but because it is possible to understand this phrase as a partitive genitive in light of Orthodoxy (in light of the incarnation, the man Christ is most supreme, the most preeminent of all creation), I would instead like to direct attention to the preposition found in v. 16, ὅτι (“He is the image of the invisible God, the Firstborn of all creation, because…”), because our understanding of the subsequent things that Paul has to say is key to understanding what he meant by referring to Christ as “Firstborn of all creation.” The reason for Christ being called the “Firstborn of all creation” is “because all things were made in Him… through Him… and for Him.” This statement of course makes little or no sense if the phrase “Firstborn of all creation” is meant to mean that Christ is the first thing that God ever created. How is it that Christ is the first-created of all creation, because all things were created in, through, and for Him?
Of course, the Watchtower has a way around this by the simple addition of the word "other" into v. 16. They argue, that because the word “all,” does not always mean “all without exception” that this somehow justifies the insertion of “other” into the text. In their attempt to be consistent, they have added “other” in a number of places throughout Colossians 1 (v. 16 [x2]; v. 17[x2]; v. 20[x1]) with exception to v. 18, and the one place it would counteract their theological motive, Colossians 1.15 (“the Firstborn of all creation”). Thus, in attempt to be consistent, they have actually become inconsistent in their application. Working through the remainder of the Book of Colossians also reveals this inconsistency.
It seems strange that here at Colossians 1, Paul would suggest that it is “in,” and “through” Christ “all other things” came into existence, and turn right around in 1 Corinthians 8.6, and speak of “all things”within the created order as having their existence through Christ, particularly in light of the Father being the one “from whom are all things.” Of course, should one infer from 1 Corinthians 8.6 that through Christ “all other things” came into existence, then to remain consistent in application, they must also infer, that it is “from” the Father “whom are all other things.”
Moreover, when the expression τὰ πάντα ("all things") is used in the context of the created order, it , as Richard Bauckham has suggested (God Crucified: Monotheism and Christology, 32), “belongs to the standard rhetoric of Jewish monotheism, in which it constantly refers, quite naturally, to the whole of the created reality from which God is absolutely distinguished as its Creator, and Ruler,” i.e., Romans 11.36; 1 Cor 8.6; Ephesians 3.9; Heb 2.10; Gen 1.31; Neh 9.6; Eccl 3.11, 11.5; Job 8.3; Jer 10.16; 3 Macc 2.3; Wisdom 1.14, 9.1; Sirach 18.1, 23.20. Paul’s emphasis in the Christ-hymn upon the powers, the angelic agencies is circumstantial – it reflects Paul’s deliberate purpose and use of τὰ πάντα (v. 16).
Christ’s creation of “all things” serves as the sole basis of Him being “Firstborn of all creation.” If I were to say, “He is president of the United States, because he received the most votes,” the ground clause “because he received the most votes” modifies the predicate nominative “president” (giving the grounds for it) but does not contribute anything to the subordinate prepositional phrase “of the United States.” In fact, you could remove the subordinate prepositional phrase without issue, which again seems to indicate that there isn’t a link between it and the ground clause.
Whatever we take “Firstborn of all creation” to mean (and there are divergent views within Orthodoxy), it must be on the basis of Christ existing before, and creating all things as indicated in the ground clause, “because in Him all things in heaven and on earth were created.” This is elsewhere expressed throughout the NT, where the authority of the Creator over creation derives from the very act of creation itself (Revelation 4.11, Hebrews 2.8).
There's plenty more to say in regards to the πρὸ πάντων predication in v. 17, the εἰκὼν title in v. 15, the πλήρωμα ascription in Colossians 2.9, and the link between Colossians 1.12-20 and Hebrews 1.1-3, where there is a striking correspondence of concepts: (a) "through" the Son the world came into existence; (b) Christ is the "heir of all things" ("firstborn of all creation"); (c) He upholds the universe by the word of His power ("in Him all things hold together"); (d) He is the "radiance of the glory of God, and the exact imprint of His nature" ("the image of the invisible God"); (e) He made purification for sins ("through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross")
"Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets,but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things (c.f. Hebrews 1.6), through whom also he created the world. He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high" (Hebrews 1.1-3)
"giving thanks to the Father, who has qualified you to share in the inheritance of the saints in light.He has delivered us from the domain of darkness and transferred us to the kingdom of his beloved Son,in whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins. He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For in him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him. And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in everything he might be preeminent. For in him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether on earth or in heaven, making peace by the blood of his cross" (Colossians 1.12-20)
But finally, the espoused interpretation doesn't mesh with other Pauline Christological texts (i.e., Philippians 2, 1 Corinthians 8-10).
but tell me this everyone, god is eternal correct? which means he is without end or beginning, but look at this. 1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.2 The same was in the beginning with God.
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.
4 In him was life; and the life was the light of men.
5 And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.
7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.
8 He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.
9 That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.
10 He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.
11 He came unto his own, and his own received him not.
12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
John 1:1-14
read it carefully to see what it is saying, God is Eternal. but we notice, in the beginning was the word, and the word was with god, and the word was god. and later down in the chapter we see that THE WORD was MADE FLESH. now Eternal means lasting or existing forever without end or beginning but we see that the word had a beginning and it was made flesh and was the only begotten son of the father now read this with an open mind not what you knew before or in some denomination it is right there. Jesus was the fullness of the godhead bodily. in christ dwelt God. The body of Jesus was the only tabernacle of God, the difference with God and Jesus is God had no beginning but Jesus had a beginning, there is no trinity how could the son be his own father? he is the word of god and we notice when he was baptized the spirit of God came down into him To dwell in him, he was the tabernacle of God