The True Nature of God/Word, Father/Son, and the Trinity

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
G

GRA

Guest
#1
... "as I see it" ...

( Disclaimer: What follows is merely an attempt to describe my conceptualization, reasoning, and understanding of the true nature of God - according to the scriptures - with specific regard to 'identity'. )



Genesis 1:

[SUP]1[/SUP] In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.



The phrase 'In the beginning' is referring to our beginning - 'time and space', as we know it.

It is talking about the beginning of the heaven and the earth - when God created the heaven and the earth.

How did He create it?

He created it "by the Word of His mouth" -- He 'spoke' it into existence.

God said - and it was...

Now -- understand that - because of the true nature of God - the very Word that He speaks is literally 'alive'.

This is because God is 'life'. All life comes from God. All that comes from God is alive.

It is impossible for anything to "come out" from God and not be 'alive'.

This is the true nature of the existence of God.

This 'Word' - that "comes out" from God - that is 'alive' -- is an "extension" of Himself -- the "outward expression" of Himself to His creation.


John 1:

[SUP]1[/SUP] In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. [SUP]2[/SUP] The same was in the beginning with God.



This "outward expression" of God to His creation -- which "was with God" - which "was God" - which "was in the beginning with God" -- was fully alive, and was fully God.

The Word did not "come into existence" - but, rather - "always was" - because of what is being said in verse 2 -- the Word already "was" at the beginning...

What these verses do not say is - that the 'Word' was 'Almighty God [ the Father ]' - in the "full personification" sense.

The Word was God; however, the Word was not [ "the actual", full, complete, "all-that-He-is" ] 'God the Father' Himself.

In the "full Godship" sense - yes.
In the "full personification" sense - no.


In terms of 'identity', this allows for a separate 'entity' that is [ fully ] God without being [ "the exacting original" ] 'God the Father'.

( "This is vitally important to the plan of salvation, as well as some other things involving the 'eternality' of God. And, not to mention, how He can have a Son without being His own Father..." )

In other words - there IS a separation - such that they are not "exactly identically" the same.

The separation exists in the difference between "God Himself" and "the outward expression of Himself" to His creation. Both are actually God. The difference is a matter of finite identity. The former is the Almighty 'personage' ( 'God the Father' ) - who has never been seen by man. ( Please understand the context -- in the "full personification" sense - not in the "effectual sense" of "the back parts" in Exodus 33:23 -- see John 1:18 below... ) The latter is the Almighty 'manifest' ( 'God the Word' ) - revealed to be seen by man.

God 'unseen' and God 'manifest' -- same God.

God the Father maintains His "rightful just 'private' dignified solemn sacred majestic holy existence"...
God the Word manifests His "rightful just 'public' dignified solemn sacred majestic holy existence"...

Also, the scope of the Word in this context goes beyond the text of the Bible ( which is called "the Word of God" ) - and includes "all things ever shown forth" in the "outward expression" of God to all of His creation.

So then - the Word is "the complete total-sum full living manifestation of the outward expression of God to His creation"...

The phrase 'In the beginning' means the exact same thing as it does in Genesis 1:1 -- and, does not represent the "beginning" of God, the Word, or Jesus.


John 1:

[SUP]3[/SUP] All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.



God the Word was the "means" or the "mechanism" - through which and by which - God the Father, "by the Word of His mouth", made everything.

It is perfectly legitimate and acceptable to say that God the Father created everything.

It is perfectly legitimate and acceptable to say that God the Word created everything.

Both of these statements are true and in perfect harmony.


John 1:

[SUP]4[/SUP] In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

[SUP]10[/SUP] He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.

[SUP]14[/SUP] And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

[SUP]18[/SUP] No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.



Jesus was born into the world as a person - body, soul, and spirit. His 'body' was human flesh. His 'soul' was the Word. His 'spirit' was the Holy Spirit.

At His conception, His body was "new"; however, His soul and spirit already existed together before that time - as the Word.

The Word does not have a beginning, and has always been with the Father. ( John 1:1 )

Jesus the person -- the Godhead bodily ( Colossians 2:9 ) -- had a beginning ( through human conception by the Holy Spirit ); however, the Word ( "Jesus the person, minus His body" ) always was...

From verse 14:

The Word ( already existing ) was made ( took on the form of ) flesh ( human conception and birth ).

The sonship of Jesus rests totally in the virgin birth. There is no such thing as 'the Son of God' outside of the bodily existence of Jesus. The Word was not 'the Son of God' before, or outside of, the birth of Jesus --- 'Almighty God' is the Father, 'Jesus Christ' is the Son.

Now -- understand that - after Jesus was raised from the dead, with His 'glorified' body, He ( being God ) could ( I believe ) appear to Abraham, for example, in that very same resurrected body -- because, He could "step inside and outside of time" and "make appearances" whenever He wished.

As for the 'Trinity'...

I believe in "the 'triune' nature" of God. I do not tend to think of Him in the full sense of "three persons" -- because -- a 'person' ( in the full sense ) is generally thought of as having body, soul, and spirit. Of course, God the Father - Who is 'Soul and Spirit' - and has no body - is thought of as a person ( in the full sense ). However, the Holy Spirit is never thought of as having any "part" of a person ( in the full sense ) except 'spirit'. So - while all three might be considered a "person" - strictly by virtue of their 'spirit' ( which happens to be the Holy Spirit for all three ) - each of the three is not a "person" ( in the full sense ) - having body, soul, and spirit.

So then -- whether you want to use the word "person" or not -- there are three, which are the same God:


[TABLE="width: 500, align: left"]
[TR]
[TD]God the Word / Jesus
[/TD]
[TD]body, soul, and spirit[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]God the Father[/TD]
[TD]soul and spirit[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]God the Holy Spirit[/TD]
[TD]spirit[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]






Confusing, isn't it?

:)
 
Aug 31, 2013
651
3
0
#2
I'll call what you call God, "Divinity". The divine essence if you will.

Jesus is Divinity, but Jesus is jesus.
GOD is DIvinity, but God is God. even Jesus admits to that.
Spirit is Divinity, but Spirit is Spirit as well.

The Church has believed since it made a call on this topic, that they were both together and separate. In recent years there is a faction called ONENESS that says it's all God. And they teach it in a way that you could just x out Jesus name and write God and it would suit them just fine.

Well in His wisdom He wrote it as they were separate as well. I consider them as separate, but acknowledge their togetherness. I consider them as separate because at HIS ADVICE or his writings, HE put it that way.

This keeps the aspects alive and the roles more clear. In other words it doesn't muddy up the water in pedantics and semantics.

BTW most denominations consider Oneness a bit off, some a cult, some just heresy, some just nod and smile at them. And of course they love themselves as they are the only ones that got it right, in their eyes. That's how we all are though, right? :)


Water covers the earth, in the sky, the polar caps the oceans and the lakes, and in my bladder for that point. :|

Sorry for the pause. Water is in the sky, the oceans and the polar caps.

Water is water. It's always gonna be water. It will never be anything BUT water.

In the oceans it's LIQUID.
In the air it's GASSEOUS.
On the caps, and in my freezer, ti's SOLID.

They are all water.

If you call them water it's ok. But it can be confusing.

If I ask for water to keep my meat from thawing out, and you bring me steam, that is water, but it is not going to be much help.

I need to ask for ICE, which is water, so you can get the right aspect of water that will be of benefit to me.

Hope that helps. This topic gets folks banned. :)
 
Q

Quickfire

Guest
#3
hi gra i believe the farther has many spirits rev 5.6 And I beheld, and lo, in the midst of the throne and the four living beings, and in the midst of the elders, stood a Lamb as it had been slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God, sent forth into all the earth.
 
G

GRA

Guest
#4
This topic gets folks banned.
As long as we maintain a proper reverential respect toward God while contemplating His nature, I do not believe that it should be that much of a problem. However --- when people are added to the equation ------ "yeah, I know what you mean..."

:)
 
G

GaryA

Guest
#5
... "as I see it" ...

( Disclaimer: What follows is merely an attempt to describe my conceptualization, reasoning, and understanding of the true nature of God - according to the scriptures - with specific regard to 'identity'. )

.
.
.

:)
"It may not make sense to anyone else, but - that is the way I see it..."

:)