The Hebrew Roots Cult - Jim Pruitt

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#1
The Hebrew Roots Cult
by Jim Pruitt, 4/1/2006

-> The Hebrew Roots Cult | For the Love of His Truth

hebrew_roots.jpg


Titus 1:10-11, 13-14
For there are many rebellious men, empty talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, who must be silenced because they are upsetting whole families, teaching things they should not teach…For this reason reprove them severely so that they may be sound in the faith, not paying attention to Jewish myths and commandments of men who turn away from the truth.​

What an insidious and devious Enemy we have! The ability to take devout men and women of God who are zealous for good works and twist their desires so as to put them back into bondage to the Law illustrates the truly evil nature of Satan.

I had the recent misfortune of encountering a cult which is growing in influence within Christianity. It is not to be confused with Messianic Judaism or simply seeking to explore the Jewish culture within which most of the Bible was written. Although there are many organizations which are promoting this general view and their specific doctrines often vary, it is generally known as the Hebrew Roots Movement.

Why Haven't I Heard About This?

As a rule, this spreading wave of false doctrine is not being addressed by the church. This is due to several reasons:
  • There is a fear of appearing anti-Semitic
  • The depth of the movement’s doctrinal heresies is not generally known
  • There is within the church in general a reluctance to address false doctrine
  • The movement usually hides their beliefs and presents itself as simply seeking to educate Christians concerning their Jewish heritage. As they become acclimated to the Jewish orientation the more aberrant doctrines are slowly introduced.
The influence of this movement is working its way into our churches and our seminaries. The longer we refuse to address it directly and publicly the greater the damage will be to our brothers and sisters and to the core doctrines of our faith. If it is not the responsibility of the clergy to correct issues of doctrine, then whose responsibility is it? [OP: Christian Chat!]

A Few Symptoms

Allow me to delineate some of their more common symptomatic doctrinal heresies:

  • All Christians should adhere to a kosher diet
  • The Sabbath can only be observed on Saturdays
  • The Jewish festivals and holidays should still be observed today
I addressed in a previous article (The Subtle and Insidious Nature of False Doctrine) why these are not sound doctrinal stances so I will not reiterate them here.

The Cause

The root of their symptomatic heresies is hermeneutic (having to do with the methodology used to interpret scripture) in nature. The Protestant Reformers used a grammatical-literal hermeneutic when interpreting scripture. In other words, it means what it says unless there is a significant reason to believe otherwise. This movement uses a grammatical-historical hermeneutic with a twist. Their underlying assumptions when approaching any scripture are:

  • Whatever God has ever commanded of those who seek Him (i.e., the Jews, their ancestors, their descendents, and Christians) is still in effect today (including the Levitical law)
  • Gentile followers of Christ were “grafted into” the Jews which they interpret to mean that Gentiles must assume Jewish customs if they really want to mature and please God
Based on those unquestionable assumptions, they then decide how they can best interpret a given scripture to support those beliefs.

The farther down this rabbit hole they go, the more bizarre their doctrines become. Many see the New Testament as inferior to the Old (or a conspiracy by the Catholic church). More still say that Paul’s teachings are contrary to Christ (since they have trouble with his obvious statements against their beliefs) and, therefore, reject his epistles as scripture. Some say that the only reason we aren’t still sacrificing animals and stoning people for their sins is because there is no Temple and no Sanhedrin. But when they are restored then these will resume. Others go so far as to eventually reject Jesus as the Messiah and simply say that He was just a Rabbi. The inevitable outcome of following this train of thought is to put people back into bondage to the Law.

The Truth

These heresies are so fundamentally and obviously wrong that I hesitate to even address them. However, it is apparently not obvious to the adherents of this cult so I will briefly spell out a few.

We (as Gentile believers) were not grafted into the Law and Judaism but into the faith of Abraham which preceded the Law and Jewish customs (Romans 4, Romans 11:17-24, Galatians 3:15-18). The law was given because of transgressions and to be our tutor to lead us to Christ (Galatians 3:19,24,25). Jesus fulfilled all of the requirements of the law (Matthew 5:17-20) for all time (John 19:30, Romans 5:12-21). We were “made to die to the Law through the body of Christ” so that we might be joined to Him (Romans 7:1-6, Galatians 2:19,21) because Christ is “the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes” (Romans 10:4). You mature in Christ and please Him by the same means by which you were saved…by faith…not by following the Law.

Galatians 3:1-4
You foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified? This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh? Did you suffer so many things in vain--if indeed it was in vain?​

No where in the Bible do we find Gentile believers being instructed to follow Levitical laws or Jewish customs. In fact, just the opposite (see my previous article). However, we do find several examples where Jewish Christians are reprimanded for trying to convince Gentile Christians to follow the Law (Acts 15, Galatians, Romans 14, Titus 1).

Those in the Hebrew Roots cult have stumbled over the Great Stumbling Block (1 Corinthians 1:23,24, Galatians 5:11). This heresy goes all the way back to the first century but like a bad penny it keeps turning up every few centuries. Beware of those who come to you professing to educate you about your Hebrew roots in order to “make you a better Christian” or to “restore your Biblical Hebrew heritage.” Question them closely concerning these heresies to prevent them from being introduced into your churches and families (as they have been introduced into mine).

Below are some websites with more information concerning the Hebrew Roots Movement as well as relevant scriptures for you to consider. Test the spirits, my brothers and sisters and refute unsound doctrine (Titus 1:9).

Jews for Jesus warn of the dangers of the Hebrew Roots Movement
http://www.jfjonline.org/witness/faq_bt_hebraicroots.htm
The Jewish Roots Movement: Flowers and Thorns - Jews for Jesus

Critical explorations of the Hebrew Roots Movement
SeekGod.ca - Hebrew Roots, Hebraic Roots, Messianic Movement
The Hebraic Roots Movement

Galatians 3:28,29
There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham's descendants, heirs according to promise.


Romans 2:17-21 But if you bear the name “Jew” and rely upon the Law and boast in God, and know His will and approve the things that are essential, being instructed out of the Law, and are confident that you yourself are a guide to the blind, a light to those who are in darkness, a corrector of the foolish, a teacher of the immature, having in the Law the embodiment of knowledge and of the truth, you, therefore, who teach another, do you not teach yourself?


1 Timothy 1:3, 6-10 As I urged you upon my departure for Macedonia, remain on at Ephesus so that you may instruct certain men not to teach strange doctrines…For some men, straying from these things, have turned aside to fruitless discussion, wanting to be teachers of the Law, even though they do not understand either what they are saying or the matters about which they make confident assertions. But we know that the Law is good, if one uses it lawfully, realizing the fact that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching


2 Peter 2:1 But false prophets also arose among the people, just as there will also be false teachers among you, who will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing swift destruction upon themselves.​
 
M

Married_Richenbrachen

Guest
#2
  • The movement usually hides their beliefs and presents itself as simply seeking to educate Christians concerning their Jewish heritage. As they become acclimated to the Jewish orientation the more aberrant doctrines are slowly introduced.
A brilliant description of one of my observations about heretical behaviour and doctrines.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#3
Having dabbled for 6 mos in the HRM I would say that is one of the better concise assessments of it's pitfalls.
They also don't seem to grasp that a change of Priesthood necessitates a change of law. Heb 7:12
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#4
Is this another "group every Torah-observant sect into one and indiscriminately portray them all as evil" thread?
 
L

letti

Guest
#5
I think,the thread is trying to bring to light,that Christ left his holy spirit for a huge reason, to reconcile us to God.Where the old covenant failed to do that.After,all if the old covenant was working ,why make one with Christ,where we were given the Holy spirit, and Christ example as well as teachings to lead us.
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#6
No where in the Bible do we find Gentile believers being instructed to follow Levitical laws or Jewish customs.
Acts 15:28-29 It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things. Farewell.

Leviticus 7:26 And wherever you live, you must not eat the blood of any bird or animal.

I guess some things they believe in aren't so crazy after all. But this one part of the original post pretty much sums up my thoughts on the entire post. It addresses a very broad topic and in a very general manner, so much so that I really see no point to it. For instance...

The Protestant Reformers used a grammatical-literal hermeneutic when interpreting scripture. In other words, it means what it says unless there is a significant reason to believe otherwise. This movement uses a grammatical-historical hermeneutic with a twist
Using a grammatical-literal hermeneutic for the Acts passage would mean that every Gentile should abstain from eating blood. If that's the case Protestant Reformers would do well to heed New Testament advice and not eat blood. As a result, many of them resort to a grammatical-historical hermeneutic to interpret this passage (which is an approach similar to those evil cultists') to mean that not eating blood would best serve only those Gentiles being addressed rather than the Gentiles of our present day for historical and contextual reasons A, B, C, etc. Personally, I favor whatever hermeneutic is the most thorough and makes the most sense.
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#7
Yes.

2 Tim 4:2 preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction. (NASB)

"group every Torah-observant sect into one and indiscriminately
No, clearly this thread is not about Orthodox, Liberal, Reform or Karaite Judaism, etc. Furthermore, the original post states:

It is not to be confused with Messianic Judaism or simply seeking to explore the Jewish culture within which most of the Bible was written. Although there are many organizations which are promoting this general view and their specific doctrines often vary, it is generally known as the Hebrew Roots Movement.
portray them all as evil" thread?
Misled?

Gal 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, to perform them.” (NASB)
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#8
Acts 15:28-29 It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things. Farewell.

Leviticus 7:26 And wherever you live, you must not eat the blood of any bird or animal.

I guess some things they believe in aren't so crazy after all.
Did you understand the essay? :confused:

We (as Gentile believers) were not grafted into the Law and Judaism but into the faith of Abraham which preceded the Law and Jewish customs (Romans 4, Romans 11:17-24, Galatians 3:15-18).
The commandment against blood consumption was given to Noah, long before Levitical laws

Gen 9:4 Only you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood.

But this one part of the original post pretty much sums up my thoughts on the entire post. It addresses a very broad topic and in a very general manner, so much so that I really see no point to it. For instance...

Using a grammatical-literal hermeneutic for the Acts passage would mean that every Gentile should abstain from eating blood. If that's the case Protestant Reformers would do well to heed New Testament advice and not eat blood. As a result, many of them resort to a grammatical-historical hermeneutic to interpret this passage (which is an approach similar to those evil cultists') to mean that not eating blood would best serve only those Gentiles being addressed rather than the Gentiles of our present day for historical and contextual reasons A, B, C, etc. Personally, I favor whatever hermeneutic is the most thorough and makes the most sense.
Your hermeneutic involves ignoring Genesis 9.
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#9
Yes.

2 Tim 4:2 preach the word; be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with great patience and instruction. (NASB)



No, clearly this thread is not about Orthodox, Liberal, Reform or Karaite Judaism, etc. Furthermore, the original post states:





Misled?

Gal 3:10 For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, to perform them.” (NASB)
Ah. I understand. Then I sincerely apologize, and hope you will forgive me. Thank you for specifying. I do agree that people from such Gospel-denying cults present themselves as trying to enlighten others on the history of God and teach them to follow God's laws. They never answer touchy questions (such as a literal Gospel) with clear answers so as not to offend anyone and push them away from their cult. I'm not sure what they hope to achieve by this as when you listen to their teachings you eventually find out the truth. I guess they're just hoping to convince you or hook the weak-minded or weak in faith before they can get out.
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#10
The commandment against blood consumption was given to Noah, long before Levitical laws

Gen 9:4 Only you shall not eat flesh with its life, that is, its blood.
I've encountered this teaching on the Noachide laws. What is your opinion on them in terms of Gentiles?

In my opinion... The commandment of circumcision was also given to Abraham, who was not a Jew. Does that mean that the New Testament promoted circumcision or that all Gentiles should be circumcised? I just think that the fact that these laws appear to be given indiscriminately to Jews and to Gentiles speaks to the will of God for our lives. Meaning that God gave his laws to a specific people for the sake of contrasting them with the surrounding nations so that the nations would likewise learn to follow God's laws for their own sake. And even if Christ somehow abolished the laws, what does that mean for the Noachide laws (some of which are found in the Torah) which are supposedly outside the jurisdiction of the Torah according to these abolitionists?
 
Last edited:
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#11
Listen, for many months I served as a Temple Goy (The Non-Jew who aids on the Sabbath at a Temple) for a Chabad Lubavitch Hasidic community. Through them I gained a great appreciation for the Jewish traditions. However, I still ate cheeseburgers, and cheesesteaks. While I bought Kosher meat, that was more because I now knew how humanely the Jewish laws of killing livestock was. I do not believe we should all celebrate Simchat Torah or Yom Kippur or even the New Moon festivals, but I did so because I have a great love of their culture. I still have the kipah (yalmulke) and Tallit (prayer shawl) that was given to me by a dear friend, and occassionally I still use them in prayer, but only because I wanted to know more about Jesus and the world He had lived in.

The Gospel writers often assume that we know Jewish history and tradition, but we don't. I suggest any Christian to study the Jewish traditions, but do not become a Jew. We are the Body of Christ, and friends and family of God. I am not a Jew, but I still think that in order to understand the Apostles, the early disciples, and Christ more deeply, we can learn from the modernized version of the culture that existed 2000 years ago.
 
M

Married_Richenbrachen

Guest
#12
I've encountered this teaching on the Noachide laws. What is your opinion on them in terms of Gentiles?

In my opinion... The commandment of circumcision was also given to Abraham, who was not a Jew. Does that mean that the New Testament promoted circumcision or that all Gentiles should be circumcised? I just think that the fact that these laws appear to be given indiscriminately to Jews and to Gentiles speaks to the will of God for our lives. Meaning that God gave his laws to a specific people for the sake of contrasting them with the surrounding nations so that the nations would likewise learn to follow God's laws for their own sake. And even if Christ somehow abolished the laws, what does that mean for the Noachide laws (some of which are found in the Torah) which are supposedly outside the jurisdiction of the Torah according to these abolitionists?
The Noachide laws aren't scriptural (and I believe are designed for Pharisaic global domination). My understanding of these "laws" are that they are just a rip-off of the Ten commandments, with a Pharisaic spin on them.

If it's wrong for Christians to (try to) obey the law of Moses for righteousness, how much more the man-made laws of the Pharisees?
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#13
I've encountered this teaching on the Noachide laws. What is your opinion on them in terms of Gentiles?
It's Talmudic--not for Christians.

Seven Laws of Noah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"In Judaism, the Seven Laws of Noah (Hebrew: Sheva mitzvot B'nei Noach), or the Noahide Laws, are a set of moral imperatives that, according to the Talmud, were given by God as a binding set of laws for the "children of Noah" – that is, all of humanity."

The real Noahide laws (for lack of a better term) are in Gen 9:1-17.

In my opinion... The commandment of circumcision was also given to Abraham, who was not a Jew. Does that mean that the New Testament promoted circumcision or that all Gentiles should be circumcised?
Gentiles means not Jewish, there are many descendants of Abraham that are not Jewish, many practise circumcision.

I just think that the fact that these laws appear to be given indiscriminately to Jews and to Gentiles speaks to the will of God for our lives.
If you believe that God gives out laws indiscriminately then you need more Bible study and lots of it.

Meaning that God gave his laws to a specific people for the sake of contrasting them with the surrounding nations so that the nations would likewise learn to follow God's laws for their own sake. And even if Christ somehow abolished the laws, what does that mean for the Noachide laws (some of which are found in the Torah) which are supposedly outside the jurisdiction of the Torah according to these abolitionists?
Is the Apostle Paul an "abolitionist"? :confused:
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#14
It's Talmudic--not for Christians.

Seven Laws of Noah - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"In Judaism, the Seven Laws of Noah (Hebrew: Sheva mitzvot B'nei Noach), or the Noahide Laws, are a set of moral imperatives that, according to the Talmud, were given by God as a binding set of laws for the "children of Noah" – that is, all of humanity."
I've never seen a distinction between the Noachide laws and the laws in the Torah, with perhaps one debated exception. I think what comes from the mouth of God is holy and worthy of consideration no matter what title Men give to it. So, probably like you, I really don't care what the Talmud has to say on the issue.

The real Noahide laws (for lack of a better term) are in Gen 9:1-17.
So do you believe that Gentiles should not eat blood?

Gentiles means not Jewish, there are many descendants of Abraham that are not Jewish, many practise circumcision.
But that's not the same as God specifically giving the law of circumcision to a Gentile as he did in Abraham's case. Heck, some Gentiles in America observe circumcision as a health practice. I was circumcised when born, and at that time my parents both considered themselves Baptists and had no clue of any Jewish ancestry. And they certainly weren't doing it because of any law in the Torah. It was just viewed as a healthy practice. So does this mean they're under the curse of the law? Or does it just mean they believed there was merit to the practice? If you can answer this question you might just understand my position on the Torah.

If you believe that God gives out laws indiscriminately then you need more Bible study and lots of it.
Don't confuse the the connotations of the word indiscriminate with the actual meaning of the word here. If God is giving laws - found in the Torah - to both Gentiles and Jews (first to the Gentiles and then to the Jews), then this is known as indiscriminate (i.e. not discriminating between Gentile or Jew with regard to observance of these laws).

Is the Apostle Paul an "abolitionist"? :confused:
Abolitionist with regard to the Torah (not slavery lol). Some Christians will argue that he is this sort of abolitionist. They think he believed the laws were abolished and had no value. But he answers them quite nicely on many occasions.

Acts 24:17-18a After an absence of several years, I came to Jerusalem to bring my people gifts for the poor and to present offerings. I was ceremonially clean when they found me in the temple courts doing this. [...]

Acts 21:24, 26 Take these men, join in their purification rites and pay their expenses, so that they can have their heads shaved. Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law. [...] The next day Paul took the men and purified himself along with them. Then he went to the temple to give notice of the date when the days of purification would end and the offering would be made for each of them.
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#15
I look forward to the creation of the man-made third temple so that I, like Paul has done, may go there at least once and present offerings to God before its future corruption and desolation. It's one of my life goals. :D
 
M

Married_Richenbrachen

Guest
#16
I look forward to the creation of the man-made third temple so that I, like Paul has done, may go there at least once and present offerings to God before its future corruption and desolation. It's one of my life goals. :D
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: You're being sarcastic, right?
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#17
I look forward to the creation of the man-made third temple so that I, like Paul has done, may go there at least once and present offerings to God before its future corruption and desolation. It's one of my life goals. :D
It's one of your life goals to watch an animal die? Why? :confused:
 
Dec 21, 2012
2,982
40
0
#18
I look forward to the creation of the man-made third temple so that I, like Paul has done, may go there at least once and present offerings to God before its future corruption and desolation. It's one of my life goals. :D
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: You're being sarcastic, right?
It's in the original post.

The farther down this rabbit hole they go, the more bizarre their doctrines become. ... Some say that the only reason we aren’t still sacrificing animals and stoning people for their sins is because there is no Temple and no Sanhedrin. But when they are restored then these will resume.
 
M

Married_Richenbrachen

Guest
#19
It's in the original post.
Ya, but I thought Aristocat wasn't one of them. He's a Christian, right? I mean, his parents were Baptists... :| Surely he's not one of them?
 

TheAristocat

Senior Member
Oct 4, 2011
2,150
26
0
#20
It's one of your life goals to watch an animal die? Why? :confused:
I could answer this question, but it'd involve getting off-topic a bit. Suffice it to say, offerings consist of more than animal sacrifices.