Bible Exposes Error In The Nicene Creed

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
#1
What are the scripture to support the practise of worshipping the Holy Spirit with the Father & the Son? I know the Holy Spirit is of the Triune God, but I cannot find any scripture in the NT that states that this is the will of the Father for us to do when we can only honour the Father by honouring the Son in fellowship, prayer, & worship.

There are the verses from which singles out the Father's will.

John 5:22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: 23 That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.

John 13:31 Therefore, when he was gone out, Jesus said, Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him. 32 If God be glorified in him, God shall also glorify him in himself, and shall straightway glorify him.

1 Corinthians 1:9 God is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of his Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

1 Corinthians 2:1And I, brethren, when I came to you, came not with excellency of speech or of wisdom, declaring unto you the testimony of God. 2 For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.

Philippians 2:5 Let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: 6 Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: 7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: 8 And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross. 9 Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above every name: 10 That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; 11 And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.

The role of the Holy Spirit as God, will not speak of Himself ( John 16:13 ) but testify of the Son ( John 15:26 ) to seek to glorify the Son ( John 16:14 ) as a true witness will do ( John 7:18 ) as those led by the Spirit will be doing the same thing ( John 15:27 ) so that as a combined singular witness with the indwelling Holy Spirit's, our witness may be true ( John 8:17 )

Scripture reproves the practise of the Holy Spirit to be worshipped with the Father & the Son because those led by the Spirit would not speak of the Holy Spirit in seeking the glory of the Holy Spirit.

This was what I have learned from the Lord in the scripture, and the verses that websites places for validating the Nicene creed does not support it. It just testify that the Holy Spirit is God, but it does not signify the will of the Father in how we are to come to Him in worship when scripture has singled out the Son as the only way.

What's the point of contention? Why did the "holy laughter" movement went across the denomenations in 1994 as reported by the 700 Club as happening in Catholic & Protestant churches when it used to be a streamlined Pentecostal/Charismatic event? Why after that initial encounter, the focus was on the "Holy Spirit" to come and do that again? And they do call on the Person of the Holy Spirit directly for that to occur again & it has.... and yet many believers would say that it is not of God because it is of confusion.

Are the promises of God yea & nay? Will those that call on Jesus Christ will have the devil answer them? No. So what happened?

The commandment of His invitation was to come to the Son for He is the only way to the Father: not by way of the "Spirit". By broadening the way in the worship place ( Matthew 7:13-14) by including the worship of the Holy Spirit with the Father & the Son, churches have suffered a thief to break thru and many houses have fallen because of it as Jesus warned for not heeding His words & doing them ( Matthew 7:24-27 )

Proverbs 25:26 A righteous man falling down before the wicked is as a troubled fountain, and a corrupt spring. 27 It is not good to eat much honey: so for men to search their own glory is not glory. 28 He that hath no rule over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls.

To avoid that above: is why Jesus said this to saved believers below.

Luke 13:24 Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.

John 10:1Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. 7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him....13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.

As the chaste bride is to be to the Bridegroom, believers as well as churches need to recognize the role of the Holy Spirit & the will of the Father in heeding the commandment of the Son's invitation in living this reconciled relationship with God thru the Son.Jesus Christ
 
B

Bryancampbell

Guest
#2
"But an hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for such people the Father seeks to be His worshipers. God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth." - John 4:23-24 NASB

Holy Spirit is our spiritual growth, our sanctification, our teacher, leader, and guide. Without Him, we are worthless in trying to overcome the flesh and be the acceptable living sacrifice that we are called to be.
 

Nick01

Senior Member
Jul 15, 2013
1,272
26
48
#3
What are the scripture to support the practise of worshipping the Holy Spirit with the Father & the Son? I know the Holy Spirit is of the Triune God, but I cannot find any scripture in the NT that states that this is the will of the Father for us to do when we can only honour the Father by honouring the Son in fellowship, prayer, & worship.
The Bible doesn't say worship the Spirit specifically, no. But I think the Spirit is worthy of worship, because he is God. Almost by definition, God is worthy of worship. The OT tells us on countless occassions that this triune, but single God, that we worship, must be worshipped. Does that not include the Spirit?

I think the Creed strikes the balance, quite well, in how it expresses this:

Nicene Creed said:
We believe in the Holy Spirit, the Lord, the giver of life,
Who proceeds from the Father and the Son,
Who with the Father and the Son is worshipped and glorified.
The Spirit is never separate from the Father and Son. Of course, this could be said of the other two - they are triune - but it is particularly vividly said of the Spirit. He does nothing without the fullness of the Godhead. Indeed, it is interesting to read Paul, who talks about this in Romans 15, in terms of how the power of the Holy Spirit interacts with the gospel preaching he did:

Romans 15 said:
In Christ Jesus, then, I have reason to be proud of my work for God. For I will not venture to speak of anything except what Christ has wrought through me to win obedience from the Gentiles, by word and deed, by the power of signs and wonders, by the power of the Holy Spirit, so that from Jerusalem and as far round as Illyricum I have fully preached the gospel of Christ, thus making it my ambition to preach the gospel, not where Christ has already been named, lest I build on another man's foundation, but as it is written, "They shall see who have never been told of him, and they shall understand who have never heard of him."
So you get where I'm coming from, I'm Anglican (evangelical, Reformed, not particularly charismatic). We say the Creeds at my church from time to time, and we sign songs and pray in ways that acknowledge the Holy Spirit. We ask for His power, and we even worship him as a person of the triune God. I can't think of times where we've singled him out for praise off the top of my head, but I don't think it would be wrong to do so, as long as His worship and ministry reminds us off the fulness of what Jesus said and points us to the Father's glory. I think the Creed treads that line perfectly ok.
 

starfield

Senior Member
Jun 13, 2009
3,393
58
48
#4
What are the scripture to support the practise of worshipping the Holy Spirit with the Father & the Son? I know the Holy Spirit is of the Triune God, but I cannot find any scripture in the NT that states that this is the will of the Father for us to do when we can only honour the Father by honouring the Son in fellowship, prayer, & worship.
When we are worshiping the Father we are also worshiping the Son and the Spirit.
 
G

GraceBeUntoYou

Guest
#5
Foremost, you are confusing the Nicene Creed of 325AD with the Creed of 381AD. The original Creed of 325AD was the byproduct of the Nicene Council,

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten of his Father, of the substance of the Father, God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father. By whom all things were made, both which be in heaven and in earth. Who for us men and for our salvation came down and was incarnate and was made man. He suffered and the third day he rose again, and ascended into heaven. And he shall come again to judge both the quick and the dead. And in the Holy Ghost. And whosoever shall say that there was a time when the Son of God was not, or that before he was begotten he was not, or that he was made of things that were not, or that he is of a different substance or essence, or that he is a creature, or subject to change or conversion — all that so say, the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes them.

The changes to that Creed came years later, and this is actually a major contention between Eastern and Western churches even to this day. The Council of Constantinople did not intend to change what the Creed initially said, but made additions that they also held to be true. The Trinitarian model of the Eastern Church (Nicene Creed 325AD) is a lot different from the Trinitarian model of the Western Church (Creed of 381AD).
 
Last edited:

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
#6
"But an hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth; for such people the Father seeks to be His worshipers. God is spirit, and those who worship Him must worship in spirit and truth." - John 4:23-24 NASB
In context, Jesus was saying to the Samaritan woman that God is not going to be confined to a place of worship anymore as if one has to go to a place to worship God there.

John 4:[SUP]19 [/SUP]The woman saith unto him, Sir, I perceive that thou art a prophet. [SUP]20 [/SUP]Our fathers worshipped in this mountain; and ye say, that in Jerusalem is the place where men ought to worship. [SUP]21 [/SUP]Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father. [SUP]22 [/SUP]Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews. [SUP]23 [/SUP]But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. [SUP]24 [/SUP]God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

Jesus did not say that God is the Spirit, and thus not having any image or form whasoever. In context, Jesus was referring to how those that seek to worship the Father ( and you have to be saved in having His seal of adoption to call Him Father ) they shall worship Him in spirit & in truth because of what Jesus Christ have done for them.

1 Corinthians 6:[SUP]19 [/SUP]What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? [SUP]20 [/SUP]For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.

So there is no more going to a place of worship to be where the Spirit of God is, because He dwells within us and thus it is required to worship the Father by way of the Son "in spirit & in truth" for what He has done for us to give thanks in Jesus' name. There is no more seeking the Spirit in worship for our faith requires Him to be dwelling within us by faith so that the line of discernment can now be said that whatever spirit is felt in the place of worship or any place with sesnational signs in the flesh as coming over them & even the sensation of filling them again & again, THAT IS NOT the Holy Spirit but the spirit of the antichrist as in "instead of the Son". That is the work of seducing spirits that would draw our eyes off of the Son in worship to seek after them for a sign again, thus worshipping the Father "out of spirit" & "apart from the truth".

It is because of seducing spirits that the real indwelling Holy Spirit will keep the spotlight on the Son in honouring the Son & glorifying the Son for it is by the Son is the Father honoured & glorified as well. That is the role of the Holy Spirit to not speak of Himself ( John 16:13 ) but testify of the Son ( John 15:26 ) to glorify the Son ( John 16:14 ) as we led by the Spirit will be doing the same thing ( John 15:26 & John 3:28-30 & John 5:31 & John 7:18-19 ) so that as a singular witness combined with the real indwelling Holy Spirit's, our witness will be true ( John 8:17 )

So the only way to come to God the Father in fellowship & worship is by way of the Son.

1 Corinthians 1:[SUP]9 [/SUP]God is faithful, by whom ye were called unto the fellowship of his Son Jesus Christ our Lord.

1 Corinthians 2:[SUP]2 [/SUP]For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified.

John 14:[SUP]6 [/SUP]Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. [SUP]7 [/SUP]If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.

John 13:[SUP]31 [/SUP]Therefore, when he was gone out, Jesus said, Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in him. [SUP]32 [/SUP]If God be glorified in him, God shall also glorify him in himself, and shall straightway glorify him.

Make no mistake. This is the will of the Father in how we are to live this reconciled realtionship with God thru the Bridegroom.

Holy Spirit is our spiritual growth, our sanctification, our teacher, leader, and guide. Without Him, we are worthless in trying to overcome the flesh and be the acceptable living sacrifice that we are called to be.
There is no denying that as long as we understand His role as leading us to relate to God the Father thru the Bridegroom as the Son of God as our Good Shepherd is leading us by the Holy Spirit within us.

Since the Holy Spirit speaks what He hears, then our response is not towards the Holy Spirit Whom is the Divine Messenger, but towards the One actually speaking: our Good Shepherd: the Bridegroom at that throne of grace.

John 16:[SUP]13 [/SUP]Howbeit when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatsoever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will shew you things to come. [SUP]14 [/SUP]He shall glorify me: for he shall receive of mine, and shall shew it unto you. [SUP]15 [/SUP]All things that the Father hath are mine: therefore said I, that he shall take of mine, and shall shew it unto you.

Philippians 1:[SUP]6 [/SUP]Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ:....[SUP]11 [/SUP]Being filled with the fruits of righteousness, which are by Jesus Christ, unto the glory and praise of God.

Hebrews 12:1Wherefore seeing we also are compassed about with so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which doth so easily beset us, and let us run with patience the race that is set before us, [SUP]2 [/SUP]Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.

2 Timothy 4:[SUP]18 [/SUP]And the Lord shall deliver me from every evil work, and will preserve me unto his heavenly kingdom: to whom be glory for ever and ever. Amen.

Since the Holy Spirit is sent to NOT speak of Himself BUT to glorify the Son, then that is what the believers led by the Spirit & His words will be doing too.


Just because the Holy Spirit is God does not mean for believers to formulate a different way to honour & glorify the Father by doing the same thing to the Spirit when the Spirit would not be leading the believers to do that but to ONLY honour & glorify the Son.
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
#7
The Bible doesn't say worship the Spirit specifically, no. But I think the Spirit is worthy of worship, because he is God. Almost by definition, God is worthy of worship. The OT tells us on countless occassions that this triune, but single God, that we worship, must be worshipped. Does that not include the Spirit?
Explain why honouring the Father & glorifying the Father soley rests on the Son. Why is the role of the Holy Spirit is to not speak of Himself, but to testify of the Son to glorify Him? Doesn't the role of the Holy Spirit dictates how He will lead the believers to be doing the same thing... not speak of the Holy Spirit in testifying of the Holy Spirit in seeking the glory of the Holy Spirit but of the Son in testifying of the Son in seeking the glory of the Son and by Him, the honour & glory of God the Father as well.

I think the Creed strikes the balance, quite well, in how it expresses this:
Being ecumenical in format & purpose, as gathering grapes of thorns & figs of thistles, I would give such creeds pause, especially when Catholic Churches uses them, thus striking an accord or an agreement by that creed.

2 Corinthians 6:[SUP]16 [/SUP]And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. [SUP]17 [/SUP]Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you. [SUP]18 [/SUP]And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.

The Spirit is never separate from the Father and Son. Of course, this could be said of the other two - they are triune - but it is particularly vividly said of the Spirit. He does nothing without the fullness of the Godhead. Indeed, it is interesting to read Paul, who talks about this in Romans 15, in terms of how the power of the Holy Spirit interacts with the gospel preaching he did:

So you get where I'm coming from, I'm Anglican (evangelical, Reformed, not particularly charismatic). We say the Creeds at my church from time to time, and we sign songs and pray in ways that acknowledge the Holy Spirit. We ask for His power, and we even worship him as a person of the triune God. I can't think of times where we've singled him out for praise off the top of my head, but I don't think it would be wrong to do so, as long as His worship and ministry reminds us off the fulness of what Jesus said and points us to the Father's glory. I think the Creed treads that line perfectly ok.
Yes, the Holy Spirit is of the Triune God, but not to the point that He blurs the lines of the roles of the Son & the Father being the same as His. You can't say that all of the Triune God died on that cross.

When Jesus said that He is the only way to God the Father, that is giving the commandment of His invitation the law for every believer to honour the Father by and that is by honouring the commandment of the Son's invitation in how we come to Him even in worship. We are led by the Spirit of God to do what the Spirit of God is sent to do.. to testify of the Son in seeking the glory of the Son. There is no other way and that is how we are His disciples by serving the Son in seeking His glory & by Him, the glory of God the Father.
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
#8
When we are worshiping the Father we are also worshiping the Son and the Spirit.
Feel free to quote scripture as I cannot find any that would support honouring the Father nor glorifying the Father by any other way than honouring & glorifying the Son.

What's the point of contention? Why did the "holy laughter" movement went across the denomenations in 1994 as reported by the 700 Club as happening in Catholic & Protestant churches when it used to be a streamlined Pentecostal/Charismatic event? Why after that initial encounter, the focus was on the "Holy Spirit" to come and do that again? And they do call on the Person of the Holy Spirit directly for that to occur again & it has.... and yet many believers would say that it is not of God because it is of confusion.

Are the promises of God yea & nay? Will those that call on Jesus Christ will have the devil answer them? No. So what happened?

The commandment of His invitation was to come to the Son for He is the only way to the Father: not by way of the "Spirit". By broadening the way in the worship place ( Matthew 7:13-14) by including the worship of the Holy Spirit with the Father & the Son, churches have suffered a thief to break thru and many houses have fallen because of it as Jesus warned for not heeding His words & doing them ( Matthew 7:24-27 )

Proverbs 25:26 A righteous man falling down before the wicked is as a troubled fountain, and a corrupt spring. 27 It is not good to eat much honey: so for men to search their own glory is not glory. 28 He that hath no rule over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls.

To avoid that above: is why Jesus said this to saved believers below.

Luke 13:24 Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.

John 10:1Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. 7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him....13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.

As the chaste bride is to be to the Bridegroom, believers as well as churches need to recognize the role of the Holy Spirit & the will of the Father in heeding the commandment of the Son's invitation in living this reconciled relationship with God thru the Son.Jesus Christ
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
#9
Foremost, you are confusing the Nicene Creed of 325AD with the Creed of 381AD. The original Creed of 325AD was the byproduct of the Nicene Council,

We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten of his Father, of the substance of the Father, God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten, not made, being of one substance with the Father. By whom all things were made, both which be in heaven and in earth. Who for us men and for our salvation came down and was incarnate and was made man. He suffered and the third day he rose again, and ascended into heaven. And he shall come again to judge both the quick and the dead. And in the Holy Ghost. And whosoever shall say that there was a time when the Son of God was not, or that before he was begotten he was not, or that he was made of things that were not, or that he is of a different substance or essence, or that he is a creature, or subject to change or conversion — all that so say, the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes them.

The changes to that Creed came years later, and this is actually a major contention between Eastern and Western churches even to this day. The Council of Constantinople did not intend to change what the Creed initially said, but made additions that they also held to be true. The Trinitarian model of the Eastern Church (Nicene Creed 325AD) is a lot different from the Trinitarian model of the Western Church (Creed of 381AD).
Thanks for sharing that information, brother, but there are still several points of contentions to be had regarding this portion below:

"And in the Holy Ghost. And whosoever shall say that there was a time when the Son of God was not, or that before he was begotten he was not, or that he was made of things that were not, or that he is of a different substance or essence, or that he is a creature, or subject to change or conversion — all that so say, the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes them."

#1) What is the point of that phrase "And in the Holy Ghost."?

#2) This phrase "all that so say, the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes them." still goes against this Biblical teaching for churches to do in having an ecumenical agreement with the Catholic Churches.

2 Corinthians 6:[SUP]16 [/SUP]And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. [SUP]17 [/SUP]Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you. [SUP]18 [/SUP]And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.

Something to reconsider & discern with His wisdom in His words.
 
G

GraceBeUntoYou

Guest
#10
Thanks for sharing that information, brother, but there are still several points of contentions to be had regarding this portion below:

"And in the Holy Ghost. And whosoever shall say that there was a time when the Son of God was not, or that before he was begotten he was not, or that he was made of things that were not, or that he is of a different substance or essence, or that he is a creature, or subject to change or conversion — all that so say, the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes them."

#1) What is the point of that phrase "And in the Holy Ghost."?

#2) This phrase "all that so say, the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes them." still goes against this Biblical teaching for churches to do in having an ecumenical agreement with the Catholic Churches.

2 Corinthians 6:[SUP]16 [/SUP]And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? for ye are the temple of the living God; as God hath said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. [SUP]17 [/SUP]Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you. [SUP]18 [/SUP]And will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.

Something to reconsider & discern with His wisdom in His words.

The primary contention at Nicea was solely focused upon Christology, not Pneumatology, or even the Doctrine of the Trinity (though they all do have a close relation).

Arians of the time of Nicea did not believe what modern Arians believe today. If you were to ask a Jehovah's Witness about the Holy Spirit, you would get a very different answer than if you were to ask the father of Arianism, Arius.

You seem to confuse the usage of terms such as, "Catholic Church" with Roman Catholicism -- the two have no relation at all. The Early Church used terms like these to emphasize a universal scope. So what's being emphasized in the last few words of the Creed is the condemnation by the Body of Christ.
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
#11
The primary contention at Nicea was solely focused upon Christology, not Pneumatology, or even the Doctrine of the Trinity (though they all do have a close relation).

Arians of the time of Nicea did not believe what modern Arians believe today. If you were to ask a Jehovah's Witness about the Holy Spirit, you would get a very different answer than if you were to ask the father of Arianism, Arius.

You seem to confuse the usage of terms such as, "Catholic Church" with Roman Catholicism -- the two have no relation at all. The Early Church used terms like these to emphasize a universal scope. So what's being emphasized in the last few words of the Creed is the condemnation by the Body of Christ.
If one does not find the term in the NT, then the use of the term is circumspect when referred to as in the early church.

Also: this part of the creed is dubious

"And whosoever shall say that there was a time when the Son of God was not, or that before he was begotten he was not, or that he was made of things that were not, or that he is of a different substance or essence, or that he is a creature, or subject to change or conversion "

Explain their meaning in relation to our understanding the bold portion of that part of the creed, because Jesus is the Son of Man & the Son of God that has risen and we shall be changed to be like Him.
 
G

GraceBeUntoYou

Guest
#12
If one does not find the term in the NT, then the use of the term is circumspect when referred to as in the early church.

Also: this part of the creed is dubious

"And whosoever shall say that there was a time when the Son of God was not, or that before he was begotten he was not, or that he was made of things that were not, or that he is of a different substance or essence, or that he is a creature, or subject to change or conversion "

Explain their meaning in relation to our understanding the bold portion of that part of the creed, because Jesus is the Son of Man & the Son of God that has risen and we shall be changed to be like Him.
You're committing anarchronism at its very finest. Instead, you should go to the literature of that time and understand how it was used. Just because the term is not in the NT does not mean it is circumspect, because the vocabulary of the NT authors is extremely limited. There are terms used by Paul that no other NT author uses. There are terms used by John that no other NT author uses. And you can bet there are terms that none of the NT authors used, but that doesn't mean they weren't in use. Just take a look at some of the successors of the Apostles (i.e., Polycarp, Ignatius).

You've either read too much Wikipedia for one day, or you misunderstand the data presented. At least, I assume Wikipedia is where you got the idea that the last paragraph is "dubious." The use or non-use of the bracketed verbiage does not indicate that it is uncertain, or dubious. In fact, the chart provided on Wikipedia is a comparison of the 325AD, and the 381AD creed. The bracketed verbiage in the 325AD creed is the portion that is missing from the 381AD version, and the italicized in the 381 version indicates the absence in the 325 creed. The article makes this clear, "The following table, which indicates by [square brackets] the portions of the 325 text that were omitted or moved in 381, and uses italics to indicate what phrases, absent in the 325 text, were added in 381."
 
Last edited:
Oct 31, 2011
8,200
182
0
#13
I think that God's thoughts are higher than our thoughts and there are many things we just don't completely understand. When every little bit of scripture is pulled and tugged at like this by man's thoughts, it gets distorted. It doesn't clarify, it bewilders and muddies the water.

We are told about the Holy Spirit and we are told why we have it, when we have it, that it is of God. We can believe it with faith in our Lord, and use the Holy Spirit. We can praise our Lord for the HS. So why are we digging into this and having a controversy over it?

Let it go.
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
#14
You're committing anarchronism at its very finest. Instead, you should go to the literature of that time and understand how it was used. Just because the term is not in the NT does not mean it is circumspect, because the vocabulary of the NT authors is extremely limited. There are terms used by Paul that no other NT author uses. There are terms used by John that no other NT author uses. And you can bet there are terms that none of the NT authors used, but that doesn't mean they weren't in use. Just take a look at some of the successors of the Apostles (i.e., Polycarp, Ignatius).


Granted, there are terms like the rapture that is not in the Bible but believers use it today, My point of conetntion is when such terms are being related to the apostate church like Catholic by name of the church and sacrament by the origin of a system of works that deny Him in catholicism, they should be "pruned" so that our faith in Christ stands further apart from what is well known in the world as Catholic: a religion.


You've either read too much Wikipedia for one day, or you misunderstand the data presented. At least, I assume Wikipedia is where you got the idea that the last paragraph is "dubious." The use or non-use of the bracketed verbiage does not indicate that it is uncertain, or dubious. In fact, the chart provided on Wikipedia is a comparison of the 325AD, and the 381AD creed. The bracketed verbiage in the 325AD creed is the portion that is missing from the 381AD version, and the italicized in the 381 version indicates the absence in the 325 creed. The article makes this clear, "The following table, which indicates by [square brackets] the portions of the 325 text that were omitted or moved in 381, and uses italics to indicate what phrases, absent in the 325 text, were added in 381."
I didn't use Wikipedia.. and I don't care to go there because anybody can put anything they want in there. Not a reliable source.

In our witness, we should use words to say what we mean and that means there are some words we should avoid using to not be confused with an apostate church or a system of works like catholicism that deny Him.

All Catholics that believe in the Lord Jesus Christ & that God raised Him from the dead are saved, regardless if they believe their catholic catechism saying that they are not saved yet. Catholicism are works that deny Him as they are wood, stubble, and hay that is going to get burned up on that foundation when God comes to judge His House at the pre tribulational rapture event.

So yes... terms matter as we are to abstain from all appearances of evil in regards to our faith in Christ so that the world may see our faith clearly as standing apart from all things Catholic, and that should include the creeds. We do not need them anyway. By abstaining from the creed, Catholics would take notice, inquire and know our faith as standing further apart from what they believe in as per their works of catholicism.

They will know we are christians by our love for one another and see our faith in Jesus Christ that they are saved, and keeping the faith is the good fight.
 

Enow

Banned
Dec 21, 2012
2,901
39
0
#15
I think that God's thoughts are higher than our thoughts and there are many things we just don't completely understand. When every little bit of scripture is pulled and tugged at like this by man's thoughts, it gets distorted. It doesn't clarify, it bewilders and muddies the water.

We are told about the Holy Spirit and we are told why we have it, when we have it, that it is of God. We can believe it with faith in our Lord, and use the Holy Spirit. We can praise our Lord for the HS. So why are we digging into this and having a controversy over it?

Let it go.
What's the point of contention? Why did the "holy laughter" movement went across the denomenations in 1994 as reported by the 700 Club as happening in Catholic & Protestant churches when it used to be a streamlined Pentecostal/Charismatic event? Why after that initial encounter, the focus was on the "Holy Spirit" to come and do that again? And they do call on the Person of the Holy Spirit directly for that to occur again & it has.... and yet many believers would say that it is not of God because it is of confusion.

Are the promises of God yea & nay? Will those that call on Jesus Christ will have the devil answer them? No. So what happened?

The commandment of His invitation was to come to the Son for He is the only way to the Father: not by way of the "Spirit". By broadening the way in the worship place ( Matthew 7:13-14) by including the worship of the Holy Spirit with the Father & the Son, churches have suffered a thief to break thru and many houses have fallen because of it as Jesus warned for not heeding His words & doing them ( Matthew 7:24-27 )

Proverbs 25:26 A righteous man falling down before the wicked is as a troubled fountain, and a corrupt spring. 27 It is not good to eat much honey: so for men to search their own glory is not glory. 28 He that hath no rule over his own spirit is like a city that is broken down, and without walls.

To avoid that above: is why Jesus said this to saved believers below.

Luke 13:24 Strive to enter in at the strait gate: for many, I say unto you, will seek to enter in, and shall not be able.

John 10:1Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.

John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. 7 If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him....13 And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it.

As the chaste bride is to be to the Bridegroom, believers as well as churches need to recognize the role of the Holy Spirit & the will of the Father in heeding the commandment of the Son's invitation in living this reconciled relationship with God thru the Son.Jesus Christ