How do we know we've received the Holy Spirit?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

NazariteNation

Guest
#21
You recieve the Holy Spirit the moment you are born again. That doesn't mean that you are walking in the spirit tho.
Very true. I view the Baptism of the Holy Spirit to be a lot like what Jesus describes in John 15. When you first give your life to Christ, the Holy Spirit comes live (abide) in your heart. However, in order to receive the Baptism of the Holy Spirit, this requires submission on our behalf, which could and should be viewed as us learning to abide in Him. Which makes sense when you take into account that one facet is receiving a personal prayer language, a direct link to the Father than the enemy can not dissrupt.
 
N

NazariteNation

Guest
#22
That point of view also means that those Pentecostals/ Charismatics don't think that Baptists, Methodists, etc. are not saved and don't have the Holy Spirit, they just think they don't have the Baptism of the Holy Spirit and thus will not operate in the Gifts.
Actually, from my experience in the Pentecostal / Spirit Filled faith with Church of God, International Pentecostal Holiness Church & International House of Prayer, that assessment is not true at all. Although I'm pretty sure that the perspective that you have just given actually belongs to UPC which holds to various doctrine that most Pentecostals do not agree with. I'm not really familiar enough with Assembles of God to comment on their behalf.

Pentecostalism (at least in the sotheastern part of the United States) evolved out of the Methodist faith which is why most Pentecostals adhere so strictly to sanctification and consecration. So in essence a lot Pentecostals could be considered Spirit filled Methodists.

As far as the Baptist faith is concerned, it's not that we don't believe they are saved. We believe that anyone who is sincere in their walk with Christ is indeed saved. However, the disconnect is over the matter of Eternal Security. Pentecostal view this doctrine as using scripture to tolerate / justify sin thus there are excessive abuses of God's grace (which some feel borderlines Catholicism).
 
N

NazariteNation

Guest
#23
That point of view also means that those Pentecostals/ Charismatics don't think that Baptists, Methodists, etc. are not saved and don't have the Holy Spirit, they just think they don't have the Baptism of the Holy Spirit and thus will not operate in the Gifts.{/quote]

I apologize Shawn. I think may have originally misread your post.

You are right. We don't have a problem with Methodists and Baptists as far as salvation is concerned. As I alluded to earlier, and disagreements that we have usually revolve around the area of tolerance of sin.

While we agree that no man is perfect, usually Pentecostals are assertive in their beliefs that one should do everything within their power to separate themselves from sinful tendencies / patterns out of fear / respect for God. Where as certain other denomination(s), we feel tend to take grace for granted.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#24
Nazarite do you mean those denom. you mentioned do not believe baptists etc are saved?
 
N

NazariteNation

Guest
#26
Nazarite do you mean those denom. you mentioned do not believe baptists etc are saved?
Now I'm pretty sure that UPC (United Pentecostal Church) actually believes that if you're not spirit filled, then there's no hope for you to be taken up in the rapture which is probably safe to assume that they (UPC) believe they (non spirit filled believers) are not saved. UPC also don't believe in trinity. I'm pretty sure that they have a few more questionable doctrines that most pentecostals don't agree with.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#27
I know AOG in Australia don't believe it is necessary for salvation. In fact some AOG churches I've been to here aren't much different from modern baptist or presbyterian ,you rarely hear the gifts mentioned at all or anyone speak in tongues etc.
 
O

onwingsaseagles

Guest
#28
Now I'm pretty sure that UPC (United Pentecostal Church) actually believes that if you're not spirit filled, then there's no hope for you to be taken up in the rapture which is probably safe to assume that they (UPC) believe they (non spirit filled believers) are not saved. UPC also don't believe in trinity. I'm pretty sure that they have a few more questionable doctrines that most pentecostals don't agree with.
Well not to put myself out there to far. I disagree with them about the rapture I do not believe in a pretrib rapture, the rapture is at the post trib 2nd coming. I also disagree with them on the point as to whether you need to be baptized in the Holy Spirit to be saved or not. They believe it is necessary, I do not. However I do agree with their stance on the Trinity. If you NazariteNation or you Mahogany, or anyone else for that matter would like me to explain my stance on the Trinity further, start a thread, and I will respond.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#29
Why dont you start a thread if you feel like discussing it
 
N

NazariteNation

Guest
#30
Mind you, I wasn't trying to debate the issue of Eternal Security. Just wanted to give folks an idea of the differences in beliefs.

The church I currently attend is IPHC - International Pentecostal Holiness Church. Which, like most Holiness churches, has it's roots in the Methodist faith. Holiness is a more traditional form of Pentecostalism that tends to stick to women wearing skirts / dresses, singing old hymns, etc. while Pentecostals tend to be more progressive and modern. I'm also thinking that there various Pentecostal churches with it's roots in the Prysbeterian faith, although I'm not certain (which believe that Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors and Teachers in that order are actually the God given heiarchy in which the church is to organized.)

Anyways, I personal believe that most christianity boils down to one of two mindsets and I believe that this why you see so much division, especially between Baptists and Pentecostals.

Some christians are taught that "We can do nothing without Christ" which is biblically accurate. Other christians are taught "We can do all things through Christ who strengthens me" which is biblically accurate also. Where the problem seems to come in is that christians on both sides tend to take the "We can do nothing..." and the "We can do all things..." very seriously thus the two mindsets tend to clash.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#31
re: apostolic you might be thinking of Edward Irving who was a presbyterian in his attempt to bring prebyterians into charismatic renewal and the catholic apostolic church, there's various apostolic churches around the only difference between them and other churches is that they just call the pastor a "apostle" or something like that but the function or role seems to be the same as any old pastor. The real apostles today if there are any would be the ones planting churches - the native missionaries in India, Nepal etc for example.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#32
Here's a read about the origins of pentecostalism etc it's fairly detailed but simple too:

http://www.oru.edu/university/library/holyspirit/pentorg1.html

I sympathise sometimes with roman catholics when they talk about the 30,000 or so different denominations and "look what the reformation led to, a divided church", in some ways they are right. Although I also point out to them that catholicism is probably just as fragmented and varied in its beliefs within its own church.

I personally look with some suspicion about the latest things like the "Florida revival" of mid last year.
But I think every new pentecostal movement has been looked upon with some suspicion by those of the former pentecostal movements.
 
Jan 8, 2009
7,576
23
0
#33
So all the pentecostal movements seem to be an attempt to restore the way things were in early church, even the book of Acts with signs and wonders etc with the signs and wonders movements.
So I guess a person can either believe a) that all that ceased in the early church according to God's will, and was replaced by a church structure consisting of a heirarchy of bishops etc.. and a complete bible.
or b) that all that ceased in the early church but was not supposed to. i.e. it ceased because it was replaced (or snuffed out) by organised religion. And needs to be restored today.

Pentecostals also usually associate the pentecostal movement with the last days, i.e. God's plan to somehow restore the five-fold ministry of the early church in preparation for Christ's return. There's all sorts of other little beliefs and movements like dominionism or kingdom now teachings. Then you have your old word-faith movements, prosperity doctrines etc mixed in, none of which I believe are right.
 
S

Shawn

Guest
#34
That point of view also means that those Pentecostals/ Charismatics don't think that Baptists, Methodists, etc. are not saved and don't have the Holy Spirit, they just think they don't have the Baptism of the Holy Spirit and thus will not operate in the Gifts.{/quote]

I apologize Shawn. I think may have originally misread your post.

You are right. We don't have a problem with Methodists and Baptists as far as salvation is concerned. As I alluded to earlier, and disagreements that we have usually revolve around the area of tolerance of sin.

While we agree that no man is perfect, usually Pentecostals are assertive in their beliefs that one should do everything within their power to separate themselves from sinful tendencies / patterns out of fear / respect for God. Where as certain other denomination(s), we feel tend to take grace for granted.
Not a problem, but anyone who thinks that most Baptists and Methodists are tolerant of sin or take grace for granted, I suspect are misunderstanding their theology and how they are altogether. You say Pentecostals don't sin because of fear of God. Baptists would say you might as well be under the Law then because we don't sin because of love not fear. And if anyone doesn't love God enough to stop sinning then they are not saved in the first place. God wants people to come to Him out of fear and respect but of love also. Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. But people who feared and then tried to keep the law were not made better people because of it. Is someone not a thief because he's afraid to steal and get caught? What if no one was looking? God wants people following Him and not sinning because they love Him and delight in Him. Being saved means freedom from the fear of hell and condemnation and a new life that I can dedicate to the Lord. It does not mean I can then go on sinning. I just see it as a matter of point of view. From God's who knows the end from the beginning..those who will persevere are the elect who will inherit the Kingdom. From mans point of view you better stay in the faith and stop sinning. This is how I see Eternal Security, but we're not hear to debate that and I don't follow Calvinism or any extreme form of that idea that would do away with human free-will. I do think people can give salvation away, but not lose it. Anyway, a person can hardly lump millions of people together in a denomination and then judge them like that on how seriously they take sin. It's not like anyone but God knows them ALL personally. Unfortunately a lot of Baptists and Methodists will say things about your denomination and Pentecostalism like that too. Things such as "those people are caught up in emotionalism and don't know the Bible! They put experience over the Word of God!" Now does that sound like an accurate depiction of YOU? I'm sure it's not my friend since I know good Christians from various denominations, including charismatics. They take the Bible very seriously. Baptists also take sin very seriously. And if they're wrong about you, can you see that maybe you just misunderstand them too? And that's one of the problems I see in the Body of Christ today. There's nothing wrong with defending your brand of theology, but most of what I see is Baptists criticizing Charismatics while not even understanding their theology, and Charismatics blasting Baptist theology by misunderstanding and therefore misrepresenting it too. I know no Baptist who thinks it's ok to keep sinning while you're saved because of grace or eternal security. I also know people who operate in the Gifts who aren't "demon possessed," like some people of other denominations would say. Christians should find common ground as long as they agree on the essential things, while having dialogue about the things they don't. Not to prove their point and how wrong everyone else is, but to honestly seek the TRUTH. If your Christian brothers and sisters are in error about some things, it would do you well to fully understand their points too so you can more effectively argue yours. I've seen people try to witness to members of a cult before where they even so badly confused what the cult believed and then accused the people they wanted to help of things that they KNEW their religion didn't believe or do. So at that point they just assumed the good Christian didn't know much about anything since they clearly had no clue what they were talking about when it came to this cult. It's always better to understand the other denomination or even religion or cult, and don't go making statements that are false or show ignorance about the group or you'll just push the person away and make them stop listening to the TRUE things you say too.

Too many people only want to keep reinforcing their own beliefs in their denominations point of view instead of studying the Word and then praying for understanding. It's hard for people to think that they've been wrong and change their minds and so people don't always look for the truth.

(and when I mentioned Church of God, I should have pointed out that there are several denominations of that name...one of which is a non-Christian cult altogether. But the one I mentioned has it's headquarters in Cleveland, Tennessee and as far as I can tell is identical in belief to the Assemblies of God. Neither of which think other denominations aren't saved as long as they believe in the essential things of salvation.)

Nazarite, I just want to make it clear that I'm not aiming this rant at you personally or anything like that. I just see a lot of misunderstanding amongst practically everyone on all sides. Even when one side in my opinion is right, it seems like they too can just misunderstand the other side completely and it leads to more problems instead of people coming together.


I'm enjoying hearing about everyone's experiences and testimonies here so far. This thread has been a good dialogue.
 
S

sonofjay817

Guest
#35
Sighhh...I don't know. I'm just becoming a bit frustrated. So many views; so many interpretations. I suppose I shouldn't let my head spin but just let the Spirit teach me, but then again, I know there are sincere people on both sides that have attempted to do that...so why so much dissension? I recently attended a church that had a wonderful spirit. It was an evangelical presbyterian church and is considered charismatic, but I liked that it seemed to have a right balance; sober teaching of the Word, order and structure, and with joyful and free worship but not descending into self-absorbed emotionalism which I have seen a lot of. After I started going there I began studying up on Calvinism and after struggling to make sure I understood it, decided I couldn't accept it. The preacher there was brilliant and knew his Bible so well I think, who am I to disagree with this man, but there I was in total disagreement with Him over the character of God. It seemed to me my spirit rejoiced to worship with these people and I feel the Spirit was truly there, yet I just can't seem to accept their Calvinistic teaching. Perhaps God can still be glorified in a body of believers even though some of their doctrine is flawed.

So I've been a bit disillusioned since then. The Southern Baptist churches I've gone to leave something to be desired in the way of heartfelt worship and the fact they seem to be intimidated by freemasonry and will not call it for what it is (there's a debate waiting to happen). The independent baptist church I've been to seems to be legalistic, and the megachurch I attended seems to lack a certain reverence and awe for God and I don't agree with the way they design everything in their services to be attractive to lost people in a sensual way (I don't mean sexual mind you). The preachers at the charismatic churches I've been to seem to be theatrical and have artifical mannerisms and inflections when they speak. There's a whole subculture tied to it even in the way they jig and shout.

Take the fervency and realness of the baptists, put it with the intellectual leanings of the presbyterians, and the passion of the charismatics, with the youthful vigor of the community churches and then you'd have a church!

Sometimes I think I've become far to much the critic.
 
S

sonofjay817

Guest
#36
Not a problem, but anyone who thinks that most Baptists and Methodists are tolerant of sin or take grace for granted, I suspect are misunderstanding their theology and how they are altogether. You say Pentecostals don't sin because of fear of God. Baptists would say you might as well be under the Law then because we don't sin because of love not fear. And if anyone doesn't love God enough to stop sinning then they are not saved in the first place. God wants people to come to Him out of fear and respect but of love also..

Shawn, this was put extremely well. I've never quite understood why so many people fail to understand this about what baptists believe. I compare it to a married couple. If they truly loved their spouse, even if they knew their spouse would never divorce them for any reason, that does not mean they would be compelled to treat them bad and cheat on them.
 
S

Shawn

Guest
#37
The problem with Calvinism is that he went overboard and came to a lot of illogical extreme conclusions. He also was consenting to a number of people being put to death for different views so for the life of me I don't understand why so many evangelicals become obsessed with his theology and writings. Then you have Arminius who came along and in my opinion went too far the other way in his zeal to refute Calvinism lol. Sonofjay, I am right with you and feel the way you do about a lot of things. I believe in both free will and eternal security, although the way I believe in eternal security is not quite the same as the way my own Baptist Church does. I think you're right that there can be good Godly people who just have some theological errors. Study both sides to every issue that divides, pray about it, and then try to realize that both popular sides can have things wrong about them. Generally that's the problem. Two sides going to two extremes to try to grasp something. Sometimes the Bible can say things that at first thought seem contradictory, but then you just have to figure out how they can both be true. Usually people grab one point or the other and then twist scriptures that seem to disagree in bizarre and illogical ways.

I'm like you....just trying to figure out the truth and that includes about the Gifts of the Spirit.
 
S

Shawn

Guest
#38
Take the fervency and realness of the baptists, put it with the intellectual leanings of the presbyterians, and the passion of the charismatics, with the youthful vigor of the community churches and then you'd have a church!
LOL....that sounds about right to me. I would go to that Church!
 
O

onwingsaseagles

Guest
#39
Why dont you start a thread if you feel like discussing it
I dont feel like it really, I just didn't want this thread to be distracted with questions. However I would not mind answering any questions, just not on this thread seeing as it would be off topic. :)
 
P

pinky

Guest
#40
We know because a change takes place, whether its imediate or gradual, things in my life that use to mean alot did not mean so much after I recieved the Holy Spirit, example, my interest in reading novels left and it was replaced with reading the Bible, drinking left, going out to party at the lake left, instead I went to church, patience increased, compassion came my way, it is an on going growth , we learn more, as we read His word more, thats how I knew, I changed..........
 
Status
Not open for further replies.