Ok to be lesbian?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
#1
I have reason to believe that being lesbian is not a sin.

The idea that being lesbian is a sin, particularly an act of sexual immorality, appears to be referring to two things found in the Bible.

The first, is this:

Leviticus 18:22

"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." (KJV)
"You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination." (ESV & NSRV)
"You are not to sleep with a man as with a woman; it is detestable." (HCSB)

which is a line in a list of sexual immoralities addressed directly by GOD.

However, this is a line that specifically states a man may not sleep with a man in the same way as they would with a woman.
This does not say that a woman can not sleep with a woman as they would with a man.

In other words, this is a rule for men, not women.

Argument 1:
It's implied that same sex relations are wrong.
Counterargument 1:
The very next line states
"Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto". This addresses a rule specifically for women in a separate section of the same line. It comes off as strange that it would be so specific here, yet not specific in the rule made immediately before it. If it was a rule against women doing it with women, then it would likely say something along the lines of "You are not to sleep with a man as with a woman; Neither shall any woman sleep with a woman as with a man: it is detestable". However, it did not do so, which comes off as strange considering the formatting of the rule that comes immediately after it.

Argument 2:
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.". The bolded part is saying that women may not do so either.
Counterargument 2:
If that were the case, then "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." the bolded part here would be separate. Even if they are not separate, then no matter how you twist this, the closest thing you are going to get to a rule about lesbians would be "You may not sleep with a man as you would with a woman, neither shall any woman sleep with a man as they would with a woman."

Argument 3:
If it is not okay for two men to have a sexual relationship, then why would it be okay for two women to have a sexual relationship?! Just because the bible does not explicitly say it is unacceptable for two women to have a sexual relationship does not mean that it is okay!
Counterargument 3:
See Counterargument 1:. We can't assume that it is a sin if it does not explicitly say so. There is actually nothing here suggesting it is wrong to have a lesbian relationship, so there is no reason to act like it is.

Argument 4:
Are you a lesbian? If so, then this whole topic is you twisting the Bible and manipulating to have your way! You are just making it mean something else to your own benefit! That is not good in the eyes of GOD.
Counterargument 4:
I am not lesbian. In fact, the thought of doing something like that personally grosses and creeps me out a bit (Although the thought of doing it with a man also grosses me out. I'm a virgin btw. I plan on staying that way for life.). That much is irrelevant regardless. As for what my motive is behind this topic, a few things. You are making lesbians feel like they will go to hell for what they are and how they feel. Moreover, it is possible that it is not even a sin in the first place! More importantly, you are turning them away from GOD by saying so. You may think that because they would turn from GOD to indulge in being lesbian, that they were already too sinful in the first place. This is incorrect. It turns them away because they believe that if GOD is the kind of person that would send people to hell over something like love, that GOD is a cruel being. Even so, many lesbians try to be Christian regardless, and are put down by daring to call themselves Christian while being so sexually perverse and immoral. This makes Christians, some who are likely the home of much more sin in general, look bad, and turns them away from the religion. This also makes them feel like a minority doomed to hell for how they are. In other words, you are making Christianity a thing that makes them miserable and ruins their life. And for what? Because we think a verse may imply that it is wrong without even explicitly saying so? Aren't we contradicting ourselves, to think we will be fine for our sins that we choose to do in our lives as well as the sinful tendencies that we call a part of who we are and what we are? Unforgivable, by most but not GOD who is understanding and has forgiven you for all of your sins that are much more vast than the one potential sin you pointed out.

Additionally, there is nothing logically incorrect about anything that I pointed out. It does not say it is a sin for women to sleep with women as they would with a man. That means there is nothing suggesting that it is a sin in the first place. Why would this
"Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." be worded this way, but the line "Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto" that comes immediately afterwards be so specific and address women separately?

Argument 5:
So according to you, it's perfectly fine to be lesbian! Great! Now society is one step closer to incest and pedophilia!
Counterargument 5:
No more so than heterosexual relationships. In fact, GOD specified against incest and pedophilia in the section regarding sexual immoralities. Do not forget, however, that we are not to judge, and that we need to focus on ourselves as much as possible. We are sinful ourselves, and have no time to focus on the immorality of society or the acts of others. It is not your place to judge, and I believe, judging is the one of very few ways to get GOD to judge you now that Jesus has died for your sins. Another, is sinning purposefully as though you have a get out of jail free card and do true evil feeling you will meet no consequence. Do not judge, or you too will be judged, and with your unit of measure, it will be measured to you.

In other words, focus on yourself. Focus on yourself as much as you can. You need to do all you can to be good yourself. Teach others, but do not force the word down their throats. Do not abhore a sinful Christian, as they are in need of Christianity the most. Do not say "How dare you call yourself Christian when X" because the same should be said to you.


The other part:

Romans 1:18
That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.
Note here, that it is not GOD speaking, but the apostle Paul.

This appears to be written from the perspective of Paul who was watching what became of the people who worshiped an idol instead of GOD.

The verse does have this line "
Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other.". The way this is worded, seems more like a declaration of geniune surprise in response to the observation that even women were doing it with women.

The lines "
And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.", also said by Paul, all seems to be referring specifically to men.

Although Paul was an apostle and therefore technically able to declare lesbian relationships as a sin, he was certainly not doing so at this time.

This combined with the list of sexual immoralities stated directly by GOD that specified for women in the line
"Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto" but not in the line "Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination." convinced me that perhaps it is not actually a sin. It doesn't appear to be mentioned anywhere else in the Bible as far as I know, unless i'm wrong? It appears as though it isn't explicitely or clearly stated anywhere in the Bible that lesbian relationships are wrong.

What do you think?


 
J

ji

Guest
#2
Nope you're wrong.Its an evil spirit presence and influence that promotes lesbianism..
you must continue in struggle to get out of it,if you couldn't get out instantly...
Because God has greater things in store to Bless you,crippled with disorders like these will block them..
 
Mar 4, 2014
411
4
0
#4
This is very easy to answer and I will say you wrote quite a lot and it took a while to read :S. All homosexual acts are sodomy. You should look up the definition of sodomy but to answer it briefly, any sexual act that can end in an orgasim that does not come to fruition through intercourse (penis in vagina) is sodomy.

As for Bible quotes, Sodom and Gomorrah is a very popular Bible story so I'm going to assume you know about it already. As for a more specific Bible quote about sodomy sending people to hell, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 should be one to view.

Keep in note, this is a popular thing that happens to Christians (including myself). You think, "Masturbation isnt mentioned in the Bible so is it really sinful?" Then you realize that masturbation falls under the category of sodomy, same with homosexual acts, and the like.
 
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
#5
Hm, for now, I will ask if this applies to heterosexual relationsips where one or both partners are infertile?
 
Mar 4, 2014
411
4
0
#6
Hm, for now, I will ask if this applies to heterosexual relationsips where one or both partners are infertile?
Very interesting question. To be honest, I forget where it is in the 4 gospels of Christ but to paraphrase Jesus said that people will want to become infertile (he says it in a negative way, I forget if he meant in the last days or just in the future but I remember him saying it. I couldn't find the Bible quote so I'm just leaving it out there incase you want to research it yourself). Basically saying, people will want sex just for the joy and not for the child Birth.

Do I think it constitutes as being sodomy? First I would like to say this is only my opinion, and that I am no biblical scholar so take this with a grain of salt. But to get to the point, no.

For example, there were many Biblical births without people even having sex or people who were infertile who became fertile. My opinion is, if you purposely did something to make yourself infertile for the sole purpose of just having orgasims without children, then I would say that it was sinful. If you became infertile out of God's will well then I think that theres nothing wrong.

However, I still believe in neither situations would ti be counted as sodomy. Due to the fact that they still had an orgasim during intercourse, and not in some other way (referring back to the definition of sodomy).

Keep in mind, this is just my perspective. I can say for a fact about what I said previously about homosexuality being sodomy to be true, the question you ask now is much more difficult for me to answer.

Lastly, welcome to the forums :D
 
A

Animus

Guest
#7
"Surely, if you eat of the tree, you will not die'" - Satan

The Bible says that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Fornication is sex outside of marriage, and is a sin.
Therefore, two people of the same gender cannot have sex inside of marriage.
Therefore, all sex between people of the same gender is fornication.
 

breno785au

Senior Member
Jul 23, 2013
6,002
764
113
39
Australia
#8
Try and justify it as you wish. You really think God would only be displeased with men having sex with men but not women having sex with each other?
 
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
#9
[h=3]If I understand correctly, "sodomy" means any penetrative sex for non-reproductive purposes, which reinforces the idea that being gay would be listed as a sexual immorality but not being lesbian.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10[/h]New International Version (NIV)

9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a] 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

It does say sexually immoral here, but also specifies against men and not women here, which is curious. I'm really unsure.

 
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
#10
The Bible says that marriage is between a man and a woman.
Fornication is sex outside of marriage, and is a sin.
Therefore, two people of the same gender cannot have sex inside of marriage.
Therefore, all sex between people of the same gender is fornication.


The bible seems to refer to sex as penetrative, though, as I understand it...
 
Last edited:

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#12
You say in your profile under 'spiritual status' that you are unsure.
If that is the case, you are barking up the wrong tree for even a straight person is in danger of eternal condemnation if they haven't seen their whole Adamic nature as sinful and condemn before God.
Our old nature was condemned in Christ at Calvary and He now calls us to turn and embrace His FREE GIFT of pardon and life found in the Person of Christ Jesus who gave Himself at Calvary for our sins.
 
Mar 4, 2014
411
4
0
#13
If I understand correctly, "sodomy" means any penetrative sex for non-reproductive purposes, which reinforces the idea that being gay would be listed as a sexual immorality but not being lesbian.

1 Corinthians 6:9-10


New International Version (NIV)

9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a] 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

It does say sexually immoral here, but also specifies against men and not women here, which is curious. I'm really unsure.

Sorry for delayed response, Im trying to workout andpost in several things so I apologzie I didnt even know you asked another question. Here, I'll post the definition of Sodomy from wikipedia speficially.

"Sodomy /ˈsɒdəmi/ is generally anal sex, oral sex or sexual activity between a person and a non-human animal (bestiality), but may also include any non-procreative sexual activity.[SUP][[/SUP]"

So believe it or not, that quote there makes it easier what you asked me about earlier too. Sorry for the somewhat short response, but I think that should clear everything up now.
 
Dec 18, 2013
6,733
45
0
#14
It seems to me Romans 1:26-27 pretty much answers the question. Paul is pretty clearly and obviously identifying lesbianism with male homosexuality inferring a connection between both as well as indentifying both to be against nature and God.

Though I will also add, I am not one to advocate for hurting anyone (obviously this is why homosexuality is a sin in the first place since it is contrary to love.) I think we should just hope anyone that is a lesbian can stop sexually abusing other women and can repent.
 

Radius

Senior Member
Feb 11, 2013
1,138
180
63
#15
you can't justify this sin as acceptable in God's Eyes OP. It just doesn't work like that. Any wrongdoing is sin. Two men being with each other and two women being with each other is a sin.
 
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
#16
You say in your profile under 'spiritual status' that you are unsure.
If that is the case, you are barking up the wrong tree for even a straight person is in danger of eternal condemnation if they haven't seen their whole Adamic nature as sinful and condemn before God.
Our old nature was condemned in Christ at Calvary and He now calls us to turn and embrace His FREE GIFT of pardon and life found in the Person of Christ Jesus who gave Himself at Calvary for our sins.
My profile status says unsure, yes. This is in the sense that I look at things from the perspective of a detective. That is to say, I can believe in things, but I will never assume anything without logical proof. Logical proof is that one person plus another person equals two people and not three. I cannot ascertain GOD or that Christianity is right but can still believe and follow the religion as if I do. I follow the moral layout, and I do see myself as a selfish person and do what I can to make myself better. If I believe without proof, though, then it becomes easy to be deceived. If I get lost in possibilities such as the world being virtual reality or a dream, then I lose touch with reality.

That is to say that if I grew up having visions or something, and most of them came true, assuming that the next vision would come true would be what could potentially be what a demon wants me to believe. Imagine if I trust the vision, and it turns out to have been a clever lie that ruins my life or even someone elses? It is in this sense that I never assume anything I cannot ascertain. In other words, I work with logical proof to ground myself so that I do not become lost in a lie. That is what I mean by uncertain.

However, on the same coin, I cannot deny the possibility either. It is possible for GOD to exist, for Christianity to be true, and for me to require salvation. I have nothing that logically proves otherwise. It is in this sense that I am Christian.
 
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
#17
Sorry for delayed response, Im trying to workout andpost in several things so I apologzie I didnt even know you asked another question. Here, I'll post the definition of Sodomy from wikipedia speficially.

"Sodomy /ˈsɒdəmi/ is generally anal sex, oral sex or sexual activity between a person and a non-human animal (bestiality), but may also include any non-procreative sexual activity.[SUP][[/SUP]"

So believe it or not, that quote there makes it easier what you asked me about earlier too. Sorry for the somewhat short response, but I think that should clear everything up now.
This will sound like I am stretching the truth or twisting things in my favor, but isn't the current definition of sodomy deviant from the definition in the Bible? I believe Wikipedia also explains that the definition has changed in recent years and refers to laws in some countries. I believe that if a definition of sodomy exists in the Bible, that definition should be used...
 
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
#18
you can't justify this sin as acceptable in God's Eyes OP. It just doesn't work like that. Any wrongdoing is sin. Two men being with each other and two women being with each other is a sin.
I'm not really trying to justify it as much as I am trying to point out the possibility that it might not be a sin...
 
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
#19
Though I will also add, I am not one to advocate for hurting anyone (obviously this is why homosexuality is a sin in the first place since it is contrary to love.) I think we should just hope anyone that is a lesbian can stop sexually abusing other women and can repent.
I don't believe that lesbians love each other any less than any heterosexual partner does with another...
 
Mar 15, 2014
75
0
0
#20
This will sound like I am stretching the truth or twisting things in my favor, but isn't the current definition of sodomy deviant from the definition in the Bible? I believe Wikipedia also explains that the definition has changed in recent years and refers to laws in some countries. I believe that if a definition of sodomy exists in the Bible, that definition should be used...
In fact, it seems the same Wiki article also states "Originally, the term sodomy was commonly restricted to anal sex,[SUP][4][/SUP][SUP][5][/SUP] and is derived from the story of Sodom and Gomorrah in chapters 18 and 19 of the Book of Genesis in the Bible.[SUP][6][/SUP] " immediately after your quote.