What do dispensationalist think about this?
- Thread starter Bookends
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sorry Bookends! Most Dispensationalist would never have a debate with Gary Demar;
much less have a conversation about eschatology after hearing it!
Haven't you heard them cry and whimper and get angered to a point of hatred,
when ever they are challenged on the subject?!
Always having to find the high ground, so they can condescend toward us!
They don't have a collective original thought in the theology of Dispensational Eschatology.
It has all been laid out for them by the satanic prophetic deceivers,
of their Dispensational christian cults!
i e .....left behind....... & many others....
In the fairy-tales of the wicked minds of those.
whom the Holy Spirit would not impart the truth to!
Good luck Bro.! These people have drank the Devil's brew,
they like it and they want more of it! I say, let them have it!
just some of my thoughts
E
Hate to say this bro. But I have had some extreme hatred shown my way in my many years. And even quite a few on here for my view of dispensationalism. So this goes both ways.
And I must wonder why people have to use these attack tactics to try to get their point across. or even prove they are right. do you think this even ads to the conversation?
Wow. Ok. Thanks. I know I WILL NOT speak to you concerning eschatology, You have already made up your mind and think all of us who believe the way I do get it from listening to a few men.
Funny thing is. You just did the very thing you claimed in the first part of your post we do.
Talk about hypocracy.. WOW
And I must wonder why people have to use these attack tactics to try to get their point across. or even prove they are right. do you think this even ads to the conversation?
Wow. Ok. Thanks. I know I WILL NOT speak to you concerning eschatology, You have already made up your mind and think all of us who believe the way I do get it from listening to a few men.
Funny thing is. You just did the very thing you claimed in the first part of your post we do.
Talk about hypocracy.. WOW
Show me who EG, give me an example, past post, etc., so I can rebuke them! (besides the one in this post by ProphetExcalibur)
Last edited:
No I don't EG, but you could take it piece by piece when you have the time and not all one chunk (just remember where you left off).
BTW. I don't 100% agree with Dr Gary Demar, I'm not a 100% Dominionist, I believe Christians will go through pockets of persecution until the return of Christ. Demar predicts the majority of the world will become Christianized. That said, I do feel Gary Demar is right in that most depensationalist focus on Israel and a little piece of land rather then standing up for and spreading the gospel to all nations.
BTW. I don't 100% agree with Dr Gary Demar, I'm not a 100% Dominionist, I believe Christians will go through pockets of persecution until the return of Christ. Demar predicts the majority of the world will become Christianized. That said, I do feel Gary Demar is right in that most depensationalist focus on Israel and a little piece of land rather then standing up for and spreading the gospel to all nations.
E
ok that works.
ps.. WHo are the MOST of the dispensationalists who focus on one nation and a small peace of land, and not the gospel and evangelizing the world.
MOST dispensations realise when we see the signs of things which are fortold. we have to evangelize like we never have before. Because the time is running short. They also realise one of the signs, is that the gospel will be spread to all nations, tribes, and tongues before these things can occur. So their focus is on the world and the lost. Not Israel.
The only reason most people even speak of Isreal is because it is what differentiates our belief system.
ps.. WHo are the MOST of the dispensationalists who focus on one nation and a small peace of land, and not the gospel and evangelizing the world.
MOST dispensations realise when we see the signs of things which are fortold. we have to evangelize like we never have before. Because the time is running short. They also realise one of the signs, is that the gospel will be spread to all nations, tribes, and tongues before these things can occur. So their focus is on the world and the lost. Not Israel.
The only reason most people even speak of Isreal is because it is what differentiates our belief system.
I approach all this through a process of elimination. So when I see that post mils are striking out on the wrong foot, it's hard to swallow anything eschatological further from them...
2 Timothy 3:1-4 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
2 Timothy 3:1-4 This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
I listened to the video and mainly what he said regarding dispentionalists was that there is no mention of a gap between the 69th and 70th year of Daniel. That there is no mention of a distinction between the Israel and the church. That most have to force text of scripture to fit their eschatological system.
He also said: "What you feel about the future affects what you do today. He said something about prophetic scripture - how some say to "just leave it out" and "not study it at all". He then spoke about "Newspaper exegesis" - reading the Bible through the newspaper - that headlines are driving people's interpretation - I have seen that myself. He mainly said that the future doesn't matter to dispensationalist because they just sit around looking for the rapture or the next event in the middle east. While I agree that I have seen evidence of this - it's wrong to lump all dispensationalist into these groups.
The above is just a basis of what was said . . .
He also said: "What you feel about the future affects what you do today. He said something about prophetic scripture - how some say to "just leave it out" and "not study it at all". He then spoke about "Newspaper exegesis" - reading the Bible through the newspaper - that headlines are driving people's interpretation - I have seen that myself. He mainly said that the future doesn't matter to dispensationalist because they just sit around looking for the rapture or the next event in the middle east. While I agree that I have seen evidence of this - it's wrong to lump all dispensationalist into these groups.
The above is just a basis of what was said . . .
R
i made this observation before...but i have noticed that a lot of the people who think dominionism and its offshoots are seriously false doctrine -also- regard dispensationalism as something like the ultimate deception...and due to their extreme dislike of dispensationalism those people tend to take the opposite extreme and embrace preterism...
they fail to realize that historically postmillennialism and dominionism have been viewed as the logical consequences of preterism...
they fail to realize that historically postmillennialism and dominionism have been viewed as the logical consequences of preterism...
~.