Jesus turned water into unfermented wine and not fermented wine.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
I don't particularly care whether Luther said exactly that in one speech or not.

The evidence is clear what Luther's position was regarding the consumption of alcohol.

In an article at Wikipedia entitled "Christian views on alcohol" it says under the subtitle "Reformation" that:

"As the Protestant Reformation began, the Reformers from Luther and Calvin to Zwingli and Knox strongly supported the enjoyment of wine as a biblical blessing,[105] and Calvin's annual salary in Geneva included seven barrels of wine."

My point is that I am much more interested in what people like Luther and Calvin thought about drinking alcoholic beverages than I am what Jason0047 thinks.

Christian views on alcohol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See, here is the difference between us. I don't want you to believe whatever I say. I also don't want you to believe what other Christians have said thru out History, either. They are just men who are flawed. The only Christians you should focus on are those Christians mentioned in the New Testament. See, I want you to not take my word for it. Nor any other word by a man thru history. I want you to ask God over and over about this topic with an open and honest heart (Jeremiah 33:3). I want you to be a good Berean and have an openness of mind and seek the Scriptures whether those things be so or not (Acts 17:11). Are you willing to do that?
 
Last edited:
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Furthermore, I am simply trying to get you to see the danger in this if you are wrong. I am not juding I am simply asking you to stop juding the blood which covers me you are judging yourself.. Please open your eyes.. I care nothing of being right. I care only to be a vessel that the Lord use me to show others Gods love not His judgment....if you are in Christ and if He abides in you there is no condemnation in you. I am a sinner but I had to know pain to be able to feel joy... the pain is not evil...it washed my eyes with tears from my soul and I see.
Let's get something straight here. Unless you believe there is no sense of right and wrong in the world whatseover and that we should not side with good and nor evil, then you are judging. For the Scriptures say, know you not that we shall judge angels? (1 Corinthians 6:3). So if you care nothing about being right about that which is good, then how can you stand for the goodness and righteousness of Jesus Christ? Is Jesus good or bad to you? Do you think Jesus would approve of us doing good or evil? How much more good is Jesus Christ and His righteousness? For would you serve alcohol at a public party where people were already filled with alcoholic wine already?

See, I am not judging the Lord our God who is only good (as mentioned within the Holy Scriptures). I am judging YOUR VERSION of God that approves of evil. Yet you ARE NOT explaining how Jesus pushing a drug upon people who are already taken by that drug is good. Nobody here has been able to explain it because it is not moral and good. For it is no different than you providing alcohol to people who are tipsy or drunk. But how would you feel if one of those people in the crowd you gave alcohol to was a loved one and they died drinking and driving. Would you not be contributing to their death? What is someone you know slipped back into alcoholism by your service of alcohol? Would you feel no accountability in the matter? Does not what we do as Christians matter? Our we to lights leading people into righteousness or unrighteousness?
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,647
13,124
113
24 pages and no one has mentioned it, but there is a perfectly good Greek word for "juice"

χυμός

and it is not the word used in the scripture for what Jesus did at Cana.
 
L

Last

Guest
Wine freezes. Try it.
No one is denying that. What people are denying is that there was no way to realistically preserve grape juice in the ancient world.

The idea that Jesus drank grape juice at the Last Supper is pure silliness. It's all part of a rationalization to deny that people drank back then, even Jesus.

Jesus drank wine and offered it. It was part of their culture.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
24 pages and no one has mentioned it, but there is a perfectly good Greek word for "juice"

χυμός

and it is not the word used in the scripture for what Jesus did at Cana.
That really doesn't prove anything. Words can have different usages and meanings. In fact, I believe the Bible has homonyms within it. Sons of God speaks of both angels and believers. The word "gods" speaks of both rulers and false deities that people worship. The word "all" sometimes means all and other times it does not.

In fact, I drive past a liquor store every day on my way to work. What is amazing is that 90 some percent of the people are totally unaware that the word "liquor" was a word that was once defined as any juice (Whether it be alcoholic or not). Just look in a couple of past dictionaries and check it out for yourself.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,647
13,124
113
Nobody here has been able to explain it because it is not moral and good.
maybe you didn't see it when i posted it before ---

He causes grass to grow for the livestock
and provides crops for man to cultivate,
producing food from the earth,
wine that makes man’s heart glad —
making his face shine with oil —
and bread that sustains man’s heart.

(Psalm 104:14-15)

Christ does not do evil by making men's hearts glad. He does not do wrong to give comfort and joy and refreshment to those whose storehouses are emptied.


For it is no different than you providing alcohol to people who are tipsy or drunk. But how would you feel if one of those people in the crowd you gave alcohol to was a loved one and they died drinking and driving. Would you not be contributing to their death? What is someone you know slipped back into alcoholism by your service of alcohol? Would you feel no accountability in the matter? Does not what we do as Christians matter? Our we to lights leading people into righteousness or unrighteousness?

how would you feel if God gave you freedom, and you used that for licentiousness? would you blame God, who let you have free will? He made a world in which it's possible for us to follow our own hearts desires into sin and death -- a thousand terrible things are within reach of my hands to do -- will i call Him unrighteous because evil exists and it's in my hand to do it? i dare not!

i'm not disputing that we should take care not to lead others into sin, not at all. i hope you see that. what i mean to say is that we should not judge anyone over food or drink - including Jesus - and that what He gave to those people rejoicing at the feast - people who were "well drunk" - was received with thanksgiving.

if we just let John's words say what they say, it is abundantly obvious that Jesus made wine from water, and that the man best qualified to judge the quality of it said it was superior to all the rest of the wine that had been served, and that this was marvelous because the type of beverage they were drinking deadens the senses, and normally men would serve inferior product once everyone was to the point that they couldn't tell the difference anymore. grape jelly simply does not have that effect on people. wine with an alcohol content does have that effect.
we don't need to go searching dictionaries from the 18th century to project our prohibitionist sentimentality onto the 1st century text. the Word speaks for itself, and the immediate context is clear!

i'd say this thread is fruitless if it weren't for the abundance of grapes
;)
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,647
13,124
113
That really doesn't prove anything. Words can have different usages and meanings. In fact, I believe the Bible has homonyms within it. Sons of God speaks of both angels and believers. The word "gods" speaks of both rulers and false deities that people worship. The word "all" sometimes means all and other times it does not.

In fact, I drive past a liquor store every day on my way to work. What is amazing is that 90 some percent of the people are totally unaware that the word "liquor" was a word that was once defined as any juice (Whether it be alcoholic or not). Just look in a couple of past dictionaries and check it out for yourself.

so is it OK with you if every time the word "agape" is used in the new testament we replace it with the word "eros" ??

do you see any problem with that?
 
L

Last

Guest
My point is: Your responses on this thread only proves that you are trying to justify your use of alcoholic beverages. You will go to any extreme to do so. Your reasons are self-serving...you are simply pleasing yourself and really don't care if what you do causes someone else to be offended or stumble.
My responses to this thread are about people making up history. That's the rationalization and justification.

If you don't want to drink, then don't drink. There is no reason to make up history to do so.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0

so is it OK with you if every time the word "agape" is used in the new testament we replace it with the word "eros" ??

do you see any problem with that?
Are you ignoring that words can have multiple meanings in the Bible?
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
My responses to this thread are about people making up history. That's the rationalization and justification.

If you don't want to drink, then don't drink. There is no reason to make up history to do so.
Yes, I do not like it when folks ignore history either. Just look in a couple of dictionaries (within it's various definitions) and you will see that the word "wine" can refer to either fermented or unfermented wine. Look up the word "liquor" and you will see that it is not a reference to just alcholic beverages. Look up quotes from men in the past and they will talk about how they preserved grape juice in different ways and how many of them considered the best wines were ones that did not inflame the senses.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
36,647
13,124
113
Are you ignoring that words can have multiple meanings in the Bible?
normally when we come to a word like, for example "word" - "logos" we use the immediate context to determine the exact implication.
so we know that logos used here:
Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven
(Matthew 12:32)
doesn't mean the same thing as when it is used here:

the Word became flesh and dwelt among us

(John 1:14)


are you ignoring the immediate context of John chapter 2 ?
 
P

phil112

Guest
maybe you didn't see it when i posted it before ---

He causes grass to grow for the livestock
and provides crops for man to cultivate,
producing food from the earth,
wine that makes man’s heart glad —
making his face shine with oil —
and bread that sustains man’s heart.

(Psalm 104:14-15)

Christ does not do evil by making men's hearts glad. He does not do wrong to give comfort and joy and refreshment to those whose storehouses are emptied.
.................
The problem here is that the OP doesn't understand that God puts the onus of moderation on man. He doesn't understand that all things are made by God and that the stewardship of those things is an individual responsibilty. He clearly wants someone else to be responsible for his, or someone he is close, drinking problem.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
maybe you didn't see it when i posted it before


He causes grass to grow for the livestock
and provides crops for man to cultivate,
producing food from the earth,
wine that makes man’s heart glad —
making his face shine with oil —
and bread that sustains man’s heart.
(Psalm 104:14-15)


Christ does not do evil by making men's hearts glad. He does not do wrong to give comfort and joy and refreshment to those whose storehouses are emptied.

Alcoholic wine in Biblical times was limited in content and is not like wine today. The sugar of grape juice can only ferment up to 3% alcohol, which is of little to the use to a drinker because they would need to drink a lot of it to get even get a light buzz. For grape juice to exceed 3% alcohol, then yeast must be added. The yeast added to ancient wines produced between 4-10% alcohol. Alcohol also kills yeast cells and prevents alcoholic content over 10%.


Yes, does Biblical wine make your heart glad? Sure, it does. At a 3% alcohol level it can make you feel a little better. But it is not going to get you drunk unless you drink a ridiclous amount of it. For many folks can drink 7-8 glasses of a 3% alcoholic beverage and barely feel a light buzz.


The point is that I am trying to make is that the Biblical wine was not fermented like our version of wine today. Also, ferementation is a process of death and decay. Why would Jesus create an element that was a process of death and decay? Did God ever create something that was partially dead? Or does God create life?


how would you feel if God gave you freedom, and you used that for licentiousness? would you blame God, who let you have free will? He made a world in which it's possible for us to follow our own hearts desires into sin and death -- a thousand terrible things are within reach of my hands to do -- will i call Him unrighteous because evil exists and it's in my hand to do it? i dare not!


i'm not disputing that we should take care not to lead others into sin, not at all. i hope you see that. what i mean to say is that we should not judge anyone over food or drink - including Jesus - and that what He gave to those people rejoicing at the feast - people who were "well drunk" - was received with thanksgiving.

When I read the words "well drunk", it means that whatever substance they drank of, it was a lot. If the beverage was strong in alcoholic content, then it would contradict what the Bible teaches on drunkeness. For the Scriptures say that no drunkard shall inherit the Kingdom of God.


if we just let John's words say what they say, it is abundantly obvious that Jesus made wine from water, and that the man best qualified to judge the quality of it said it was superior to all the rest of the wine that had been served, and that this was marvelous because the type of beverage they were drinking deadens the senses, and normally men would serve inferior product once everyone was to the point that they couldn't tell the difference anymore. grape jelly simply does not have that effect on people. wine with an alcohol content does have that effect.
we don't need to go searching dictionaries from the 18th century to project our prohibitionist sentimentality onto the 1st century text. the Word speaks for itself, and the immediate context is clear!


i'd say this thread is fruitless if it weren't for the abundance of grapes.

Well, if you believe Jesus served alcoholic wine, then you would again be in contradiction of Scripture. Habakkuk 2:15 says, “Woe to him who gives drink to his neighbor, Pressing him to your bottle, Even to make him drunk, That you may look on his nakedness! Apparently, the Scriptures warn against disturbed individuals waiting on others to get drunk and pushing others to drink, so that they can satisfy their own lusts against others.


Sobriety is repeatedly taught in the Scriptures. The Spirit of Christ says in 1 Thessalonians 5:6-8,


“So then let us not sleep, as others do, but let us keep awake and be sober. For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk, are drunk at night. But since we belong to the day, let us be sober, having put on the breastplate of faith and love, and for a helmet the hope of salvation”.


Source:
Is Drinking a Sin in the Bible? | Seeing God's Breath
(Note: While I do not agree with the writer's belief that a believer is not allowed to drink in moderation and soberly in private, I do agree with him on how the wine that Jesus served was not intoxicating and that alcohol can be a very dangerous thing (as taught in the Bible)).
 
Last edited:
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
normally when we come to a word like, for example "word" - "logos" we use the immediate context to determine the exact implication.
so we know that logos used here:
Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven
(Matthew 12:32)
doesn't mean the same thing as when it is used here:

the Word became flesh and dwelt among us

(John 1:14)

are you ignoring the immediate context of John chapter 2 ?
I believe you are ignoring the context and the rest of Scripture to justify a position that does not exist within the Scriptures. The Bible clearly condemns drunkeness and commands us to be sober. Yet you believe that the men at the party were tipsy to drunk and that Jesus contributed even further into them being intoxicated. Which would be wrong.
 
Jun 5, 2014
1,750
6
0
The only Christians you should focus on are those Christians mentioned in the New Testament.
That sounds like the same thing I said to you when you said (over and over and again and again) that the KJV is perfect.
 

Agricola

Senior Member
Dec 10, 2012
2,638
88
48
Comming soon in all good bible bookshops, The Bible according to Jason and the King James Only Cult. And now we have a short interlude :

[video=youtube;cOoHM56A6TA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOoHM56A6TA[/video]
 
L

Last

Guest
Yes, I do not like it when folks ignore history either. Just look in a couple of dictionaries (within it's various definitions) and you will see that the word "wine" can refer to either fermented or unfermented wine. Look up the word "liquor" and you will see that it is not a reference to just alcholic beverages. Look up quotes from men in the past and they will talk about how they preserved grape juice in different ways and how many of them considered the best wines were ones that did not inflame the senses.
There was no 'unfermented wine'. Grape juice ferments as soon as you squeeze it. It's only in recent history that grape juice became available.

You are also repeated a source that I proved was completely silly.
 
L

Last

Guest
Alcoholic wine in Biblical times was limited in content and is not like wine today. The sugar of grape juice can only ferment up to 3% alcohol, which is of little to the use to a drinker because they would need to drink a lot of it to get even get a light buzz. For grape juice to exceed 3% alcohol, then yeast must be added. The yeast added to ancient wines produced between 4-10% alcohol. Alcohol also kills yeast cells and prevents alcoholic content over 10%.
Your source of information is completely wrong. Wine ferments up to 10-15% depending on the year and variety. You do not add yeast to wine, it is already present on the grapes.


Yes, does Biblical wine make your heart glad? Sure, it does. At a 3% alcohol level it can make you feel a little better. But it is not going to get you drunk unless you drink a ridiclous amount of it. For many folks can drink 7-8 glasses of a 3% alcoholic beverage and barely feel a light buzz.
wherever you are getting the 3% thing, it is totally made up. There is no such thing as 'biblical' wine. Wine is wine.

The point is that I am trying to make is that the Biblical wine was not fermented like our version of wine today.
Wine back then and wine today are fermented.

Also, ferementation is a process of death and decay. Why would Jesus create an element that was a process of death and decay? Did God ever create something that was partially dead? Or does God create life?
Fermentation is actually a form of preservation.


I do agree with him on how the wine that Jesus served was not intoxicating and that alcohol can be a very dangerous thing (as taught in the Bible)).
That's called projection. "I don't like the idea of Jesus having anything to do with wine, so I'll just make up history and distort scripture"
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
Your source of information is completely wrong. Wine ferments up to 10-15% depending on the year and variety. You do not add yeast to wine, it is already present on the grapes.
You are not telling me anything new. I have already stated that yeast appears as a poweder like substance present on the grape. However, this is not always the case, though. I know. I read up on wine sites before. If they were to wash the grapes, they would eliminate this yeast and the yeast level is not always high enough in content to make strong alcoholic wine. Just research in how to make your own wine and you will see that you will need to add cultured yeast to make the wines that you are familar with today.

wherever you are getting the 3% thing, it is totally made up. There is no such thing as 'biblical' wine. Wine is wine.
No, read a dictionary. Wine can be fermented or unfermented. Look up the word "liquor", too (While you are at it). It doesn't always mean something that is alcoholic.

Wine back then and wine today are fermented.
The word "wine" in the Bible can refer to either fermented or unfermented wine.

Fermentation is actually a form of preservation.
Grape juice can be preserved back then, too (In various different forms). Yes, fermentation allows a product to be preserved, but it is a process of death and decay because the yeast eats the sugar and poops out alcohol. Don't believe me. Research it for yourself at wine sites.

That's called projection. "I don't like the idea of Jesus having anything to do with wine, so I'll just make up history and distort scripture"
Not true at all. I believe you are wrong because you are ignoring Scripture that says that drunkards shall not inherit the Kingdom of God. I also believe you are ignoring those many passages that tells us to be sober minded too.
 
Jul 22, 2014
10,350
51
0
There was no 'unfermented wine'. Grape juice ferments as soon as you squeeze it. It's only in recent history that grape juice became available.

You are also repeated a source that I proved was completely silly.
While it is true that grape juice ferments as soon as you squeeze it into a container, it does not produce more than 3% alcohol on it's own power without cultured yeast or a super large abnormal amount of yeast build up on the skin of the grape. Please research a wine website on how to make alcholic wine that is at the levels of alcoholic content that we have in them today. They will tell you to always add cultured yeast.