This reminds me of the faulty presuppositional statement made by OSAS proponents about how a believer cannot be "
unborn." At first glance, the statement that one cannot be "
unborn" as a defense for "
Once Saved Always Saved" appears to be one of the most puzzling arguments presented. But it is a completely illogical assertion for even in the natural, there is no such condition as being "
unborn".
However, being born is the process whereby life is made manifest. The opposite of having life is not to be "
unborn", but to be "
dead." Just as one dies physically when life is no longer present, one also dies spiritually when the life of Christ is no longer present within.
This truth is reiterated in the parable of the Prodigal Son. When the son returns from his rebellious, riotous living, the father states:
"For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost, and is found." (
Luke 15:11-24)
For the argument about being "
unborn" is a strawman. No one is asserting that someone can be "
unborn." However, being separated from the life of Christ will result in "
spiritual death" (this is discussed in more detail
here).