'We've just been told that a 'Truth-Teller' has been banned...
- Thread starter oldethennew
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
It's just your good fortune that I happened to look back at this thread since I don't normally browse the Family Forum. I'm willing to discuss most things in public if I know someone wants to have said discussion and as long as that discussion remains respectful and civil (towards all parties involved).
The biggest reason that I only (usually) stick my nose in BDF is to look into reported posts is because I can't stand watching persons who claim to be Christians going for each others jugular veins over (frequently) minor doctrinal differences.
The biggest reason that I only (usually) stick my nose in BDF is to look into reported posts is because I can't stand watching persons who claim to be Christians going for each others jugular veins over (frequently) minor doctrinal differences.
D
Yeah, I've been going with limited contact there too, and don't have to. lol
Soo, basic question -- which major doctrinal differences qualify?
Despite my beliefs, (unrepentant Reformer/Calvinist with a semi-preterist's view), I honestly don't think Calvinism/Arminianism, OSAS, eschatology, flat earth, evolution, and most things on BDF are heretical. But there are people teaching some things that is heretical. They're just nice about it, so I never considered reporting it for "heretical."
I just thought you gave infractions for being rude, inappropriate, etc. Or, for the sake of the person's mental health.
So, could you run down the list of heretical in your mind? (And, I do understand, if it's coming off the top of your head, it will likely be an incomplete list.)
Soo, basic question -- which major doctrinal differences qualify?
Despite my beliefs, (unrepentant Reformer/Calvinist with a semi-preterist's view), I honestly don't think Calvinism/Arminianism, OSAS, eschatology, flat earth, evolution, and most things on BDF are heretical. But there are people teaching some things that is heretical. They're just nice about it, so I never considered reporting it for "heretical."
I just thought you gave infractions for being rude, inappropriate, etc. Or, for the sake of the person's mental health.
So, could you run down the list of heretical in your mind? (And, I do understand, if it's coming off the top of your head, it will likely be an incomplete list.)
Let me say this first. We do not necessarily ban every user immediately for supporting heresy. Some of it comes down to our perception of the user since some persons that proclaim heresy are correctable whereas others are clearly attempting to promote and spread their heresy. In other words, just because someone doesn't get removed immediately for promoting heresy doesn't mean that we won't remove them eventually if they continue in it.
This is not all inclusive just some of the more common:
Rejecting the deity/eternity of Christ
Rejection of the Trinity (we tend to allow wiggle room for Oneness Pentecostals) but we do hold that Modalism/Seballianism is heresy
Rejecting the omniscience, omnipresence, omnipotence of God
Rejecting the Pauline Epistles
Universalism (eventually everyone goes to Heaven)
Serpent Seed
Aryan Israelism
Afro Israelism
This is not all inclusive just some of the more common:
Rejecting the deity/eternity of Christ
Rejection of the Trinity (we tend to allow wiggle room for Oneness Pentecostals) but we do hold that Modalism/Seballianism is heresy
Rejecting the omniscience, omnipresence, omnipotence of God
Rejecting the Pauline Epistles
Universalism (eventually everyone goes to Heaven)
Serpent Seed
Aryan Israelism
Afro Israelism
I like the one about Universalism....
Most people swear Revelation is about THE END of the world. Yet the last part of Revelation talks about the gates never being shut, and the river of Life and the tree (Jesus) for the healing of the nations, flowing out of the New Jerusalem.
Why heal the nations if they are no longer there to be healed? Aren't they already in Hell, and beyond any hope?
Personally, I think Revelation means exactly what it says...... because I believe Revelation was written as addressing a time a couple of thousand years ago..... when the water flowing was (and still is) for the healing of the nations.
But, to believe Revelation is true, (and I think we all do) and those things do exist to heal the nations......... how are you not teaching universalism if you say all that is after they have been judged and sent to Hell.......... yet, they continue to have a chance to be saved??
Most people swear Revelation is about THE END of the world. Yet the last part of Revelation talks about the gates never being shut, and the river of Life and the tree (Jesus) for the healing of the nations, flowing out of the New Jerusalem.
Why heal the nations if they are no longer there to be healed? Aren't they already in Hell, and beyond any hope?
Personally, I think Revelation means exactly what it says...... because I believe Revelation was written as addressing a time a couple of thousand years ago..... when the water flowing was (and still is) for the healing of the nations.
But, to believe Revelation is true, (and I think we all do) and those things do exist to heal the nations......... how are you not teaching universalism if you say all that is after they have been judged and sent to Hell.......... yet, they continue to have a chance to be saved??
G
If I understand things correctly ( and, if I don't - Jim, please correct me ) -- no actual rule exists that states that it is not okay for members to merely mention such - or, even ask about such - from other members.
For the most part, the site staff does not want members asking them - why - someone got banned. They also do not want members having intense discussion about someone being banned - such that it creates an "uproar" concerning it.
However, I don't think they mind if members make simple inquiry - or, have simple discussions about - someone having been banned -- such as that which has been posted in this thread. I really don't think they even mind if someone is "named" ( as you indicate in the quote above ) - strictly for the sake of identification of the member ( because, people will naturally be curious and wondering... ) --- as long as it does not cause an "uproar" among the members that results in a "problem" for the site staff.
For the most part, the site staff does not want members asking them - why - someone got banned. They also do not want members having intense discussion about someone being banned - such that it creates an "uproar" concerning it.
However, I don't think they mind if members make simple inquiry - or, have simple discussions about - someone having been banned -- such as that which has been posted in this thread. I really don't think they even mind if someone is "named" ( as you indicate in the quote above ) - strictly for the sake of identification of the member ( because, people will naturally be curious and wondering... ) --- as long as it does not cause an "uproar" among the members that results in a "problem" for the site staff.
D
I had to look up some of those phrases. I didn't even know there were people who believed some of it.
But it does raise two more questions, (which might end up more, but I really didn't think I'd be asking more this time):
1. Universalism -- like Pelgagianism?
2. What about the Prosperity Gospel or its offspring -- WoF and "not WoF?" (If you don't know the last one, it's WoF, but they've taken out the catch phrases, like "word of faith.")
Also, I'm very pro-wiggle-room. I've been known to report, not to ask that the person be banned, but that you just let them know what they're doing isn't appropriate. Often, they just don't know, and they tend to think no one can tell them what they can do, free speech, blahblahblah.
BTW, thanks for this. I really didn't know, have been dying of curiosity, but thought we couldn't talk about it at all.
If you feel Rev is speaking of a time somewhere in our future when all the unbelievers have been judged and sent to Hell.... how do you explain those things I wrote about? Are those convicted and sentenced people getting a second chance? If not, then who is that healing of leaves and river for? (The "Saints" are already totally recreated at that final time, forever.)
I had to look up some of those phrases. I didn't even know there were people who believed some of it.
But it does raise two more questions, (which might end up more, but I really didn't think I'd be asking more this time):
1. Universalism -- like Pelgagianism?
2. What about the Prosperity Gospel or its offspring -- WoF and "not WoF?" (If you don't know the last one, it's WoF, but they've taken out the catch phrases, like "word of faith.")
But it does raise two more questions, (which might end up more, but I really didn't think I'd be asking more this time):
1. Universalism -- like Pelgagianism?
2. What about the Prosperity Gospel or its offspring -- WoF and "not WoF?" (If you don't know the last one, it's WoF, but they've taken out the catch phrases, like "word of faith.")
Universalism basically says that everyone (Christian, Buddhist, atheist, etc) all get to heaven in the end.
Pelagianism says that we, as humans, are capable of achieving perfection this side of the grave without the help of God a variant of Pelgianism today is Sinless Perfection which basically says that true Christians no longer sin (at all, ever).
In reality, by far the majority of heresies floating around Christendom today are merely recycled heresies that date back to the early church. If you look at the early church councils and creeds, all of them were to codify proper doctrine in order to combat heresies.
As far as WoF and it's variants, site Administration DOES NOT agree with these doctrines and I would go as gar as saying that some of the doctrines that have come out of these movements are outright dangerous but they would fall more under that category that RoboOp would call quirky doctrine versus outright heresy.
Last time I checked, we still have seas... Not to mention, death, sorrow, crying, pain, ...
Not to mention, death, sorrow, crying, pain, ...
Revelation also presents us with pictures of a Woman, a Dragon, a wilderness, a mark in the forehead, a sickle, pearls, a winepress, a cup of wine, a Harlot, a river, Sodom, Egypt, Babylon, resurrection, a wedding, a marriage supper, the Bridegroom, and the Bride/City in the shape of a pyramid. And then there's the use of symbolic numbers: two, three, four, seven, ten, twelve, and multiples thereof—24, 42, 144, 666, 1,000, 1,260, 7,000, 12,000, and 144,000.
And in all that, you want to pick "seas" disappearing as being literal?
This is why it's necessary to understand the Bible and its use of symbols and patterns if we are ever to understand the Book of Revelation.