Pope Francis declares evolution and big Bang theory are right

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S

Sophia1993

Guest
#1
Okay then... Any opinions about this?
 
U

Ugly

Guest
#2
I'm not Catholic, so doesn't phase me one bit.
 

T_Laurich

Senior Member
Mar 24, 2013
3,356
122
63
29
#3
Personally it phases me quite a bit... But I stand more so on the side of Ugly. Even tho majority of the modern world symbolizes and views Catholicism as 'true' Christianity... I can't tell you how many times I have been in a discussion with a person and they say "Your wrong because the Pope says [this]". We just have to explain that we follow the bible 100% and believe its 100% author inspired by God himself.

It's just extremely sad that the Pope has not read the first chapter of Genesis when considering if Evolution could be biblical...
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#4
you can read the first chapter of genesis and still believe in evolution/bbt. Its called theistic evolution. I don't know which one I believe in more, but at the end of the day, its not your belief in origins that saves you.
 
C

christianperson91

Guest
#5
Fine by me, he is already stating what many Christians already accept in the world (and not just within Catholics).
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
#7
I doubt the big bang theory. But if there were a big bang I know Who spoke it.

God said let there be and there was. End of story.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,704
3,649
113
#8
I'm surprised a Catholic hasn't already proven that the charge is false.
If true, it probably isn't official Rome's dogma.
Big Bang is definitely not bible!
 
Nov 30, 2012
2,396
26
0
#9
I'm surprised a Catholic hasn't already proven that the charge is false.
If true, it probably isn't official Rome's dogma.
Big Bang is definitely not bible!
He stated that he sees no problem with evolution being the scientific view of God's forming of creation, and that the Big Bang very well could describe the sudden spark of creation at the will of God. I agree with him.
 
Sep 21, 2014
214
1
0
#10
Truth (scientific) cannot contradict truth (theological). Both are correct and non-exclusive of each other. The truth of evolution cannot be denied except through scientific methods. The theological truth of belief cannot be denied except through theology.

Strict literal interpretation of Genesis is highly problematic for young earth creationists, because it reduces God to a magician. God endowed humans with reason; a brain, He expects us to use it.

The Pope is addressing the Pontifical Academy of Science, he is not making a doctrinal, infallible declaration. But what he is saying is nothing new.

Unfortunately, there are still today biblical fundamentalists, both Protestant and Catholic, who do not understand this simple point: the bible is not a scientific treatise. When Christ said that the mustard seed was the smallest of seeds (and it is about the size of a speck of dust), he was not laying down a principle of botany. In fact, botanists tell us that there are smaller seeds. He was simply talking to the men of his time in their own language, and with reference to their own experience. Hence the warning of Pius XII in Divino Afflante Spiritu (1943) that the true sense of a biblical passage is not always obvious, as the sacred writers made full use of the idioms of their time and place.

Concerning cosmological evolution, the Church has infallibly defined that the universe was specially created out of nothing. Vatican I solemnly defined that everyone must "confess the world and all things which are contained in it, both spiritual and material, as regards their whole substance, have been produced by God from nothing" (Canons on God the Creator of All Things, canon 5).

The Church does not have an official position on whether the stars, nebulae, and planets we see today were created at that time or whether they developed over time (for example, in the aftermath of the Big Bang that modern cosmologists discuss). However, the Church would maintain that, if the stars and planets did develop over time, this still ultimately must be attributed to God and his plan, for Scripture records: "By the word of the Lord the heavens were made, and all their host [stars, nebulae, planets] by the breath of his mouth" (Ps. 33:6).
Concerning biological evolution, the Church does not have an official position on whether various life forms developed over the course of time. However, it says that, if they did develop, then they did so under the impetus and guidance of God, and their ultimate creation must be ascribed to him.

Concerning human evolution, the Church has a more definite teaching. It allows for the possibility that man’s body developed from previous biological forms, under God’s guidance, but it insists on the special creation of his soul. Pope Pius XII declared that "the teaching authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions . . . take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter—[but] the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God" (Pius XII, Humani Generis 36). So whether the human body was specially created or developed, we are required to hold as a matter of Catholic faith that the human soul is specially created; it did not evolve, and it is not inherited from our parents, as our bodies are.
While the Church permits belief in either special creation or developmental creation on certain questions, it in no circumstances permits belief in atheistic evolution.

"Though faith is above reason, there can never be any real discrepancy between faith and reason. Since the same God who reveals mysteries and infuses faith has bestowed the light of reason on the human mind, God cannot deny himself, nor can truth ever contradict truth" (Catechism of the Catholic Church 159).

"The question about the origins of the world and of man has been the object of many scientific studies which have splendidly enriched our knowledge of the age and dimensions of the cosmos, the development of life-forms and the appearance of man. These discoveries invite us to even greater admiration for the greatness of the Creator, prompting us to give him thanks for all his works and for the understanding and wisdom he gives to scholars and researchers" (CCC 283).

The Catholic Church has always taught that "no real disagreement can exist between the theologian and the scientist provided each keeps within his own limits. . . . If nevertheless there is a disagreement . . . it should be remembered that the sacred writers, or more truly ‘the Spirit of God who spoke through them, did not wish to teach men such truths (as the inner structure of visible objects) which do not help anyone to salvation’; and that, for this reason, rather than trying to provide a scientific exposition of nature, they sometimes describe and treat these matters either in a somewhat figurative language or as the common manner of speech those times required, and indeed still requires nowadays in everyday life, even amongst most learned people" (Leo XIII, Providentissimus Deus 18).

As the Catechism puts it, "Methodical research in all branches of knowledge, provided it is carried out in a truly scientific manner and does not override moral laws, can never conflict with the faith, because the things of the world and the things the of the faith derive from the same God. The humble and persevering investigator of the secrets of nature is being led, as it were, by the hand of God in spite of himself, for it is God, the conserver of all things, who made them what they are" (CCC 159). The Catholic Church has no fear of science or scientific discovery.


Bottom line: God is the creator of all things.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,704
3,649
113
#11
He stated that he sees no problem with evolution being the scientific view of God's forming of creation, and that the Big Bang very well could describe the sudden spark of creation at the will of God. I agree with him.
Like a true catholic...loyal to the Pope over Scripture. Was this the view of the Popes thru the centuries?
 
J

jjtj22

Guest
#12
For those who believe theistic evolution, riddle me this:

How was there death of the evolving man before the fall?
 
Sep 21, 2014
214
1
0
#13
Like a true catholic...loyal to the Pope over Scripture. Was this the view of the Popes thru the centuries?
"...loyal to the Pope over Scripture" is just another insulting flaming zinger and raw bigotry. If you wish to defend young earth creationism, please do so with an intelligent argument. The Popes of previous centuries did not have access to all bodies of scientific knowledge that we have today. Truth (scientific) cannot contradict truth (theological). Scroll up. I think you missed that.
 
Sep 21, 2014
214
1
0
#14
Like a true catholic...loyal to the Pope over Scripture. Was this the view of the Popes thru the centuries?
"...loyal to the Pope over Scripture" is just another insulting flaming zinger and raw bigotry. If you wish to defend young earth creationism, please do so with an intelligent argument. The Popes of previous centuries did not have access to all bodies of scientific knowledge that we have today. Their "view" was current for the times they lived in.
Truth (scientific) cannot contradict truth (theological). Scroll up. I think you missed that.
 
Oct 24, 2014
595
14
0
#15
O how fascinating! Oh oh, I think I just wet a little
 

Nautilus

Senior Member
Jun 29, 2012
6,488
53
48
#16
For those who believe theistic evolution, riddle me this:

How was there death of the evolving man before the fall?
because 'evolving man' had no soul until adam, hence they functioned like any other thing. Unless you believe plants and animals were immortal too. I dont even believe theistic evolution and that was a simple one.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,704
3,649
113
#17
"...loyal to the Pope over Scripture" is just another insulting flaming zinger and raw bigotry. If you wish to defend young earth creationism, please do so with an intelligent argument. The Popes of previous centuries did not have access to all bodies of scientific knowledge that we have today. Truth (scientific) cannot contradict truth (theological). Scroll up. I think you missed that.
Call it what you may, it is still the Pope over Scripture. The Popes own words are the flaming zinger thrown at those who uphold a literal view of Scripture. An intelligent argument based on so called evolutionary science? I'd rather go with God's revelation...

Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.
(Heb 11:3)

But your apostate pope refuses to walk by faith but by what the pagan world dictates.
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,704
3,649
113
#18
For those who believe theistic evolution, riddle me this:

How was there death of the evolving man before the fall?
because 'evolving man' had no soul until adam, hence they functioned like any other thing. Unless you believe plants and animals were immortal too. I dont even believe theistic evolution and that was a simple one.
Here is the reference...

Wherefore, as by one man (Adam) sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned: (Rom 5:12)

So how could there have been 'evolving man' without death?

Also where did you get your info that " 'evolving man' had no soul until adam"?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,704
3,649
113
#20
Truth (scientific) cannot contradict truth (theological). Both are correct and non-exclusive of each other. The truth of evolution cannot be denied except through scientific methods. The theological truth of belief cannot be denied except through theology.

Strict literal interpretation of Genesis is highly problematic for young earth creationists, because it reduces God to a magician. God endowed humans with reason; a brain, He expects us to use it.
Allegorical/symbolic interpretation of Genesis is a denial of God's power and truthfulness as well as opening the flood gate to all kinds of lame brain interpretations. As Scripture says...

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. (1Co 2:14)

And part of the 'things of the Spirit of God' is His own account of Creation.
God spoke....
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3 etc. not a BIG BANG.

Now I know, Rome has gone over the edge and she is dragging much of apostate Christendom with her.