Hillary Clinton: Future Dictator

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#61
Social reform is on the agenda... lolol. That's a good one. The magnitude of ignorance and deception on the left is remarkable.

We have a soaring national debt (greatest ever accumulated in world history) and skyrocketing annual interest payment which must be paid every year to creditors (increasingly foreign) from the deficit ridden federal budget which is currently dominated by welfare programs despite the decline in military expenditures (see SIPRI).

Additionally, the ITCI finds that the United States ranks 32nd out of 34 OECD member countries for tax competitiveness and this is primarily because of high corporate taxes (third highest in the world), high personal income taxes (which include high top marginal tax rate and the double taxation of capital gains and dividend income [see historical]).

And all in an ailing domestic labor market hosting real dollar household income decline despite a record number of American households (and private non-profit and for profit entities) accessing government money.

Tell me Einstein, at what point in your colossal ignorance did it occur to you that implementing sweeping new uber-expensive government socialized welfare spending schemes that dramatically raise the national debt (further injuring the USD), dramatically increase annual interest expenditures in the federal budget (forcing new huge deficits beyond the increasing projected ones and much greater debt and interest liabilities beyond the increasing projected ones), increased taxation, etc... was a good idea for the U.S.?

Don't you have some British children to save from the immigrant sexual grooming gangs you imported?


A small observation. It appears the right hate Obama, but you sound like if Hillary stood you think she would win and are demonising her at this early stage.

It suggests to me, the US has lost its way, and social reform is on the agenda, not a right wing set of flag waving.
The tea party is too right wing, and unless you conquer the centre ground you are lost.

Now you know this, but maybe your sense of persecution and the state is out to get us, has got the better of you.
 
G

Galahad

Guest
#62

And I'm beginning to think you protest too much. I'm guessing you're not supporting Walker, Paul, Huckabee, or Carson. I'm guessing you're a Billary fan and are trying to deflate the competition.
That's pretty good detective work Viligant! I too wonder.

LAMBIEBEAR

IE means for example or that is.

LAMB - that is, I am actually - a BEAR.

A Bear in Lamb's clothing! :eek:

Wasn't a bear associated with Russia or the USSR, or was it China?
 
G

Galahad

Guest
#63
Ladies and gentlemen ...

... Johnny One-Note!


OH NO. . . . NO, NO, NO! NOT AGAIN.

Here comes the floor.

ROFL. HELP ME UP.

I'm going to look at the picture later. It's funny.

Look at it. Hilarious.

ROFL. Tooooo much. :)
 
G

Galahad

Guest
#64
OH NO. . . . NO, NO, NO! NOT AGAIN.

Here comes the floor.

ROFL. HELP ME UP.

I'm going to look at the picture later. It's funny.

Look at it. Hilarious.

ROFL. Tooooo much. :)
Same as above. Looked at it again.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#67
Well, I'm running for president with Deschido as my vice presidential candidate so you may want to reconsider. ;).
Listen to your deck furniture.



No offense to either of you, but I think I'll stick with Ben.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#68
Well, I can see why. Ben is an excellent choice for any political office including the oval one. Perhaps I'll join you if he wins the nomination.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#70
You don't know the power of the Dark Side.
I would not say that for if anybody sides with another Bush in office, or a person who agrees in the same principles or should I say the same political standards as that family does know the dark side.
The economy got bad under both previous Bushes, so do you really think it is smart to put another in office that believe in the same economics as them. I sure don't as we need the economy to get better, not worse !!!
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#71
I would not say that for if anybody sides with another Bush in office, or a person who agrees in the same principles or should I say the same political standards as that family does know the dark side.
The economy got bad under both previous Bushes, so do you really think it is smart to put another in office that believe in the same economics as them. I sure don't as we need the economy to get better, not worse !!!
Context, man. Context!
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#72
Context, man. Context!
The context is that Bush put our economy in bad shape, then Bill Clinton got in office and made things a little better, then we got another Bush and things in the economy went right back down hill again. Obama has made things worse, even though the polls have some areas very very very slightly improving now.
We need somebody who will help to improve our economy in office next, and the Bush family has a very very bad track record on that issue. Even if Jeb said all the right things, I would not trust another Bush in office, nor would I trust somebody who sides with that family.

Rather a Republican or another Democrat gets into office they need to focus on how they can improve the economy, and during the running process all they need to do is speak on what they are going to do.

Also another thing the Republican candidates need to start doing if they are smart is move away from this whole smear the others campaign. The American public is tired of smear campaigns and this has been proven to be a major issue that has turned a lot of voters away from candidates who use such tactics the past few elections...........
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#73
The context is that Bush put our economy in bad shape, then Bill Clinton got in office and made things a little better, then we got another Bush and things in the economy went right back down hill again. Obama has made things worse, even though the polls have some areas very very very slightly improving now.
We need somebody who will help to improve our economy in office next, and the Bush family has a very very bad track record on that issue. Even if Jeb said all the right things, I would not trust another Bush in office, nor would I trust somebody who sides with that family.

Rather a Republican or another Democrat gets into office they need to focus on how they can improve the economy, and during the running process all they need to do is speak on what they are going to do.

Also another thing the Republican candidates need to start doing if they are smart is move away from this whole smear the others campaign. The American public is tired of smear campaigns and this has been proven to be a major issue that has turned a lot of voters away from candidates who use such tactics the past few elections...........
I encourage you to read context of the post you are responding to before you go on a diatribe.

Really, this is being said with your best interest in mind.
 
K

kennethcadwell

Guest
#74
I encourage you to read context of the post you are responding to before you go on a diatribe.

Really, this is being said with your best interest in mind.

I have read some of the posts and for the most part it is about smearing Clinton, while others have been placing their stance on who they believe and side with to be the next president.
And my response was to a couple who said they would vote Jeb Bush or anybody who is associated with that family.

There are many different polls and out of some of the ones I have seen Jeb was not even the front runner in them because many people see it the same way I do that the family has a bad track record. I do not like Hilary or Jeb Bush but if it came down to the two in the final running for president, then I would probably opt out in voting again because I would not want either one. But just like the last election the vote would have to go to the lesser of two evils !!!
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#75
I've had KC on ignore since: http://www.justice.gov/sites/defaul...doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown_1.pdf

Leftards aren't interested in the facts. They rely on the leftard media, false Internet conspiracy fly-by-night websites, the nonsense of them and their friends cosigning each other which they believe lends credence to their mistaken fallacies, all washed down with booze and buds.

You want to try and reason with them? Go ahead but you're wasting your time.


I encourage you to read context of the post you are responding to before you go on a diatribe.

Really, this is being said with your best interest in mind.
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#76
I've had KC on ignore since: http://www.justice.gov/sites/defaul...doj_report_on_shooting_of_michael_brown_1.pdf

Leftards aren't interested in the facts. They rely on the leftard media, false Internet conspiracy fly-by-night websites, the nonsense of them and their friends cosigning each other which they believe lends credence to their mistaken fallacies, all washed down with booze and buds.

You want to try and reason with them? Go ahead but you're wasting your time.
I'm expecting them to understand a joke when they see one.

Leftists are responsible for a lot of my favorite comedy. How is that for irony?

RIP George Carlin
 

Desdichado

Senior Member
Feb 9, 2014
8,768
838
113
#77
I have read some of the posts and for the most part it is about smearing Clinton, while others have been placing their stance on who they believe and side with to be the next president.
And my response was to a couple who said they would vote Jeb Bush or anybody who is associated with that family.

There are many different polls and out of some of the ones I have seen Jeb was not even the front runner in them because many people see it the same way I do that the family has a bad track record. I do not like Hilary or Jeb Bush but if it came down to the two in the final running for president, then I would probably opt out in voting again because I would not want either one. But just like the last election the vote would have to go to the lesser of two evils !!!
Please. Please. Please. Lighten up. Ice cream is a good start.
 
A

AgeofKnowledge

Guest
#78
Well sure, I mean of course leftards are going to be good at comedy. It's their forte`.



I'm expecting them to understand a joke when they see one.

Leftists are responsible for a lot of my favorite comedy. How is that for irony?

RIP George Carlin
 
Last edited:
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#80
The context is that Bush put our economy in bad shape, then Bill Clinton got in office and made things a little better ...
Tax cuts, not the Clinton tax hike, produced the 1990s boom

Clinton tax hikes slowed growth

... then we got another Bush and things in the economy went right back down hill again.
Bush inherited Clinton's recession

Blame Barney Frank for the "Great Recession," not President George Bush

Obama has made things worse, even though the polls have some areas very very very slightly improving now.
Gallup Polling Org Rips Obama’s Fake Recovery As Jobless