Iran Deal Breaker: Talks hit snag over sanctions

[Viligant_Warrior]

Iran nuclear talks reportedly hit snag over lifting of sanctions as Obama makes appeal to Iran's people

A dispute over when international sanctions against Iran would be lifted following a potential nuclear agreement reportedly is the latest issue to bog down negotiations.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Iran's negotiators say that sanctions must be lifted almost immediately after a deal is concluded. U.S. and European diplomats, for their part, hold that sanctions should only be lifted once Tehran accounts for its past nuclear activity and is confirmed to be using nuclear energy for peaceful means by the United Nations' nuclear watchdog.

That actually sounds like the talks are being semi-sensible, though why any of the G8 nations -- with the exception of Russia -- would trust Iran is beyond understanding. But deep in the article, there is this:

President Barack Obama appealed directly to Iranian citizens in a message commemorating Nowruz, the Persian New Yea.

"Our negotiations have made progress, but gaps remain," Obama said Thursday in a video message posted online.

"If Iran's leaders can agree to a reasonable deal, it can lead to a better path — the path of greater opportunities for the Iranian people," he said.

This guy won't give a Christmas or Resurrection Sunday message to his own people, but he addresses some terrorist-led nation of slaves to Islam on their New Year's Day, as though they will have any influence whatsoever on the fantatics who lead their faith and their country?

Where this man's loyalty actually lies is mystifying, but I'm becoming more and more convinced it is not with the country he "leads."

 

[dcontroversal]

That actually sounds like the talks are being semi-sensible, though why any of the G8 nations -- with the exception of Russia -- would trust Iran is beyond understanding. But deep in the article, there is this:

This guy won't give a Christmas or Resurrection Sunday message to his own people, but he addresses some terrorist-led nation of slaves to Islam on their New Year's Day, as though they will have any influence whatsoever on the fantatics who lead their faith and their country?

Where this man's loyalty actually lies is mystifying, but I'm becoming more and more convinced it is not with the country he "leads."[/QUOTE]

I agree and will say.......Iran (Persia) is stalling and will have a nuke...maybe even already does and at the end of the day our illustrious leader is not for this country.....even though his policies prove this and the state of the nation....many are blind to it....