Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 63
Like Tree79Likes

Christian News Forum

Share the latest news (world news, local news, current events, etc.) with your Christian friends right here, and give or get a Christian perspective on it.

Thread: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

  1. #1
    Viligant_Warrior
    Guest

    Default Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    The debate over free speech in the U.S. is focusing on Pamela Geller this week.

    Cartoon contest organizer says 9/11 inspired her campaign against Muslim extremism

    NEW YORK – Does Pamela Geller regret organizing the Prophet Muhammad cartoon contest that ended in gunfire?

    No, she says confidently. In fact, she plans to host more events just like it, with only one difference: Next time, she'll be wearing a bulletproof vest.

    "I will continue to speak in defense of freedom until the day I die," Geller said Thursday in an interview with The Associated Press, as a grim-looking personal security guard hovered nearby. "It's just that simple. It's not even a choice. It's a calling."
    The founder of "Stop the Islamization of America" says she has the right to say whatever she needs to say to achieve the goals the name of the organization implies. She was the coiner of the phrase "ground zero mosque" in beginning the successful effort to to force New York City mullahs to rethink their plan to build near the World Trade Center and 9/11 memorial.

    But in her zeal, she's obviously attracted some detractors. A number of anti-Geller articles have been published over the years.

    What Pamela Geller advocates is not free speech

    Tea Party event [featuring Geller] booted from Sugar Land Hotel

    Free Speech vs. Hate Speech, this being a New York Times editorial published two days ago that claims terror victims "bring it upon themselves." So the Times would vehemently attack a defense attorney who made such a claim about a rape victim, but thinks it's OK to dismiss terror as "your fault" when you're a victim of it?

    I don't like everything Geller says. Sometimes she makes me cringe. But two things:

    1. She's right, most of the time, even when it's harsh.
    2. She has, by the First Amendment, the right to say whatever she wants.

    Our freedom of speech is slipping away to attacks from the politically correct left and from "Goebbels-like propagandists" (to borrow a Geller phrase from one of her blogs) who would silence their opposition. Many on the center and right are beginning to buy into the garbage from these two anti-American fronts, and all have Geller and those like her -- those who would demand the right to say whatever they want, even if it is ugly, biased, or just plain wrong -- in their crosshairs, because bringing Geller et al down brings down the First Amendment, which is their goal.

    The First Amendment guarantee of freedom of speech wasn't meant to be limited to "freedom to speak what I like" or " ... what does not offend me." Freedom of speech is for all speech. If you don't like it, don't listen.

  2. #2
    Senior Member crossnote's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 24th, 2012
    Age
    68
    Posts
    25,790
    Rep Power
    138

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    This is an important discussion. It's hard to believe it sat here 15 hours stagnant.

    On the issue, it seems a divide is being created between "staying quiet" and thus keeping the peace or freely speaking with the possibility of endangering/enciting violence.

    If you antagonize a bully, expect a bloody nose...but whose fault? Yours or the bully?

    I hope to hear some discussion on this topic.
    kaylagrl and Utah like this.

    Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God.
    (Psa 20:7)






    "Sir, we wish to see Jesus."
    Jn 12:21


  3. #3
    Senior Member Desdichado's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 9th, 2014
    Age
    26
    Posts
    5,507
    Rep Power
    51

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Well, if our goal is not to offend the radicals of the Muslim world, I guess we'll have to stop marrying gay couples, exporting junk movies, and trying to be "open and inclusive."
    Nihil novi sub sole.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Desdichado's Avatar
    Join Date
    February 9th, 2014
    Age
    26
    Posts
    5,507
    Rep Power
    51

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    She's 1st Amendment covered here in the good ol' US of A. But radical muslims do not like the 1st Amendment, the men who wrote the 1st Amendment, the Christians who actually support it in the meaningful, original sense, etc.

    See my point here?
    Grandpa likes this.
    Nihil novi sub sole.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    December 26th, 2014
    Age
    60
    Posts
    3,757
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Quote Originally Posted by crossnote View Post
    This is an important discussion. It's hard to believe it sat here 15 hours stagnant.

    On the issue, it seems a divide is being created between "staying quiet" and thus keeping the peace or freely speaking with the possibility of endangering/enciting violence.

    If you antagonize a bully, expect a bloody nose...but whose fault? Yours or the bully?

    I hope to hear some discussion on this topic.
    when jesus or we who follow jesus speak the truth, he and we are attacked. whose fault?
    notice on this forum, it is not (apparently) muslims mostly, but rcc advocates and others who have been deceived who attack yahweh's WORD, jesus, and us.


    Quote Originally Posted by Desdichado View Post
    Well, if our goal is not to offend the radicals of the Muslim world, I guess we'll have to stop marrying gay couples, exporting junk movies, and trying to be "open and inclusive."
    ... "our goal".... ?

    remember jesus did not advocate free speech anything like goes on in the untied states/ world. (nor as is practiced quite freely on this forum --- but there's no foreseeable way to regulate it and it's not likely to happen. those opposed to GOD'S WORD and opposed to JESUS and opposed to we who follow JESUS will keep posting with little restraint. )

  6. #6
    Senior Member notuptome's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 17th, 2013
    Age
    63
    Posts
    8,608
    Rep Power
    89

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    The difference between hate speech and free speech is that free speech does not take an AK-47 and endeavor to silence the voice of its opponent.

    For the cause of Christ
    Roger
    crossnote and kaylagrl like this.

  7. #7
    Viligant_Warrior
    Guest

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    There is no such thing as "hate speech." I'm sure that will bruise the liberal left's sensibilities, but it happens to be the truth.

    The U.S. Constitution does not recognize "hate speech" as a separate, unprotected category of speech. The term "hate speech" is a created category, a mere buzz word, the left uses to pigeonhole speech that its membership finds offensive. To be fair, some conservatives also would practice selective censorship, attempting to cancel out speech they don't want to hear.

    Very troubling is when people begin to treat “hate speech” as unprotected speech. For example, Penn State University was taken to court in 2003 by some of its own student body over what the plaintiffs claimed was its "unconstitutionally vague and overbroad speech codes." At the height of the controversy, one of those students made the following comment to PSU's daily newspaper, The Daily Collegian:

    "We support any and all university policies that prohibit intolerant actions against any student on this campus,” said [Jerri] Watson, adding that hate speech was not protected by the constitution. [Emphasis added]
    That is one of the first publicly recorded comments makes that claim. It isn't true, as the plaintiffs found out when they couldn't even get their case to trial, but saw it thrown out by a federal judge. But this belief has become pervasive, especially on college campuses, making it high time to put this fundamentally false and dangerous belief to rest.

    There is no constitutional exception for so-called "hate speech." The First Amendment fully protects speech that some may find offensive, unpopular, or even racist. The First Amendment allows you to wear a jacket that says "[Expletive] the Draft" in a public building (see Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15), yell "We’ll take the [expletive]ing street later!" during a protest (see Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105), burn the American flag in protest (Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 and United States v. Eichman, 496 U.S. 310), and even give a racially charged speech to a restless crowd (see Terminello v. Chicago, 337 U.S. 1). You can even, consistent with the First Amendment, call for the overthrow of the United States government (see Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444).

    These cases do not represent a recent development in constitutional law -- these are SCOTUS decisions dating back to 1949. In addition, efforts by both public and private universities to limit free speech have never been left standing. Check out Doe v. University of Michigan, 721 F. Supp. 852, UWM Post, Inc., v. Board of Regents of University of Wisc., 774 F. Supp. 1163, and Bair v. Shippensburg Univ., 280 F. Supp. 2d 357 to confirm that statement.

    It's unanimous. it is unconstitutional to limit or suppress, even if its vulgar, ethnically biased, obscene, and especially if it's unpopular. Liberals need to get it through their thick anti-democratic skulls, if they don't like certain speech, don't listen!

    [FONT=Calibri][SIZE=3]Court cases and some content taken from
    [url="https://www.thefire.org/there-is-no-such-thing-as-hate-speech/[/SIZE][/FONT]"]There is no such thing as free speech"
    FIRE: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education

    Last edited by Viligant_Warrior; May 9th, 2015 at 09:27 AM.

  8. #8
    Senior Member crossnote's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 24th, 2012
    Age
    68
    Posts
    25,790
    Rep Power
    138

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Objection: But isn't Geller's position like yelling fire in a crowded theatre?

    Answer: That's only unlawful if there is no fire, in Geller's case the fire is real.
    PennEd, kaylagrl and Utah like this.

    Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God.
    (Psa 20:7)






    "Sir, we wish to see Jesus."
    Jn 12:21


  9. #9
    Senior Member PennEd's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 22nd, 2013
    Age
    53
    Posts
    3,376
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    116

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Quote Originally Posted by crossnote View Post
    Objection: But isn't Geller's position like yelling fire in a crowded theatre?

    Answer: That's only unlawful if there is no fire, in Geller's case the fire is real.

    Aside from that the analogy only works if she had a draw muhammad contest INSIDE A MOSQUE with muslims inside!
    kaylagrl likes this.

  10. #10
    Senior Member PennEd's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 22nd, 2013
    Age
    53
    Posts
    3,376
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    116

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    kaylagrl and Utah like this.

  11. #11
    Senior Member crossnote's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 24th, 2012
    Age
    68
    Posts
    25,790
    Rep Power
    138

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Quote Originally Posted by PennEd View Post
    Aside from that the analogy only works if she had a draw muhammad contest INSIDE A MOSQUE with muslims inside!
    Sometimes I think the Muslims see the whole world as their Mosque.
    PennEd and kaylagrl like this.

    Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God.
    (Psa 20:7)






    "Sir, we wish to see Jesus."
    Jn 12:21


  12. #12
    Senior Member Nautilus's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 29th, 2012
    Age
    33
    Posts
    6,459
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    For some reaosn anytime I see someone mention the first amendment I feel like they dont fully grasp it. Sure you DO have you freedom of speech to say what you want. Literally you can say anything. What the first amendent DOES NOT do is protect you from the consequences of what you said. Hate speech? You can say it all day. You might become a target but thats a risk you take.

  13. #13
    Senior Member crossnote's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 24th, 2012
    Age
    68
    Posts
    25,790
    Rep Power
    138

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nautilus View Post
    For some reaosn anytime I see someone mention the first amendment I feel like they dont fully grasp it. Sure you DO have you freedom of speech to say what you want. Literally you can say anything. What the first amendent DOES NOT do is protect you from the consequences of what you said. Hate speech? You can say it all day. You might become a target but thats a risk you take.
    So when there's consequences, should the blame go to the one who exercises the free speech or to the one who metes out the consequences?
    PennEd and kaylagrl like this.

    Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God.
    (Psa 20:7)






    "Sir, we wish to see Jesus."
    Jn 12:21


  14. #14
    Senior Member Miri's Avatar
    Join Date
    July 22nd, 2012
    Age
    48
    Posts
    5,601
    Blog Entries
    13
    Rep Power
    127

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    I can only speak of this from the perspective of the UK and my experiences, as I don't know
    the current atmosphere in the US on this.

    There is a fine line between free speech and deliberately going out of you way to
    antagonise another person or group of people. If someone targets a group of people
    under the disguise of free speech, then it's not right.

    While a different matter (but not entirely), I am hearing a lot about Christians being
    forced to bake cakes for gay marriages under discrimination laws. Obviously that
    is one example of the discrimination laws being used by a group of people for their
    own agenda. It feels as though the free speech laws are being used here in a similar
    fashion.

    Just on a separate issue the Muslim population are still sinners needing to be saved.
    i have found there is a real hunger among individuals to know the truth, they have
    got a bit of truth mixed with loads of lies and are trapped by satan in bondage.

    Groups won't admit it, but get people on their own and speak to them as individuals
    and there is the hunger beneath the surface.

    i often get taxis especially to church. Most taxi drivers are Asian men. As soon as
    I say I am going to church, most want to know if I go regulaly, what do I believe,
    many start debating and asking questions.

    i have had many astounding conversations while on my way to church.
    i have prayed with several on the way and prayed Gods blessing in the name of
    Jesus over them, they have openly received this and have agreed beforehand to
    me praying for them.

    There was one man who knew the Koran inside and out and was some sort of
    leader at his local mosk. But he was so full of questions you could see the
    hunger he had, he knew deep down that his faith was not providing the
    answers to life. We ended up parked outside my church for 20 mins discusing
    the gospel message! Then he asked me to pray for him!

    As Christians we have to be very careful to be seen to be different from the
    world, otherwise we can lose that right to speak about the gospel to
    other religions, deliberately antagonising them under the disguise of
    free speech definitely would not help.

    There is nothing wrong with explaining what you believe, it's necessary to
    do so to spread the gospel. Free speech is a blessing to the christian to
    promote the gospel, it shouldn't be used as a weapon of war with ulterior motives.

    Thats my thoughts anyway.
    crossnote and InSpiritInTruth like this.
    He is God and
    we are not.

  15. #15
    Senior Member PennEd's Avatar
    Join Date
    April 22nd, 2013
    Age
    53
    Posts
    3,376
    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    116

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Quote Originally Posted by Miri View Post
    I can only speak of this from the perspective of the UK and my experiences, as I don't know
    the current atmosphere in the US on this.

    There is a fine line between free speech and deliberately going out of you way to
    antagonise another person or group of people. If someone targets a group of people
    under the disguise of free speech, then it's not right.

    While a different matter (but not entirely), I am hearing a lot about Christians being
    forced to bake cakes for gay marriages under discrimination laws. Obviously that
    is one example of the discrimination laws being used by a group of people for their
    own agenda. It feels as though the free speech laws are being used here in a similar
    fashion.

    Just on a separate issue the Muslim population are still sinners needing to be saved.
    i have found there is a real hunger among individuals to know the truth, they have
    got a bit of truth mixed with loads of lies and are trapped by satan in bondage.

    Groups won't admit it, but get people on their own and speak to them as individuals
    and there is the hunger beneath the surface.

    i often get taxis especially to church. Most taxi drivers are Asian men. As soon as
    I say I am going to church, most want to know if I go regulaly, what do I believe,
    many start debating and asking questions.

    i have had many astounding conversations while on my way to church.
    i have prayed with several on the way and prayed Gods blessing in the name of
    Jesus over them, they have openly received this and have agreed beforehand to
    me praying for them.

    There was one man who knew the Koran inside and out and was some sort of
    leader at his local mosk. But he was so full of questions you could see the
    hunger he had, he knew deep down that his faith was not providing the
    answers to life. We ended up parked outside my church for 20 mins discusing
    the gospel message! Then he asked me to pray for him!

    As Christians we have to be very careful to be seen to be different from the
    world, otherwise we can lose that right to speak about the gospel to
    other religions, deliberately antagonising them under the disguise of
    free speech definitely would not help.

    There is nothing wrong with explaining what you believe, it's necessary to
    do so to spread the gospel. Free speech is a blessing to the christian to
    promote the gospel, it shouldn't be used as a weapon of war with ulterior motives.

    Thats my thoughts anyway.
    And who exactly get's to be the decider of what that "thin line" between "hate speech" and free speech?

    The ENTIRE point of free speech is to protect that which might be offense to a particular person. If everyone agreed on what everyone else said then thee wouldn't be a need for free speech.
    crossnote and kaylagrl like this.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Nautilus's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 29th, 2012
    Age
    33
    Posts
    6,459
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Quote Originally Posted by crossnote View Post
    So when there's consequences, should the blame go to the one who exercises the free speech or to the one who metes out the consequences?
    Why would it go to the one who metes out the consequences? If you are smart enough to know their might be ramifications then you should be smart enough to decide if it is worth it or not.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Utah's Avatar
    Join Date
    December 1st, 2014
    Age
    52
    Posts
    9,301
    Rep Power
    148

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nautilus View Post
    the first amendment DOES NOT protect you from the consequences of what you said.
    That's why we have the 2nd Amendment.
    Grandpa, PennEd and kaylagrl like this.
    Fear not, little flock, for it is God's good pleasure to give you the Kingdom.

  18. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    December 18th, 2013
    Age
    28
    Posts
    6,735
    Rep Power
    0

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    The First Amendment and indeed all the Constitution merely serves to highlight the role of the government. The Constitution does not gurantee you any innate rights, but only gurantees the government may not penalize you. So in this instance, the First Amendment does not give you the right to draw anything, but merely it means the government does not have a right to penalize you for whatever you draw. Issues such as this are beyond the Constitution and government of America.

    With that understood; what profit does drawing Mahomet render to anyone?

  19. #19
    Senior Member crossnote's Avatar
    Join Date
    November 24th, 2012
    Age
    68
    Posts
    25,790
    Rep Power
    138

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nautilus View Post
    Why would it go to the one who metes out the consequences? If you are smart enough to know their might be ramifications then you should be smart enough to decide if it is worth it or not.
    If there was no deterrent to the one who violently acted then the concept of 'free speech' would only be a paper tiger.
    kaylagrl likes this.

    Some trust in chariots, and some in horses: but we will remember the name of the LORD our God.
    (Psa 20:7)






    "Sir, we wish to see Jesus."
    Jn 12:21


  20. #20
    Senior Member Nautilus's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 29th, 2012
    Age
    33
    Posts
    6,459
    Rep Power
    18

    Default Re: Pamela Geller: Free speech advocate, or 'hate speech' antagonist?

    If they react violently then they will pay their own consequnces. I don;t know why people think the first amendment is some carte-clanc to say whatever nonsense they want and get away with it. I like if I insulted your mother, thats free speech, but you might hit me, which i probably deserve. Though you may also at that point be charged with assault.

    Its all cause and effect. Like this woman organized an event she knew would be offensive to a group of people and they retaliated...oh boy look how that works. I guess neither of them are that smart after all.

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Obama's IRS Is Attempting To Seriously Undermine Your Free Speech
    By AgeofKnowledge in forum Christian News Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: February 28th, 2014, 08:42 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: August 30th, 2013, 02:27 PM
  3. The New York Jewish Times: Who tried to silence Pamela Geller?
    By AmmiAmmiel in forum Christian News Forum
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: April 21st, 2013, 09:37 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: March 30th, 2012, 03:54 AM