Drone Problems

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#21
Where is the footage from the drone itself? Seems the police should confiscate and analyze that. That's what will clear it all up. The owners video of the data log is irrelevant. With todays zoom cameras 272 ft of altitude doesn't mean squat, and you don't have to be directly over someone's property to spy into it. Spying is usually a little better from a distance. And 2 seconds transiting the property is plenty of time to rip off some stills. I'm not buying the owners story. Produce the video and pics from the drone itself.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#22
No, I don't think I have. I'm sorry if thats a bitter pill to swallow for you but I stand by what I said, you need to have the full facts first before you point fingers of blame at people.
Doesn't your own statement prevent you from "deciding" Meredith is wrong?

Flying over someones house with a camera drone does not mean you are using that camera drone to spy on the people in that house.
No, of course not. But hovering for several minutes, the camera obviously focusing on a sunbathing teenage daughter is evidence that is exactly what Drone Owner was doing, and if that is a bitter pill for you to swallow, I'm sorry. Several witnesses report that is exactly what Drone Owner was doing, and I'm talking witnesses outside the family. He has nothing but his own word.

It was unfortunate for the drone pilot that Meredith had his kids in the garden at the time but there are other ways of going about things rather than resorting to violence with a shotgun which could have put other people at risk and injured them because he thought he could take the law into his own hands.
What would you suggest? How do you stop a Peeping Tom using drone technology to hover out of reach of his hands or a fishing net?

Of course they would say that the drone was spying on them. That makes it sort of alright by their standards to back up their fathers response and action. But was it really? Was it? Or was it just flying too close to his house/garden.
Again, two neighbors say that is what Drone Owner was doing. It's not like they all rushed out into the yard with a shotgun and started blasting away. They watched what Drone Owner was doing before taking action. By the way, it wasn't the first time the girls and the neighbors had seen this same drone "doing whatever it was doing" (i.e., spying on the girls) while the girls sunbathed.

We don't know the full facts. One thing I do know is that you do NOT have the right to blast things out of the sky just for hovering above your house/garden.
And yet again, that isn't why Meredith shot it down.

Do you know how much noise drones make? That's why they are no good at weddings yet. They simply make too much noise what with the props spinning. I own a small minidrone, a Parrot Rolling Spider. Its only small but is very loud and can easily be heard. How much more noise do you think a larger camera drone makes? A lot I can tell you! It's almost as loud as a drill. Do you really think the drone pilot thought he could get away with spying on his neighbors without getting caught out from the noise the props make? Come on.
I don't know what the drone pilot thought he could get away with. Neither do you. Perhaps straying over the property line was a mistake that resulted in the demise of his expensive drone. Or perhaps the nuerous times before that the drone had been spotted pointing its camera at the girls was enough for Meredith to decide enough was enough. And if he did, I agree with him.

This was not a perverted old man, this was a young inexperienced drone pilot ...
Why do you think being "young" precludes him from being a pervert? Just because you aren't doesn't mean he is not. How many teens and young adults get arrested every day for taking "upskirt" pictures or planting remote-feed videos in the toilet bowls of women's bathrooms? Or do you not realize that more perverts get started before their tenth birthday?

...and an over zealous, trigger happy father, who (to be fair to him) acted like any father that wants to protect their kids honor would act.
How you can decide he's "trigger happy" if he "acted like any father that wants to protect their kids' honor would act"? That's not quite logical.

But what he should have done is took pictures or even recorded video of the drone and reported it to the police.
You're a drone owner. How many drones that look exactly like yours are there in your town? In your state? You "come on."

Not pulled out his shotgun and blast it from the sky which could have landed on someone and seriously injured them.
Since he was such a good shot -- he only shot once -- I'd say he knew whether it was safe to blast at the drone or not.

But was he thinking clear when he done that?
Yep, very clear, "acting like any father that wants to protect their kids' honor would act."

Was he thinking about the repercussions of his actions?
I doubt he thought he'd be arrested. But let's remember, he wasn't arrested for shooting down the drone. Heck, the cops probably applauded him when they heard his story down at the station.

He was arrested for discharging a firearm in the city. I doubt he's going to have to do anything but pay a fine, and if the kid with the shot-down drone tries to collect in civil court, he'll get laughed off the docket. I can hear the judge now: "Maybe you better think next time you send your drone up about what you're doing and who you're looking at."
 
Last edited:
R

Rudimental

Guest
#23
As Elie Mystal wrote for Above the Law about the New Jersey case last October:
"I don't think I've ever been on the side of a person who discharged a weapon in a non-lethal situation, but if your jackass neighbor is spying on your property with a remote controlled doohickey, shouldn't you be allowed to destroy it?"


The issue centers on imminent harm, robotics law expert Ryan Calo of the University of Washington tells tech site GigaOM. He says, "You would probably have to be threatened physically, or another person or maybe your property, for you to be able to destroy someone else's drone without fear of a counterclaim."

The situation can be compared to a trespass, GigaOM says: "In this sense, the law is the same as what applies when a car or a cow trespasses on your land — you can remove the car or cow (or whatever) and bill the owner for your trouble, but you can't simply destroy the invading article."
 
H

Hellooo

Guest
#24
We don't know the full facts. One thing I do know is that you do NOT have the right to blast things out of the sky just for hovering above your house/garden.
If you don't want it blasted, then keep it away from other people's yards. There are a lot of creeps in existence who DO hide cameras in bathrooms and dressing rooms or try to peek in places they shouldn't. I don't have time to sit around and suss out why a robot with a camera is hovering in my space, or the possible intentions of its owner. if it's not invited, I'm assuming the worst in order to protect my privacy. If you value your toys, control them and keep it away. It's on you, 100% as the owner.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#25
The situation can be compared to a trespass, GigaOM says: "In this sense, the law is the same as what applies when a car or a cow trespasses on your land — you can remove the car or cow (or whatever) and bill the owner for your trouble, but you can't simply destroy the invading article."
Explain how a hovering drone can be "removed" in any other manner than bringing it down somehow? Perhaps you can consult Ms. Mystal for an answer.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,048
1,488
113
#26
This is the tip of the iceberg when it comes to problems these things are going to present in the very near future unless some responsible rules for their use are enacted.

In this case how was the father to know that this camera wasn't being streamed directly to the internet. I promise you, that if you want to play with your toy?, you had better keep it off my property, and it's camera off my children. If I see it, I'll do my best to eliminate it.
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#27
Explain how a hovering drone can be "removed" in any other manner than bringing it down somehow? Perhaps you can consult Ms. Mystal for an answer.
I used to use paintballs in a slingshot to chase away birds.
 
V

Viligant_Warrior

Guest
#28
I used to use paintballs in a slingshot to chase away birds.
That's an idea. If the drone gets away, you can tell the police to look for the paint stain. Better load the balls with enamel, though. Latex washes off.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,048
1,488
113
#29
I used to use paintballs in a slingshot to chase away birds.
Ricky, I think that I could bring that thing down with my grandson's paintball gun.
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#30
Just the hit alone should destabilize it. If you put a ball into the rotor it'll probably bring it down. One in the camera lense will blind it. If you're that good with paintballs and slingshots ;)
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#31
Ricky, I think that I could bring that thing down with my grandson's paintball gun.
Yes and you'd be more accurate. But you're still firing a gun in a restricted area (assuming). But for sure I'd rather get hit by a falling paintball than a falling bullet.
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,048
1,488
113
#33
Yes and you'd be more accurate. But you're still firing a gun in a restricted area (assuming). But for sure I'd rather get hit by a falling paintball than a falling bullet.
I guess there are some who would want to call it a firearm.

I don't think that you would be injured by falling bird shot either. I did a lot of bird hunting over the years, and have been hit by a few. They don't even leave a mark.
 

Galatians2-20

Senior Member
Mar 17, 2013
261
19
18
#34
There are no federal laws prohibiting a drone from flying over personal property at this time just as long as it flys withing certain height limitations. While not new, drone technology is becoming more affordable thus you are seeing more & more hobbyists every year. As of right now, drone technology must adhere to federal and state "remote control vehicle laws". However, many states have ammended such laws to include drone use seeing as many businesses and emergency agencies hope to use drones for various reasons.

I am a drone owner & pilot. I own seven drones. Four are custom built for high velocity racing & aerial acrobatics. The other three are for training purposes. Drone racing is becoming very popular and you are likely to see a professional circuit sooner than later. I've also been approached by many real estate agencies looking to hire me & my pilots to record video of houses for sale & rental properties in order to produce virtual tours of their properties for website & social media use.

If the man who shot the drone down had lived in the country, chances are he would not have been arrested. However, there are various local laws & ordinances that regulate weapons fire, which it looks as though thats what he was arrested for. Most responsible drone owners would not trespass onto someone else's property without seeking permission first. Most drone owners custom build & drop a small fortune into their drones for various reasons, many drones being worth more than a used car, and they would never chance losing such an expensive piece of technology that they've put so much time into.

Like it or not, drones not only here to stay, theres a good chances that most of you will live to see the day when you encounter at least one drone on a daily basis.
 

Galatians2-20

Senior Member
Mar 17, 2013
261
19
18
#35
Just the hit alone should destabilize it. If you put a ball into the rotor it'll probably bring it down. One in the camera lense will blind it. If you're that good with paintballs and slingshots
An $1800 drone most likely has six motors & carbon fiber props. An experienced pilot could withstand such a shot. Water balloon would be more effective seeing as the water would short any exposed circuitry. :p
 
Last edited:
W

WoundedWarrior

Guest
#36
Like it or not, drones not only here to stay, theres a good chances that most of you will live to see the day when you encounter at least one drone on a daily basis.
Gonna need more ammunition..
 

Billyd

Senior Member
May 8, 2014
5,048
1,488
113
#37
There are no federal laws prohibiting a drone from flying over personal property at this time just as long as it flys withing certain height limitations. While not new, drone technology is becoming more affordable thus you are seeing more & more hobbyists every year. As of right now, drone technology must adhere to federal and state "remote control vehicle laws". However, many states have ammended such laws to include drone use seeing as many businesses and emergency agencies hope to use drones for various reasons.

I am a drone owner & pilot. I own seven drones. Four are custom built for high velocity racing & aerial acrobatics. The other three are for training purposes. Drone racing is becoming very popular and you are likely to see a professional circuit sooner than later. I've also been approached by many real estate agencies looking to hire me & my pilots to record video of houses for sale & rental properties in order to produce virtual tours of their properties for website & social media use.

If the man who shot the drone down had lived in the country, chances are he would not have been arrested. However, there are various local laws & ordinances that regulate weapons fire, which it looks as though thats what he was arrested for. Most responsible drone owners would not trespass onto someone else's property without seeking permission first. Most drone owners custom build & drop a small fortune into their drones for various reasons, many drones being worth more than a used car, and they would never chance losing such an expensive piece of technology that they've put so much time into.

Like it or not, drones not only here to stay, theres a good chances that most of you will live to see the day when you encounter at least one drone on a daily basis.
I know that they are here to stay. I pray that we have adequate rules in effect soon, because that day is not far away.
 

RickyZ

Senior Member
Sep 20, 2012
9,635
787
113
#39
Here in CA, because they have proven to be a problem around airports and fires, they are considering a bill to allow law enforcement to shoot them down.

I like the water balloon suggestion. Gotta get me a bigger slingshot!
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,706
3,650
113
#40
Last edited: